Go ahead Snoofy.
I'll happily defend the position that an individual, exercising their own free will, can make CHOICES that render them sub-human (for example: Typical Jihadists), and that RECOGNIZING that they have done so is completely ethical, and that REFUSING to recognize it is unethical.
On a related note, I believe scum such as Jihadists can achieve redemption by ethical use of their free well, but never heard of a case where such has happened with Jihadists.
If you can't see the difference from the Nazis you are comparing me to, you are blind (Hint: Free will has consequence if you believe in the existence of actual ethics).
Or perhaps you believe that Mexican mayor who ordered the murder of those 43 teaching students is as much of a valid person as you are.
Perhaps you think Charles Manson and Jeffrey Dalhmer were just 'sick'.
Remember that case a few years ago where some thugs knocked out a father, then made a CHOICE to rape his wife and children, made a CHOICE to tie them down and pour gas on them, and then made a FREE WILL CHOICE to lite them of fire? I say, and say again, that those thugs BY INTENTIONAL CHOICE destroyed their own humanity and rendered THEMSELVES sub-human, and not only is it ethical to recognize it. It is UNETHICAL to not recognize it.
You help empower those bastards by not recognizing what they CHOOSE to be. But you have all sorts of blame for me for rubbing your nose in it.