Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, March 07, 2013

On September 15, 2011, I wrote to Rev. Msgr. Kuriakose Bharanikulangara, the First Counsellor of the Permanent Observer Mission of the Holy See to the United Nations. In that letter, which was prompted by the killing of the 79th priest in Colombia since 1984, I expressed my concern for the continued killing of Catholic priests and other religious in Colombia. I asserted my belief "that this assault on the Church in Colombia is both state policy of Colombia as well as the United States which is propping up that military with billions of dollars of assistance, and which views organized movements for social justice in Latin America as a threat to its economic domination of the region. I am not alone in this opinion as other priests in Colombia, notably Father Javier Giraldo, S.J., have also expressed this view for many years."

Advertisement

Menu

Advertisement

Subscriptions

Author Info

PunchyPossum

 

Advertisement

MORE STORIES

 

Advertisement

More

Someone else who has been talking and writing for years on this subject is Noam Chomsky, a friend and supporter of Father Giraldo. In response to my most recent article on the continued assault against the Church in Colombia, Professor Chomsky wrote to me: "Very few are aware of the war the US waged against the Church after the heresy of Vatican II, seeking to return the Church to the Gospels for the first time since Emperor Constantine. You probably know that I've been writing about it for a long time. To closed ears, mostly." Alas, it was a video of a lecture which Chomsky gave in 2009 which really awakened me to the reality of this war and its true nature.

Thus, in December of 2009, Professor Noam Chomsky gave a fascinating speech at Columbia University which summarized events known to few in the developed world: In 1962, Pope John XXIII, through the Second Vatican Council, attempted to reclaim the early roots of the Church; the Church of the first 300 years when it was the "persecuted Church," the Church of the martyrs. The nature of the Church had changed with Constantine's declaration in 324 A.D. that the Catholic Church would be the official Church of the Roman Empire, thereby making it the "persecuting Church," with the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition and complicity with Nazism among the numerous crimes which flowed from this.

With the Second Vatican Council in 1962, the Church worldwide began to reevaluate itself. In Latin America, this took the form of "Liberation Theology" – a philosophy which took a "preferential treatment for the poor" and which called for active support for social justice movements on behalf of workers, landless peasants and indigenous peoples and active opposition to military rule and corporate domination.

This philosophy, which combined Christianity with Marxism, was first formulated at a meeting of Latin American theologians, spearheaded by Gustavo Gutierrez, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1964. Brazil became ground zero for this new movement and Christian "base communities" dedicated to Liberation Theology began to spring up in that country and to spread throughout Latin America, with more theological meetings to develop Liberation Theology held in Havana, Cuba; Bogotá, Colombia and Cuernavaca, Mexico in June and July 1965.

As Noam Chomsky explains, the United States, not content to sit back and watch as an openly Marxist theology take hold in Latin America – a theology which threatened the U.S.'s economic and military domination of the region – quickly moved to wipe out this emerging movement through violence. For its part, the Vatican, after the death of John XXIII, also moved to wipe it out through the censuring, removal and even de-frocking of liberation priests and bishops.

The first strike against Liberation Theology by the U.S., Chomsky relates, took place in its very cradle – Brazil. Thus, in 1964, the U.S. sponsored the toppling of democratically-elected Brazilian President João Goulart, setting up a military dictatorship which would rule until 1985 and which, through continued U.S. military assistance, violently attack Liberation priests, religious and base communities, thereby extracting the new radical theological movement by its roots.

The U.S. would continue to engage in active, military operations to wipe out Liberation Theology, leaving a slew of murdered priests, brothers and sisters, and even the Archbishop of San Salvador, Oscar Romero, in its wake. All told, well over 100 religious were murdered in Latin America between 1964 and 1985, and the bloodshed did not stop there.

As Chomsky emphasizes, even after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, which marked the official end to the Cold War, the U.S. continued its onslaught against the Liberation Church, most famously through its support of the military slaying of 6 Jesuit Priests, along with their housekeeper and her daughter, in November of 1989. As we know from the 1993 UN Truth Commission report, the intellectual authors of the killings of these Jesuits was Col. Inocente Orlando Montano Morales and Colonel Rene Emilio Ponce – fellow 1970 graduates of the U.S. Army School of the Americas (SOA) in Fort Benning, Georgia. And, this stands to reason, for as Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer notes in his book, School for Assassins (Orbis Books, 1999), in 75% of the training exercises at the SOA, the priest or other religious figure (usually played by a U.S. army chaplain) end up either killed or wounded.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

And the War against Priests and Nuns still goes on in Latin America

#1 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-07 06:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

The link between some who followed Liberation Theology and Marxism was very real at one time.

It may still be very real.

#2 | Posted by Tor at 2013-03-07 06:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

Fast forward a few years later to February 27, 2009, and the U.S. Embassy in San Salvador is wringing its hands again over a new and "More Outspoken Archbishop" who the Embassy suspects of having Liberation Theology sympathies. (5) Thus, the cable contains an entire section about the new Archbishop which reads, "SYMPATHETIC BUT NOT WEDDED TO LIBERATION THEOLOGY." As the Embassy explains, Archbishop "Escobar's public statements suggest that he may hold views close to liberation theology, a movement in the Catholic Church that emphasized liberating the poor and oppressed and led some adherents to support revolutionary activity in Latin American including the FMLN's insurgency (1980-1992)" – an insurgency, of course, which the U.S. vigorously opposed through its support of the repressive military forces in El Salvador which crushed the insurgency and killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians in the process.

As this cable explains, some of the statements which Archbishop Escobar has made which make the U.S. suspicious of his sympathy for Liberation Theology are his pronouncements against mining operations in El Salvador, including the mining of Pacific Rim – a "Canadian company with U.S. investors" as the cable explains. Also betraying his Liberation Theology sympathies, the cable explains, is the fact that "in his first homily, Escobar asserted that he wants to be with the weak and poor because that is the Church's duty and called for priority to be given to the ministering to the poor." The cable goes on to say that "Escobar also professed . . . to admire Father Ignacio Ellacuria, a Jesuit priest and contributor to liberation theology, who was murdered by the Salvadoran Forces in 1989, and Bishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero, who was assassinated by death squads in 1981 [sic.]." Again, the new Archbishop's loyalty to these slain religious makes him suspect in terms of his true loyalties.

Still in another cable from San Salvador, dated June 24, 2008, which purports to give a historical view of the FMLN, the Embassy claims, "During the 12 year Salvadoran civil war (1980-92), the FMLN attempted to overthrow the government utilizing a strategy that included armed struggle, terrorism, socialist/communist political indoctrination. The liberation theology movement within the Catholic Church and labor unions largely supported these efforts. The group received monetary support and arms from the Soviet Bloc and Cuba." (6) This statement, filled with quite misleading information, is very revealing of the Embassy's antipathy towards Liberation Theology.

Thus, in this short passage, the Embassy paints the Liberation Theology movement as largely supporting the FMLN's alleged terrorism, and in conjunction with the Soviet Union and Cuba. Of course, this intentionally ignores the fact that it was the U.S.-backed military and paramilitary death squads in El Salvador which committed the vast majority of the terrorism against the civilian population; that much of the liberation theology movement, as best exemplified by Archbishop Romero himself, condemned the violence committed by both sides of the conflict; and that the claims of Soviet and Cuban support for the home-grown FMLN were always overblown.

#3 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-07 06:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

The link between some who followed Liberation Theology and Marxism was very real at one time.

It may still be very real.

#2 | Posted by Tor

Yeah it is OK to kill them if they even have a hint of a smell of Marxism.

#4 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-07 06:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

"The nature of the Church had changed with Constantine's declaration in 324 A.D. that the Catholic Church would be the official Church of the Roman Empire, thereby making it the "persecuting Church," with the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition and complicity with Nazism among the numerous crimes which flowed from this."

An astonishing example of either ignorance or willful distortion.
Constantine allowed Christianity to practice freely and became a Christian himself. He later, however, recalled Arianus joined the Arian heresy, hardly a "Catholic" thing to do. St. Athanasius put up serious resistance the creed named after him is his great legacy.
In time, the Arian heresy would cover all Europe except Rome and to the south. Slowly (over centuries) the Catholic Church regained predominance over this heresy.
If you want to find the churches that admire Constantine, only the Orthodox to my memory do. Maybe the Copts but I am not sure of that.
Constantine was baptized on his death bed, but by an Arian priest, which is why the Roman Catholics never considered him anyone to venerate as a Christian.
How this fake you cite turned that into Nazism the Crusades and the now largely considered mythical Spanish Inquisition is a masterpiece of lying.

#5 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 09:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

P.S. The schisms between government and Church in Latin American countries have been there since Cortez wrote the Emperor begging him to side with the Church in these conflicts. It is not the exclusive property of "liberation theology" adherents.

#6 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 09:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

5 | Posted by Diablo at

No he is not a Saint in Roman Catholic and most of what you said here is correct but to deny that the Imperialism of Rome had not infiltrate the faith is ridiculous and it took Vatican 2 to bring back the faith to what its roots, I do not see how you can deny this.

#6 | Posted by Diablo

Oh horse pucky, Rome it self had a history of turning a blind eye to some of the worst dictators in Latin America if not out right supporting them.

I truly love the Church, I really do Diablo and I will never leave it, their is much to be proud of in the Catholic Church. the service to the poor by its members and the love of God and the love it shows to each other is wonderful, the Church occupies much of my life and effort.
but I will not lie for her, to do so allows the errors of the past to be repeated in the future, I want the Church to truly be what it claims to be, The Bride of Christ.

#7 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-07 09:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

Oh on this part "complicity with Nazism"

I agree with you that is pure BS the Church never backed the Nazis there were so members of the Church did but the Church never did German Catholics were some of the most out spoken against Hitler and paid huge price for that

#8 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-07 10:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

"..the Imperialism of Rome had not infiltrate the faith is ridiculous and it took Vatican 2 to bring back the faith to what its roots, I do not see how you can deny this."

I've read the documents of Vatican II and saw nothing resembling this, Punchy. But one of the worst abuses of the post Vatican II era had nothing to do with the Council itself, but everything to do with fringe conservative and liberals interpreting the teachings of the Council in a ludicrously self-serving way. So many misconceptions have been taught as a result and I always urge people to actually read the documents, easily available in book form and online.

"..a history of turning a blind eye to some of the worst dictators in Latin America if not out right supporting them."

Just as they try to do in the Far East today, because thousands might be killed if the situation is not handled deftly. My grandfather was in Mexico during the 20's and saw not one newspaper article in English or Spanish that told him the churches had been shut and clergy were in hiding. A kid brought him to a home where the Sacrament was there with permission for the faithful to gives themselves Communion in extremis.
Google Fr. Miguel Pro. The photos of his martyrdom are online from this era.
Good thread!

#9 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 10:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

Oh! BTW, Punchy. Google "Papal Encyclicals Online." You will find two encyclicals by separate Popes against the Nazis.
Encyclicals are ex catherdra and the highest and most binding instruction for the faithful to follow. To accuse the Church of somehow fostering the Nazis is just plain incorrect.

#10 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 10:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

From what I remember of Liberation Theology is full of communist, racist conspiracy theories and rabidly anti-American.

#11 | Posted by HeliumRat at 2013-03-07 10:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

Not usually, Helium. Most are missionaries who are simply sick of seeing the lower castes of Indians peed on. Some became Marxists but most liberation theology types just posited Christianity mandates opposing a government for these abuses.
It WAS the radical liberationist wing that caused the head smashers to start taking out anyone sounding remotely like those ones.
The orthodox teaching of the Church is to do everything legal to alleviate such suffering, but the clergy should avoid political alignments that could provoke deadly reactions in such countries. They can have their own views, but not from the pulpit or all hell (literally) can break loose.

#12 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 10:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

Not usually, Helium. Most are missionaries who are simply sick of seeing the lower castes of Indians peed on. Some became Marxists but most liberation theology types just posited Christianity mandates opposing a government for these abuses.
12 | Posted by Diablo

YUP! Absolutely correct

#13 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-07 10:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

Since the nazi canard comes up so often, I'll link directly to an encyclical written by the man the left calls "Hitler's Pope":

www.papalencyclicals.net

#14 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 10:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

And to save the lazy the trouble:

"8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community -- however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things -- whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds."

#15 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 11:02 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Yeah it is OK to kill them if they even have a hint of a smell of Marxism."

When someone smells of dog crap they are not welcome in my house no matter how faint the smell.

Still I wouldn't kill them over it.

#16 | Posted by Tor at 2013-03-07 11:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

Neither would I, Tor. Maybe that's the reason millions are killed in marxist countries and people like us are far less 'motivated' to do so. Even the South American dictators are much more judicious in the application of mass murder.
Scary stuff. We are somewhat jaded by peace and harmony....at least the harmony of agreeing on a system of sober decisions.

#17 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-03-07 11:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Yeah it is OK to kill them if they even have a hint of a smell of Marxism."

When someone smells of dog crap they are not welcome in my house no matter how faint the smell.

Still I wouldn't kill them over it.

#16 | Posted by Tor at 2

How many times do you see here on DR people list Democrats as Marxist?
the thing is people will call are sorts of political systems marxists
say like Iceland or France I sure you people in many of the Latin America
Nations were being and called Marxists just wanted justice and the end of butchery of the natives and the end of dictatorship.
And by the way not everything Marx had to say was wrong.

#18 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-08 01:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

Not all socialism is marxist.

#19 | Posted by Tor at 2013-03-08 01:14 AM | Reply | Flag:

i support LT.

#20 | Posted by ichiro at 2013-03-08 04:24 AM | Reply | Flag:

20 | Posted by ichiro

So do I.
OK I probably should back off responding here before RCade accuses me of padding this thread.

#21 | Posted by PunchyPossum at 2013-03-08 05:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2013 World Readable

 

Advertisement