Over 75% of the weather stations (that monitor temperature) are not compliant with industry standards (too close to AC exhaust vents, blacktop, etc)
Temperature data is also taken by satellite to account for places where there aren't stations. You know, in places like those little things called oceans?
The current temperature flat-line is about (if it hasn't already) to go below EVERY single computer-models' predictions for the past 15+ years.
So the models were wrong. Says something about the models (which researchers are aware of, I know one who makes a living refining models) and nothing about observed data.
The frequency of extreme weather events are down accross the board and have been for a while - hurricanes, etc.
And others, of course. I'm not familiar enough with this one but it seems the jury is still out.
Polar ice has NOT melted anywhere close to expected.
Oops. Although I'm suspicious that "expected" is your weasel word.
CERN supposedly created a micro-atmosphere, a controlled environment where CO2 could be inserted and all other variables were held constant. The results were contrary to the alarmists politics and were thus suppressed.
And yet you supposedly know about it.
This one isn't worth addressing.
None of these things were supposed to happen based upon the computer models upon which the AGW theory has been applied.
Again with the models.
But I get it, it lets you ignore everything else, so whatever.
Feel free to google any of the above points if you think I am making this up.
I don't need Google to know you're full of [...] on most of them.
And even when I did it showed you far from correct.
I already mentioned the East Anglia emails.
Which was a made up scandal that was shown to be nothing. Stop bringing it up as if it's relevant.
I am barely scratching the surface.
Then it's not looking good for you.
A modicum of humility and, well, skepticism (in the spirit of the Scientific Method) would be a welcome tack from you and your ilk.
Me and my "ilk"? I just hate the butchery of science by the ignorant. Most of the morons "debating" this topic are so conceptually wrong it isn't even possible to get into the actual science.
I suspect that isn't possible.
Hopefully, you prove me wrong.
It's not possible when arguing with someone still talking about the stolen emails. Sorry, but you're still too far in lala land to make it worth the time.