Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Drudge Retort

User Info

Doc_Sarvis

Subscribe to Doc_Sarvis's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Links

If McCain wins he'd be the oldest man ever elected president, and so age has to be a consideration. For the moment, though, the concern is not McCain's physical age but his intellectual age -- his willingness to revise his views and grapple with the new. Costumed as George W. Bush, he goes around the country peddling a joke of a tax plan and a frightening foreign policy. Ideas matter, and on the Middle East, McCain not only has little to say that is interesting but, as he takes a swipe at Obama, a distinctly ugly way of saying it. He's driven his vaunted Strait Talk Express off the high road and into the mud.

read more


Increasing numbers of U.S. troops have left the military with damaged bodies and minds. The government expects to be spending $59 billion a year to compensate injured warriors in 25 years, up from today's $29 billion. And the Veterans Affairs Department concedes the bill could be much higher.

read more


Hillary Clinton may have a financial incentive to remain in the presidential race for a while. And she has Senator John McCain to thank for it.

read more


Frank Rich: The demographic reshaping of the electoral map still isn't fully understood. But this isn't 2004, and the rise in black voters and young voters of all races in Democratic primaries is re-weighting the electorate. As long as the likely Democratic nominee keeps partying like it's 2008 while everyone else refights the battles of yesteryear, he will continue to be underestimated every step of the way.

read more


The Clintons are destroying themselves and their legacy and their capacity to bridge the very gaps they now must widen to stay in the race. It is a Clinton tragedy and one that most Americans seem slowly, cautiously but palpably determined not to make their own.

read more


The U.S. military has, since 2001, cremated some of the remains of American service members killed in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere at a Delaware facility that also cremates pets, a practice that ended yesterday when the Pentagon banned the arrangement.

read more


Bob Herbert: The Clintons have never understood how to exit the stage gracefully. Theirs is a repertoire that's always been deficient in grace and class. The Clintons should be ashamed of themselves. But they long ago proved to the world that they have no shame.


A group of U.S. evangelical leaders called on Wednesday for a pullback from party politics so that followers would not become "useful idiots" exploited for partisan gain.

read more


Several funeral directors in the U.S. are considering the adoption of a new alternative to burial and cremation: alkaline hydrolysis, a process of heating a the carcass up to 300-degrees at 60 psi and flushing the brown, syrupy loved one down the drain. "It's not often that a truly game-changing technology comes along in the funeral service," the newsletter Funeral Service Insider said in September.

read more


[The content of this blog entry has been removed in response to a DMCA Notice of Copyright Infringement filed by Associated Press]


She's well on her way to becoming the spoiler of the 2008 presidential election.

read more


After paying $75 to fill his black Dodge Ram pickup truck for the third time in a week, Douglas Chrystall couldn't take it anymore. "The SUV craze was a bubble and now it is bursting," said George Hoffer, an economics professor at Virginia Commonwealth University whose research focuses on the automotive industry. "It's an irrational vehicle. It'll never come back."

read more


Comments

GOP's New Slogan Already Being Used To Market Anti-Depressant

Leave it to the tone deaf GOP to find a way of attaching themselves to this election cycle's "change" mandate that simultaneously reinforces the fact that their failed policies have messed up the world to such an inhuman extent that many Americans now live their daily lives in a state of free-floating panic and paralyzing anxiety.

In today's New York Times' Caucus blog, Carl Hulse reports that House Republicans have got themselves a brand-new slogan:

It looks like Republicans will counter the Democratic push for change from the years of the Bush administration with their own pledge to deliver, drum roll please, "the change you deserve."

What the GOP doesn't seem to realize, because they are idiots, is that "the change you deserve" is the registered advertising slogan of Effexor XR, a drug that many of you might have started taking as a result of all the...you know -- terrorism. (Hat tip to Bluestem for catching this gem.)

Effexor, also known as Venlafaxine, is approved for the treatment "of depression, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder in adults." Its common side effects are very much in keeping with the world the House Republicans have striven to build: nausea, apathy, constipation, fatigue, vertigo, sexual dysfunction, sweating, memory loss, and - and I swear I am not making this up - "electric shock-like sensations also called 'brain zaps.'"

Its less common side effects are equally awesome in their appropriateness.
www.huffingtonpost.com

OK, so they blew it. How about: "GOP - Better than Soma and only five times more expensive"?

Fair-Weather Wolverine:
Hillary Clinton wants to seat Michigan and Florida delegates.
She sang a different tune last year


It was a different story in October. Back then, Clinton was far and away the national front-runner--by some 20 points in a number of polls. With much less at stake in the matter, she told a New Hampshire public-radio audience, "It's clear, this election [Michigan is] having is not going to count for anything." Clinton was unwilling to take her name off the Michigan primary ballot, as Obama and her other significant rivals did, but like them she agreed not to campaign in Michigan or in Florida before their primaries.

On Aug. 25, when the DNC's rules panel declared Florida's primary date out of order, it agreed by a near-unanimous majority to exceed the 50 percent penalty called for under party rules. Instead, the group stripped Florida of all 210 delegates to underscore its displeasure with Florida's defiance and to discourage other states from following suit. In doing so, the DNC essentially committed itself, for fairness' sake, to strip the similarly defiant Michigan of all 156 of its delegates three months later. Clinton held tremendous potential leverage over this decision, and not only because she was then widely judged the likely nominee. Of the committee's 30 members, a near-majority of 12 were Clinton supporters. All of them--most notably strategist Harold Ickes--voted for Florida's full disenfranchisement. (The only dissenting vote was cast by a Tallahassee, Fla., city commissioner who supported Obama.)

Six days later, when the party chairs in the DNC-approved "early" primary states urged Democratic candidates to sign a "four-state pledge" promising not to campaign in any state that violated the DNC calendar, Clinton did not object. She waited, with characteristic prudence, until the other candidates had signed, then signed herself.
. . .
In October, after Obama and some of the other candidates withdrew their names from the Michigan ballot, Clinton declined to do the same. Her stated reason, however, was not to dissent from the DNC's decision to disenfranchise wronged Michigan, but rather to mend fences with Michigan voters come November. Besides, Hillary said, there was no reason to remove her name if the results weren't going to count anyway. "I personally did not think it made any difference," she said.
. . .
What a difference four months make.
mobile.slate.com

Will Obama Win Enough White Votes to Beat McCain?

By Art Levine
...
Obama doesn't need a majority of blue-collar white voters to win the general election, and he's unlikely to win them all over. All he needs is enough whites in his coalition of liberals,concerned middle-class people worried about the economy, some fed-up blue-collar workers, enthusiasic young people and college students, and the 90%-plus of African-Americans to piece together a winning coalition. Indeed, he's competitive or ahead in several of the states that Hillary says that only she can win, including Ohio and Pennsyvlania. In fact, it's worth remembering that no Democratic presidential candidate since LBJ has won a majority of white voters. The search for these blue-collar "Reagan Democrats" to stay with the Democrats may be as elusive as the search for the "NASCAR Dads" before the 2004 election, who had previously voted less than 30% for Democrats. As an ABC pollster observed before that Kerry vs. Bush election:


"When we run data from our recent polls we find that married, middle- and lower-income white men account for a single-digit share of the national population, and support President Bush in precisely the same proportion as all white men. (Make it rural white men, and it goes down to low single digits.) And white men, particularly Southern white men, are a solidly Republican group, highly unlikely to swing anywhere, anyhow.

For good measure, we checked rural, suburban or small city married white men with children and incomes under $50,000 in the 2000 exit poll. They accounted for 2 percent of all voters, and supported Bush over Gore by 70 percent to 27 percent. You really want to call this a swing voter group?"



Apparently white people hold a grudge for a long time: ever since Democrats pushed for African-American voting rights and integration, most whites haven't voted for a Democratic presidential candidate for over 40 years, even as the racial animus got translated into a cleaned-up anti-govenment, anti-crime, anti-tax message.
. . .
Actually, it seems, Hillary isn't just playing the race card, she's playing the race deck -- throwing everything she can against the wall about Obama to see what sticks, in a last-ditch effort to convinces the superdelegates. But a nuanced look at the racial dynamics at Real Clear Politics, found that Obama's reduced some of the defections among whites since Ohio and Pennsylvania.
. . .
Some observers argue by speaking so bluntly about race, and invoking Jesse Helms/George Wallace-type comments about "hard-working" white people, she's playing to racial and class stereotypes again.
www.huffingtonpost.com