" Israel is the wild card.

Those Losers don't see their enemies as being Human.

No sense of proportion or ability to see the viewpoints of others."

Sigh. It's a shame liberals hold so much hate against different groups of people based on their demographic. If you look at the viewpoints of others geographically, there are several major powers in that area that call for the elimination/genocide of Israel. So what viewpoints are you talking about? If your neighbors call for your death every day and you respond harshly, your logic is saying that YOU are the problem and not them. I mean, I can't even use the wrong pronoun of someone without my entire life being canceled but liberals are OK with anyone they don't agree with being threatened with genocide. They even support and encourage that death and genocide, which is all easy to research on record so it isn't even arguable. At some point, liberals are going to have to deal with their racism and discrimination. It may not happen until they have removed all of the demographic groups they don't like and only have themselves to eat but it will happen eventually.

"$3.5 trillion is interest on the national debt. 1/3 of that is from Trump."

Someone doesn't know how math works. I'm not saying he, like every other POTUS, is innocent but the accrual of debt is a percentage game, not a sum game. And the percentage added under Trump isn't even in the top 10 of past POTUS terms. But, since liberals have already proven time and time again they don't know how math works, this isn't surprising.

Cool story, bro. Now can you tell us why the ugly Dems lie to us about inflation not being a problem, illegal immigrants aren't a tax problem, etc. You know, all those things that have been proven but Dems continue to lie.

Once again, just more propaganda to make the other side look bad while doing nothing to clean your own house.

And liberals are the forefront of laws that allow China to purchase huge amounts of American property. So what? If you truly have a problem with allowing China to reap benefits from American laws, then why don't you try to fight it as much as you want Reps to fight it? I mean, Biden couldn't even keep Trump's policies that were reducing our dependence on China. So, saying one thing and doing another just makes you part of the problem.

To liberals, if Putin says "Killing is bad" and then a Rep 10 years later says "Killing is bad", they will call it Russia propaganda.

Don't believe me? Many years ago during Clinton's years, there was someone who was pushing the idea that just because we have different political beliefs doesn't mean we should hate each other. We should be friends with everyone. Dems applauded it like it was Jesus talking (and, kind of rightfully so, the message is greeat). But then, Ellen DeGeneres said the same thing and all of a sudden liberals roasted her for it.

Seriously, did all of you liberals completely just willfully ignore all of the elite, you can't get in unless you are wealthy fundraisers that Biden has done? I mean, they were all over the news. Oh, wait, you guys only go to CNN for your news so that answers my question. And, some of you said getting news from different sources is not a good idea.

The circle of liberalism continues....

"And at the local level I did vote for a D, who was specifically aligned with that. And I voted for a R on the local level that aligned with my thoughts on job creation in my town a couple years back. I also voted against an R and a D who both had weird ideas about climate change and local level actions. So I'm all over the place based on what the candidates background and personal pledges are. "

The reality is that most people are like this. Reality also shows us that people are too afraid of going against their base to ever say something like this. People feel they are pigeon-holed into 2 parties and you have to agree with everything the party you pledge to says. That's one of the biggest problems of our government. It causes more problems than all social issues combined.

Um, another article was just posted this week of a women punching an elderly person down steps. This isn't unique.

The problem that is much larger than these incidents are the people who ignore all of the bad that is done that doesn't jive with their ideology. Women aren't any better than men. Black people aren't any better than white people. We see evidence of this over and over again constantly. We are all human and we all have the same sins, for lack of a better word. Black CEOs embezzle money, as do women. Women in sports fight all the time, just like men. Women lawmakers perform the same biased, special interest catering that men do. Black people are just as racist as white people, and that can't be argued in any way since black on white racism is fully allowed and ALL media outlets have articles that prove me right.

When we get daily evidence that DEI doesn't also mean who is more capable of causing problems, trying to insinuate as such only makes YOU look stupid.

Just more politicians trying to fix a problem they know nothing about. But if it sounds good on paper, then great, right?

They still have the same fundamental problem as HIPAA, GDPR, etc., and that is a lack of oversight. They make all these laws and cripple companies, while increasing costs of doing business. But they have no one who is actually making sure companies follow the law. For example, HIPAA has never fined one company for not following the rules until after a breach occurred. All of those regulating bodies leave it up to the companies to make sure they are following the law, and companies typically don't do the right thing until something bad happens. But, by that time, the damage is already done.

This is my career. I make fat paychecks for costing companies money in the short-term but end up saving them a huge amount of money and reputation damage by preventing breaches. So, while the laws can be as well-natured as possible, they don't actually stop anything from happening. In my industry, compliance laws are called money-getters. It's a way for the government to profit off of a company's bad fortune. And the biggest kicker is, one that CA just makes worse, is that in many cases breaches occur even when a company is doing everything right. Because privacy and security is a reactive game. It's very rare that attack vectors are blocked until a bad guy actually finds one and exploits it. Only then does the world know about the vulnerability and, by then, it's too late.

And lastly, these laws hurt the common person more than many of you realize. Since more than 70% (higher depending on the metric you look at) of breaches occur due to stupid people falling for stupid phishing scams, companies are slowly changing their culture where the person who fell for it is on the hook for the breach and is sued for damages. And it's not the companies themselves who are leading that charge, it's the fat cat cyber insurance companies who are doing this...and lobbying for laws that make it possible.

"We can't fund those hospitals though. That would be Socialism."

And we can't get anyone in legislation who has the power to help because liberals continue to try to ruin our constitutional republic by treating rural citizens as second class. Just reading the comments above proves my statement beyond any reproach. So, if liberals don't care about them and want them to not be equally represented in our government, socialism wouldn't do anything to help them. Socialism is still run by people in power who decide what is allocated and where. The fact you don't know that is terribly scary coming from people who want to spread socialism.

Nobody can defend Trump, his age and greed have made him a laughing stock. That being said, the biggest problem for the country about this topic is that liberals STILL refuse to accept that no matter how much Trump's age is showing, Biden is still way ahead of him. Ignoring one politicians deficiencies while demonizing another for the same deficiencies is hypocrisy, which we have all concluded by now that hypocrisy is the only tangible platform Dems have been consistent with.

Of course they are. To liberals, the only people in America who deserve immunity are illegal immigrants who commit crimes. Why can't cons get this through their head? I mean, Liberals have provided ample, undeniable proof of this so many times in the last few years that we have to conclude that Cons are actively trying to reject that mentality. But why would they do that? It's so morally righteous!

"Why would they? Roe was decided law. Ask any of Lewzer's SCOTUS nominees."

Slavery was decided law. I guess maybe that explains why Dems ignored it so long until it impacted their pocketbooks and then fought in a civil war to keep slavery.

The saddest part is these comments prove beyond any doubt that so many liberals don't actually listen to what the other side says at all. In general, and most comment boards and online personality rhetoric proves it, cons have wanted it to be state law for a very long time. And when the SCOTUS reversed it, cons saw it as a huge win for state law. Now, I'm with liberals being irked that cons went way too far and didn't even compromise, but both sides do this often. But, cons went to the extreme and started wanting it banned everywhere and now the extreme right is fighting to make it federal...which is the dumbest response to the situation that one could come up with. That doesn't take away the fact that most cons want it to be left at a state level. To prove this, I went to Fox and opened an article about this, and the majority of the comments are about people agreeing with Trump and that it shouldn't be tackled at the federal level.

But, don't let doing doing your own research across multiple paths get in the way of making knee-jerk, partisan responses. In fact, I KNOW that DR members don't since not long ago and article came up about this and someone commented how using multiple sources isn't a good thing, and many agreed with that person. I'm still blown away by that, which says a lot coming from DR comments.

In other words, they are still more solvent than CNN these days.

Protecting our votes can easily be seen by those who are negatively impacted by those protections as a threat to democracy. No argument there. Dems lose votes when we increase the integrity of votes, so it only stands to reason they would want to remove the mechanisms used to protect that integrity. The real issue is why do Dems truly not care about what is best for the country instead of what is just best for them? It's the same type of question that Dems use when trying to figure out why Reps care more about what is best for the rich instead of what is best for the country. Unfortunately, dropping common sense and objectivity on either side is met with consternation instead of intrigue.

"Too many states voting on amendments to guarantee a right that women had for 50 years."

Careful there, you are sounding a whole lot like Dems just prior to the Civil War...

"Unity, most of the Magats know that he is lying, they just don't care. In fact, I saw two of them the other day at a bar I go to in WV laughing at what Trump said, that was clearly a lie disparaging Biden, and they almost certainly knew it, but they thought it was funny, so they just bought into it.

These people are truly reprehensible filth. And they don't care. It's all a big game to them. They only care about 'sticking it to the libs'. As if we were at fault for all of the bad decisions they've made in life getting them stuck in their 'dead ender' lives of having less.

They are just looking for someone (other than themselves) to blame. And they are willing to watch the nation burn, in order to stick it to someone..."

And you just took this from the ad-lib template of partisan hate spreading. Yet, the only reason the nation "burns" when a Rep is in office is because he doesn't use the proper pronouns. But with a Dem in office today we get to watch the nation burn from illegal immigrants, high inflation, etc.

If you don't like how political parties go after each other, STOP DOING IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But as long as your side is doing it just as much as the other, you have no dog in the fight.

"The kid-diddling sack of dementia lies every time he opens his Putin-sucker."

It has been proven Biden has falsely claimed talking to people or getting feedback from people he says he has on different topics. It's not even debatable, it's very true and proven. Yet, all we hear from liberals are crickets about that. But when Trump does it, all of sudden it's worth spreading hate and more lies.

Liberals can't get out of their own damn way and go back to being a party that is actually for the people. They have succumbed to a political ideology of finger pointing and hypocrisy.

"Oh do STFU BillJohnson. The Democrats didn't destroy the economy during COVID-19. It was the virus itself that did damage to the economy. You're such a intellectually dishonest partisan hack."

Then why do Biden and Dems keep blaming Trump for the economy? In fact, it was just last week that once again both Hillary and KJP blamed the economic problems solely on Trump (as if 3 years of Biden isn't enough time to put any blame on him). Don't get me wrong, I agree with you 100%. But Biden and Dems are constantly defending the last three year's as Trump's fault, not covid or anything else.

Meh, yet another example of liberals taking something that could have a million origin stories and only picking the one that matches their ideology while ignoring all other possibilities. And the only reason nobody does anything about it because cons do the exact same thing, all the time. And since neither side has any objectivity anymore, they both cling to their ideologies as the only right one.

Just like Dems normalizing looting, rioting, and killing during riots. Too bad liberals are so blind to their own hate they can't be objective enough to see it. If you don't like normalizing the bad things, stop doing it.

Awesome! So you mean peace in the Middle East (and Ukraine), inflation that isn't out of control, a plethora of investing in American oil and NIL, appliances that don't cost a small fortune, trade becoming more American-heavy than China, a lot less border problems, etc....oh, and an orange guy who said mean and/or not politically correct things.

I'll take the orange guy who said mean and/or not politically correct things if I can get all of that other stuff back again please. Don't like the guy but my head is also not buried in sand so the pros significantly outweigh the cons in this regard. Liberals would unbury themselves too if they didn't have to be so nonobjective. And I'm not even saying a Dem candidate wouldn't be better but Biden has proven he is not what this country needs at this time.

""Voyager 1 Starts Making Sense Again After Months of Babble"

Finally got out of range of fox news."

And the babble was somehow more coherent than anything Harris has ever said.

""We just spent millions telling you something you wont believe anyways" -Department of Defense All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office"

100%.

Wow, you even have issues just understanding what it means to use multiple sources to form your conclusions. Wow............