<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:sitemap="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
  xmlns:wordzilla="http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/wordzilla/namespace">
  <channel>
    <title>Drudge Retort: Et_al's blog</title>
    <link>http://www.drudge.com/user/et_al</link>
    <description>New links and comments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>Wordzilla/0.58</generator>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="self" href="http://www.drudge.com/feed/Discussion" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
    <item>
      <title>Colorado Sheriffs Sue over Gun Control Laws</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168547/colorado-sheriffs-sue-over-gun-control-laws</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/17/colorado-sheriffs-sue-ove_n_3294629.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Fifty-four Colorado county sheriffs have joined a lawsuit against the state of Colorado arguing that the state's new gun control laws violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. The lawsuit takes aim at two laws Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) signed in March -- House Bill 1224, which banned high-capacity magazines limiting them to 15 rounds, and House Bill 1229, which requires background checks for all gun sales and transfers in the state. The Colorado Association of Police Chiefs have been supportive of the laws.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Joining the Sheriffs as Plaintiffs are the Colorado Farm Bureau, disabled persons, Outdoor Buddies (an organization that helps disabled persons participate in outdoor sports), the Colorado Outfitters Association (the trade association for hunting guides), the National Shooting Sports Foundation (the trade association for the firearms industry), magazine manufacturer Magpul, federally-licensed firearms dealers, the state's largest shooting range, the Colorado State Shooting Association (governing body for the shooting sports in Colorado), and Women for Concealed Carry.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:30:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168547/colorado-sheriffs-sue-over-gun-control-laws#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168547</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168547</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Congress Revisits 2001 AUMF Law</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168441/congress-revisits-2001-aumf-law</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/02/us-usa-congress-counterterrorism-idUSBRE94105V20130502</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>A few dozen words rushed into law days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks have been used to justify U.S. counterterrorism efforts from the war in Afghanistan to warrantless wiretapping and drone strikes with little congressional oversight. Some Democrats and Republicans have begun writing legislation to update the 12-year-old resolution. &quot;If you look back at the 60-word authorization that was put in place on September 18, 2001, and look at where we are today, there's a very, very thin thread, if any, between that authorization and what is occurring today,&quot; said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), a leader of the effort to examine the 2001 resolution.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>What says the Administration?
&lt;p&gt;&quot;White House officials had no immediate comment.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;The silence is deafening.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:14:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168441/congress-revisits-2001-aumf-law#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168441</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168441</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>West Medic Arrested on Bomb Charge</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168218/west-medic-arrested-bomb-charge</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.wacotrib.com/news/west_explosion/updated-former-west-ems-volunteer-arrested-on-charge-of-possession/article_497ff644-0631-53c4-8181-755e1743aa39.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>A former West, Texas, EMS volunteer has been charged with possession of a destructive device, but multiple sources say there is no indication he is connected to the deadly April 17 explosion at West Fertilizer plant. Bryce Ashley Reed, 31, was booked into the McLennan County Jail on the federal charge then later released into the custody of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents, according to jail records. Bryce Ashley Reed, 31, is accused of having the components to make a pipe bomb, according to court documents.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 13:31:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168218/west-medic-arrested-bomb-charge#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168218</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168218</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama Reluctant to Escalate in Syria</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/167824/obama-reluctant-escalate-syria</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/27/world/middleeast/white-house-in-no-rush-on-syria-action.html?_r=0</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>President Barack Obama said Friday that he would respond &quot;prudently&quot; and &quot;deliberately&quot; to evidence that Syria had used chemical weapons, tamping down any expectations that he would take swift action after an American intelligence assessment that the Syrian government had used the chemical agent sarin on a small scale in the nation's civil war. &quot;But I meant what I'd said,&quot; the president added. &quot;To use potential weapons of mass destruction on civilian populations crosses another line with respect to international norms and international law. And that is going to be a game changer.&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>The risk of not responding now, even with less than definitive proof, Michael Eisenstadt, director of the military and security studies program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, is that it could embolden President Bashar al-Assad to use chemical weapons on a wider scale. American officials said the administration had privately warned the Syrian government not to take that step.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:31:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/167824/obama-reluctant-escalate-syria#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.167824</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>167824</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Americans Tired of Trading Liberty for Safety</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/167734/americans-tired-trading-liberty-safety</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/polls-show-growing-resolve-to-live-with-terror-threat/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Public opinion surveys conducted since the Boston Marathon bombings indicate that most Americans -- while convinced future attacks are quite likely -- don't feel personally threatened by terrorism, and an increasing share of the public is skeptical about sacrificing personal freedoms for security. A new Pew Research survey finds that while 75 percent of Americans expect acts of terrorism to be a part of life in the future (up by 11 percent from a year ago), worry about terrorism has not increased. The most recent Fox News survey finds that -- for the first time since before 9/11 -- more respondents were unwilling (45 percent) than willing (43 percent) to sacrifice personal freedoms to reduce the threat of terrorism.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>&quot;Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.&quot; -- Benjamin Franklin</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:05:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/167734/americans-tired-trading-liberty-safety#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.167734</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>167734</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bloomberg: Constitution Has to Change</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/167665/bloomberg-constitution-has-change</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://politicker.com/2013/04/bloomberg-says-post-boston-interpretation-of-the-constitution-will-have-to-change/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (I) said Monday the country's interpretation of the Constitution will &quot;have to change&quot; to allow for greater security to stave off future attacks. &quot;Look, we live in a very dangerous world. We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms. New Yorkers probably know that as much if not more than anybody else after the terrible tragedy of 9/11.&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>People want to take away freedoms? One of them is named Bloomberg. Unbelievable.  Then there is the pandering hypocrisy.
&lt;p&gt;Still, Bloomberg argued the attacks shouldn't be used as an excuse to persecute certain religions or groups.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What we cant do is let the protection get in the way of us enjoying our freedoms,&quot; he said.  &quot;You still want to let people practice their religion, no matter what that religion is. And I think one of the great dangers here is going and categorizing anybody from one religion as a terrorist. That's not true  That would let the terrorists win. That's what they want us to do.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;Can't attack &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; group but &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; group (gun owners) is okay.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:30:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/167665/bloomberg-constitution-has-change#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.167665</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>167665</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arrest Warrant for Tx District Attorney; Hiding Evidence</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/167574/arrest-warrant-tx-district-attorney</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.texastribune.org/2013/04/19/judge-rules-anderson-court-inquiry/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>A judge issued an arrest warrant for former Williamson County District Attorney Ken Anderson Friday, after finding probable cause to believe Anderson withheld critical evidence in Michael Morton's 1987 murder trial. &lt;p&gt;Judge Louis Sturns concluded his court of inquiry by charging Anderson, who is now a state district judge, with tampering with government records (a misdemeanor), tampering with physical evidence (a felony) and failing to comply with a judge's order to turn over such evidence, for which he could be held in &quot;contempt of court.&quot;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:09:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/167574/arrest-warrant-tx-district-attorney#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.167574</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>167574</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How an American Became Targeted for Death</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/166315/american-became-targeted-death</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/world/middleeast/anwar-al-awlaki-a-us-citizen-in-americas-cross-hairs.html?hp</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>One morning in late September 2011, a group of American drones took off from an airstrip the C.I.A. had built in the remote southern expanse of Saudi Arabia. The drones crossed the border into Yemen, and were soon hovering over a group of trucks clustered in a desert patch of Jawf Province, a region of the impoverished country once renowned for breeding Arabian horses. A group of men who had just finished breakfast scrambled to get to their trucks. One was Anwar al-Awlaki, the firebrand preacher, born in New Mexico, who had evolved from a peddler of Internet hatred to a senior operative in Al Qaeda's branch in Yemen. Another was Samir Khan, another American citizen who had moved to Yemen from North Carolina and was the creative force behind &lt;i&gt;Inspire&lt;/i&gt;, the militant group's English-language Internet magazine.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>This account of what led to the Awlaki strike, based on interviews with three dozen current and former legal and counterterrorism officials and outside experts, fills in new details of the legal, intelligence and military challenges faced by the Obama administration in what proved to be a landmark episode in American history and law.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:14:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/166315/american-became-targeted-death#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.166315</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>166315</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texas Proposes Nation's "Most Sweeping" Mobile Privacy Laws</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/166266/texas-proposes-nations-most-sweeping</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/texas-proposes-one-of-nations-most-sweeping-mobile-privacy-laws/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Privacy experts say that a pair of new mobile privacy bills recently introduced in Texas are among the &quot;most sweeping&quot; ever seen. And they say the proposed legislation offers better protection than a related privacy bill introduced this week in Congress.&lt;p&gt;If passed, the new bills would establish a well-defined, probable-cause-driven warrant requirement for all location information. That's not just data from GPS, but potentially pen register, tap and trace, and tower location data as well. Such data would be disclosed to law enforcement &quot;if there is probable cause to believe the records disclosing location information will provide evidence in a criminal investigation.&quot;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:32:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/166266/texas-proposes-nations-most-sweeping#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.166266</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>166266</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feds Lose Pot Trial Without GPS</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/166172/feds-lose-pot-trial-without-gps</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2013/03/judge-declares-mistrial-in-drug-case-at-center-of-landmark-supreme-court-ruling.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>&lt;i&gt;LegalTimes&lt;/i&gt;: For the U.S. Justice Department, the third time wasn't the charm in the high-profile drug prosecution of Washington nightclub owner Antoine Jones. A federal judge today declared a mistrial, the latest setback for the government after a loss in the U.S. Supreme Court last year. The trial was the third for Jones, who represented himself, and the government after an earlier mistrial in 2007 and then last year's historic Supreme Court ruling that voided Jones's life sentence. The high court concluded the warrantless use of a tracking device violated Jones' rights under the Fourth Amendment, a ruling whose scope is being assessed in courts across the country.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:30:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/166172/feds-lose-pot-trial-without-gps#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.166172</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>166172</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lawyers Shut Up Unhappy Client</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/166108/lawyers-shut-up-unhappy-client</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.volokh.com/2013/03/02/that-troublesome-first-amendment-michigan-edition/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>A few weeks ago McDonald's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drudge.com/news/164890/mcdonalds-settles-islamic-diet-suit&quot;&gt;settled&lt;/a&gt; a class-action suit brought by Muslims regarding misrepresented food sold at one of its restaurants. After one of the class members didn't like the settlement and voiced his objections on his Facebook wall, the plaintiffs' lawyers who represented him as a class member -- and stand to get a hefty cut of the settlement -- filed in court demanding he take down the post and replace it with their own comments. The lawyers got a preliminary injunction against Majed Moughni's Facebook page. &quot;Unbelievably enough, the court granted the motion and entered a preliminary injunction; finding that  Moughni had made 'materially false, deceptive and misleading statements concerning the settlement ... and concerning the rights of the members of the Settlement Class,&quot; writes David Post on Volokh.Com.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>The judge found that Moughni &quot;thereby engaged in deliberate and abusive conduct which has created a likelihood of confusion of class members, adversely has effected the administration of justice and has undermined this Court's responsibility and authority to protect Class members from such abuses.&quot;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:31:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/166108/lawyers-shut-up-unhappy-client#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.166108</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>166108</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Can Contest FISA Surveillance? Nobody</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/165984/can-contest-fisa-surveillance-nobody</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/27/us/politics/supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-fisa-surveillance-law.html?_r=0</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned back a challenge to a federal law that broadened the government's power to eavesdrop on international phone calls and e-mails. More broadly, the ruling illustrated how hard it is to mount court challenges to a wide array of antiterrorism measures, including renditions of terrorism suspects to foreign countries and targeted killings using drones, in light of the combination of government secrecy and judicial doctrines limiting access to the courts. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said that the journalists, lawyers and human rights advocates who challenged the constitutionality of the law could not show they had been harmed by it and so lacked standing to sue. The plaintiffs' fear that they would be subject to surveillance in the future was too speculative to establish standing, he wrote.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>In dissent, Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote that the harm claimed by the plaintiffs was not speculative. &quot;Indeed,&quot; he wrote, &quot;it is as likely to take place as are most future events that common-sense inference and ordinary knowledge of human nature tell us will happen.&quot; 
&lt;p&gt;He further wrote, &quot;[W]e need only assume that the Government is doing its job (to find out about, and combat, terrorism) in order to conclude that there is a high probability that the Government will intercept at least some electronic communication to which at least some of the plaintiffs are parties. The majority is wrong when it describes the harm threatened plaintiffs as &quot;speculative.&quot;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:30:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/165984/can-contest-fisa-surveillance-nobody#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.165984</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>165984</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Houst Bill Unveiled to Legalize Medical Pot</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/165937/houst-bill-unveiled-legalize-medical-pot</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/bill-unveiled-to-legalize-medical-pot-88031.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Flanked by more than 150 advocates from around the country, Oregon Democrat Earl Blumenauer on Monday put forward his legislation allowing states to legalize medical marijuana in an effort to end the confusion surrounding federal pot policy.&lt;p&gt;Blumeanuer's legislation, which has 13 co-sponsors -- including GOP Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of California -- would create a framework for the FDA to eventually legalize medicinal marijuana. It would also block the feds from interfering in any of the 19 states where medical marijuana is legal.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:42:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/165937/houst-bill-unveiled-legalize-medical-pot#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.165937</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>165937</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pozen: The Leaky Leviathan: ...Unlawful Disclosures...</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/165916/pozen-leaky-leviathan-unlawful</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/02/readings-david-pozen-on-the-leaky-leviathan-why-the-government-condemns-and-condones-unlawful-disclosures-of-information/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Scroll down to the introduction to this draft article.  A little long but interesting:&lt;p&gt;Ours is a polity saturated with, vexed by, and dependent upon leaks. The Bay of Pigs, the Pentagon Papers, warrantless wiretapping by the National Security Agency at home, targeted killings by the Central Intelligence Agency abroad: The contours of these and countless other government activities have emerged over the years through anonymous disclosures of confidential information to the press. Across the ideological spectrum, many Americans believe both that leaking &quot;is a problem of major proportions&quot; and that &quot;our particular form of government wouldn't work without it.&quot; Episodically, leaks generate political frenzy.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Our comprehension of leaking has not kept pace with our fascination. Even accounting for the secrecy that obscures its workings, the ratio of heat to light in commentary on the subject is extreme. Some valuable progress has been made. Journalists and ex-officials have chronicled the role of leaks in their work. Students of government and the press have limned leaks' different forms and motivations. Legal theorists have considered their First Amendment implications. Yet for a variety of reasons, the literature reflects only a rudimentary understanding of leaks' consequences, inside and outside government. More surprising, because the questions are more tractable, scholars have devoted scant attention to the constitutive elements of the leak, as a legal and bureaucratic concept, or to the policies the executive branch has developed to enforce relevant prohibitions. We know something about the phenomenology and constitutionality of leaks but next to nothing about how the government deals with them.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:16:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/165916/pozen-leaky-leviathan-unlawful#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.165916</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>165916</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Citizens United, Deja Vu All Over Again?</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/165799/citizens-united-deja-vu-all-over-again</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mccutcheon-case-could-give-citizens-united-a-run-for-its-money-in-supreme-court/2013/02/20/ee09f758-7b8a-11e2-9a75-dab0201670da_story.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>The Supreme Court's decision Tuesday to hear a campaign finance case, &lt;i&gt;McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission&lt;/i&gt;, in its next term gives the justices a chance to continue their dismantling of restrictions on money in politics, most notably with the landmark &lt;i&gt;Citizens United v. FEC&lt;/i&gt; decision of early 2010.&lt;p&gt;With the new case, the court could strike a blow against fundraising limits for federal candidates and political parties.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Stronger parties are a good thing, says Jim Bopp Jr., a seasoned campaign lawyer who is arguing the case for the RNC coming off several victories in the courts in recent years.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In a rational universe, candidates and political parties would be more central to our system,&quot; Bopp said. &quot;They are the most accountable and the most transparent. The candidate is the one going into office, not the super PAC.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;Advocates for restrictions on political money are concerned, however. They say that without the aggregate limit, officeholders and political candidates could solicit eye-popping sums of money, conceivably more than $2 million.
&lt;p&gt;Currently, those big contributions have to go to super PACs, groups that must operate independently of the federal candidates they're working to help. Candidates are prohibited from soliciting checks of that size for a super PAC backing them.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:34:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>et_al</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/165799/citizens-united-deja-vu-all-over-again#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.165799</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>165799</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
