#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2014-08-07 01:25 PMFlag: | Newsworthy
Right - women only in the kitchen. That's exactly what I said.
It's a risk reward issue - being a woman brings NOTHING to the coaching table that is not brought by an equally qualified man. Being a woman in an all male sport brings lots of baggage and negative attention from players that counters any coaching experience (again NOT related to her sex) she may have that qualifies her for a coaching position.
It's an attention play and it is working so far - wait till the players have to take direction from her or make some "guy" comments around her and she calls in HR.
It's like the military - women bring nothing to the table that men don't already contribute - and at a greater cost to the taxpayer (see fraternization resulting in pregnancies on board ships for example).
There is nothing to celebrate here but a liberal circus. Another step to removing any differences between genders so that liberals can live guilt free for any actions THEY deem moral.
And I didn't "dig" at the blacks - it only takes about 0.5 seconds to google quotes from black leaders that say they need blacks to represent them and that only blacks can relate to the black culture. Same with women and reproductive rights.
So I say again - it's always A-OK for males, especially white males, to have decisions made for them/other gender decide issues for them - but heaven forbid a man decides when a woman can or cannot murder a baby inside her.