<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:wordzilla="http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/wordzilla/namespace">
  <channel>
    <title>Drudge Retort: Cookfish's blog</title>
    <link>http://www.drudge.com/user/cookfish</link>
    <description>New links and comments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>Wordzilla/0.58</generator>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="self" href="http://www.drudge.com/feed/Discussion" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Gallup: Obama's Race Doesn't Affect Race</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/113447/gallup-obamas-race-doesnt-affect-race</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.gallup.com/poll/111049/Obamas-Race-May-Much-Plus-Minus.aspx</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Gallup: While 6% of voters say they are less likely to vote for Barack Obama because of his race, 9% say they are more likely to vote for him, making the impact of his race a neutral to slightly positive factor when all voters' self-reported attitudes are taken into account.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>At the same time, 6% of voters say John McCain's race will make them less likely to vote for him, with 7% saying it makes them more likely to vote for him, leading to the same basic conclusion: McCain's race, like Obama's, is on balance neither a plus nor a minus.
&lt;p&gt;Eighty-five percent of voters say Obama's race makes no difference, and 87% say McCain's race makes no difference. This makes race the single dimension out of the eight tested that is the least likely to have an impact on the vote.
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:33:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/113447/gallup-obamas-race-doesnt-affect-race#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.113447</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>113447</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mee-Yum! Peru's Fried Feline Fiesta</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/113403/mee-yum-perus-fried-feline-fiesta</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1782932.ece</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Animal rights groups are up in arms over an annual festival in Peru that serves up hundreds of fried CATS to locals. The 'Gastronomical Festival of the Cat'  dubbed the 'Massacre of the Moggies'  sees townsfolk in Canete, near Lima, feast on the fluffy pets for two days.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>They believe that eating cat burgers  and fried cat legs and tails  can cure bronchial disease. 
&lt;p&gt;It is also believed that feline meat serves as an aphrodisiac. 
&lt;p&gt;The cats are bred especially for this festival  which takes place at the end of September on the Day of Santa Ifigenia. 
&lt;p&gt;But it has generated fury among animal rights groups. 
&lt;p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:07:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/113403/mee-yum-perus-fried-feline-fiesta#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.113403</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>113403</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNN: Obama's Lying About William Ayers</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/113355/cnn-obamas-lying-william-ayers</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/07/cnn-obamas-lying-about-william-ayers/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>You'll want to double-check the logo at the bottom left corner (of the video) during this report.  It really is CNN and Anderson Cooper fact-checking Barack Obama's claims to have barely known William Ayers  &lt;b&gt;and calling it dishonest.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Griffin also tells a somewhat nonplussed Cooper that Obama has lied about his &quot;coming out party&quot; at the home of William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn in 1995. Obama has said that Alice Palmer arranged the fundraiser and the venue, but Griffin spoke to two people who attended the event, who claim Obama lied. Palmer had nothing to do with that event outside of being invited to it. Obama and Ayers planned the event themselves.
&lt;p&gt;Obama has lied repeatedly about his relationship with the unrepentant domestic terrorist. He spent years working for Ayers, promoting Ayers' causes. Even CNN won't buy the Obama line any longer. Expect John McCain to raise this point tonight in the debate.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:00:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/113355/cnn-obamas-lying-william-ayers#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.113355</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>113355</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pelosi Paid Husband $99,000 from PAC</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/113102/pelosi-paid-husband-99000-pac</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/oct/01/pelosis-pac-pays-bills-for-spouses-firm/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has paid $99,000 from her political action committee to her husband's real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying relatives with political donations that she spoke against last year.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Financial Leasing Services Inc. (FLS), owned by Paul F. Pelosi, has received $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting fees from the speaker's &quot;PAC to the Future&quot; over the PAC's nine-year history. 
&lt;p&gt;The payments have quadrupled since Mr. Pelosi took over as treasurer of his wife's committee in 2007, Federal Election Commission records show. FLS is on track to take in $48,000 in payments this year alone - eight times as much as it received annually from 2000 to 2005, when the committee was run by another treasurer. 
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:15:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/113102/pelosi-paid-husband-99000-pac#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.113102</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>113102</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama/Biden Voted Twice to Keep 'Nowhere Bridge'</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112840/obamabiden-voted-twice-keep-nowhere</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/23/biden.earmarks/index.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Although Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden routinely mocks his Republican counterpart, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, for her onetime support of the infamous &quot;Bridge to Nowhere,&quot; &lt;b&gt;Biden and his running mate voted to keep the project alive twice.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;p&gt;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Both Biden and Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama voted to kill a Senate amendment that would have diverted federal funding for the bridge to repair a Louisiana span badly damaged by Hurricane Katrina, Senate records show. 
&lt;p&gt;And both voted for the final transportation bill that included the $223 million earmark for the Alaska project.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;That is probably the most disturbing element of this and the campaigning on the Bridge to Nowhere,&quot; said Bill Allison of the Sunlight Foundation, a taxpayer watchdog group. &quot;Because, yes, they had a chance to vote specifically against the Bridge to Nowhere in Alaska to redirect the money to people, to bridges and infrastructure damaged by Hurricane Katrina going in to New Orleans, and they chose not to.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:44:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112840/obamabiden-voted-twice-keep-nowhere#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112840</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112840</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biden Won't Let Obama Seize HIS Guns, Either</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112635/biden-wont-let-obama-seize-his-guns-either</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/oh-that-joe-n-9.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Sen. Barack Obama better not mess with his running mate Joe Biden's guns...or else.&lt;p&gt;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>In an out-of-nowhere attempt to re-assure a southwestern Virginia labor crowd about gun owners' rights, Biden -- who regularly scores &quot;F&quot; ratings from the National Rifle Association -- warned Obama that if &quot;he tries to fool with my Beretta, he's got a problem.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;I guarantee you Barack Obama ain't taking my shotguns, so don't buy that malarkey,&quot; Biden said Saturday at the United Mine Workers of America's annual fish fry in Castlewood, Virginia. &quot;Don't buy that malarkey. They're going to start peddling that to you.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;Biden told the crowd that he himself is a gun owner. &quot;I got two,&quot; Biden said, &quot;if he tries to fool with my Beretta, he's got a problem. I like that little over and under, you know? I'm not bad with it. So give me a break. Give me a break.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:11:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112635/biden-wont-let-obama-seize-his-guns-either#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112635</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112635</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Racist Democrats Could Derail Obama Election</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112630/racist-democrats-could-derail-obama-election</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://news.yahoo.com/page/election-2008-political-pulse-obama-race</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Deep-seated racial misgivings could cost Barack Obama the White House if the election is close, according to an AP-Yahoo News poll that found one-third of white Democrats harbor negative views toward blacks  many calling them &quot;lazy,&quot; &quot;violent,&quot; responsible for their own troubles.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Certainly, Republican John McCain has his own obstacles: He's an ally of an unpopular president and would be the nation's oldest first-term president. But Obama faces this: 40 percent of all white Americans hold at least a partly negative view toward blacks, and that includes many Democrats and independents.
&lt;p&gt;More than a third of all white Democrats and independents  voters Obama can't win the White House without  agreed with at least one negative adjective about blacks, according to the survey, and they are significantly less likely to vote for Obama than those who don't have such views.
&lt;p&gt;The pollsters set out to determine why Obama is locked in a close race with McCain even as the political landscape seems to favor Democrats. President Bush's unpopularity, the Iraq war and a national sense of economic hard times cut against GOP candidates, as does that fact that Democratic voters outnumber Republicans. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;The findings suggest that Obama's problem is close to home  among his fellow Democrats, particularly non-Hispanic white voters. Just seven in 10 people who call themselves Democrats support Obama, compared to the 85 percent of self-identified Republicans who back McCain.&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:07:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112630/racist-democrats-could-derail-obama-election#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112630</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112630</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When Going Gets Tough Democrat Congress Adjourns</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112530/going-gets-tough-democrat-congress</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&#x26;sid=aVPBaUbYV_qQ</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>The Democratic-controlled Congress, acknowledging that it isn't equipped to lead the way to a solution for the financial crisis and can't agree on a path to follow, is likely to just get out of the way.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Lawmakers say they are unlikely to take action before, or to delay, their planned adjournments -- Sept. 26 for the House of Representatives, a week later for the Senate. While they haven't ruled out returning after the Nov. 4 elections, they would rather wait until next year unless Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, who are leading efforts to contain the crisis, call for help.
&lt;p&gt;One reason, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said yesterday, is that ``no one knows what to do'' at the moment.
&lt;p&gt;Still, the Democrats opened themselves up for attack with Reid's comments. The Republican National Committee pounced on the Nevada lawmaker for his ``despair,'' and Senator Mel Martinez, a Florida Republican, said his remarks are ``not a way to inspire confidence or begin to turn the tide.'' 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;The only thing this Democrat-controlled Congress has excelled at is incompetence. Reid and Pelosi have lost the trust and respect of all America, and do not deserve to keep their positions.&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:29:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112530/going-gets-tough-democrat-congress#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112530</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112530</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Media Skimps on Biden Coverage</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112317/media-skimps-biden-coverage</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/12/biden.palin/index.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Sen. Joe Biden offers the most unfiltered contact with the media of any of the big four, but he's the least likely to be covered. Over the three weeks since Sen. Barack Obama tapped Biden to be his running mate, Biden has seen coverage of his campaign slip from feverish to low-key.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>The night before Obama announced his vice presidential choice August 23, the press staked out Biden's Delaware home and gave minute-by-minute updates of his every movement. 
&lt;p&gt;But then Sen. John McCain picked telegenic and nationally unknown Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate, and the press corps traveling with Biden's campaign dwindled to a skeleton crew.
&lt;p&gt;While reporters covering Palin complained the candidate was endlessly sequestered with aides, the Biden press corps had more quotes than could possibly be reported. And most of them weren't.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:30:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112317/media-skimps-biden-coverage#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112317</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112317</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AP Poll: Palin Beats Obama on 'Experience' Issue</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112329/ap-poll-palin-beats-obama-experience</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_ap_poll</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>WASHINGTON - An overwhelming advantage in experience and lopsided support from working-class and suburban whites have lifted Republican John McCain to a slender lead over Barack Obama less than two months from Election Day, a poll on the presidential race said Friday. &lt;p&gt;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>The Arizona senator has a 13-percentage-point lead over his Democratic rival both with men and senior citizens, and a 23-point advantage among rural residents, according to the Associated Press-GfK Poll of likely voters. He's also doing better than Obama at consolidating support from party loyalists: 94 percent of Republicans back McCain, while 83 percent of Democrats prefer the Illinois senator.
&lt;p&gt;The poll suggests that perceived inexperience is more of a problem at the top of the Democratic ticket than in the No. 2 spot for Republicans.
&lt;p&gt;Eighty percent say McCain, with nearly three decades in Congress, has the right experience to be president. Just 46 percent say Obama, now in his fourth year in the Senate, is experienced enough.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fully 47 percent say Obama lacks the proper experience  an even worse reading than the 36 percent who had the same criticism about McCain running mate Sarah Palin, serving her second year as Alaska governor after being a small-town mayor.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;This is his fourth year in the Senate, and two of those four years he spent campaigning for president,&quot; said Arthur Koch, 63, an undecided voter from Wallington, N.J. &quot;I'm not too comfortable with that.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:07:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112329/ap-poll-palin-beats-obama-experience#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112329</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112329</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rove: Obama Can't Win Against Palin</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112220/rove-obama-cant-win-against-palin</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>&quot;Of all the advantages Gov. Sarah Palin has brought to the GOP ticket, the most important may be that she has gotten into Barack Obama's head,&quot; Karl Rove claims. &quot;How else to explain Sen. Obama's decision to go one-on-one against 'Sarah Barracuda,' captain of the Wasilla High state basketball champs?&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>It's a matchup he'll lose. If Mr. Obama wants to win, he needs to remember he's running against John McCain for president, not Mrs. Palin for vice president.
&lt;p&gt;Michael Dukakis spent the last months of the 1988 campaign calling his opponent's running mate, Dan Quayle, a risky choice and even ran a TV ad blasting Mr. Quayle. The Bush/Quayle ticket carried 40 states.
&lt;p&gt;Adlai Stevenson spent the fall of 1952 bashing Dwight Eisenhower's running mate, Richard Nixon, calling him &quot;the kind of politician who would cut down a redwood tree, and then mount the stump and make a speech for conservation.&quot; The Republican ticket carried 39 of 48 states.
&lt;p&gt;If Mr. Obama keeps attacking Mrs. Palin, he could suffer the fate of his Democratic predecessors. These assaults highlight his own tissue-thin rsum, waste precious time better spent reassuring voters he is up for the job, and diminish him -- not her.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;In Denver two weeks ago, Mr. Obama said, &quot;If you don't have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.&quot; That's what he's trying to do, only the object of his painting is Sarah Palin, not John McCain.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:30:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112220/rove-obama-cant-win-against-palin#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112220</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112220</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FactCheck.org Debunks  Desperate DemoDeceptions</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112169/factcheckorg-debunks-desperate</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Weve been flooded for the past few days with queries about dubious Internet postings and mass e-mail messages making claims about McCains running mate, Gov. Palin. We find that many are completely false, or misleading.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didnt cut it at all. In fact, she tripled per-pupil funding over just three years.
 
She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a &quot;What if?&quot; question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin's first term.
&lt;p&gt;She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. Shes been registered as a Republican since May 1982.
&lt;p&gt;Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a &quot;courtesy&quot; when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.
&lt;p&gt;Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska's schools. She has said that students should be allowed to &quot;debate both sides&quot; of the evolution question, but she also said creationism &quot;doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.&quot;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:53:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112169/factcheckorg-debunks-desperate#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112169</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112169</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>McCain Surges Over That Other Guy In NC - Up 20%</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112150/mccain-surges-over-other-guy-nc-up</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/politics&#x26;id=6380065</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>RALEIGH (WTVD) -- In an election for President of the United States in North Carolina Tuesday, September 09, Republican John McCain suddenly and breathtakingly surges to a 20-point win over Democrat Barack Obama, 58% to 38%, according to this latest exclusive SurveyUSA election poll conducted for ABC11-WTVD.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>McCain is now in front among the educated and less educated, among the affluent and less affluent. He's polling at 64% in Coastal Carolina (up from 57%), at 60% in Charlotte (up from 53%), and at 54% in Raleigh / Greensboro (up from 44%). Pro-Life voters backed McCain 2:1 last month, 4:1 this month.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:25:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112150/mccain-surges-over-other-guy-nc-up#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112150</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112150</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why'd The Chicken Cross The Road? To Escape Biden</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/112137/whyd-chicken-cross-road-escape</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/oh-that-joe-n-5.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>On a flight to Kalispell, Mont., Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., was asked by a reporter, &quot;Do you still believe in a tripartite solution to Iraq?&quot; His answer lasted 13 minutes, 20 seconds.&lt;p&gt;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Before we reprint it, in full, it's only fair to ponder how long Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's answer to such a question would be.
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Biden's response:
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Bush administration's policy in the beginning -- and John's -- continues to be a strong, central government, democracy, that will gain the confidence of all the Iraqi people that would be a democratic institution that would make the dominoes of the oligarchies fall in the Middle East. That was success, that's what they talked about. Now what's happened? Where there's relative peace, where is it? It's up in the Kurdish area. Where? Where they don't allow Shia troops to come up. Where they don't allow the Iraqi army to come up without their permission. There is now relative calm in Anbar. Why? They did exactly what I proposed two years ago. They turned over authority and trained homegrown local Sh-- Sunnis. And said, 'we promise you, those Shia aren't coming and patrolling your streets.' That's called the awakening. That's what got all of the sheikhs to come together and say OK. I predicted if you ask the sheikhs to have their sons join the army or join the police force, the security forces, and you told them they'd protect their own area, they'd join in droves. The first day Petraeus wisely made that offer, 1,000 Sunnis showed up for the police force. Virtually none showed up before. So, what's happening? Where's it working? It's working from the ground up. Exactly what I've proposed is happening. We're about to have regional elections. What are the regional elections? The Iraqi constitution says in article 114, 15, 16, it says that any of these areas can conclude that they want to be, not a governate, there's 18 of these things, but they can be essentially a state, like the state of California or the state of Massachusetts. They can write their own constitution. They can have their own laws relative what you teach your kids in school, like California versus Alabama. They can have their own laws, their own security force, their own cops, not a national police force sent out. That's why it's working. And the second reason why it's working is that, so far is, what else did they do? They did exactly what I've been calling for for two years. It's the mix of forces. You may remember, if you had to cover this, my saying it's the wrong mix of forces in Iraq. We need counterinsurgency forces. And what did they do? They brought them back from Afghanistan, unfortunately, instead of adding them. And what happened? The counterinsurgency forces are now the forces that, today and yesterday, the military says are having the most success. So, folks, they may not want to call it what I was talking about. But the end result is, there is a lot of autonomy in the Anbar province today. There is a lot of autonomy up in the Kurdish area today. And there is increasing autonomy in the Shia regions. But I've always proposed a central government. A central government that has a standing army, controls the currency, controls the banking system, controls the borders, controls the foreign policy. And so, you know, John says he wants to have every shred of Iranian influence eliminated from Iraq. And he supports Maliki. You notice, every time Ahmadinejad comes to Baghdad, Maliki kisses him on both cheeks. Literally, not figuratively. You notice, before agreed to begin to negotiate the Status of Forces Agreement, what did, what did Maliki think he had to do? He had to get on a plane to go to Tehran and talk about it with the Iranians. 'Cause look, folks. It's a geographic fact of life, they've got a long border and a 5,000-year history. So, it's about time we get real here and take a look at the possibilities now, if they continue along these lines, of something good happening. And the possibilities rest in two things. One, there's a genuine political accommodation. And so, you're going to have, as I said, elections in the provinces. Supposedly -- and by the way they're supposed to take place next month. I've been predicting they're not likely to take place next month. But maybe they will. If they will, do you think the people down in Basra are going to vote for a government in Basra any different than an all-Shia government in Basra? what do you think? Want to take any bets anyone? So, come on. It's time that we had people who understand, understand what's going on in Iraq, not just sloganeering. Not just sloganeering. And the irony is, the guy who supposedly has the least experience among us, Barack Obama, got it right 14, 15 months ago. He said, 'Look, let's transfer -- let's be as responsible getting out as irresponsibly we were getting in.' And then he said, 'We need a timeline here. And you're going to go ahead and hand off authority gradually to Iraqis, and what are you going to do? You're going to pull out American combat forces.' Where, if reports are correct, and my information is based on the State Department and others, what is Maliki demanding, and what is Bush agreeing to? A timeline to draw down American combat troops. A gradual hand-off of police authority and military authority to the Iraqis. Who's the only guy, major figure in America who's standing outside that agreement? John McCain. John. And the other point I made today, and it's an important point, since you poor devils have to cover me, you should be aware of it in my view: John, I've never heard John utter a word about what he's going to do, after, after -- quote he establishes victory in Iraq? What's he going to do about Syria? Turkey? Iran? Saudi Arabia? What's he going to do to have some reason to believe whatever is worked out, that Iraqi's neighbors are going to sign on to it? And tell me, how is it possible to have a long-term stable, stable Iraq, free and open without some regional understanding of Iraq's independence? Barack and I, and I have laid this out in painful detail for two years, as Barack has. That's why we've called for a regional conference. That's why we talked about the need to bring the permanent five of the United Nations in to give the imprimatur to this. To make it clear to Iran, Syria, Turkey, Saudi Arabia -- hands off. Hands off. Whatever deal the Iraqis work out, you've got to stand by. You need the weight of the world putting pressure on the region a little like we did in Bosnia. A little like what happened in Kosovo. Could that have happened if the Germans didn't buy into the deal? If the Greeks didn't buy into the deal? If the Italians didn't buy into the deal? If the Hungarians didn't buy into the deal? So, what I -- what confuses me, and it does confuse me about John McCain and Sarah Palin's position on Iraq is, tell me the end of the story, John. Victory sounds wonderful. We're all for victory. What do you mean by victory? And so, I just say, there's, you know, you can call -- and by the way, you recall when I put forward that plan, I said there's a half a dozen ways you can implement this plan. I don't have any -- It wasn't three areas, it doesn't have to be five, it can be two, it can be seven. But there's got to be a way where we finally, if you have peace -- 'Hey, I'm a Shia. I'm not going to kill your Sunni family. And you don't have to worry the Kurds are going to come and get you, because the Kurds are basically with you.' Everybody has to get to the point where they conclude there's more in it for them staying together than there is in it them going separately.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:27:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/112137/whyd-chicken-cross-road-escape#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.112137</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>112137</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lieberman: Obama Young, Untested, But Eloquent</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/111858/lieberman-obama-young-untested-but</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jDFfYI1C7XjeWYsEChbBEyPPJstQD92V4UA80</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Democratic vice presidential pick eight years ago, criticized his former party's nominee on Tuesday as an untested candidate. &quot;Sen. Barack Obama is a gifted and eloquent young man who can do great things for our country in the years ahead,&quot; Lieberman said. &quot;But my friends, eloquence is no substitute for a record -- not in these tough times for America.&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Playing his former party's spoiler, the Democrat-turned-Independent called McCain  not Democratic nominee Barack Obama  the best choice to lead the country forward in his prime-time address to the Republican National Convention.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:22:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cookfish</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/111858/lieberman-obama-young-untested-but#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.111858</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <wordzilla:id>111858</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
                                                                