Over a year ago Obama in reference to teaching sex ed to preschoolers said and I quote "It's the right thing to do"

#5 | Posted by shirtsbyeric

You are an ignorant ass. REally -if you can't take the time out to find out what he actually said, then why don't you just STFU?

Good grief these simpletons are pathetic at times.

Maybe I lost the thread here, but what about being [paind per diem while being at home? That's the part that stands out in my mind.

The rest is worthy of discussion because of the hypocirsy of it - repubs are once again defending her on the grounds of "she did nothing illegal", while skimming over the fact that she once again seems to be a "do as I say but not as I do".

Oh, and ... anyway else growing weary of that twangy accent and those stale talking points? AND the f-ing lie about the bridge.

Did she or did she not bill the state for travel or other illegit expenses while living at home?

That's a legit question, and has nothing to do with her being a religious extremist or shitty mother.

So it's true that Palin put the plane up for sale on eBay, but it didn't sell on eBay. That's not a huge point, but it is worth noting. We rate Palin's statement True.

www.politifact.com

#70 | Posted by Mutt at

Yeah, it's McCain who's the liar. He said this:

"How many saw her speech a couple of nights ago? Wasn't it fabulous?" McCain said Friday during a campaign stop in Cedarburg, Wisconsin. "You know what I enjoyed the most? She took the luxury jet that was purchased by her predecessor and sold it on eBay and made a profit."

SMEAR, SMEAR, SMEAR, SMEAR I'm sure DANNI loves this one. As someone who traveled I would like to see a breakdown of her expenses.
You Liberal ASSHOLES are really scapping the bottom of the barrel. $16950 is peanuts comared to the hundreds of millions of dollar FLOP EARS got for his SLUM LORD BUDDIES.

#32 | Posted by ozzieoswald

How is this a smear? She billed the state while she was living at home. That could make her a criminal.

Telling the truth about someone is not the same as smearing the person.

Nothwithstanding the breathtaking hypocrisy of any repubican criticizing anyone else for "smearing". lol

Obama: Recession could delay rescinding tax cuts

apnews.myway.com

sweetness-light.com

say anything

#4 | Posted by kerrin57

That's just simple-minded. Are you saying that a preident should never adjust his policies to changing cirmcumstances. You people really need to get serious and gorw up a bit.

What? Obama AND Biden voted FOR the bridge??? Wow!

#182 | Posted by Farmer_John

You really aren't that clueless as to how these things work, are you? Do you think that there was a separate vote on the bridge, or was it one of many earmarks in a much larger bill? Or are you just fundamentally dishonest, relying on the stupidity of others to advance your cause (the norm for republicans)?

If there indeed was a separate bill and vote for the bridge, I'm sure you can cite it.

I'll wait.

Hmmm ... I just checked the gallup website, and they are reporting 5%, with no mention of the 10% that I could see.

Anyone have ANY clue how they determinge "likely voter" in this day and age, and are they reaching cell phone voters?

Please ... no serious person would argue that the polls would be VERY different if Obama were white.

Let's wait for the state by state polls ... or, better yet, let's wait for the election to see who wins.

Remember NEITHER side can win without the "stupid" vote, which is the group swinging back and forth between totally different policy positions and philosophies. In theis county, it is ALWAYS true that stupid people are responsible for whoever wins the presidency.

USATODAY: McCain Takes 10 Point Lead Likely Voters

Great News

#6 | Posted by 51773

lol I bet this was your reaction when Bush won, too.

Pathetic.

What an ignorant country. G_d help us.

Come one, guys. A week ago Obama was way ahead. Before that, McCain was ahead.

Two things: do you REALLY believe these polls reflect how the election will turn out? We still have the debates, random news developments, and the republican onslaught of lies, misreprenetation, and distortion to look forward to.

Who ARE these numbnut, dumbass american simpletons who change their minds based on speeches and pageantry? Good lord what a country of morons.

Americans deserve McCain/Palin, and they will probably win. If Obama were white, he'd be so far ahead the race would be over.

In the meantime, I will practice being republican and will keep telling myself that I should just make as much money as I can and not worry about anyone or anything else. I won't be able to support torture and random war, though, but I'll do my best to just overlook those. i alsohave a hard time being afraid of terrorists, even though I live in NY. Just deosn't seem all that likely to those of us who actually live here.

Ideals are for the young, and as McCain has shown, principles can get in the way of self-interest.

So you're actually believe we should put a slick junior Democratic politican from Chicago who has done NOTHING in the WH with Madam Speaker and that idiot Reed so they can bring huge tax increases, more programs we can't pay for and powerful unions driving the rest of our manufacturing base overseas... not to mention the collapse of public education

#20 | Posted by smashmouth

lo. what an idiot. You forgot welcoming the muslim hordes and massacring infants, along with giving free handouts to mexicans.

Note to young people: stay in school.

You do realize how pathetic that looks, don't you?

#7 | Posted by YAV

shhhhh!!! don't tell them ... it'll only spoil our fun. Reading crap like their posts makes me very thankful that I took my education seriously and live in a deep-blue state.

I agree she should speak to the press and answer their questions...
the day after the Empty Suit answers an actual question....
But the NOBama worshipers don't want that. They only want her to answer questions while their Messiah continues delivering his sermons on the Mount...

#127 | Posted by TheShyGuy

YOU may not realize how dumb that is, but everyone reading it does. Say what you want about Obama, but he has been interviewed MANY times, including by Bill O'Reilly.

Posting utter bullshit makes you sound a tad foolish. Maybe you should START by reading some news, etc.

Consider the source, people.

This lady is a registered Democrat. Would you really believe what a registered Republican would say about a Democrat running for office?

#33 | Posted by Pirate

Ah, yes ... the ad hominem attack. Let's let the FACTS decide, and skip the partisan bullshit. Will you accpet facts, or will you wait to see if they came from republican sources first? Are there any ABSOLUTE facts in your world, not subject to partisan bias? Check on the 527s, the bridge to nowhere, the earmarks, the ebay jet, the tax increases, the debt left by Palin, etc., and then let us know whether or not Sarah P is a lying sack of shit. HINT: she is. But I support Obama, so I guess I don't count as a reported of known fact.

Check the google and see for yourself.

midiman

"It's hard for a serious person to take their side seriously in all of this. Sadly, people actually believe the McCain camp's bullshit because they don't take the time to move beyond blind partisan loyalty. The hypicrisy is breathtaking, but they are blindly loyal nonetheless."

That is funny coming from an Obama supporter/lib..... lololololololol
Read your man's past again... lolololololol ROFL.....

#25 | Posted by libslayer

Take a breath, dude.

YOU side has a record of dismal failure. My suppor tof Obama has to do with his specific policy proposals, and has nothing to do with blind loyalty. My first choice did not win the primary, but on the issues, Obama offers specific plans and proposals with which I agree. You seem to be one of those types who will vote republican no matter what, and will scramble to defend his candidate AFTER the fact, no matter what.

You adolescent guffaws are not unexpected, considering your previous posts, but I have yet to read anything from you of substance with regard to a particular policy proposal from McCain or Sarah P.

Not that I have any great expectations, but as a teacher, I'm inclined to recognize effort, even when substance is lacking ... so DO give it a try sometime.

BTW ... could you IMAGINE the reaction of the repubs if one of Obama's daughters (were she old enough) were to come home pregnant from such a thug boyfriend?

It's hard for a serious person to take their side seriously in all of this. Sadly, people actually believe the McCain camp's bullshit because they don't take the time to move beyond blind partisan loyalty. The hypicrisy is breathtaking, but they are blindly loyal nonetheless.

How sad for them and their party (which once contributed serious proposals and ideas to the debate), and how sad for the country.

Sarah an adultress hussy? Her daughter will be shocked!!

God said that? Must be in the Bible. Perhaps the same book as the story of McCain and Abel.

#19 | Posted by truthsetyoufree

lol

oops ... "courtesy", not "sourtest".

Although ....

Got to give McCain credit for continuing to try to work with "the other side" no matter how they continue with their personal attacks on Palin while saying they want to talk about the "issues".

And in typical Anti-American style DEMS WAIVE the flag (when it provides a means to power - (Obamas flag pin) then Trash it once the show is over.

At least Rep. put the country and the flag first.

elections.foxnews.com

But being Proud of America is so not the Democratic party (or Michele or Barack or his America Communist Party cronies)

#2 | Posted by foshaffer

Pathetic.

These new rightards are springing up like mushrooms these days. Not surprising, considering the abundant supply of bullshit available for them to consume, sourtest of McCain and now Gidget.

As it should be.

Rightnut has spoken - and exposed his intellect.

Criticize Obama all you want to, but to say he has no leadership skills proves you to be someone not to be taken seriously when discussing issues on a factual level.

But don't worry, that is not a change in circumstances for most of us.

Is a hearing necessary to fire you?

#34 | Posted by eberly

I would think in this case (or in any case where someone is accused of doing something he may not have done), I would certainly hope so, in order to determine whether or not he actually did it. If it were for incompetence, etc., then there would be a record of that.

I'm not defending him, but Sarah P has a record of trying to get people fired, so I certainly have no problem believing she would use her power inappropriately.