<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:sitemap="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
  xmlns:wordzilla="http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/wordzilla/namespace">
  <channel>
    <title>Drudge Retort: MURPHY's blog</title>
    <link>http://www.drudge.com/user/MURPHY</link>
    <description>New links and comments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>Wordzilla/0.58</generator>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="self" href="http://www.drudge.com/feed/Discussion" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
    <item>
      <title>Romney Wins Maine</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153401/romney-wins-maine</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-02-11/romney-paul-maine-caucus/53050376/1</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Mitt Romney won narrowly in the Maine caucuses over Ron Paul Saturday, receiving 2,190 votes to Paul's 1,996. Rick Santorum received 989 votes and Newt Gingrich 349, but neither candidate campaigned in the state. Romney won at least 8 delegates and Paul took 7, with six more to be allocated. Romney leads the delegates race with 120, followed by Santorum at 72, Gingrich 32 and Paul 16.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:52:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153401/romney-wins-maine#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153401</guid>
      <category>news</category>
      <category>breaking,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153401</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama's Assault On Religious Freedom &#x26; Faith</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153397/obamas-assault-religious-freedom-faith</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.crosswalk.com/news/pastors-arrested-protest-nyc-ban-worship-schools.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>We hear every year about the assault on Christmas.  No more school Christmas plays, no more Christmas songs, no more &amp;#145;Merry Christmas'.  We are not allowed to mention God in public -- at high school football games, graduations, or before taking that Algebra test.  No God on the Air Force patch, attacks on the Boy Scouts, and remove crosses from everywhere.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>But those attacks are apparently small potatoes.  There is a disturbing pattern emerging under President Obama -- the assault on religious freedom and faith. 
In April 2008, Obama said this about Pennsylvanians and the loss of jobs, &quot;So it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;Obama stated at a press conference in Turkey in April 2009 that we Americans &quot;do not consider ourselves a Christian nation, or a Muslim nation, but rather, a nation of citizens who are, uh, bound by a set of values.&quot;  He dodged the National Prayer Breakfast until this year.  He proclaims that Jesus dictates that the governments should take care of everyone.  What Bible verse was he referring to?
&lt;p&gt;Obama has been to church maybe three times since becoming POTUS.  He does not seek any counsel from black clergy -- or any clergy for that matter.  Perhaps it is the Christian religion that he has such distaste.  After all, black liberation theology preaches that the Christian religion is the &amp;#145;white man's religion'.  
&lt;p&gt;The Affordable Health Care Act was not read by anyone until after it was passed.  Then HHS Kathleen Sebelius announced the edict to force all religious organizations to provide contraceptives including aborticides to their employees.  The country is looking at the face of the smiling tiger with Sebelius and Obama.  They were negotiating a compromise for months. Obama was even so gracious as to give the organizations a year to comply.  If the organizations did not comply they would face heavy fines.  Notre Dame would face a fine of 10 million dollars a year if they did not provide this to their employees.  Catholic Charities USA employs 70,000 employees.  If they refused to provide the insurance, their fine would be about 140 million per year.  There are thousands of religious charities in this country who do great work taking care of the sick and the poor.  They would all be affected.
&lt;p&gt;Then Obama forbade the reading of the Archbishop of Military Services' letter that was read to nearly every Catholic mass and other denominations across the country.  It appears reverse psychology does work despite veiled threats of sedition and assaults on freedom of speech.  The letter is linked here http://www.milarch.org/atf/cf/%7B1AF42501-01D5-4EF8-BA48-4450AC27EF98%7D/statementConscienceProtection26Jan12.pdf 
 
Mayor Bloomberg, the Mini Me Mr. Nanny State, is on a rampage against religion and faith as well.  He refused to allow any mention of any religion at the 10 Year Anniversary of 9/11 Ceremony.  No Faith, No Prayers, No Comfort was allowed for the families or for the country.
  
Bloomberg was completely on the side of Cordoba to build that mosque near Ground Zero.  But when it comes to any other faith, he wants to ban them in the city.  Bloomberg along with the NY Board of Education has a ban going into effect February 12th.  He is banning religious use of city schools on Sunday mornings when the schools are empty.  Why you might ask?  Well it seems that the Board of Education officials believe it will protect the minds of &quot;impressionable youth.&quot;  Bloomberg has been arresting pastors, preachers, reverends, and parishioners by the bus load.  If the ban prevails, more than 150 congregations will have to move to other meeting space.  Despite the fact that there will be millions of dollars lost to the schools from those congregations for lost rents.  (See link)
&lt;p&gt;And now this Pandora's Box has been opened by Obama to force religious organizations to pay for employees' birth control and aborticides.  This issue is not going away.  He may say he's going to force the insurance companies to provide free contraception.  But that is just a lie -- another broken promise on the horizon.  If it were not so serious, it would be amusing that Obama would issue one edict against religious organizations, of which he has no power under the constitution to do so.  Then he issues another edict against the insurance companies to provide something for free.  Again, Obama has no authority in the first or second place.
&lt;p&gt;So what is going on here?  Obama is so wrapped up with the ideology of himself and getting re-elected, he is missing everything else.  These statists have to destroy religion, the churches, marginalize them, and force them to do things against their conscience or face a fine that will close their doors.  And that is the end game for people like Obama, Sebelius, and Bloomberg, take it all down, shut it all down.  Hostility seems to be the attitude towards faith.  The left ideologues want to first destroy the family then the churches.  Then there will not be anyone or anything left to rely upon except the government.
Regarding this issue, it is easy to agree with Mark Levin that the &amp;#145;nature of man is liberty and the nature of government is tyranny'.  Obama is the picture of tyranny.  But people say, &quot;He is so well-intentioned&quot;.   Well, history is chock full of tragic narratives depicting ruined societies that were destroyed by well-intentioned people.
&lt;p&gt;The only silver lining about opening Pandora's Box after releasing all the evils of the world was that &amp;#145;Hope' was at the bottom.  Obama has such a tin ear, tone deaf really, and purposely ignorant.  People will not vote for his &amp;#145;vision' of the country.  We have to all &amp;#145;Hope' Obama is not re-elected.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:28:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153397/obamas-assault-religious-freedom-faith#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153397</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153397</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribe Sues Brewers for Selling It Beer</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153344/tribe-sues-brewers-selling-beer</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.argusleader.com/article/20120210/NEWS/302100002/Tribe-sues-brewers-alcohol-woes</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>An American Indian tribe sued several large beer makers Thursday, claiming they knowingly contributed to alcohol-related problems on South Dakota's Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. The Oglala Sioux Tribe demands $500 million in damages for the cost of health care, social services and child rehabilitation caused by chronic alcoholism on the reservation. The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court of Nebraska also targets four beer stores in Whiteclay, Nebr.,ska town of a dozen residents that sold nearly 5 million cans of beer in 2010.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>&quot;You cannot sell 4.9 million 12-ounce cans of beer and wash your hands like Pontius Pilate, and say we've got nothing to do with it being smuggled,&quot; said Tom White, the tribe's attorney.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:33:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153344/tribe-sues-brewers-selling-beer#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153344</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153344</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Library Patron Watches Porn Around Kids</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153312/library-patron-watches-porn-around-kids</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Seattle-library-lets-man-watch-porn-despite-2873692.php</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>A Seattle librarian refused to force a man watching hardcore porn on one of its computer to move to a more discreet location, even after a woman with two children complained, reports the &lt;i&gt;Seattle Post-Intelligencer&lt;/i&gt;. The Lake City librarian said the library &quot;doesn't censor content&quot; and could not &quot;be in the business of monitoring what their patrons are doing at any given computer.&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/249516/seattle_library_lets_man_watch_porn_in_view_of_children.html#tk.hp_new&quot;&gt;PC World&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;The Seattle Public Library is upholding its decision to not censor anything (except, as the &lt;i&gt;Seattle Post-Intelligencer&lt;/i&gt; points out, sleeping, eating, not wearing shoes, and talking loudly). And the discussion over there is pretty intense. What do you think? Porn in public libraries, or should you keep that within the privacy of your own home?&quot;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:55:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153312/library-patron-watches-porn-around-kids#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153312</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153312</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Napolitano: Obamacare's Unconstitutional Coercion</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153330/napolitano-obamacares-unconstitutional</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/obamacares-unconstitutional-coercion/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>When we were colonists and fought a war against the king and Parliament so that we could secede from the British Empire and be independent of it, we also fought for the value of personal freedom. That is the idea that in matters of personal choice, the government should play no role. The king only cared about the colonists' personal choices if he could control or tax them. &lt;p&gt;One of the taxes he imposed was to support the Church of England. The Church of England that the colonists' tax dollars supported was, of course, in England; it was not here. So, among the hateful taxes that impelled the colonists to revolt was this tax to support the king's church.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>But that resistance reached unconstitutional proportions a few weeks ago when Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, herself a Catholic, issued regulations that require all employers in America to provide health insurance that makes contraceptive materials and devices available to their employees. The &quot;all employers&quot; includes Catholic universities, Catholic hospitals, Catholic schools and even local Catholic churches. The failure to comply with this law will result in a fine to these institutions and the provision of contraceptive coverage to their employees by the government itself.
 
This is quite literally Congress making a law that interferes with the free exercise of religion. This is not about the morality of contraception. This is about the constitutionality of government coercion, coercion of religious institutions, coercion directly and profoundly prohibited by the Constitution itself. The motivation for the coercion &amp;#150; that Catholics have too many babies &amp;#150; is reprehensible, and those in government who embrace that and are willing to use the power of government to resist that should be voted out of office. But the coercion is the same as that faced by the folks who seceded from England because of the king's tax to pay for his church.
 
We have a king today, and he wants a tax to pay for his church. The king is the president, and his church is called Obamacare. We can't let this happen here. This is not just a Catholic issue. This is an issue about whether the Constitution means what it says. Does the Constitution let the government compel Jews to eat pork, or Protestants to genuflect, or Muslims to own dogs, or Catholics to pay for contraception? The answer is obvious.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:56:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153330/napolitano-obamacares-unconstitutional#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153330</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153330</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Josh Powell Explodes House After Hatchet His 2 Sons-Evil</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153301/josh-powell-explodes-house-after-hatchet-his</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/07/district-attorney-missing-utah-mom-is-most-likely-dead/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Authorities released 911 calls that revealed a social worker's frantic attempts to alert authorities that Josh Powell had locked himself in his home with his two young sons, moments before he set off a huge fire that killed all inside. Before the fire erupted, the woman, who was supposed to monitor a supervised visit between Powell and his children, said he grabbed them and wouldn't let her in the door.  Newly-released 911 calls reveal how social worker Elizabeth Griffin-Hall told authorities that the man refused to allow her into the home and that she was &quot;afraid for their lives.&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Autopsy: Boys killed in fire suffered hatchet wounds
 
Josh Powell reportedly apologized in voicemail to family before chopping sons' necks, setting blaze.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;What should I do?&quot; she asks the dispatcher. &quot;Nothing like this has ever happened before at these visitations. ... I could hear one of the kids crying, and he still wouldn't let me in.&quot;
 
When a dispatcher told her that authorities had to respond to life-threatening situations first,  she replied, &quot;This could be life threatening!&quot;
 
During the second call Griffin-Hall screamed, &quot;He exploded the house. He exploded the house.&quot;
 
&quot;People are saying there is not somebody here, but there's a couple of boys, five and seven, he has supervised visitation and he blew up the house and the kids,&quot; she said.
 
Also Tuesday, police searched a storage unit Powell rented as they tried to determine why he ultimately committed the murder-suicide, and questions remained about the status of the investigation into his wife's 2009 Utah disappearance.
 
For at least six months, Utah authorities have investigated the disappearance of Susan Powell as a murder case. But without a body, they publicly held out hope that she would be found alive.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:39:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153301/josh-powell-explodes-house-after-hatchet-his#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153301</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153301</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Santorum Wins 3 States</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153269/santorum-wins-3-states</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/07/politics/gop-tuesday-contests/index.html?hpt=hp_c1</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Rick Santorum won the caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado and a non-binding primary in Missouri Tuesday night, breaking Mitt Romney's streak of victories in nominating contests with a surprising three-state sweep. Colorado was the most competitive state of the day, with Santorum winning 40 percent of the vote to 35 percent for Romney, 13 percent for Newt Gingrich and 12 percent for Ron Paul.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:51:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153269/santorum-wins-3-states#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153269</guid>
      <category>news</category>
      <category>breaking,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153269</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Romney Wins Nevada</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153172/romney-wins-nevada</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/04/10319217-romney-wins-nevada-caucus-solidifying-momentum</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>With the closing of the final votes in the Nevada caucuses at 7 p.m. Pacific, NBC News has called Mitt Romney the winner by a significant margin. Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul are battling for second place and Rick Santorum is bringing up the rear. TalkingPointsMemo has the &lt;a href=&quot;http://core.talkingpointsmemo.com/election/results/nevada-caucuses-r&quot;&gt;current results&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:14:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153172/romney-wins-nevada#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153172</guid>
      <category>news</category>
      <category>breaking,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153172</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pelosi: Girl Scouts And Planned Parenthood &#145;Very Valuable'</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153098/pelosi-girl-scouts-and-planned-parenthood</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-girl-scouts-relationship-planned-parenthood-very-valuable</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Planned Parenthood's relationship with the Girl Scouts of America is &quot;very valuable,&quot; Wednesday, at a congressional reception to commemorate the 100 year anniversary of the organization for young girls.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>After the event CNSNews.com asked Pelosi: &quot;The Girl Scouts has had some ties to Planned Parenthood, do you think that's a valuable relationship to have working together?&quot;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Girl Scouts have relationships with many organizations,&quot; Rep. Pelosi replied.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;And, yes, I think they are all very valuable.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;The Girl Scouts have been linked to the nation's largest abortion provider in the past.  In 2010, a panel sponsored by the Girl Scouts USA at the United Nations Commission featured a Planned Parenthood pamphlet called &quot;Healthy, Happy and Hot,&quot; according to published reports.
&lt;p&gt;A portion of the pamphlet read: &quot;Many people think sex is just about vaginal or anal intercourse. But there are lots of different ways to have sex and lots of different types of sex. Sex can include kissing, touching, licking, tickling, sucking and cuddling. Some people like to have aggressive sex, while others like to have soft sex and slow sex with their partners. There is no right or wrong way to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!&quot;
&lt;p&gt;A similar pamphlet was distributed at a Waco, Texas Girl Scouts organization in 2008 that included information on masturbation, diagrams of adults having sex and a boy putting on a condom.
&lt;p&gt;That year then-CEO of the Girl Scouts Kathy Cloninger told NBC's &quot;Today&quot; show, &quot;We have relationships with our church communities, with YWCA's, and with Planned Parenthood organizations across the country, to bring information-based sex education programs to girls.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;A Girl Scout conference was also co-sponsored by Planned Parenthood in 2004.
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:55:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153098/pelosi-girl-scouts-and-planned-parenthood#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153098</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153098</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sources: Trump To Endorse Newt</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/153073/sources-trump-endorse-newt</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/02/trump-to-endorse-newt-113227.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Word started leaking out in Las Vegas earlier that Donald Trump's &quot;major announcement&quot; is to back Newt Gingrich, and sources are confirming it to POLITICO.&lt;p&gt;The announcement is expected to come at an 11:30 a.m. press conference tomorrow that The Donald is holding.&lt;p&gt;The move is a bit unexpected, since Trump had talked even within the last few days about how he may be compelled to run a third-party campaign of his own if he didn't see a Republican candidate who he thought could beat President Obama.&lt;p&gt;Gingrich is the longer-shot choice in a field in which Mitt Romney has re-established himself as the frontrunner after a commanding win in Florida.&lt;p&gt;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Trump was courted repeatedly by several of the GOP hopefuls. Gingrich, when he was soaring in his first rise before the Iowa caucuses, made a trek to Trump's Fifth Avenue office in Manhattan to ask for his support.
&lt;p&gt;Instead of an endorsement, they emerged with Gingrich saying he'd gotten Trump to agree to an &quot;Apprenticeship&quot; (get it?) program in poorer New York City schools.
&lt;p&gt;The endorsement gives Gingrich a needed dose of free media from the person who became the first to channel, in the GOP field, the desire by the grassroots to find a nominee who could take the fight to President Obama.
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:20:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/153073/sources-trump-endorse-newt#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.153073</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>153073</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NLRB May Force Companies To Breach More PrivacyTo Unions?</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/152911/nlrb-may-force-companies-breach-more</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/01/26/nlrb-chair-wants-to-force-companies-to-turn-over-employee-telephone-numbers-e-mail-addresses/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Union-backed NLRB Chairman: &quot;We keep our eye on the prize.&quot; Undaunted by the constitutionally-questionable appointment of three members to Barack Obama's National Labor Relations Board, union attorney and current NLRB chairman Mark Pearce declared in an Associated Press interview that he and his union comrades are continuing their assault on the 93% of private-sector employees who are union-free.&lt;p&gt;In fact, if Obama's union appointees have their way, all employees who are targeted for unionization will have their employers forced to turn over their home telephone number and e-mail addresses to unions.&lt;p&gt;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Ever since the 1960s, when unions have targeted companies for unionization through a NLRB-supervised election, employers have been required to turn over the list of employee names and their home addresses. The NLRB, in turn, promptly gives the list of employee names and home addresses to the involved union(s).
&lt;p&gt;This list, called an Excelsior List, gives union organizers the ability to conduct intrusive home visits prior to the NLRB election. As is often said, just as when any other salesperson doing door-to-door sales knocks at the door, targeted employees can invite the union organizers into their homes, or they can sic the chihuahua on them.
&lt;p&gt;The requirement to furnish the employees' names and addresses list is mandatory. In fact, the refusal by an employer to furnish the list (or providing a list with too many errors) would typically result in the NLRB's automatic overturning of an election if a union were to lose. Again, this requirement has been the standard since the 1960s.
&lt;p&gt;Now, however, the union appointees within the Obama NLRB want to expand the current Excelsior List requirement from the mere furnishing of names and addresses to also include furnishing employees' home telephone numbers and their e-mail addresses to enable unions to perpetually propagandize employees.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:31:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/152911/nlrb-may-force-companies-breach-more#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.152911</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>152911</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elliott Abrams Caught Misleading On Newt</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/152899/elliott-abrams-caught-misleading-newt</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://spectator.org/blog/2012/01/27/elliott-abrams-caught-misleadi#commentcontainer</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>As Ronald Reagan used to say: Well...&lt;p&gt;Yesterday we took note of former Reagan State Department official Elliott Abrams' piece over at NRO that went after Newt Gingrich on his relationship with Reagan. While voting regularly with Reagan as a young congressman from Georgia, Gingrich, claimed Abrams, &quot;often spewed insulting rhetoric at Reagan, his top aides and his policies to defeat Communism.&quot; Abrams then goes on to cite &quot; a famous floor statement Gingrich made on March 21, 1986.&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Or sort of cites it. 
&lt;p&gt;In fact, I'm sorry to say, what appears to be going on here is that Elliott Abrams, a considerably admirable public servant and a very smart guy, has been swept up in the GOP Establishment's Romney frothings over the rise of Newt Gingrich in the Republican primaries. He is even being accused of trolling for a job in a Romney administration. No way!!!! Really????....
&lt;p&gt;Due to the diligence of one Chris Scheve of a group called Aqua Terra Strategies in Washington, Mr. Abrams has been caught red-handed in lending himself to this attempted Romney hit job.
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Scheve, you see, is himself a former foreign policy aide to none other than Speaker Newt Gingrich in his days as Speaker. While now out on his own and not working for Gingrich, Scheve is considerably conversant with the Gingrich foreign policy record.
&lt;p&gt;Uh-oh.
&lt;p&gt;That's right. Mr. Scheve, incensed at what he felt was a deliberate misrepresentation of his old boss by Abrams and the Romney forces, specifically of Gingrich's long ago March 21, 1986 &quot;Special Order&quot; speech on the floor of the House, and aware &quot;that most of [Abrams'] comments had to have been selectively taken from the special order&quot; -- Scheve started digging. Since the Congressional Record for 1986 was difficult to obtain electronically, Scheve trekked to the George Mason Library to physically track down the March 21, 1986 edition of the Congressional Record. Locating it, copying and scanning, he was kind enough to send to me.
&lt;p&gt;So now I've read the Gingrich speech that is the source of all the hoopla. All seven, fine print pages worth of it exactly as it appeared in its original form.
&lt;p&gt;Due to the diligence of one Chris Scheve of a group called Aqua Terra Strategies in Washington, Mr. Abrams has been caught red-handed in lending himself to this attempted Romney hit job.
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Scheve, you see, is himself a former foreign policy aide to none other than Speaker Newt Gingrich in his days as Speaker. While now out on his own and not working for Gingrich, Scheve is considerably conversant with the Gingrich foreign policy record.
&lt;p&gt;Uh-oh.
&lt;p&gt;That's right. Mr. Scheve, incensed at what he felt was a deliberate misrepresentation of his old boss by Abrams and the Romney forces, specifically of Gingrich's long ago March 21, 1986 &quot;Special Order&quot; speech on the floor of the House, and aware &quot;that most of [Abrams'] comments had to have been selectively taken from the special order&quot; -- Scheve started digging. Since the Congressional Record for 1986 was difficult to obtain electronically, Scheve trekked to the George Mason Library to physically track down the March 21, 1986 edition of the Congressional Record. Locating it, copying and scanning, he was kind enough to send to me.
&lt;p&gt;So now I've read the Gingrich speech that is the source of all the hoopla. All seven, fine print pages worth of it exactly as it appeared in its original form.
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:08:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/152899/elliott-abrams-caught-misleading-newt#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.152899</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>152899</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reagan's Young Lieutenant--Gingrich</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/152816/reagans-young-lieutenant-gingrich</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://spectator.org/archives/2012/01/24/reagans-young-lieutenant/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Mitt Romney has raised the issue of Newt Gingrich's &quot;work product.&quot;  Wow.&lt;p&gt;Intended to prod the former Speaker on the issue of his work for Freddie Mac (Gingrich last night released his contract with Freddie), the question, as seems to be a Romney characteristic, has clumsily backfired. It raises an all-too obvious question that is becoming increasingly revealing.  What is Mitt Romney's &quot;work product&quot; for the conservative cause?&lt;p&gt;The closest Mitt Romney ever got to the Reagan Revolution is apparently because he reads about it 30 years later. And he isn't even reading everything he should. This is the man, remember, who proudly professed when running against Ted Kennedy in 1994:&lt;p&gt;&quot;I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Why? Why is Romney going after Gingrich on his supposed lack of Reagan ties?
&lt;p&gt;Because the former Governor apparently looked into the &quot;G&quot; section of the Reagan Diaries and found the then backbench congressman's name but once.
&lt;p&gt;The ignorance this shows about what was actually happening inside the Reagan Revolution -- not to mention the positive change Ronald Reagan and his lieutenants like Newt Gingrich were bringing to Washington and America -- is almost painful to watch. Romney flounders, giving the impression that he is learning conservatism as others learn painting by numbers. A splotch of free market economics here at Number 1, a dab of social issues over there at Number 2&amp;#133; or not&amp;#133;or, well, maybe&amp;#133; or&amp;#133; yes, kinda sort of maybe&amp;#133; ending with bright bold colorful strokes of national security war paint at Number 3.  And voila. Conservatism by Romney.
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:10:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/152816/reagans-young-lieutenant-gingrich#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.152816</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>152816</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gingrich Reveals Freddie Mac Contract</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/152739/gingrich-reveals-freddie-mac-contract</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/campaigns/company-that-gingrich-founded-to-release-freddie-mac-contracts-and-details/2012/01/23/gIQAQqP1LQ_story.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Newt Gingrich released the contract Monday in which the housing government-sponsored enterprise Freddie Mac paid his consulting firm a $25,000 monthly retainer fee in 2006 ($300,000 a year). The &quot;consulting and related services&quot; agreement makes no mention of lobbying. Though Gingrich once said he was paid by the enterprise to be a historian, Mitt Romney criticized that description during Tuesday's GOP debate in Tampa. &quot;This contract proves you were not a historian. You were a consultant,&quot; Romney said. &quot;And you were hired by the chief lobbyist of Freddie Mac.&quot;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:33:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/152739/gingrich-reveals-freddie-mac-contract#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.152739</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>152739</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ex-Wife: Newt Wanted Open Marriage</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/152566/ex-wife-newt-wanted-open-marriage</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/exclusive-gingrich-lacks-moral-character-president-wife/story?id=15392899#.TxhB8m-PlW1</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Newt Gingrich lacks the moral character to serve as president, his second ex-wife Marianne Gingrich told ABC News in an interview that will air Thursday night on &lt;i&gt;Nightline&lt;/i&gt;. In her first TV interview since the couple's 1999 divorce, Marianne Gingrich said that when Newt admitted he was having a six-year affair with his Congressional aide (and current wife) Callista, he asked if he could continue the arrangement. &quot;He wanted an open marriage and I refused,&quot; she said. &quot;I just stared at him and he said, 'Callista doesn't care what I do.'&quot;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:55:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MURPHY</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/152566/ex-wife-newt-wanted-open-marriage#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.152566</guid>
      <category>news</category>
      <category>breaking,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>152566</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

