The civilians who died as a result were intentionally killed.
Then there is no such thing as collateral damage and every army is guilty of the same charge.
If it is true and the IDF are intentionally killing civilians, they are really bad at their job. Random shelling with cheap artillery could have easily killed hundreds of thousands by now.
As for the Islamic terrorists, you think they would stop if we would just leave them alone?
Honestly, no. You and I aren't people, we're infidels, we deserve death. Israel isn't the end of the game. All the Jews could move to Mars, it would only encourage Islam. They would require Turkey, then Greece, Armenia. The House of Saud is "too western". India is full of polytheists, lower than dogs, fit for slaughter. And on and on and on. Labensraum can be pursued for its' own sake, this time under holy orders.
We look weak. We are weak. Western cities are regularly shut down by people wearing t-shirts with para-gliders openly supporting terrorists. They don't even have the decency to blush.
France is in real trouble. England, too. 'Americans' who support Palestine say they'll be voting for Trump even if it means the end of the Republic. Russia, Iran and China are . < this close to a formal alliance; three societies that won't be bothered by internal dissent if when war breaks out. Meanwhile, the majority of Americans moan about a measly 3 billion dollars -what the treasury department spends on toner and post-it notes- in military aid to the only ally willing to fight our enemy.
European Colonialism.
^See what I mean.^
How much energy do you think the people in Islamic States waste crying about what happened 400 years ago? Islamic Colonialism swept across Africa and into Europe, burning, killing and converting by sword everything in it's path. And without the help of small pox which did most of the heavy lifting for the Europeans. It is still going on to this day.
The self-immolation in Western society today is perfectly personified in Clownshow; a gay man who, if he were lucky, would be hurled head first from a tall building within minutes of setting foot in any of the places he seems to prefer to America.
They needed it for South America and Australia?
Yes. 60-90% of the Inca died to small pox. Aboriginal Australians fell to a wider range of viruses, small pox, chicken pox, measles, flu... There were not that many to begin with, 300k on the low end, 1.5m at the high end. No hard numbers because like in the Americas, disease spread so fast and so far entire villages were wiped out before they even made contact with Europeans.
India was less susceptible. Lots of contact for centuries and they had their own domesticated animals. As a result the Muslim invasions/colonization of the subcontinent were far more 'successful' and bloody than England's attempt.
But they were colonizing the African and Asian continents for centuries.
So were Arabs. So were other Asian societies. You think Europeans were the only colonizers? Genghis Khan killed ~80 million people and made subjects as far west as modern day Poland. You think China appeared 4000 years ago with her borders intact?