Drunken hooligans packed all the seats on the trains this morning ....

There WILL BE puke all over the trains for the ride home.

Why did I come in.......

Did you hear that woman at the Newt Gingrich rally the other day congratulating Newt on "putting Juan Williams in his place"????
#4 | Posted by danni

Juan is not authentically black ..
- signed; PBS

#65 | Posted by L_E_Light

Them Blacks is sure gettin a might bit uppity lately.

I hears tell dey got one in de dang ole White House now.

#69 | Posted by donnerboy

I am not authentically black ..
- signed; BHO

Utter horseshit. "Laid a foundation for slavery to end" is not a reason for the Revolution.

That's not at all what it says in post #62 so the only utter horeshit ( which has gotten you obviously agitated and losing your composure) came from your own lack of understanding.
Do try again... though.

self hating apologetic revisionist history. This is a hallmark of the Democrat ghetto landlord. Keep voting for me i'll feed you white devil stories.

#57 Only problem: There is not a single textbook which does this.

WRONG- read one.
distribution is concentrated to the few dozen or so publishers with the strongest lobbying aparatus. They are all heavy pushers of the liberal agenda.

#55 | Posted by dr_dude2

So if I say the sky is extremely blue and you say the sky is extremely red, that must mean the sky is purple.
Got it.

That would not be a real,legitmate argument, that would be one person who was obviously seriously confused. Simpleton.

I mean unless Danni has a secret power to read words on a webpage that I can't see, I don't see the words "remove slavery" in the petition.
I do see this :(emphasis aded)
given the social structure of their time, they were revolutionaries who brought liberty into a world where it hadn't existed, to everybody , not all equally instantly ... and it was their progress that we need to look at...

that statement is absolutely true ....
Why even have this thread? why do so many retards buy into the false permise created by Dummi and come here and argue this????
Rogers wouldn't you normally step in and change this terribly innacurate and misleading headline?

.... the truth usually lies somewhere in the middle of the 2 extreme sides of the argument ......

I think these people just did not write the petition very well. They didn't get their point acros clearly. When you read this , i think i see a point that could have been beter made:

No portrayal of minority experience in the history which actually occurred shall obscure the experience or contributions of the Founding Fathers, or the majority of citizens, including those who reached positions of leadership.”.......
“The thing we need to focus on about the founders is that, given the social structure of their time, they were revolutionaries who brought liberty into a world where it hadn’t existed, to everybody â€" not all equally instantly â€" and it was their progress that we need to look at...

What they should have tried to do is make a convincing argument, by giving examples, of how the current textbooks strictly demonize the founding fathers and their contemporaries by focussing only on slave ownership. I think their point is They want the textooks to not completely overshadow some of the positive acomplishments by focussing only on slavery.... I think they were trying to argue balance the focus , not remove slavery all together .... as the lying retarded douche who posted this aticle used as the headline. Here's the real hadline : "Tea parties issue demands to Tennessee legislators"

#1 | Posted by dianna

You fool, Hans IS Goatman !

Seriously, what club are you appearing at?
#54 | Posted by 8roper"

That's creepy, dude. Why do you ask?

#58 | Posted by mOntecOre

Do you have big tits ? There aren't a lot of females at this site.... I am just being friendly :-)

lol CORKY RULES.

#53 | Posted by truthhurts

Lol . YEP.

In your wife's bed, and your sister's cunt.
#46 | Posted by mOntecOre

LOL ! I have neither so you must be confused.
That loss to the Giants stings, huh?

Seriously, what club are you appearing at?

No shit. But enough about another stupid lib like yourself who has no business posting on anything sports related.

#14 | Posted by crispee_oc

After going thru this thread I have to agree with the above statement. You have liberals and females commenting on football and they are just grasping at any bad call talking point that they heard on local radio. You have some girl who is a dancer or prostitue or whatever pretending she knows the rules about when its a tackle in the end zone or not.

Sheesh

Monte, where do you dance?

The Giants won the game. Period. They had too much class to bitch about the Green Bay officiating. have some self respect you assholes, stop bleeding from your vaginas. NEW YORK in the SB.
RECOGNIZE.

If she was a few years older, I think a cageing could be a cool scenario.

Monte, you're a dancer?

hey you know what's funny? My roomate in college and I used to drive back up to school at the start of every semester and we always did that thing ( back when there were manned toll booths) where we would pull up the the toll and ask the toll booth attendent- Hey can you take a look at our dog on the roof? is his cage still attached securely?

#65

not me. i dont come here and talk shit.
maybe others do.
I found that my dispensing with talking out of my ass often makes me the subject of ridicule at this site so i dont really post here any more. I meant it about the strip searches, as long as the searcher was female - i think it would be hot. I would definitely have a boner. Maybe Rand Paul has some embarassment issue.

#64, so you're willing to be strip searched every time you walk out your front door? Cause that's the bottom of the slippery slope.

the slope is not slippery because Constitution has set up a representational system for making laws. Most people I know do not want to be strip searched when they leave their front door. So I doubt you will see any legislation on the table. Unfortunately we are still dealing with Obama and Pelosi so my comments must be taken with that caveat in mind.( see: OBAMACARE,secretive legislation, etc. )

I, myself, want to be strip searched as often as possible. penis, anus, the whole works. Thanks for your concern

hi HC I was saying that the law is certainly not unAmerican in any way shape or form. therefore no point to reexamine (in your #53). it is completely the ONLY thing govt SHOULD be involved in - public safety

#63

good Lord, again, who the fuck am I agreeing with ????

i have the true hard conservative viewpoint on this. As it says in the USC - provide for the general welfare. ( what ??? !!!)

This is the ONLY role of the Exceutive branch. Protection of the population- i mean physical protection. by enforcing agreed upon laws. I WANT the government involved in the rules that are applied to people's behavior in PUBLIC settings.