1. President Obama has given in to the Fordo uranium enrichment plant continuing to operate instead of shutting down, as demanded by Israel – even though its function is to turn out 20 percent pure (near-weapons grade) uranium;

2. He has even consented to the Iranians continuing to manufacture uranium to that level;

3. Washington has dropped its insistence on Iran sending out of the country its stocks of 3.5-5 percent enriched uranium.

Bho PROMISED he would not tolerate a nuclear Iran. How many times did he say that danni?

Do his words mean anything?

- President Barack Obama signed off on $85 billion in Sequestration cuts on March 1 and opened the door to cuts in Social Security benefits and Medicare benefits for Americans the next week.
But as the president whacks away at the U.S. military, Homeland Security and safety nets for Americans, he has been quite generous to foreign groups like the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, the Taliban-infested nation of Afghanistan and even Iran.
For example, the U.S. is donating $2.3 billion to Afghanistan this year and plans to gift that country at least $1 billion a year over the next decade, according to an unnamed official quoted by the Associated Press.

Answer the question danni. [...]

"Bho PROMISED he would not tolerate a nuclear Iran. How many times did he say that?

So you want an invasion, or just bombing?
#34 | Posted by danni

Excuse me? This is not what I want. He said it. Did he mean it? Do his words have meaning???

How many times do you think he said it???

In a forceful address to the group, the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Mr. Obama declared that he would not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran and would act -- with military force, if necessary -- to prevent that from happening. 3/2012

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton vowed Monday that the Obama administration will not accept a nuclear armed Iran and is working on sanctions that will bite to press it to come clean about its suspected atomic program. 3/2010

The Obama administration has repeatedly said that there is still time and space to solve the Iranian nuclear issue peacefully, although it has made it clear the United States will not allow Tehran to have a nuclear bomb.

Last month, the New York Times, quoting Obama administration officials, reported that the United States and Iran had agreed for the first time to have one-on-one talks over the latter's controversial nuclear program. The White House later quickly denied the report.11/2012

Obama made the speech at the U.N. General Assembly in New York and noted, "Make no mistake: a nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained. It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy. It risks triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the non-proliferation treaty. That's why the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon09/2012

Bet you I can find two dozen more refrences OF HIS DIRECT WORDS

Secret Gates memo warns that U.S. has no strategy for dealing with a nuclear Iran.

"Of course they didn't prepare alternatives. How could they possibly fathom that diplomacy might fail? The core plank of "smart power," such as it is, has always been the Obama charm offensive. Simply by being the anti-Bush and offering an open hand to Iran, he would convince Tehran to unclench its fist and open a dialogue. Bush was the problem (he always is!) and once the problem was removed, solutions would inevitably follow. So why bother developing a Plan B? The result: Iran's now enriching uranium to 20 percent purity and rolling out advanced centrifuges, which means nuclear "breakout" capacity, i.e. the ability to build a bomb quickly even if they haven't yet done so, won't be long in coming.

So you refuse to answer. That's funny. So you agree

OBAMA'S WORDS MEAN NOTHING. HE LIES REGULARLY AND IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT HE HAS TO SAY POLITICALLY. HE CAN'T PASS A BUDGET, BUT HE CAN PASS THE BUCK

No wonder he divides peoples

#60 this retort is about Obama dividing Israel, which you are in full support of such. It has nothing to do with me. Nada, zip, zero. Only someone afraid to answer would deflect away to something completely irrelevant to the retort. What is wrong with you? Why can't you answer a question directly pertinent to topic. (As usual the Dr left tries to put words in my mouth, because they are speechless)

The president has spoken. Do his words mean anything?