<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:sitemap="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
  xmlns:wordzilla="http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/wordzilla/namespace">
  <channel>
    <title>Drudge Retort: Doc_Sarvis's blog</title>
    <link>http://www.drudge.com/user/Doc_Sarvis</link>
    <description>New links and comments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>Wordzilla/0.58</generator>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="self" href="http://www.drudge.com/feed/Discussion" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
    <item>
      <title>GOP Congressman: It's Reagan's Fault Obama Was Reelected</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168699/gop-congressman-its-reagans-fault-obama</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/23/steve-king-ronald-reagan_n_3329484.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) took a stroll down memory lane on Thursday, pointing a finger at a former president for helping Barack Obama get elected.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Definitely worth watching the video to see how his boob goes about connecting the dots.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:01:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168699/gop-congressman-its-reagans-fault-obama#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168699</guid>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168699</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Restaurant's Extreme Burger Moved to Regular Menu</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168692/restaurants-extreme-burger-moved-regular</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://pandithnews.com/2013/05/24/restaurants-extreme-burger-challenge-moved-down-to-regular-menu/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>COLUMBUS, OH - According to staff at Dusty's Kitchen, the local restaurant's extreme burger challenge, formerly described as &quot;an insurmountable mountain of beef and cheese,&quot; has recently been moved down to the regular dinner menu. &lt;p&gt;&quot;When we first started selling the Colossus Burger, we didn't actually think more than a handful of people would attempt to finish it, but now it's our most popular item,&quot; said Dusty's shift manager Rachel Ferguson, referring to the 10-pound tower of hamburger patties, bacon, onion rings, and three kinds of cheese, which also comes with five pounds of french fries and which is reportedly now referred to on the menu simply as &quot;The Classic.&quot;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:45:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doc_sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168692/restaurants-extreme-burger-moved-regular#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168692</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168692</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End of Perpetual War</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168691/end-perpetual-war</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/opinion/obama-vows-to-end-of-the-perpetual-war.html?ref=global-home&#x26;_r=0</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>President Obama's speech on Thursday was the most important statement on counterterrorism policy since the 2001 attacks, a momentous turning point in post-9/11 America. For the first time, a president stated clearly and unequivocally that the state of perpetual warfare that began nearly 12 years ago is unsustainable for a democracy and must come to an end in the not-too-distant future.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>&quot;Our systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations must continue,&quot; Mr. Obama said in the speech at the National Defense University. &quot;But this war, like all wars, must end. That's what history advises. It's what our democracy demands.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;As frustratingly late as it was -- much of what Mr. Obama said should have been said years ago -- there is no underestimating the importance of that statement....
&lt;p&gt;While there are some, particularly the more hawkish Congressional Republicans, who say this war should essentially last forever, Mr. Obama told the world that the United States must return to a state in which counterterrorism is handled, as it always was before 2001, primarily by law enforcement and the intelligence agencies....
&lt;p&gt; Mr. Obama said the Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed after Sept. 11, 2001, must be replaced to avoid keeping &quot;America on a perpetual wartime footing.&quot; He added: &quot;Unless we discipline our thinking and our actions, we may be drawn into more wars we don't need to fight, or continue to grant presidents unbound powers more suited for traditional armed conflicts between nation states.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;He did not say what should replace that law, but he vowed: &quot;I will not sign laws designed to expand this mandate further.&quot; Mr. Obama's speech covered the range of national security, counterterrorism and civil liberties issues facing the United States since 2001. 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:45:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168691/end-perpetual-war#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168691</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168691</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blacks, Conservatives, and Plantations</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168662/blacks-conservatives-and-plantations</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/opinion/blow-blacks-conservatives-and-plantations.html?hp&#x26;_r=0</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Why do Republicans keep endorsing the most extreme and hyperbolic African-American voices -- those intent on comparing blacks who support the Democratic candidates to slaves? That idea, which only a black person could invoke without being castigated for the flagrant racial overtones, is a trope to which an increasingly homogeneous Republican Party seems to subscribe.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>The Democrat Plantation theology goes something like this: Democrats use the government to addict and incapacitate blacks by giving them free things -- welfare, food stamps and the like. This renders blacks dependent on and beholden to that government and the Democratic Party.
&lt;p&gt;This is not completely dissimilar from Mitt Romney's &quot;47 percent&quot; comments, although he never mentioned race....
&lt;p&gt; Unfortunately, the runaway slave image among many black Republican politicians is becoming ingrained and conservative audiences are applauding them for it.
&lt;p&gt;Herman Cain, for example, built an entire presidential campaign on slave imagery.... 
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:28:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168662/blacks-conservatives-and-plantations#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168662</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168662</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OK GOPer Sen: OK Tornado Aid "Different" from Sandy Aid</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168620/ok-goper-sen-ok-tornado-aid-different</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/21/inhofe-oklahoma-tornado-aid_n_3312972.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe (R) said on Tuesday that federal aid to tornado-ravaged parts of his home state will be &quot;totally different&quot; than a Hurricane Sandy aid bill he voted against late last year.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Inhofe said the Sandy Relief bill &quot;was supposed to be in New Jersey,&quot; but &quot;they were getting things &amp;#133; in the Virgin Islands, fixing roads there, and putting roofs on houses in Washington, D.C.&quot; Both Inhofe and Coburn voted to slash aid to victims of Hurricane Sandy, with Inhofe saying he considered the full proposed aid amount to be a &quot;slush fund.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;While Northeastern states like New Jersey and New York suffered some of the worst damage from Hurricane Sandy, the storm affected 24 U.S. states in total during October of 2012. Sandy carved a destructive path from the Caribbean Sea to the Great Lakes, where it produced 25-foot waves in Lake Huron.
&lt;p&gt;Hurricane Sandy is believed to have cost more than $50 billion, making it the second-costliest storm in U.S. history.
&lt;p&gt;While it's too early to estimate what the damage from the Oklahoma tornadoes might cost, in 1999 the state requested and received more than $67 million after a series of tornadoes.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:26:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168620/ok-goper-sen-ok-tornado-aid-different#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168620</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168620</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oklahoma Senators Opposed Disaster Aid</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168585/oklahoma-senators-opposed-disaster-aid</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/oklahoma-senators-disaster-relief_n_3309234.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>As frantic rescue missions continued in Oklahoma following the catastrophic tornadoes that ripped through the state, residents who lost homes and businesses will likely turn to the federal government for emergency disaster aid. The state's senators, Republicans Jim Inhofe and Tom Coburn, are fiscal hawks who have repeatedly voted against funding disaster aid for other parts of the country. They also have opposed increased funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which administers federal disaster relief. Last year, Inhofe and Coburn both backed a plan to slash disaster relief to victims of Hurricane Sandy.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>&lt;iframe width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;315&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/embed/3ThmqurmTkA&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:55:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doc_sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168585/oklahoma-senators-opposed-disaster-aid#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168585</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168585</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VA GOP AG Guy: Intro'd Bill - Report Miscarriages to Cops</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168579/va-gop-ag-guy-introd-bill-report</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/05/20/2035411/virginia-gop-nominee-for-attorney-general-would-force-women-to-report-their-miscarriages-to-police/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>If a woman in Virginia has a miscarriage without a doctor present, they must report it within 24 hours to the police or risk going to jail for a full year. At least, that's what would have happened if a bill introduced in 2009 by Virginia state Sen. Mark Obenshain (R) -- currently the GOP's nominee for the state's Attorney General -- had become law.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:14:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doc_sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168579/va-gop-ag-guy-introd-bill-report#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168579</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168579</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama Should Come Clean About Basilisk Project</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168489/obama-should-come-clean-basilisk</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.theonion.com/articles/the-onion-urges-barack-obama-to-come-clean-about-t,32466/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>For months now, the Obama administration has chosen to maintain silence on the Basilisk Project, evidently relying on the complacency of the nation's so-called journalistic authorities to allow its machinations to remain out of both sight and mind.&lt;p&gt;The time has come for President Obama to explain the nature and purpose of the Basilisk Project, and to do so fully and without delay.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>You cannot hide the location of the freighters forever, Mr. President. You cannot continue to ignore the actions of the Belarusian consulate or fail to explain the nature of your relationship. Perhaps most importantly, you cannot pretend the gated compound outside Lynchburg, VA simply does not exist. We have confronted you on these and other matters in recent days, Mr. President. Your response? Not a word.
&lt;p&gt;And so the web does tangle....
&lt;p&gt;What is the addendum to the Klim Report? And who authored it?
&lt;p&gt;Who recorded the minutes during the infamous Vitebsk meeting?
&lt;p&gt;What, damn you, is the status of Onion reporter Tomas Kovacs, with whom our Minsk bureau abruptly lost contact last month?
&lt;p&gt;How do you account for the Treasury Department's response?
&lt;p&gt;Will you fire Chairperson of the Council of Economic Advisers Alan Krueger?
. . .
From what we know, the nature of the Basilisk Project is such that its uncovering is of vital importance to the immediate health and livelihoods of at least 287 Americans. Does the president believe that the lives of these 287 souls are expendable? That they can be swept under the rug, like so much shattered china? Is human life itself so worthless to you, Mr. President?</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:17:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168489/obama-should-come-clean-basilisk#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168489</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168489</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Powers: GOP Wanted Leakers Prosecuted</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168457/powers-gop-wanted-leakers-prosecuted</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/17/memo-to-gop-don-t-pretend-you-care.html</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Kirsten Powers: [P]rior to their newfound concern for a free press, the GOP was just last year attacking President Obama for an imagined lack of zeal in pursuing leaks.  John McCain even wanted a special counsel outside the Justice Department appointed to investigate national-security leaks about Obama's &quot;kill list,&quot; a story about which ended up in The New York Times. The &quot;kill list&quot; strangely wasn't the problem for the GOP. The leaks were.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>At a 2012 hearing in which the GOP tried to ascertain whether it could prosecute reporters, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) suggested that the U.S. attorneys subpoena journalists and demand they reveal sources that provided classified information. ...
&lt;p&gt;When the &lt;i&gt;Washington Post's&lt;/i&gt; Dana Priest revealed in 2005 that the Bush administration had secret prisons, conservatives went nuts. ...
&lt;p&gt;In a column in the &lt;i&gt;Washington Times&lt;/i&gt;, Jeffrey T. Kuhner suggested that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be assassinated because he &quot;undermines the war on terror.&quot;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:33:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doc_sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168457/powers-gop-wanted-leakers-prosecuted#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168457</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168457</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Former Justice Stevens: Bush v. Gore "Unacceptable"</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168460/former-justice-stevens-bush-v-gore</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stevens_rationale_for_bush_v_gore_was_unacceptable/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens said Thursday night that he's come to the realization that the rationale behind the court's Bush v. Gore decision that effectively decided the 2000 presidential election &quot;was really quite unacceptable&quot; because it differentiated between so-called &quot;hanging chads&quot; and &quot;dimpled chads.&quot; That distinction, he told a gala event for the liberal watchdog group Public Citizen in Washington, &quot;violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.&quot; All votes should have been considered the same way, he explained.&lt;p&gt;Former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor recently expressed regret that the court had taken up the case at all, and Stevens said he was &quot;pleased to hear&quot; about O'Connor's shift. The liberal Stevens wrote the dissent in that case.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:00:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168460/former-justice-stevens-bush-v-gore#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168460</guid>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168460</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Friedersdorf: The Ethics of Extreme Porn</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168459/friedersdorf-ethics-extreme-porn</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/05/the-ethics-of-extreme-porn-is-some-sex-wrong-even-among-consenting-adults/275898/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Is some sex wrong, even among consenting adults?</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Friedersdorf offers this (real) scenario, based on an essasay by Emily Witt, &quot;What Do You Desire?&quot;:
&lt;p&gt;The primary participants....grapple, at least in part, with what our response ought to be to the explicit acts described. Put bluntly, a group of San Franciscans crowded into a basement to watch and participate as a diminutive female porn actress (who consented very specifically to all that followed) is bound with rope, gagged, slapped, mildly electrocuted, and sexually penetrated in most every way. The tenor and intensity of the event can't be conveyed without reading the full rendering. The object of all that abuse describes it afterward as physically uncomfortable at times, but intensely pleasurable throughout. She departs extremely happy and eager to do it again.
&lt;p&gt;Was the consent of all participants sufficient to make the porn shoot a morally defensible enterprise?</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 07:36:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168459/friedersdorf-ethics-extreme-porn#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168459</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168459</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rich: GOP Whitewash</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168421/rich-gop-whitewash</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/republicans-civil-rights-2013-5/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>The party on the brink of destroying the Voting Rights Act reminds us that Republicans were really the great civil-rights leaders all along.[&lt;i&gt;Hoo-Haw!&lt;/i&gt;]</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>....[M]ore representative of the larger Republican effort to neutralize its racial history in the civil-rights era was another passage in [Rand] Paul's [nearly sub-moronic Howard University] speech. 
&lt;p&gt;&quot;How did the Republican Party, the party of the Great Emancipator, lose the trust and faith of an entire race?&quot; he asked rhetorically. &quot;From the Civil War to the civil-rights movement, for a century, most black Americans voted Republican. How did we lose that vote?&quot; After a meandering account of the party's glorious record on black emancipation in the post&amp;#150;Civil War era, Paul arrived at the Great Depression and this answer: &quot;The Democrats promised equalizing outcomes through unlimited federal assistance while Republicans offered something that seemed less tangible -- the promise of equalizing opportunity through free markets.&quot; 
&lt;p&gt;In other words, African-Americans of the thirties were deadbeats bought off by FDR's New Deal, much as those of the sixties (in the right's eyes) were bought off by LBJ's Great Society entitlements and those of the present day (along with the rest of America's downtrodden &quot;47 percent&quot;) were seduced by Democrats brandishing still more of what Romney called &quot;free stuff&quot; and &quot;gifts,&quot; starting with Obamacare. In this telling, the GOP's growing opposition to civil-rights laws in the past half-century (Rand's opposition included) is blameless for black defections; the party was just too high-minded, too egalitarian, too devoted to freedom to compete with Democratic bribery. 
&lt;p&gt;This kind of historical fantasia -- and worse -- has become more brazen than ever since Obama arrived on the scene. 
&lt;p&gt;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 07:50:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168421/rich-gop-whitewash#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168421</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168421</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walsh: Meet the Group IRS Actually Denied...Democrats</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168418/walsh-meet-group-irs-actually</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Although Tea Party applicants got unfair IRS scrutiny, only one known group had status revoked. They're Democrats.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>Everyone agrees that the IRS shouldn't have targeted groups with &quot;Tea Party&quot; or &quot;Patriot&quot; in their names for special scrutiny in awarding tax-exempt status....But so far no one has identified a single conservative group that was denied status in the controversial review, though some faced bureaucratic hurdles and had their tax-exempt status delayed.
&lt;p&gt;In fact, the only known 501(c)(4) applicant to have its status denied happens to be a &lt;i&gt;progressive&lt;/i&gt; group: the Maine chapter of Emerge America, which trains Democratic women to run for office. Although the group did no electoral work, and didn't participate in independent expenditure campaign activity either, its partisan status apparently disqualified it from being categorized as working for the &quot;common good.&quot;</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 07:28:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doc_sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168418/walsh-meet-group-irs-actually#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168418</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168418</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cheney Accuses WH of Lying...Cheney?!?!</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168381/cheney-accuses-wh-lyingcheney</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/05/benghazi-lies-dick-cheney-iraq</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Dick Cheney has never been short on chutzpah. Jumping aboard the GOP scandal-mongering machine, the former vice president appeared on Fox News (where else?) and declared to Sean Hannity (who else?) that President Barack Obama and his aides &quot;lied&quot; about the attack in Benghazi last September that left four Americans dead. &quot;I think it's one of the worst incidents frankly that I can recall in my career,&quot; Cheney huffed -- as if 9/11 had never happened. &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Cheney&lt;/i&gt; accused someone of lying?&lt;p&gt;Not just &quot;wow&quot; but &quot;bow-wow.&quot;</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>&quot;Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.&quot; 
Dick Cheney
August 26, 2002</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 08:15:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doc_sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168381/cheney-accuses-wh-lyingcheney#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168381</guid>
      <category>discussion,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168381</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernstein: Want a Scandal? Here's One</title>
      <link>http://www.drudge.com/news/168332/bernstein-want-scandal-heres-one</link>
      <wordzilla:destination>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/05/13/you-want-a-scandal-heres-a-scandal/</wordzilla:destination>
      <description>Jonathan Bernstein: Want a real Washington scandal -- one worse than the (phony) Benghazi scandal and the (apparently real, but apparently limited) IRS scandals combined? Try the continuing, and possibly accelerating, obstruction of executive branch nominees by Senate Republicans. Don't think it's a scandal? It's pretty basic: Republicans, by abusing their Constitutional powers, are -- deliberately, in several cases -- preventing the government from carrying out duly passed laws.</description>
      <wordzilla:extended>[W]ith virtually all nominees required to have 60 votes, one can accurately say that Republicans are filibustering every nomination. But perhaps the worst are the &quot;nullification&quot; filibusters, in which Republicans simply refuse to approve any nominee at all for some positions -- the National Labor Relations Board, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau -- because they don't want those agencies to carry out their statutory obligations.
&lt;p&gt;In doing so, Republicans are not breaking the rules of the Senate. They are, however, breaking the Senate itself, and harming the government.</wordzilla:extended>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 19:33:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Sarvis</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.drudge.com/news/168332/bernstein-want-scandal-heres-one#discuss</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:drudge.com,2005:weblog.168332</guid>
      <category>news,</category>
      <sitemap:priority>0.5</sitemap:priority>
      <sitemap:changefreq>daily</sitemap:changefreq>
      <wordzilla:id>168332</wordzilla:id>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
