Other than her birther idiocy? I would think claiming Obama isn't legally qualified to be President could be construed as libelous. Given her plagarism and said birther nonsense, the University she falsely claimed to be a graduate of should sue.
its OK for media outlets to openly report his wife used to be a hooker despite it not being true?
How do you know it isn't true? Because Played'oh Putin says so?
Why doesn't she sure the magazine that reported her alleged happy hookerdom? Or the 2 guys who wrote books about it? Because they have information? She still hasn't explained why she was working while on a tourist visa, stealing porn jobs from American porn stars. Daily Mail merely reported on an article in another publication. Seems pretty weak and instead of ignoring the story, if it is indeed false, all team Stupid have done is given every other media outlet a reason to bring the allegations to light by reporting on the lawsuit.
#12 | Posted by northguy3 at 2016-09-01 08:52 PM | Reply
I was curious what her statements on Obama's birth certificate were and her statements were, she did not think the document Obama showed constitutes a birth certificate. Now I'm sure if you were the judge that would be libel, but anyone else would consider that an opinion. Saying someone was a hooker, is not an opinion. Also your next two sentences and porn statements pretty much explain why she brought the suit.
I also don't know why she hasn't sued the two guys, maybe it is as you said that Putin told her not to. Also maybe you should lead the charge to prosecute her for doing business in US on a tourist visa.