RWers: Obama never answered the questions ergo Bret won.

LWers: Bret interrupted so often Obama was unable to answer the question.

Who Won?!?!?

It's an interview, from a news organization

It shouldn't be about who won. The point of an interview is to gleam information, not to play gotcha or try to prove how wrong the person is.

Just proves that Fox is more about spreading their ideology and not reporting facts.

#53 | Posted by Sabbatai

So what you're saying is that Gays should get married so they have an incentive to be monogamous?

Sounds good to me!

Yeah, spending thousands to retrieve a few pennies will help "folks get healthcare." lol!

#29 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

Try reading the whole thread and all the relevant comments before you blather on please.

So in your mind, Killing people and healing them are equal endeavors? It was just my dislike of Pubs and Bush that caused my distaste for their policy of spending trillions on unjust wars?

If Bush spent money on a cause that you deem deplorable; why is that carte blanche for Obama and the Dems to spend recklessly as well?

#26 | Posted by JeffJ

Care to show where I've given Obama "carte blanche" to spend as he wishes?

That being said, I still prefer they spend money to heal and feed people rather than kill them.

are you seriously going to try and justify fiscal criminalities on the part of the DNC simply because the GOP displayed corruption when they had power?

#21 | Posted by JeffJ

Did you post this thread or make the comment I was referring to? Then I guess I wasn't talking to you.

But since you stuck your nose in it.

What I am trying to say is that it seems people are willing to forgive a lot and spend endless amounts of cash with no question when it involves killing, but when the issue is helping folks get healthcare suddenly they're all up in arms.

Basically, if you didn't protest then, why now?

So now we know another way that Obamacare will be funded.

First we have to pay for those 2 unnecessary wars you supported.

Wow Nanc, you just proved that suckers with crappy taste come in all colors. Maybe now you can show explain why you're such an ass-hat.

while waterboarding or whatever else improves national security
#2 | Posted by tadowe

I've never seen anything that says any of this torture helped anything. Please prove me wrong.

"We are in a shithole and Bush is to blame".

#8 | Posted by Sniper

Well, at least you admit it.

Anyone have a link to this questionnaire?

"Didn't P.T. Barnum say "There's a sucker born every minute"?

He probably said that right before he ran for office (and won) as a Republican.

I think he actually has convinced himself that he was a big critic of Bush.
#12 | Posted by danni

That is pretty rich from a guy named Bush Lover 2.

but money a christian org got wasnt dedicated to...destroying our way of life.

#10 | Posted by afkabl2

You don't think any of those organizations had as part of their agenda say making alcohol illegal, or abortion? Do you think any of them were pushing anti-gay legislation? How about Jesus Camp, think they got any federal funds?

I routinely travel to a number of countries with my American passport. I move about within those countries with ease.

That's International travel, which is a different story.

How has my freedom been reduced?
#26 | Posted by vernon

Well, you're only traveling with their permission. They could decide to keep you from going to where you want to anytime they choose. If your name turned up on some list or another say.

Ummm, why would the "right" oppose Republican legislation just because Obama is president?

#48 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

Because if this happens while Obama is President, suddenly they're concerned for their rights. If Bush had done it it would be OK, as he only had their protection and best interest at heart.

So were you complaining when Bush was giving millions of your dollars to various Christian organizations whose goals were in direct opposition to the secular state?

Does anyone of either party on DR support this?

#35 | Posted by NotMyRealName

No, because it's been proposed under this administration. If this had been introduced in 2005, there's be a ton of right wingers here spouting "What's the problem, if you're not doing anything wrong, what have you to fear".

Basically, Vernon and Graham are right. The idea of a non-intrusive Government has been over for generations. Might as well go all the way. Those who value security over freedom won the battle a long time ago.

how so?

#16 | Posted by eberly

I'm not sure how this affects you as I was referring to RiR. But if you are against abortion but for this, then you are a hypocrite.

"The fact that Democrats have to train their own candidates on how to talk about defending America is an indictment not just of their candidates but of their policies, as well," said Ken Spain

Actually, it's more of an indictment on how stupid voters are and how easily swayed pants pissers are by tough sound bites and pretend tough guys.

For example, 11 percent would not use the phrase "had sex" if "the man did not come."

Well yea, if he stayed home, how could they have had sex?

You can't say that it's wrong for a meth addict to agree to be sterilized because of diminished capacity, and at the same time claim absolute abortion rights, though still incapacitated.

#12 | Posted by rightisright

And I agree, I think you should be able to sell a kidney if you want.
So unless you're against this, you seem to be the one with 2 differing opinions.

the Libs live their leftist hollywooders as well.....

#55 | Posted by daprof

A fact for which they are constantly derided by the right.
Although the right seems to actually elect them to office more often.

Who cares what this has been thinks about anything?

#51 | Posted by tiger150

It's just that Cons and Pubs LOVE Hollywood celebrities. From Steven Baldwin speaking at CPAC to Chuck Norris writing for World Net Daily, they seem to think that just because someone can pretend to be someone else (in other words lie) really well, that they're really smart and should be followed.