Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, March 01, 2013

Less than two months into President Obama's second term, new numbers show the national debt increased by more than $6 trillion since he took office.

It's the largest increase to date under any U.S. president. During the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush, the debt soared by $4.9 trillion.

Without fanfare, the Bureau of Public Debt at the Treasury Department quietly posted its daily debt report showing the total public debt of the U.S. government topped $16.687 trillion. (To be exact: $16,687,289,180,215.37)

On January 20, 2009, the day Mr. Obama took office, the debt stood at $10.626 trillion. The latest posting reflects an increase of over $6 trillion.

The dubious fiscal milestone came on same day as Mr. Obama and congressional leaders met to discuss the $85 billion in automatic indiscriminate spending cuts that start to take effect today.

Advertisement

Menu

Advertisement

Subscriptions

Author Info

zack991

 

Advertisement

MORE STORIES

 

Advertisement

More

The president wanted a package of targeted spending cuts and elimination of tax breaks to avert the mandatory reductions in spending that he says will adversely effect people nationwide. No deal was reached.

But the struggle to come up with just $85 billion in spending reductions or tax hikes is a big part of the reason why the national debt continues to expand.

Contributing to the National Debt, the federal deficit has topped $1 trillion four years running. Mr. Obama has routinely blamed his predecessor for policies that has sent the debt soaring on his watch.

Nevertheless, the Office of Management and Budget projects the national debt will continue to increase by over $800 billion this year and by amounts in the range of $500 billion to $800 billion in the out years - all of which will add to the national debt.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

WOW

#1 | Posted by zack991 at 2013-03-02 09:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

#1 | Posted by zack991

Please don't start this stuff so early. Danni is still sleepin' it off and when she gets up she's gonna go ballistic and lecture us over and over about how Little Caesar Barackus has reduced the deficit by billions and billions.

#2 | Posted by jestgettinalong at 2013-03-02 10:16 AM | Reply | Flag:

Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower?

It's Barack Obama.

www.forbes.com

Old spending by GW accounts for most of the debt.

Obama is a piker when it comes to new spending growth, GW at 8.1%, Obama at 1.4%.








#3 | Posted by Corky at 2013-03-02 10:57 AM | Reply | Flag:

Maybe if that Fortune link is posted a few hundred more times somebody will be impressed.

#4 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-03-02 11:02 AM | Reply | Flag:

Air-blogging, lol.

Of course, the links to the CBO data are right in the article, Curmudgefidian.

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2013-03-02 11:06 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Old spending by GW accounts for most of the debt."

Wrong...doesn't work that way. Debt is accumulated by annual deficits, not by spending itself. The annual deficits result from spending money we don't have each year (borrowing) and the trillion dollar plus deficits of the last four years are undoubtedly the largest in history. Added up, those deficits have increased the the national debt to a record level REGARDLESS of how much spending increased. Bush may have increased spending by a larger PERCENTAGE, of previous years, but it wasn't nearly as many total dollars or as much BORROWED money as what Obama has spent. Spending, deficits and debt are different things, Corky, and can be presented in various ways. I know I don't have to tell you that. In just pure dollars, Obama has spent more, borrowed more, had larger deficits and the largest increase in national debt.

#6 | Posted by jestgettinalong at 2013-03-02 11:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Here is a quick look at total debt as accumulated by each US President.

www.ritholtz.com

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2013-03-02 11:34 AM | Reply | Flag:

This economy is now at the point of stagnation. The end is in view. Expansionist government is now at the pinnacle of implosion. Tax revenues are lagging spending in an enormous structural deficit. The government dominating the economy and spending no longer can be contained to the entitlement constituencies and/or lobbying cartels.

Anyone look at the money velocity chart lately---it's approaching depression levels. Maybe we need to spend more money both fiscally/monetarily which the great economist Krugman suggested----what an idiot. We are past being able to control the eventual outcome and more money will just ultimately make the pain even greater when the slide (which has already started) accelerates.

#8 | Posted by matsop at 2013-03-02 11:38 AM | Reply | Flag:

Here is a quick look at total debt as accumulated by each US President.

www.ritholtz.com

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2013-03-02 11:34 AM | Reply |

Well, Bush did a great job in 8 years; I wonder whether Obama will beat his record----he's got 4 years to do it.

#9 | Posted by matsop at 2013-03-02 11:42 AM | Reply | Flag:

justget,

Its all just creative accounting with a purpose. If the debt mattered there would nver have been a $16 trillion bailout, largely carried out under Shrub, but continued under Obama. All that money was created out of thin air, with a few strokes of computer keys. Yet, the national debt did not change. This sudden concern about the deficit is another phoney crisis designed to further an evil political agenda by the 1% to further enrich themselves at everyone elses expense. Nothing more or less than that. Both parties are actors in this theatrical illusion for a few crumbs. One guiding principal is underwater banks must be made whole at the expense of the people they screwed. No different than the divine right of Kings.

#10 | Posted by nutcase at 2013-03-02 11:42 AM | Reply | Flag:

The "too big to fail banks" are now the "too bigger to fail banks"---when things rollover, the banking industry and your 1%ers will be trashed while mainstreet will suffer but only for awhile since all that money sitting on the balance sheets of the Federal reserve and vaults of banks will be history. It would be a beautiful thing to see the current global banking industry along with the Federal Reserve decimated---ultimately mainstreet will benefit.

#11 | Posted by matsop at 2013-03-02 11:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Its all just creative accounting with a purpose."

No argument. And for Corky's edification, I certainly wasn't defending Bush. The old adage that, "Figures don't lie, but liars can figure," holds true. The number crunchers (Corky too) defending the current administration wanna put their man forward as the most frugal president and lowest spender and debt creator in many decades and for anyone with two brain cells, that dog won't hunt. Some folks MIGHT get a clue from the fact the U.S credit rating was lowered for the FIRST TIME in history (and it certainly isn't all Obama's fault although he hasn't "helped" any.) The U.S. credit rating is in peril of another drop as well. Spin it any way you want, but these developments are NOT indications that Obama is doing a stellar job on the economy.

"A downgrade by Fitch would make two out of three major credit rating agencies to knock U.S. off the top rung of the most credit-worthy nations. Standard & Poor's cut its AAA rating on U.S. debt during Washington's 2011 battle over raising the debt ceiling. Moody's, the third agency, has its top Aaa rating for the U.S. under review."

www.usatoday.com

#12 | Posted by jestgettinalong at 2013-03-02 12:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

S&P, Fitch & Moodys provided AAA ratings to toxic securities. No one should take Standard & Poors, Fitch or Moodys seriously. They are just one piece of a large global criminal organization selling their opinion to the highest bidder and their downgrading of US debt, which is still about 1/6th as great as Japan, was another paid for political move in the ongoing class war. Japan is taking an entirely different way out, throwing their central bank under the bus. Its a long slog, but that process has begun and will probably put to bed a ton of right wing elitist inspired BS.

#13 | Posted by nutcase at 2013-03-02 12:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2013 World Readable

 

Advertisement