Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, March 15, 2013

"The GOP of old has grown stale and moss-covered," Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told the gathering at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). "I don't think we need to name any names, do we? Our party is encumbered by an inconsistent approach to freedom. The new GOP will need to embrace liberty in both the economic and the personal sphere. If we're going to have a Republican party that can win, liberty needs to be the backbone of the GOP. We must have a message that is broad, our vision must be broad, and that vision must be based on freedom. There are millions of Americans, young and old, native and immigrant, black, white and brown, who simply seek to live free, to practice a religion, free to choose where their kids go to school, free to choose their own health care, free to keep the fruits of their labor, free to live without government constantly being on their back."

Advertisement

Menu

Advertisement

Subscriptions

Author Info

lee_the_agent

 

Advertisement

MORE STORIES

 

Advertisement

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

"Liberty, Freedom and other undefined buzz words, thats what the new GOP needs."

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2013-03-14 06:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Liberty, Freedom and other undefined buzz words, thats what the new GOP needs."

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2013-03-14 06:11 PM

^^^ Bought wholeheartedly into "transparency, accountability, hope, and change."

#2 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2013-03-14 06:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

Rand the horse is at the water it just won't drink.

No this horse would rather lower it's rear end into the water and then puzzle over why it's dying of thirst.

#3 | Posted by Tor at 2013-03-14 06:22 PM | Reply | Flag:


"Liberty, Freedom and other undefined buzz words, thats what the new GOP needs."

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

I agree with Liberty and Freedom (not that I don't agree with the undefined), that which the dems want to take away and the old GOP has forgoten.

On that note, I think I'll go fix myself a home made Wiskey Sour tonight. :)

#4 | Posted by path at 2013-03-14 06:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

My how wonderful and bubbly Rand Paul sounds. So, its march 2013. The 4 year campaign till 2016 is well underway.

Too bad the new GOTP, much like the old GOTP, is against women's rights to Abortions and gay's rights to marriage.

Also, Native and immigrant Americans? Does he realize the only true native American's were viciously murder by the current crop of europeans claiming rights to this continent.

New politician, same bunch of bull.

2014 election is a year away and the 2016 election is 3 years away. keep it in your pants.

#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2013-03-14 06:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

prove it

#6 | Posted by path at 2013-03-14 06:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

No Path, YOU prove it.

#7 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2013-03-14 07:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

He must mean the GOP that could actually win nationally.

#8 | Posted by DRJIMMIES at 2013-03-14 07:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Liberty, Freedom and other undefined buzz words, thats what the new GOP needs."

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

it's kinda refreshing to see young(er) members challenging the "old guard ideals & policies"

is that permitted among Dems? it seems NO

independent TeaParty and Libertarians regularly "primary challenge" incumbent Repub elite, and actually win.

Dems do NOT "primary challenge" without permission from Party elite.
All candidates are essentially clones

#9 | Posted by roadrunner22 at 2013-03-14 07:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

So McCain's new nickname is 'Mossy' McCain? lol

#10 | Posted by MURPHY at 2013-03-14 08:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

"independent TeaParty and Libertarians regularly "primary challenge" incumbent Repub elite, and actually win"....the nomination but many times they lose the elections in the end. I love Tea Party primary challenges.

#11 | Posted by danni at 2013-03-14 08:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

#11 -- sure, some win & some lose... that's the whole point of a challenge

some tea party candidates that knocked off establishment Repubs;
Marco Rubio (FL),
Ted Cruz(TX),
Rand Paul (KY),
Mike Lee (UT),
Ron Johnson (WI),
Pat Toomey (PA)

any Dems challenge their party elite?
I thought not, not allowed

#12 | Posted by roadrunner22 at 2013-03-14 08:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

In response to #12...

Oh, challenging 'Party Elite' is allowed
on the left it just happens less often,
because our leaders fail to possess that
(what is it called?) "[...] Crazy Quality"
that so many 'Party Elite' on the Right
seem to possess...

ergo, such "Tea[...] Revolutions" are
seldom required...

Hey, but have a nice day!

#13 | Posted by earthmuse at 2013-03-15 08:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sheesh, speak of liberty and freedom and the socialist get all riled up.

#14 | Posted by Daniel at 2013-03-15 08:56 AM | Reply | Flag:

Free to make your own electricity, clean air and water, and jumbo jet. Yes, freedom is the only issue facing mankind.

#15 | Posted by nutcase at 2013-03-15 09:39 AM | Reply | Flag:

Casting evangelical issues from the GOP platform would be the worst thing that ever happened to the Democratic party.

#16 | Posted by Ben_Berkkake at 2013-03-15 10:11 AM | Reply | Flag:


No Path, YOU prove it.

#7 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

I didn't say it. I shouldn't have to prove something that someone else said and made it sound like fact. I'm not saying I agree or disagree. I'm just tired of people posting opinion as if it was fact.

#17 | Posted by path at 2013-03-15 11:52 AM | Reply | Flag:

Any Dem who doesn't think that Rand may be a formidable candidate in '16 is underestimating the amount of grass roots appeal he is building among many Americans. Regardless of whether you agree with him or not, there is nothing shy, ambiguous or retreating about him. He saying is exactly what his positions are on numerous critical issues. As a liberal who disagrees with him, I take him very seriously.

#18 | Posted by moder8 at 2013-03-15 11:56 AM | Reply | Flag:

Gotta agree with Mod; Rand is prepping a Hell of a 2016 run. His drone filibuster even gave him credibility with the Left.

#19 | Posted by kanrei at 2013-03-15 11:58 AM | Reply | Flag:

Paul: GOP Has Grown 'Moss Covered'

Yeah but so has the top of his head.

#20 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-03-15 12:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

Rand Paul might be on to something. Most of us are disgusted with the current Party politics which has little to do with making the USA a better place for we the people. We need fresh leadership of both Parties.

It would be extremely refreshing and a political winner for either Party to have as their major planks ...... aggressively supporting liberty, our Constitutional civil rights, putting the needs of the American people first, fighting cronyism and corruption, and holding corrupt bankers, corporations, politicians, and bureaucrats to a higher standard of behavior than average people.

The Ds are beholden to Wall St, and the Rs are beholden to Wall St. and both are beholden to a lobby whose primary mission is taking US resources and taxpayer money for another country. End the right for foreigners or multinational or foreign corporations to lobby our government, or pick political candidates, or appointees or judges.

#21 | Posted by Robson at 2013-03-15 12:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

This guy is actually deluded enough to think he could ever carry a national ticket.

Rock on, dude.

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2013-03-15 12:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

This guy is actually deluded enough to think he could ever carry a national ticket

He probably figures if the zero can do it, anyone can. And he's right.

#23 | Posted by goatman at 2013-03-15 12:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Liberty, Freedom and other undefined buzz words, thats what the new GOP needs."

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

I liked this undefined one by Rubio:

"We don't need a new idea! Here is an idea: the idea is called America, and it still works."

LOL

#24 | Posted by donnerboy at 2013-03-15 01:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

He really is striving to re-define himself in more Libertarian terms and American's memories are so short, it will probably work.

#25 | Posted by kanrei at 2013-03-15 01:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

This is so sad.

Same old game --- New Paul.

here is my prediction.

Rand Paul will now entrench himslef in a "government" position, collect the checks and spend the next 25 years pretending he doesnt have a seat at the table. Then come every election cycle, claim hs is held captive by "them" (ie the other parties).
Just like his old man.

#26 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2013-03-15 01:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

His drone filibuster even gave him credibility with the Left.

#19 | Posted by kanrei

Yeah, but everything else he says makes him look like a loony. How can anybody with hair like that call anybody else moss covered?

He probably figures if the zero can do it, anyone can. And he's right.

#23 | Posted by goatman

Tell that to the smartest man ever, your hero Newtsy. Obama won the nomination running on Democratic principles. Rand is running against Republican principles. Except, of course, pork and corporate whoring. Much like his daddy.

And like his daddy, Rand will toe the party line when he needs to.

#27 | Posted by northguy3 at 2013-03-15 02:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

That was why I never once took his father seriously: you can't claim independence AND seek GOP approval and support.

#28 | Posted by kanrei at 2013-03-15 02:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

Charlie Crist actually did it. He left the GOP. It cost him a Senate seat to do it, but he did it and I respect that.

I understand Crist is going to run against Scott as a Democrat. I don't support his being a Democrat, but he has my vote anyway. Anything to get Scott out of power.

#29 | Posted by kanrei at 2013-03-15 02:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Obama won the nomination running on Democratic principles.

He won with empty campaign promises and lies. So yes, you are correct.

#30 | Posted by goatman at 2013-03-15 02:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

Casting evangelical issues from the GOP platform would be the worst thing that ever happened to the Democratic party.

#16 | Posted by Ben_Berkkake

Good point Ben, but the evangelicals own the GOP. Do you think they'd give it up? Without the GOP, how could they elect guys who honestly believe women have on/off switches on their uteruses (not that you can be a GOPper and say uterus, as we found out in Michigan),that God has the President on speed dial for whenever he gets bored and wants to see some brown people blown up, or that the Flintstones was a documentary?

The GOP needs to split into the Party of God (the white, blond one) and the Party of Small Government (including staying out of people's bedrooms and uteruses). But it won't because neither part can defeat the Democrats.

#31 | Posted by northguy3 at 2013-03-15 02:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

He won with empty campaign promises and lies. So yes, you are correct.

#30 | Posted by goatman

versus your guy who wanted to invade the Moon and build Moon Unit Zappa while balancing the budget by paying Paris Hilton's car lease for her..

Btw, Goat, do the stimulus and Obamacare promises ring a bell? I believe they were in the news a while ago.

#32 | Posted by northguy3 at 2013-03-15 02:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

"The new GOP will need to embrace liberty in both the economic and the personal sphere."

Not a chance in hell.

Geez, the GOP will start and win a war long before they stop their addiction to corporate welfare and talibanesque social control.

#33 | Posted by northguy3 at 2013-03-15 02:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

versus your guy who wanted to invade the Moon and build Moon Unit Zappa while balancing the budget by paying Paris Hilton's car lease for her..

???

Gary Johnson did that? I call BS. Link, please?

#34 | Posted by goatman at 2013-03-15 02:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Get out of the propaganda bubble of your Progressive Movement echo chamber and think. Think about fundamental, radical, democratic, social and economic change, who might bring it about and how. Ask yourself if the the rich elite, the 1%, are going to fund that. Leave The Nation and Mother Jones on the shelf; turn off Ed Schultz, Rachel Madow and Chris Hayes; don't open that barrage of email missives from Alternet, Media Matters, MoveOn, and the other think tanks; and get your head out of the liberal blogosphere for a couple days.

The self-labeled Progressive Movement that has arisen over the past decade is primarily one big propaganda campaign serving the political interests of the Democratic Party's richest 1%. The funders and owners of the Progressive Movement get richer and richer off Wall Street and the corporate system. But they happen to be Democrats, cultural and social liberals who can't stomach Republican policies, and so after bruising electoral defeats a decade ago they decided to buy a movement, one just like the Republicans, a copy.

The Progressive Movement that exists today is their success story. The Democratic elite created a mirror image of the type of astroturf front groups and think tanks long ago invented, funded and promoted by the Reaganites and the Koch brothers. The liberal elite own the Progressive Movement. The Progressive Movement is just the latest big money ploy to consolidate their control and keep the feed flowing into the trough.

The professional Progressive Movement that we see reflected in the pages of The Nation magazine, in the online marketing and campaigning of MoveOn and in the speeches of Van Jones, is primarily a political public relations creation of America's richest corporate elite, the so-called 1%, who happen to bleed Blue because they have some degree of social and environmental consciousness, and don't bleed Red. But they are just as committed as the right to the overall corporate status quo, the maintenance of the American Empire, and the monopoly of the rich over the political process that serves their economic interests.

There is no grassroots organized progressive movement with power in the United States, and none is being built. Indeed, if anything threatens to emerge, the cry "Remember Nader!" arises and the budding insurgency is marginalized or coopted, as in the case of the Occupy Wall Street events. Meanwhile, the rich elite who fund the Progressive Movement, and their candidates such as Barack Obama, are completely wedded to maintaining the existing status quo on Wall Street and in the corporate boardroom.

The overall goal and result has always been to bring withering rhetorical fire and PR attacks upon the Republican Right, while creating a tremendous fear of the Right to increase the vote for Democrats. This has become Job #1 for the Progressive Movement. No one quite remembers Job #2.

KEEP HOPE A JIVE

Will any of the paid professional Progressives ever admit so? Not as long as their careers and funding depend upon it; they can't afford to take off their rose-hued glasses.

#35 | Posted by nutcase at 2013-03-15 02:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

Gary Johnson did that? I call BS. Link, please?

#34 | Posted by goatman

You were shilling on the Retort like crazy for Newtsy, the smartest man in the universe, Goat. IF you voted for Johnson after Newtsy went down in ridicule, he was clearly your second choice.

Deal with it.

#36 | Posted by northguy3 at 2013-03-15 02:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

You were shilling on the Retort like crazy for Newtsy

???

I said I liked him and thought he would kill obama on the debate floor. That's "shilling like crazy"?

Get a grip on yourself, dude.

#37 | Posted by goatman at 2013-03-15 03:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

"who happen to bleed Blue because they have some degree of social and environmental consciousness, and don't bleed Red. But they are just as committed as the right to the overall corporate status quo, the maintenance of the American Empire, and the monopoly of the rich over the political process that serves their economic interests."

Newsworthy.

#38 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-03-15 03:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

#37 | Posted by goatman

Whatever....

#39 | Posted by northguy3 at 2013-03-15 04:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

This guy is actually deluded enough to think he could ever carry a national ticket.

Rock on, dude.

#22 | Posted by Corky

Our masters who control the message, the brain washing, and the creation of a society of brainless unarmed serfs would never allow it.

#40 | Posted by Robson at 2013-03-15 06:35 PM | Reply | Flag:

The professional Progressive Movement that we see reflected in the pages of The Nation magazine, in the online marketing and campaigning of MoveOn and in the speeches of Van Jones, is primarily a political public relations creation of America's richest corporate elite, the so-called 1%, who happen to bleed Blue because they have some degree of social and environmental consciousness, and don't bleed Red. But they are just as committed as the right to the overall corporate status quo, the maintenance of the American Empire, and the monopoly of the rich over the political process that serves their economic interests.

Wow, rich people run things?
I never knew that until this very second.
Thanks for opening my eyes.
Thanks to your thoughtful letter, I now see the profound error of my ways in aligning myself with a group of influential people with whom I find the most common ground.

...
'Cause baby, I'm an anarchist,
You're a spineless liberal.
We marched together for the eight-hour day
And held hands in the streets of Seattle,
But when it came time to throw bricks
Through that Starbucks window,
You left me all alone.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-03-15 06:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

Society is divided based on issues that our owners decide.

There has never been a more truthful video of the owners of American society.

www.youtube.com

I still remember when it only had 6 figure views. Pass it on at every opportunity.

#42 | Posted by Robson at 2013-03-15 06:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

#42 newsworthy.

#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-03-15 07:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Thanks to your thoughtful letter, I now see the profound error of my ways in aligning myself with a group of influential people with whom I find the most common ground."

So it doesn't matter if the car is going off the cliff so long as one gets to kiss the hem of the skirt of the one who is holding the wheel on the way down. Perfect.

#44 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2013-03-16 10:37 AM | Reply | Flag:

"So it doesn't matter if the car is going off the cliff so long as one gets to kiss the hem of the skirt of the one who is holding the wheel on the way down. Perfect."

Newsworthy.

#45 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-03-16 11:23 AM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2013 World Readable

 

Advertisement