Axe wrote,

"Hey Buzzzzzzzzzz. Did you hear the Obama is a Muslim? I heard that today on Fox. He might even be black!!!!"

No, he is neither a muslim or black.

However, he is a communist, an idiot, and arrogant as hell.

I see Corky is smoking crack again. There is simply no way this bill will reduce the deficit but Corky believes it will.

All it will do is reduce the quality of healthcare for everyone and bankrupt the country already. Oh, excuse me Obama has already bankrupted us we just don't know it yet because the letter telling us so has not arrived in the mail yet.

Lets see what will really happen:

Government will cut 500 billion from medicare for seniors! Check!

Doctors, hospitals, and pharmacies will stop taking medicare and medicaid. I think several pharmacies have already done this to medicaid patients. Check!

Liberals cry about insurance companies day and night. Yet insurance companies reimburse hospitals and doctors with larger payments than medicare or medicaid. Now Obama wants to cut medicare reimbursements and not a peep out of liberal democrats. Why? Because they don't really care they just want to control our lives, tell us what to eat, drink, do, think, where to shit, what to say, etc.

Liberal socialist like Obama know that by taking so much of your money that you can't function in your daily lives you will need them and do what they say in order to get some of your money back in services. The is the evil rot that socialism causes. Our government has grown to large and must be taken back by the people because our leaders are no longer concerned about the will of the people. This health care bill is proof of that.

But don't worry ole corkster says we can trust fearless leader Obama cos he has our best interest at heart and he is smarter than all the rest of us combined.

Wow, I am not aware that Bin Ladin has been convicted of any crimes since he has never had a trial. So Holder would just shoot him on sight. Sounds like a war crime to me. Someone call the Haig and see if we can get Holder a cushy cell next to Bush.

I am just curious what legal authority approved Obama's birth certificate as proof of him being a natural born citizen?

Whats to keep any foreigner from claiming the right to run for president of the United States if there is no legal authority to check ones credentials?

Lets look at this another way. The deficit was lower under a republican congress from 2001 until 2006 but higher under a democrat congress from 2007-2008. Then we add a democrat president and the deficit has skyrocketed.

So your take is Bush was responsible for deficits under a republican congress, then he is responsible for deficits under a democrat congress, and last but not least Bush is responsible for deficits under a democrat president and democrat congress.

dumbass, what kept the democrats from lowering the deficit by cutting spending?

What kept the democrats from defunding the Iraq war?

Are you telling me that no party can get anything done without controlling both houses of congress and the presidency?

Democrats voted for the tax cuts for all americans, medicard part d, iraq, etc. The fact is democrats took control of both houses of congress when the economy was doing fine. What stopped them from reigning in the spending during the last 2 years of mean old george bush's presidency. They didn't even put up a fight. They didn't stop the war. They in fact had the largest deficits of George's 8 years in office.

Take some personal responsibility for once for what you party has done.

Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and has always been. The peoples money is stolen by the government and everyone crosses their fingers that they will get paid out of the next generations contributions.

No matter what you say about George Bush Barack Obama is doing 3 to 4 times what George did in deficit spending. So if George is bad Obama is real fucking bad. Lets hear you repeat after me Barack Obama is 3 times as bad as George Bush. There doesn't that feel better.

Americanunity wrote,

"We NEVER ran these kinds of deficits or debt when the Democrats controlled everything."

I am confused here, Democrats controlled the house for 40 years, the senate for most of that time and the presidency for some of that time.

Shit don't the democrats deserve some of the credit for fucking things up? Of course they do. Their social programs and there mismanagement have nearly destroyed our great country. Obama is looking to finish the job with the most wasteful and destructive social program ever.

This person obviously has a mental problem. I am curious would the new Obama Healthcare takeover cover this person for free if she becam unemployed after intentionally doing this to herself?

Or will she be sent to leftwing Nazi fatcamp and told she can't have any more donuts.

I guess with the future healthcare rationing that is surely to come she might be left out in the cold.

Nation Endowment for the Arts!

The entire Stimulus package!

Pensions for senators and congressmen!

White house staff budget especially the money wasted on the staff of the first lady no matter what party!

Farm sudsidies to not grow food!

Money for the ACLU to sue the government!

Well he sure as hell wouldn't vote for Flop Ears. Hell if we went down to the homeless shelter and took the drunkest stupidest guy there we couldn't do any worse than going to Barackistan.

Who are the idiots who still think this affirmative action communist organizer is qualified to be a butler in the white house much less be the president.

I can't wait till the elections of 2010 and 2012. I can just see the republican majorities and president making wholesale changes to the landscape using reconciliation. Changes like privitizing social security, getting any judge they want both on the Supreme court and appeals court, John Bolton back at the UN, More No Bid contracts for Haliburton and Blackwater. Boy just the thoughts of what we can do using reconciliaion.

Yep dems, go ahead and pass your health care takeover. The same one the american people are overwhelmingly opposed to. The same one that you refuse senators and congressman enough time to even read, and that you know will bankrupt this country.

Reinbutt, its liberal judges who keep letting child molestors out of jail or giving them probation. Its also liberal lawmakers who keep opposing megans law.

This is why Bill O'Reilly keeps pointing out your libtard judges who do this.

Some Famous quotes for you evolutionists:

"The Darwinian Theory of evolution has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature."

Prof Fleisman Zoologist

"(The Theory of Evolution) is one of the strangest phenomena of humanity. It is utterly destitute of proof."

Sir William Dawson
Canada greatest geologist

"Unfortuneately for Darwins future reputation, everyone of his arguments is contradicted by fact."

Prof L.T. More, University of Chicago

"The pathetic thing is we have scientist who are trying to prove evolution, which no scientist can ever prove."

Dr. Robert Millican, Physicist

"Darwins theory of natural selection has never had any proof, yet it has been universally accepted."

Dr. Richard Goldschmidt Univ of California

Natural Selection can only act on those biological properties that already exist: it cannot create properties to meet adaptational needs."

E.R. Nobel, G.A. Nobel, G.A. Shed, and A.J. McInnis

The known fossil record is not, and never has been in accordance with gradualism"

Steven M. Stanley, John Hopkins University

"A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggest that a super intellect has monkey with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about."

Fred Hoyle, Astronomer

Believing that life came by chance is like believing that a boeing 747 resulted from a tornado going through a junkyard."

Chandra Wickramsinghe

"It is legitimate to ask whether much science is to be found in this field(human origins) at all.

Solly Zuckerman, materialist
One of Britians most influential scientist

"The complexity of the simplest known type of cell is so great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could be thrown together suddenly by some kind of freakish, vastly improbable event. Such an occurence would be indistinguishable from a miracle."

Michael Denton Microbiologist

"Evolution is unproven and unprovable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation and that is unthinkable."

Sir Arthur Klein
Regarded as Britians greatest evolutionist

"Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to understanding the real struggle between science and the supernatural...
We take the side of science in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just so stories, because we have a prior committment to materialism."
"We Cannot let a divine foot in the door"

Richard Lewinton, Darwinist

JPW, did this eyeless creature turn into another species. Well then you are talking about microevolution and I am still talking about macroevolution.

Not one single fossil exist which definitively shows evolution from one species into a entirely new species. "Where are all the inbetween fossils that must surely exist if evolution is real"? Darwin supposed this same question. Yet none of you have the guts to look for the answer.

Brownjenkem wrote,

"Since the fossil is 47 million years old and the last common ancestor of humans and haplorhines lived about 60 million years ago, it couldn't be a direct human ancestor if it is in the haplorrhine lineage."

How do you know what the age of the fossil is? Are you telling me you trust the same people who couldn't determine what species it might be related to to also date? Do you even know what test they used to date it? Was it radioactive carbon dating? Could a test like that be accurate since we don't know how much radiation the fossil has been exposed to since it lived? I buy and sell diamonds for a living. All green diamonds have been exposed to natural radiation. Yet science tells us that diamonds form deep under ground over millions if not billions of years of intense heat and pressure. Now if a diamond buried deep under ground can show exposure to radiation what about a fossil? If the fossil was exposed to radiation then no test could accurately show its age.

"each claim is backed by physical evidence and experimentally validated concepts of evolution."

Really, then why did they get it wrong in the first place?

Danforth, historical refences in the Bible have been proven again and again. Places, dates, and timelines have historical accuracy when it comes to the Bible. The rest of what is written is taken on faith.

David was once considered a fable by the like of people like you but now is known by other archaelogical findings.

This is how evolutionists react when there theory is questioned.

1. They attack the person who questions them. "Dumb son of a bitch backwards hicks didn't learn shit in school."

2. Then they jump right to the next talking point without botherin to answer yet again. "We hate religion therefore we don't need to answer any stinking questions about evolution."

3. Last but not least comes there final attack. "Just because we can't answer cogent questions doesn't mean evolution didn't happen. Did we mention they taugth us in school that evolution is real."

Dumbfork wrote,

"I guarantee you it'll be before anyone finds any proof Moses ever lived."

What does Moses have to do with lack of evidence of macroevolution?

What proof would you except for the existance of Moses? Moses is written of repeatedly in the first 5 books of the old testament.

Also why is it everytime an evolution nutbag like yourself can't answer a simple question about your theory you attack religion? It doesn't take belief in a religion to disbelieve evolution. The lack of real evidence is sufficient unto itself to disbelieve evolution.

Speaksoftly, why is it that evolution nuts like yourself try to belittle someone who disagrees with you. Science is not my enemy.

In fact I wish some of you evolution believers would bring some science to the table.

Here's you a couple of question for starters.

1. How did the first living thing on earth reproduce? Where did it get the design to reproduce?

2. Did the first living thing on earth consume energy? Where did it get the ability to carry out this function?

3. What was the first living thing to have sight? How and why did it devolope this trait?

Donnerboy, the reference to Lucy having some splainin to do has to do with Lucille Ball and Desi Arnez of I love Lucy. Of course you are too stupid to pick up on that.

TFDNIHILIST wrote,

"Disproval of Evolution is not proof of Creation."

I have not disproved evolution. Those who believe in it simply have not provided any serious evidence to prove it ever happened. I simply keep pointing out that lack of evidence and the evolution nuts go crazy.

As for creation I cannot prove it since I was not there when it happened. I simply believe based on faith and a lack of facts to prove any other possibility.

Lettuce Display, neither republican did anything illegal but sexual harassment is illegal.

Still Mark Foley resigned but your butloving democrat wants to stay until the end of his term.

What is farfetched is to think that some how a bunch of chemicals joined together out of randomness and formed complex structures like DNA or that eyeballs just appeared where none had existed before.

In all of nature we can see Gods design not a random accident that modified itself over time into more complex things.

The first living thing that existed on this planet would have had to consume energy, excrete waste and reproduce. I am sorry it is too far fetched for me to believe your bullshit theory.

Oh when will poor old evolutionists find the missing link or links? Over a hundred years and still no real evidence of transmigration of species.

Like the lady from the Wendy's commercial said "Where's the Beef".

Lucy, somebody has some splainin to do.