Some will go to their graves still pretending to believe we needed to invade a country that never attacked us.

And many more will go to their graves believing we needed to kill people with drones in countries that never attacked us.

Should we invade and occupy those countries instead?

According to lefties, no. They never attacked us. I feel the same way.

Some people like to be lied to I guess.

If there weren't such people, Obama would not have been re-elected.

And GW Bush would never have been elected in the first place and maybe we wouldn't be lamenting the Big Lie.

That was your originallly stated premise that I was responding to. Thanks for repeating it for those who didn't pick it up the first time.

No, those are not our only options. Should drones NEVER be an option?

They shouldn't be be used to kill people in a country that never attacked us.

It is not countries that are attacking us but criminals within those countries that are attacking us.

So if an American goes to England and attacks their citizens and returns to the US, England has a right to fly domes over our skies.

Nope. I don't like that and I think we should treat other countries as we expect to be treated.

So has the lefts mantra of "country that never attacked us" morphed into "country who may have a citizen who didn't actually attack the US mainland but attacked a country the US has a military presence in"?

What blazing hypocricy.

When your boy was in charge I am sure you hooped it up every time it was used.

My boy has never been in charge. Is this really your best shot? LOL

So do you have a problem with another country sending their military aircraft into our skies if we don't have an extradition treaty with them?

You conveniently avoid that issue.

I have a problem with it. So it would be hypocritical to support my country doing it to other countries. So where do you fall? Do you have no problem with other countries lobbing missles at people in the US from their aircraft they feel did them wrong and have no recourse, or are you a hypocrite?

I say they should go for it.

I guess that means you don't have a problem with it.

I do. I have more respect for my fellow citizens than to give a green light to a foreign power to off them at will. You may get your wish. the Norks may lob one at the west coast one day. When it happens, remember you blessed the event.

I am pretty sure they will regret it though

No argument there.

Then what would you suggest as an alternative?

As an alternative to violating the airspace of countries who never attacked us? Is that your question?

Where those countries will do nothing about individuals who have attacked us, who reside within their borders?

The alternative is to stop flying into their airspace and killing people. I don't think anyone should do it to us, either.

Where those countries will do nothing about individuals who have attacked us,

I find it interesting how the left's position has morphed from: "country that never attacked us"to "a country who may have a citizen who didn't actually attack the US mainland but attacked a country the US has a military presence in"?

I understand of course it is blind partisanship working, but nonetheless the hypocrisy of basing policy on party is sickening.

For this, the Bushies tries to blame him for 9-11.

To be honest, danni, I never heard anyone blame Clinton until it became a defense mechanism to the democrats (thanks, hagbard) constant hammering on how Bush ignored intelligence, etc. Then they started applying the goose/gander philosophy and began blaming Clinto for his own similar lapses.

It is damned if you do and damned if you don't.

BINGO! danni. If Bush had acted on every one of the hundreds of reports of potential threats, the democrats would have had a fit of his over stepping his bounds.

Now you guys are whining that the same standards are applied to you. My advice: since y'all dealt it out under Bush, deal with it under Obama so at least you don't come across as two-faced whiners.

I find it interesting that you still haven't answered the question,

I did answer the question in post 58.

Try again. It's still up there.

So your alternative for dealing with the individuals in those countries who are attacking the US is to do nothing.

I have no alternative. But an anonymous blogger having no alternative is not a carte blanche to violate a sovereign country's airspace -- especially a country that never attacked us. There was a time the left generally thought this way. Then their president broke his campaign promise of hope and change and the left joined right in lockstep with him and now praise him for what they used to condemn Bush for doing.

Sickening. Party over all else for these guys.

I don't see anyone whining but you.

Of course you don't