Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Drudge Retort

User Info

MaryTylerWhore

Subscribe to MaryTylerWhore's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Links

Comments

"Mary--what issues? The dughter is pregnant--she is getting married and having the baby.

Sarah is pro life."

Murph:

"Pro-life" is too often a smarmy euphemism for "anti-choice". While I'm all for sensible, medically sound limits on abortion (vacuuming a later-pregnancy baby out of Mommy is nasty business, no good for Mommy's health, emotional well-being, or the doctor's malpractice rates), the option needs to exist. No woman should be legally forced to carry a rapist's baby, for instance; it's way too much emotional trauma to visit on anyone. She's not only been raped, but she's got a permanent reminder of the occasion? Give me a break - except Palin doesn't want you to have one.

Palin's position does not take the intensely personal circumstances that can arise when a woman - particularly a young one - gets pregnant into account. A young woman can be unskilled and her education unfinished, which in a lower-income setting can doom her to welfare and a housing project. Palin's daughter has resources, or at least the Palins themselves do, and are willing to expend them on her. Lots of young women who have scratched their itch (or have been smooth-talked into scratching some guy's) have ended up in profound trouble by deciding to have their "cute little baby." Cute little babies need care, and a place to live, and food, and utilities, and a young single mother is one of the least likely people to be able to provide all those things at once.

Any young woman who is facing all that - and who makes an informed decision to abort at the proper, early stage of pregnancy - is hardly to be blamed, and she should have the option of a relatively safe procedure under proper medical care. If men could get pregnant, with all the attendant hassles and economic limitations, abortions would be available by getting pills from vending machines.

Palin is forgetting that her her world view and the real world are two different things. Perhaps all this public scrutiny of her personal circumstances will enlighten her as to the difference.

"This is not our business any more then Clinton's blow job was. It's not, at all!"

Soheifox:

Sorry, but it is. Sarah Palin has established herself as anti-abortion. She is part of a political party that has done everything but send troops into the streets to enforce abstinence-only sex education. She is part of a highly flawed machine that wants to promote some fantasy world of rigid 1755 "morality" when the record shows - and shows very clearly - that these Republican ayatollahs cannot conform their own behavior to any moral code but their weird, dysfunctional private ones. For all Sarah Palin's caterwauling about honesty, she didn't make this situation public until bloggers forced her hand.

She preaches one thing, her record shows very clearly that another is practiced. It's Larry Craig with a sex change, sorry. I do not want people, of either party, in charge of social policy when their off-the-job behavior so strongly suggests that they can't deal with the very issues they want the rest of us to deal with according to laws they've passed.

Just in case you're going to try tying this to Clinton's blow job (and I'm willing to bet your fingers are hovering over the "B" and "J" keys right this minute, itching fiercely), that was private consensual behavior between two adults, and a legal sex act, however distasteful you may find it. Still, the instant the press got wind of it, a witch-hunt of proportions they'd have envied in seventeenth-century Salem ensued. What's sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose, honey. Bristol herself might actually have some right to a bit of privacy here, but it is her mother's actions that threw open her closet, and her mother who will have to take the blame.

Drudge Retort

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

RSS Spec