Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

et_al

Subscribe to et_al's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Friday, February 17, 2017

A controversial Florida law that restricted doctors from asking patients about firearm ownership violates medical professionals' constitutional right to free speech, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.


Thursday, February 09, 2017

The U.S. Court of Appeals refused to reinstate President Donald Trump's travel ban. Nearly two weeks ago Trump signed an executive ordering banning travel from seven majority Muslim countries. The sudden order sent travelers, airline workers, military officials and companies into chaos as they grappled with the short and long-term impact. The ban was halted after federal district judge issued a temporary restraining order prompting Trump to tweet about the "so-called judge." On Feb. 7th the government asked an appeals court lift the restraining order. Today they denied to do so. read more


A Grand Prairie woman who that claimed no one told her she couldn't vote in U.S. elections was sentenced to eight years in prison on Thursday.


Monday, January 23, 2017

During Friday's inauguration ceremonies,while being sworn in as president, Donald Trump vowed to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

By Monday morning, Trump was being sued by an ethics watchdog for allegedly violating the Constitution.

The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is filing suit in New York City against the president for violating the emoluments clause, which prohibits government officials from accepting payments or gifts from foreign governments.


Saturday, January 21, 2017

The Justice Department concluded Friday that Jared Kushner serving in his father-in-law's administration would not be a violation of federal anti-nepotism laws. read more


Comments

If evidence shows ...

Is dependent on "if" The Buffoon's tax returns are obtained. That's a big if and the author's speculation is dependent on two of them coming to fruition.

the law has evolved on from the Act as law does.

What "Act," wiki quotes the current statute, 18 U.S. Code § 2381. The requirement of two witnesses is compelled by Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution. Enemy has a court sanctioned definition.

And you need to learn that stating facts that illuminate your, and the author's, ignorance is not pettifogging.

Since your Washington Times article was deleted while I was composing this post, I'll just leave it here.

In find this article strange. The author talks about studies but provides no links. The "Just Facts" research opinion includes the cited quote but none of the numbers. Neither the presentation nor the memo included with the McLaughlin and Associates Hispanic survey mention the 13% figure, or at least I didn't find it.

Further, neither the "Just Facts" opinion nor the article take into account what the primary researcher of the Old Dominion University study has to say about the misuse of his research.

Do non-citizens slip through crack and vote, likely. Are there a lot of non-citizens registered to vote, more likely. Are the non-citizen votes sufficient to effect an election, not likely most likely not even close. To claim there are millions of non-citizen votes is just as crazy as the conspiracy theory about Crosscheck stealing an election for Republicans. In other words, there are nucking futs on both side of the issue.

In find this article strange. The author talks about studies but provides no links. The "Just Facts" research opinion includes the cited quote but none of the numbers. Neither the presentation nor the memo included with the McLaughlin and Associates Hispanic survey mention the 13% figure, or at least I didn't find it.

Further, neither the "Just Facts" opinion nor the article take into account what the primary researcher of the Old Dominion University study has to say about the misuse of his research.

Do non-citizens slip through crack and vote, likely. Are there a lot of non-citizens registered to vote, more likely. Are the non-citizen votes sufficient to effect an election, not likely and most likely not even close. To claim there are millions of non-citizen votes is just as crazy as the conspiracy theory about Crosscheck stealing an election for Republicans. In other words, there are nucking futs on both side of the issue.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2017 World Readable