I argue law and evidence, not anecdotes, not speculation, not what I "feel."
I don't know, and neither do you, what motivates legislators to enact law other than, generally, they respond to their constituents. See, e.g. Pew Research. Pay particular attention to the Latino polling.
You scream "minority vote disenfranchisement." Prove it, empirically. Prove the study I posted is incorrect, I've asked for years and no one has yet offered anything contrary. I actually wish someone would. Until then you are just another partisan hack.
#71 | Posted by et_al
Yeah. And OJ didn't kill his wife.
Here is your evidence -
Only happened in red states
Happened as soon as voter right act was repealed
Mostly dems don't have ID
Dem district voting places cut
Dem-favored voting hours cut
They said it was to reduce fraud, but Voting method with higher fraud (mail in ballots) that favor republicans weren't addressed.
If you were trying to convict a criminal, that's all you'd need.
I suppose you think no one is guilty unless there's a recording of them admitting it?
And what about the repub governor who SAID PUBLICLY that the voting changes would help romney win?
You can say you're all about evidence - there it is. And no republican can justify any of it, other than your little "well it wasn't ILLEGAL"