I might take you more seriously if you can show me all of the "Electoral College-Bad for Country" threads that you posted BEFORE Hillary got her big ol' behind handed to her.
I understand your cynicism, but I don't think anybody who is advocating for the EC to deny Trump the presidency is under any illusions about what that would mean. Faithless electors (or conscientious electors, as some are calling them) who would deny Trump a vote would be VERY unlikely to vote for Clinton. Assuming that enough people vote their conscience and Trump fails to get to 270, the election would then be bumped to the House. You think the House would elect Clinton?
I don't think the conscientious elector push is some veiled way to get Clinton into the White House. She's lost, she won't get in even if Trump lands at 269 in the EC. I think most people realize that.
Maybe, juuuuuust maybe, people honestly think that a Trump presidency would be disastrous and dangerous for our country on an unprecedented level, and they're working to find any means to prevent him from taking office. And maybe, juuuuuust maybe, people are talking about faithless electors now not because of sour grapes over losing the election, but because they view Trump as an existential threat to the US. I know you'd disagree with that last point, but you don't always need to question the genuineness of other's motives.