"Repetition of the same ridiculous trolling does not make it so. No strawman no false analogy just reason you cannot counter."
Projection. You have not even offered an argument....
"there is only one reasonable answer and it is absolutely not."
You just repeat this over and over and over. No argument, no evidence, just the same baseless assertion. You can call it "obvious" all you want.
"Are there other ways to ingest food? obviously hence the analogy is apt."
Not good enough. Your initial comparison was "do spoons make people fat?" The only way for that comparison to be apt would be if spoons were a preferable mechanism for those wishing to become fat amidst a dirth of other preferable mechanisms. Such is not the case. Hence, you have made a false analogy.
"And yes focusing on a tool devides attention therefore reduces the effect on the cause."
Unsubstantiated assertion. Care to try again?
"And as we can easily see the cause has nothing to do with a chunk of metal."
"Many tools exist and dispute your odd description of their use there is no substance in a claim that a lost tool prevents the action when there us a plethora of other methods that are just as easy."
Assumes a premise not previously demonstrated (that there are other methods just as easy) and ignores aspects of the argument (it is not simply that guns are easy but also that they are fast, reliable, and honorable as means of suicide). Please support your position and address the other aspects of the argument.
"Funny thing is you missed the only real argument your position has which would be the spur of the moment suicides. They are a very small percentage but there actually is a chance that without a gun that instant they may not act."
I would not say I missed them. They fit into my broader suggestion that guns are an attractive means if suicide without which certain persons would not commit suicide.
that inanimate objects are only considered to be a cause by people who do not understand the word or by those who legitimately have difficulty distinguishing fantasy from reality."
Strawman and unsupported in any case.
Suicides are a product of depression and personal struggle."
momentum and effort divided reduce impact."
Correction: attacking a problem from multiple angles increases impact. You are the one ruling out a potentially life saving approach to the problem of suicides for no good reason.
there is a problem with suicide and the solution has nothing to do with the method chosen."
an assumption that your reasoning regarding the choice and outcome is not grounded in reality and is unsupported by data, specifically when comparing the methods used by women vs men."
At least you admit that this is yet another unsupported assumption on your part.
you are just trolling and I am wasting my time explaining the obvious."
Correction: you have no argument to offer in response to my points. Your various assertions can be dismissed.