Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, March 12, 2013

A Maryland woman was pulled over on Interstate 95 in Laurel last week, but not for speeding. She was ticketed for driving too slow -- 63 mph in a 65 mph zone. "I thought, 'Oh my God, you've got to be kidding me,'" the woman told NBC Washington. She has filed a complaint with Maryland State Police and plans to fight the ticket.

Advertisement

Menu

Advertisement

Subscriptions

Author Info

BruceBanner

 

Advertisement

MORE STORIES

 

Advertisement

More

I feel safer.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

Speed limit is not the lowest legal speed, it is the highest legal speed.

I am open to learning something new.

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2013-03-12 02:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's a misleading headline, she was ticketed for failure to yield the right of way, ie. Not getting out of the left lane. Bet she was on cell phone too, driving an suv

#2 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-03-12 03:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

There's usually a minimum speed limit on an interstate, too. 40 mph or so. Lots of states have signs clearly saying "Slower traffic keep right" or Keep right unless passing" or somesuch.

#3 | Posted by American1st at 2013-03-12 03:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

I kept the spirit of the original headline. I don't think it's inaccurate to say that she was going too slow.

#4 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2013-03-12 03:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

Not getting out of the left lane. Bet she was on cell phone too, driving an suv

#2 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-03-12 03:34 PMFlag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Finally! Police should be doing more of this.

#5 | Posted by Dalton at 2013-03-12 03:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

The only problem with her driving is if she was not engaging in the act of passing another vehicle.

If she was passing, she should not have been pulled over. If she was not passing, she should have gotten pulled over.

#6 | Posted by HeuristicGratis at 2013-03-12 04:12 PM | Reply | Flag:

I wish our state had the stay right rules for inconsiderate drivers. It is one of those things that drive me nuts...

I was on the expressway just the yesterday - 5:30PM, 2-Lane expressway, 70 mph zone. Woman doing 60 pulls right in front of me (had to hit the brakes) to go around someone doing 59 and actually she was in a full size SUV. I wasn't too ticked at first but I followed them for 5 miles one pulling a little forward then the other. The line behind me was a mile long when the car in the right lane was finally slowed down by even slower traffic.

#7 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2013-03-12 05:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yes.. you can be ticketed for not yielding the fast lane, even if you are at the speed limit and in theory, no one should go faster.

Some try to block that lane and play cop ensuring no one goes faster than they should, but they are subject to a fine.

#8 | Posted by sames1 at 2013-03-12 05:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

#7 | POSTED BY GALAXIEPETE

Just before I moved out of MD they were talking about ticketing people who did that to discourage it, especially on Rt 70 and 270.

People would do that to the point where others would pass on the shoulder and motorcycles would just go between....

Have to admit in my younger years I drove between two blue hairs doing that when I lived in NJ. We had an unusually cold night and I got out of work late and hadn't worn my jacket, so I was freezing and they were driving 50 in a 55.

#9 | Posted by Lohocla at 2013-03-12 06:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

si"I wish our state had the stay right rules for inconsiderate drivers. It is one of those things that drive me nuts... "

I agree slower drives should stay to the right but how far do you want to take that? What if you are doing say 75 in a 65 in the left lane, in the lane to your right it is moving along at about 60 and then someone comes up behind you doing 85. So would you have the person doing 75 have to move into the slower lane doing 60?
This situation happens all the time here on I-95 or I-595, and here in S. Florida we have some of the rudest, nastiest rich folks in very expensive cars that actually do expect everyone to just get out of their way so they can go 85 or even faster. Last Sat. morning I was on my way to my daughter's house to babysit and a big, white Rolls Royce came up behind me, cut around me and then back into the lane and he had to have been doing 100. He was cutting in and out all they way down the road.

#10 | Posted by danni at 2013-03-12 06:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

The left lane is the passing lane. Didn't someone get banned over ridiculous posturing on this issue?

#11 | Posted by Harry_Powell at 2013-03-12 06:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's stay right, pass left. That's the law. I believe in just avoiding incidents. Some one wants to pass me? They must really be a racer X, I let them by. I'd hate to have a jerk behind me, trying to pass. I make way.

If someone wants to stay left and never yield the lane even when the right lane is then open, they deserve a warning at least. It sounds like the ticket was from a Md State Trooper. If so, you can be pretty sure she earned it.

#12 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-03-12 06:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

#10 | Posted by danni

You really need to seek help with your jealousy of the rich. :)

Anyhoo,

I dont care if you were doing 70 in a 60. If traffic in the left lane is going faster than you, you need to get over. If you need to pass someone slower than you in the right line, pass them, then GET BACK OVER. Just because the speed limit is 65, that doesnt give you the right to turtle in the left passing lane.

a big, white Rolls Royce came up behind me, cut around me and then back into the lane and he had to have been doing 100

You should have gotten out of his way. You could have caused an accident squatting in the left lane. It's none of your business why he was doing 100. He may have had a good reason. If he didnt, that's the police's job to question him...

Not speaking to you personally Danni, but I think some people turtle in the left lane because they want attention. They get tired of people passing them by and they wnat to show what they can do. It causes road rage.

#13 | Posted by boaz at 2013-03-12 06:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

The left lane is the passing lane. Didn't someone get banned over ridiculous posturing on this issue?

#11 | POSTED BY HARRY_POWELL AT 2013-03-12 06:43 PM | FLAG:

What??? That must've been quite the discussion.

#14 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2013-03-12 07:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

Woman doing 60 pulls right in front of me (had to hit the brakes) to go around someone doing 59

I hate it when semis do ths and it takes them 5 minutes to make the pass.

#15 | Posted by northguy3 at 2013-03-12 08:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Woman doing 60 pulls right in front of me (had to hit the brakes) to go around someone doing 59"

People who take more than 20 seconds to pass another vehicle should be euthanized.

#16 | Posted by REDIAL at 2013-03-12 08:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

"So would you have the person doing 75 have to move into the slower lane doing 60?"
#10 | Posted by danni

'So would you have the person doing 75 show common [uncommon in your case] courtesy and move into the slower lane doing 60 to allow them to pass?'

FTFY

#17 | Posted by KBM at 2013-03-12 09:01 PM | Reply | Flag:

So she was doing 63 in a 65 and staying in the left hand lane. Exactly how fast was she expected to go in order to stay in the left hand lane. Sounds to me like the cop intended to speed in the left hand lane and just got pissed because she wouldn't allow him to pass. This is what's wrong with the police today they use their badge to attack people who make them mad.

#18 | Posted by manuesstonedar at 2013-03-13 02:57 AM | Reply | Flag:

I like the way they do it in Germany.

On many parts of the Autobahn there is no speed limit, so when a faster moving car comes up behind you, it's your responsibility to yield the right of way.

It makes for much more courteous drivers. You don't see the guy who won't get out of the way, because he thinks he's doing the speed limit, so he can drive in any lane he wants.

.

#19 | Posted by Roy_Batty at 2013-03-13 05:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

"It's none of your business why he was doing 100. He may have had a good reason."
Baloney. He was endangering the lives of everyone else on that highway, he would have not just gotten a ticket for that kind of speed, in Florida they take you to jail for it. Over priveleged a******s like that deserve jail not courtesy.

#20 | Posted by danni at 2013-03-13 06:56 AM | Reply | Flag:

#20 Again you have issues. OMG with everybody.

The guy is a jerk get the F out of his way. Would you prefer him behind you tailgating you by 5 feet?

#21 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-03-13 07:39 AM | Reply | Flag:

Regardless of the posted speed limit, it is both selfish and dangerous to not "go with the flow". Undoubtedly, she was going 63 in the left lane at high-volume time when everyone else is maintaining 75. Much like people who use their cell phone while driving, these inconsiderate people choose to be a part of the problem, rather than the solution. Just pull-over already!

My pet peeve are the the two tractor trailers, on a two-lane interstate in the middle of nowhere that are speed-regulated to within 1 mph and it takes 10 miles or more for one to pass the other. Speed regulation is often mandated by the insurance carriers with no regard for location, conditions and traffic. I don't see how a nuisance on the road makes anything safer for anybody . . .

#22 | Posted by Gr8Music at 2013-03-13 08:01 AM | Reply | Flag:

#10 | Posted by danni

That's where Law enforcement comes in. I have drove around Florida. Miami is the worst I have been in 55mph zones doing 65 not even keeping up with traffic and had Ferarris, High end Mercedes, Rolls, Porches and everyday cars blow by me like I was sitting still - 100 mph easily. The police down there just seem to randomly stop drivers and not seriously enforce the law. Miami is honestly one of the worst places I have seen for that behavior. Some seriously poor enforcement down there.

What I am saying is it is fine if you are in the left lane doing the speed limit if you are passing cars. Don't pull a rolling road block where you sit side by side. And if someone is driving aggressively then get out of their way. That's just the smart thing to do.

#23 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2013-03-13 08:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

Road hogs who won't yield to faster traffic cause accidents. Even if the ticket doesn't stick, the officer did other drivers a favor and made the roads safer by alerting this woman to her obliviously selfish behavior.

#24 | Posted by Sully at 2013-03-13 09:23 AM | Reply | Flag:

#24 although this is true in the case of someone riding in the left lane without passing another vehicle, someone riding in the left lane at a continual speed over the speed limit is just as selfish in their behavior.

#25 | Posted by HeuristicGratis at 2013-03-13 11:04 AM | Reply | Flag:

"someone riding in the left lane at a continual speed over the speed limit is just as selfish in their behavior."

If there is nobody behind then its illegal if they are not passing but not really bothering anyone else.

But if someone else is trying to get by and they refuse to yield then I agree.

If I'm doing 80 and passing other cars and I see someone in the mirror coming up on me, I just get over and let them by. There is really no reason not to other than selfishness.

#26 | Posted by sully at 2013-03-13 11:15 AM | Reply | Flag:

What if the cited driver was texting too? Would most then support her getting a ticket?

#29 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-03-13 05:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

Speed limit is not the lowest legal speed, it is the highest legal speed.

I am open to learning something new.

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

You might try reading the article.

"The driver, who didn't want her name used, told News4 she was driving in the left lane of I-95 in Laurel last Friday when she was pulled over and cited for failing to move right.

According to the citation, she had been driving 63 mph in the left hand lane in a 65 mph zone. The citation read, "Failure of driver, driving below speed limit, 63 in a 65, to keep right."

#30 | Posted by Sniper at 2013-03-13 06:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

Regardless of the posted speed limit, it is both selfish and dangerous to not "go with the flow".
#22 | Posted by Gr8Music

I suppose you feel this way about other laws. Like looting? Or fighting?

"Officer, everyone else was rioting, I felt it was best to go with the flow"

#31 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2013-03-13 07:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

Funny how the Righties, who advocate shooting someone who's on your lawn, suddenly have the attitude of "Let the cops handle it, it's their job."

#32 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2013-03-13 07:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

The citation read, "Failure of driver, driving below speed limit, 63 in a 65, to keep right."

If the law says you're required to keep right in that circumstance, it's a legitimate ticket.

I doubt it would have happened if she was not attracting attention by blocking traffic.

#33 | Posted by REDIAL at 2013-03-13 08:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

#32 funny how the Dr left act like they are holier then thuo elitists, and the laws don't apply to them. Hey stupid, signs in md. Say stay right pass left

Can you read?

#34 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-03-13 08:26 PM | Reply | Flag:


If the law says you're required to keep right in that circumstance, it's a legitimate ticket.

I doubt it would have happened if she was not attracting attention by blocking traffic.

#33 | Posted by REDIAL at 2013-03-13 08:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

That's probably exactly what happened. There was probably a mass of cars having to go around her because he's driving as low as 5-7mph below speed limit in the left lane. She of course could care less and being the jerk she is, continues to stay in the left lane driving noticeably slower than everyone else.

#35 | Posted by daniel_3 at 2013-03-14 12:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

Traffic cops around the beltway are such a moody bunch... but frankly along that stretch of highway which can seem at times like a slow moving 5 lane parking lot doing 63 mph can make one feel almost giddy.

Honestly what is more vague than driving 2 miles below speed limit?

lim·it (lmt)
n.
1. The point, edge, or line beyond which something cannot or may not proceed.
2. limits The boundary surrounding a specific area; bounds: within the city limits.
3. A confining or restricting object, agent, or influence.
4. The greatest or least amount, number, or extent allowed or possible: a withdrawal limit of $200; no minimum age limit.

It strikes me the onus is on the officer to prove that everyone else was driving or desiring to drive exactly 65 mph... which is the maximum speed limit and she was interferring with their compliance as well. From the sounds of the whiners complaining about people who take the sign at its meaning (i.e. MAXIMUM SPEED 65 MPH) which would mean that the "fast lane" is reserved for those wishing to drive at the maximum speed allowed by law they have little regard for the law or the agreements that make about complying with the law. No what they do is complain, accusing her and "people like her" of "slowing" traffic because they have a problem with the speed limit and want to break the law and are angry at her for not doing so.

Then there is the possibility of what appears to be 65 on her speedometer versus the speed her vehicle was actually traveling and she thought she was obeying the law by observing speed limits as she agreed to do when she got her driver's license. A new set of tires can change the calibration if she was sold a set of a different size than stock.

In Maryland the fines for a speeding violation is based on how many miles over posted limit. For example 1-9 miles over is $80. and a 1 point violation.

Since she was going under by a mile or two aybe she should be given a rebate...for not exceeding the limit and the cop drawn, quartered and disemboweled with his entrails strewn over the area of the citation to serve as a reminder to errant police officers who bend to peer pressure and choose not to pursue real criminals who are actually violating the law.

In Maryland there is no 10 mile an hour cushion for exceeding speed limits. A while back the B'more sun wrote an article discussing it.

www.baltimoresun.com

#36 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2013-03-14 11:48 AM | Reply | Flag:

On one hand, you have a smug 1-mph-over-is-breaking-the-
law!
nut case clogging up traffic in the left lane.

On the other hand, one of America's most dangerous armed thugs waving his badge and gun around in her face over, at best, an extremely minor violation of traffic law.

Not sure who to root for here.

#37 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2013-03-14 12:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

RIGHTISTRITE, since you are harping on the letter of the law.

The law states that if you're are not passing you are to yield to faster traffic and move right.

That's what she was cited for.

#38 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2013-03-14 03:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2013 World Readable

 

Advertisement