Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, March 11, 2013

The Denver Post, on February 15th, ran an Associated Press article entitled Homeland Security aims to buy 1.6b rounds of ammo, so far to little notice. It confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security has issued an open purchase order for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. As reported elsewhere, some of this purchase order is for hollow-point rounds, forbidden by international law for use in war, along with a frightening amount specialized for snipers. Also reported elsewhere, at the height of the Iraq War the Army was expending less than 6 million rounds a month. Therefore 1.6 billion rounds would be enough to sustain a hot war for 20+ years. In America.

Why, indeed, should the federal government not be deploying armored personnel carriers and stockpiling enough ammo for a 20-year war in the homeland? Because it's wrong in every way. The federal government can (for a nice change) begin practicing what it preaches by controlling itself.

Advertisement

Menu

Advertisement

Subscriptions

Author Info

zack991

 

Advertisement

MORE STORIES

 

Advertisement

More

Remember the Sequester? The president is claiming its budget cuts will inconvenience travelers by squeezing essential services provided by the (opulently armed and stylishly uniformed) DHS. Quality ammunition is not cheap. (Of course, news reports that DHS is about to spend $50 million on new uniforms suggests a certain cavalier attitude toward government frugality.)

Spending money this way is beyond absurd well into perverse. According to the AP story a DHS spokesperson justifies this acquisition to "help the government get a low price for a big purchase." Peggy Dixon, spokeswoman for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center: "The training center and others like it run by the Homeland Security Department use as many as 15 million rounds every year, mostly on shooting ranges and in training exercises."

At 15 million rounds (which, in itself, is pretty extraordinary and sounds more like fun target-shooting-at-taxpayer-expense than a sensible training exercise) … that's a stockpile that would last DHS over a century. To claim that it's to "get a low price" for a ridiculously wasteful amount is an argument that could only fool a career civil servant

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

How can something as personal as a conversation be national?

#1 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-11 09:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

to start a "national conversation" we'd need the 10,000s of DHS/DOJ FOIA Docs with the black-out redaction removed

fat chance of that w/out a leaker

#2 | Posted by roadrunner22 at 2013-03-11 09:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Homeland Security aims to buy 1.6b rounds of ammo, so far to little notice..."

True... it's only been posted on this site about 30 times.

#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2013-03-11 10:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

What should piss people off is the BILLIONS they have spent wasting tax payer money every single second that they get away with it. Just look how cocky our Government has become. They are exactly like those bankers that have stolen billions from us. They will be more then happy to destroy our country and they will leave us as a 3rd world country.

#4 | Posted by zack991 at 2013-03-11 10:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

The folks who supported invading two countries look foolish today as pretend fiscal conservatives, remember they also passed tax cuts to make those wars unpaid for. I agree, it is time for a conversation. but I want a real, honest conversation that conservatives will never allow to happen.
They know that a real, honest conversation will indict them as traitors, or at least accomplices to traitors. Today, we actually have the testimony of a former President of Iran, testifying that, yes, REagan was a treasonous bastard, and Nixon before him too has been documented.
I think that those of us who honestly care about a freely elected government are finding the evidence to convict the criminals who have stolen our country and there are so many of us it may be impossible to stop the prosecution.

#5 | Posted by danni at 2013-03-11 10:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

the rabble is growing.

#6 | Posted by ichiro at 2013-03-11 11:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

we actually have the testimony of a former President of Iran, testifying that, yes, REagan was a treasonous bastard, and Nixon before him too has been documented.

#5 | Posted by danni

gee, that'll be slam-dunk case-closed if you can get Mark D Chapman & John W Hinkley to testify too

#7 | Posted by roadrunner22 at 2013-03-12 12:17 AM | Reply | Flag:

just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that they aren't out to get you!

#8 | Posted by AuntieSocial at 2013-03-12 12:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

#5 Do you realize that this thread IS about the DHS buying massive and unnecessary amount of ammunition and is NOT about Reagan?

#9 | Posted by HeuristicGratis at 2013-03-12 07:54 AM | Reply | Flag:

This message is brought to you by Forbes Mag and the NRA; who urge you to buy more ammo because the government is coming to kill you.

#10 | Posted by squinch at 2013-03-12 11:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2013 World Readable

 

Advertisement