Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Drudge Retort

User Info

JeffJ

Subscribe to JeffJ's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Links

Friday, October 02, 2009

Deep down, national-security conservatives know President Obama will not wage a decisive war against America's enemies in Afghanistan. They also know that the young men and women we already have there are sitting ducks. Ralph Peters notes that our commanders, obsessed with avoiding civilian casualties, have imposed mind-boggling rules of engagement (ROE) on our forces, compelling them to retreat from contact with the enemy and denying them resort to overwhelming force including the denial of artillery and air cover when they are under siege. As the Washington Examiner's Byron York recently reported, even some Afghans are telling our commanders to "stop being so fussy . . . and kill the enemy."


The story of California has always been a great American tale of triumph over long odds. Since its entry into the Union, in the aftermath of war and the midst of gold fever, the state has seemed an improbable colossus. But again and again, California has made its way through hours of challenge  not only surviving intact, but emerging as a model for the rest of the nation.


Thursday, September 24, 2009

It may seem rather unkind to express some serious doubts about US President Barack Obama just now. He is wowing the UN with talk of nuclear disarmament. He is mesmerising the Group of 20 with talk of global recovery. He is leading a policy review that talks of winning in Afghanistan and he will not send more troops in response to the request of the US military commander in Afghanistan, Stanley McChrystal, without deeper talks.

He has stirred hearts in the Middle East with talk of peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. And from October 1 he will be talking directly with the Iranians in pursuit of his talk of stopping Tehran from getting nuclear weapons.

It's a lot of very impressive talk. And yet, and yet...


Wednesday, September 23, 2009

I was hoping for the entire clip. However, this was the best 'highlight-reel' I could find on Youtube. The linked clip is Palin and Clinton on Saturday Night Live, during the campaign. This is seriously funny!

Please, let me be clear: I intend this to be an open-thread.

Anything funny goes.

All I ask is that commentary, links, etc. are relatively non-partisan.

I linked this Youtube video because it made fun of both Clinton and Palin; and it was pretty hilarious overall.


Let's have some fun.

Let's blow off some steam.

As a blog-community, we have been at eachothers' throats WAY too much of late.


Monday, September 14, 2009

In his speech to Congress last week, President Barack Obama attempted to sell a reform agenda by demonizing the private health-insurance industry, which many people love to hate. He opened by asserting: "More and more Americans pay their premiums, only to discover that their insurance company has dropped their coverage when they get sick, or won't pay the full cost of care. It happens every day."

read more


Comments

There's only one thing dumber than picking a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel -- picking a fight with people who don't even have to buy ink. The Obama administration's war on Fox News is dumb on multiple levels. It makes the White House look weak, unable to take Harry Truman's advice and just deal with the heat. It makes the White House look small, dragged down to the level of Glenn Beck. It makes the White House look childish and petty at best, and it has a distinct Nixonian -- Agnewesque? -- aroma at worst. It is a self-defeating trifecta: it distracts attention from the Obama administration's substantive message; it serves to help Fox, not punish it, by driving up ratings; and it deprives the White House, to the extent it refuses to provide administration officials to appear on the cable network, of access to an audience that is, in fact, broader than hard-core Obama haters.

Sure, it's legitimate -- and standard practice -- to dispense access and coveted interviews to favored reporters and news outlets. So is subtly doing the opposite: letting a reporter who's filed a tough story know that he or she is in the doghouse by leaking a scoop to a competitor. The Bush administration routinely briefed conservative columnists before a big presidential speech; the Obama White House tends to call in ideological sympathizers. This is the way the game is played.


Where the White House has gone way overboard is in its decision to treat Fox as an outright enemy and to go public with the assault. Imagine the outcry if the Bush administration had pulled a similar hissy fit with MSNBC. "Opinion journalism masquerading as news," White House communications director Anita Dunn declared of Fox. Certainly Fox tends to report its news with a conservative slant -- but has anyone at the White House clicked over to MSNBC recently? Or is the only problem opinion journalism that doesn't match its opinion? On "Fox News Sunday," host Chris Wallace replayed a quote from an Obama interview: "I don't always get my most favorable coverage on Fox, but I think that's part of how democracy is supposed to work. You know, we're not supposed to all be in lock step here."



voices.washingtonpost.com

Drudge Retort

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable