Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

rightistrite

Subscribe to rightistrite's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Comments

CSM? Really Rcade?
Any other time, those on the left of the spectrum, would mock CSM. Why should we believe them now

#4 | POSTED BY HOMERJ AT 2014-07-26 11:40 PM | FLAG: NONSENSE

CSM has long been one of the most respected news journals out there. Just because it has the word "Christian " in its name doesn't is another conservative rag.

In 2003 when Bush and the clown brigade tin foil hat soldiers were sexing up the hot air in order to justify the unjustifiable. the CSM wrote some informative expose's on the origins of the neoclown movement that had gripped the nation. Starting with its communist roots all the way the -------- Cheney. The Articles in Their entirety are no longer available online it seems but you can find exerpts from it by Googling CSM Empire builders, NeoCon 101 etc.

It also discussed in some length the blather machine justifying coming up empty handed in the WMD department as well.

Look at the works of Clay Bennett the CSM cartoonists Pulitzer Prize winning offerings for an idea of the CSM approach to conservative dogma.
www.csmonitor.com

They were also one of the first newspapers to "Go Green" forgoing the print version for online before it was chic.

Anyone who reads the news with critical eyes from the various outlets will have the CSM on thier short list of go to news sources. CSM usually comes out on top. Liberals are generally smarter and better educated than the conservatron counter parts. To assume would not be interested in what the CSM offers proves that you are clueless.

Later, under Nixon, it even went as far as poisoning livestock and so on. Big affair. And then came Vietnam; he invaded Vietnam. He invaded South Vietnam in 1962. He sent the U.S. Air Force to start bombing. Okay. We took care of Kennedy.
Johnson is trivial. The Indochina war alone, forget the invasion of the Dominican Republic, was a major war crime.

#20 | POSTED BY SHAWN AT 2014-07-11 02:51 PM | REPLY | FLAG:CLOSE BUT NO CUBAN CIGAR

Nixon had a bigger hand in Vietnam than Kennedy because he started mixing it up with Vietnam when he was VP. It was bi partisan but Nixon had more leverage and it was never declared a war until it was over. A lot of military were angry with Kennedy because he showed a lack of commitment by not declaring it a war. The thing is no one wanted to call it a war. They is how they got away with throwing draftees at it rather than the reserves. The facts are Nixon presided over it longer than anyone.We know how well that went. Nixon started it and ended it... and according to new information did what he

ould to drag it out trying to squeeze a victory dance out of it.

Cuba is another tragedy of the Eisenhower and so is Iran. Ike propped up Bautista in Cuba and helped stage a coup in Iran to oust their democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and replace him with Mohammad Pahlavi.

Kennedy was on record for hating the Bautista regime and critical of the US part that played in it.

Nevertheless the US did have a run of Presidents who has served in WW2 where our nations was able to celebrate a "victory". Fascinating that the rabbit holes those vets have led us down finally ending with Bush the elder haven't garnered the glory they wanted.

As far as Cuba is concerned I don't think there has been a president in my life time that has handled Cuba well.They were a Soviet State for so long and Reagan was all about killing the Cubans in Grenada when he started that diversionary war on trumped up charges to cover his tracks for dropping the ball in Beirut. The ghosts of Reagan/Bush drug cartel are what is haunting us in the border detention centers today. Which explains why the pigs are squealing so loudly. They hate paying for what they do.

Perhaps if the other Arab nations had first put their capital into developing the Gaza Strip and relocating those people instead of getting their asses handed to them time and again, things would be better for those people.
After all, the conflict was and always will be about the rights of the Palestinians, right?

#5 | POSTED BY AMERICANPLY AT 2014-07-10 08:02 PM | REPLY | FLAG:RIGHTWING BRILLIANCE AT WORK

Yes why not just send them to "reloaction" camps set up a reservation system or ghettos, or even gulags to make them useful instead of this nagging little thorn in the side of humanity. After all standing on the roof of a house to defend it against unjustified bombing is criminal.

Ya know the majority of the Jewish populations live in two places in the world. Israel and the U.S.A.. I know you like to believe that our military involvement in Arab nations is not a continuum of 7000 year old conflict.
One of the reasons the clown brigade like to keep creationism concept popular is so the US Talibaptist belief that the world began with the creation of Jews and that God is on our side demanding we sacrifice our family to keep the dream of a Judaic empire alive. The reward is who ever does the best job will be called a messiah.

Meanwhile the U.S. spends copious amounts of money propping up the best military in the world who regularly get their asses handed to them by tattered Arab and third world nations.

Seriously we have spent more military money battling Arab Muslims and preparing to go to battle with a than communists.Look how fast we got out of Korea and Vietnam relative to how long we stayed in Afghanistan and Iraq. The lgtfot pivotal point began when the first insurgents came to fore within six months of "Mission Accomplished" pulling what ever we created out and throwing it back at us. And what was that all about? To keep them Ay-ya-tollah fellers in Iran from going after Israel.

If Israel is so capable why don't cut off their funding and relocate the U.S. Israelis supporting the ouster of the Palestinians while living here to their homeland to solve the problem for themselves. Let those who know the world did not begin with the creation of the first Jews called Adam and Eve spend those tax dollars on something productive.

Give them a choice. You can be a US citizen or and Israeli citizen. You know like they did with the Iroquois nations of the Cherokee and Choctaw.

Read much? That list was provided by....wait for it.... CNN... DUH!!!

#38 | POSTED BY SAMES1 AT 2014-07-07 04:42 AM | FLAG: STILL STUPID

So CNN publishes a shopping list of tax defectors and that is supposed to give it credibility? And you think my head has exploded? I don't care who said it. Treating as a "dire warning" is lame hyperbole typical of the rightwingnuts. For two decades those companies with all the capital have managed to lower the income of most Americans and now they are heading for "greener pastures" and you think everyone should be upset. Why?

You losers are like battered spouses who plug in to something that beats you on a regular basis because you think we cannot live without it. As if the are the only show in town and nothing can replace them and therefore should be tolerated at all costs.

If you had any balls as an American you would know that there isn;t a business out there that cannot be replaced with something better.

Most of them are like Walgreens in the article. One year they are fined by the government for pumping oxycontin onto the streets and the next year they are leaving for "tax reasons" and you think the "tax reasons" are due to socialistic problems in the US. Meanwhile they dodge the "tax problems" by relocating to Switzerland where one of the oldest socialist parties in the world exists.

NO they are leaving because they can't maintain the profit margins without dealing in the illicit markets. All those companies "burdened" by something in the US? Grow up. Companies and corporations come and go like johns to hookers.

You brand of stupid is right up there with blaming the exodus of manufacturing jobs on unions by moving production to communist countries as a way of escaping the creeping socialist menace.

You mean they'll pay off the big screen TV and the cruise they put on their credit cards. That's why we allow the rich to live, to fund the creature comforts we are not able to fund on our own.
This is definitely Kardashianland...

#4 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER AT 2014-07-06 09:17 PM | REPLY | FLAG PFFFTT

You're the kind that is the first one to go down so just keep singing stupid things at he top of your voice. You belong to the same class those stupid quasi militia men who were going stand behind their wives so the world could see the government slaughter women... before they were carved in to small chunks.

Believe me when it gets to that the morality you are counting on to save your stupid @$$ will be just a footnote that people laugh about.

The acquisition of those big screen TV's which sell on craigslist for $200 or $300 are not the problem. It is your sanctimony that somehow you have more right to own one than someone else who worked just as hard in a profession that is paid far less. Someone fed you the idea that what it is you do is so much more valuable. The truth is without the people you denigrate the product you pitch... I don't care what it is...is worthless because there is no one else to buy it.

Throughout history it has always comes down to that and the pigs on your side of the court always lose. Every time. No exceptions.What is so stupid is you will insist on losing and you don't care who you take with you as long as you think what you did was so much more important. Most of you work for the day where you can live off your bloated sense of self and live of the proceeds of defunct services you performed in the past that serve no one in the present... and then you will bitch about the takers. Let someone intimate they are going to take that from you and your destiny is to join the rest who have to stand in the lines. You will squeal all the way home.

self righteous idiots

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2014 World Readable