Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, February 28, 2013

Paul Watson and members of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society have been called "pirates" by a U.S. judge over their tactics in disrupting the yearly whale hunt off the coast of Antarctica. "You don't need a peg leg or an eye patch," 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in a ruling. "When you ram ships; hurl glass containers of acid; drag metal-reinforced ropes in the water to damage propellers and rudders; launch smoke bombs and flares with hooks; and point high-powered lasers at other ships, you are, without a doubt, a pirate, no matter how high-minded you believe your purpose to be."

Advertisement

Menu

Advertisement

Subscriptions

Author Info

boaz

 

Advertisement

MORE STORIES

 

Advertisement

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

Absolutely correct. And it is especially dangerous when a social/political motive is used to justify this kind of behavior.
And I also want whaling banned, but do it legitimately.

#1 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-02-27 03:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

Another victory for the murderers of the planet. Idiots everywhere will rejoice. International sanctions should have been placed on Japan a long time ago.

#2 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-27 03:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Another victory for the murderers of the planet."

Killing whale is now murdering the planet?!

#3 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-02-27 04:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

"When you ram ships; hurl glass containers of acid; drag metal-reinforced ropes in the water to damage propellers and rudders; launch smoke bombs and flares with hooks; and point high-powered lasers at other ships, you are, without a doubt, a pirate, no matter how high-minded you believe your purpose to be."

Posted by boaz at 03:44 PM | 2 COMMENTS | permalink |

Another victory for the murderers of the planet. Idiots everywhere will rejoice. International sanctions should have been placed on Japan a long time ago.

#2 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-27 03:56 PM | Reply

Null, where do you live? I'll ram your house with a bull dozer, hurl glass containers of acid at it, drag metal-reinforced ropes in your lawn to damage those funny green plants in your front yard; launch smoke bombs and flares with hooks toward your propane tanks; and point high-powered lasers at your windows at night.

I'm not entitled to wreck your property just because I think you're full of it and don't agree with some of your positions.

#4 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-27 04:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

Another victory for the murderers of the planet.

#2 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-27 03:56 PM |

Must be really out-raged about the murder of innocent fetuses if he cares that much about animals.

#5 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-27 04:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I'm not entitled to wreck your property"

Japan has been raping the oceans for decades, despite international condemnation. Their government should be on trial for crimes against nature.

#6 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-27 04:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

The real pirates are corporate capitalist fishing fleets which are vacuuming the oceans and have already destroyed much of its carrying capacity.

"National Geographic News
May 15, 2003

Only 10 percent of all large fish -- both open ocean species including tuna, swordfish, marlin and the large groundfish such as cod, halibut, skates and flounder -- are left in the sea, according to research published in today's issue of the scientific journal Nature.
news.nationalgeographic.com

#7 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-27 04:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

Paul Watson and members of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society have been called "pirates" by a U.S. judge over their tactics in disrupting the yearly whale hunt off the coast of Antarctica.

This "yearly whale hunt" is supposed to be for scientific purposes only. Not for Japanese public consumption. So who are the international criminals?

What is the scientific purpose of this annual slaughter and when are the results going to be published in the scientific journals? When all the whales have been eaten by the Japanese?

I support the activities of members of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. They are very brave people, unlike some U.S. judges.

#8 | Posted by Sord at 2013-02-28 07:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

What is the scientific purpose of this annual slaughter and when are the results going to be published in the scientific journals? When all the whales have been eaten by the Japanese?

#8 | Posted by Sord

Exactly. And, why would "research" require the slaughter of up to a thousand whales?

#9 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2013-02-28 07:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

-When you ram ships; hurl glass containers of acid;

The Sea Shepherds are the smaller ships, the ramees not the rammers.

And the acid just smells really bad.

The Japanese vessel processes the whale meat for sale to Japanese consumers.

Research, my ass.

#10 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-28 07:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

Gotta agree with Nulli on this. The Japanese are raping the oceans. I want my grandchildren to grow up in a world where whales still exist. The people combatting the whalers are saving the lives of living whales, I commend them. The acid though not so much.

#11 | Posted by danni at 2013-02-28 07:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

Doesn't the Japanese Navy have frogmen? Just sink the ships in port, like the French did with the Greenpeace idiots. Or take the ships at sea, ensure that the crew is removed, and scuttle them.

#12 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-28 07:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

butyric acid is used to smell up the killing ops and taint the meat. rotten butter.

it's not the burning kind.

NATIONAL BREAKING NEWS

'Pirate' ruling irrelevant: Sea Shepherd

Mr Watson said the judge had ignored aggression from the Japanese fleet, which has clashed with Sea Shepherd vessels in recent days.

"I guess that puts me in the same boat as Johnny Depp," Mr Watson told AAP from aboard the Steve Irwin.

"That's an opinion, it's certainly not a judgment.

"He didn't mention anything in there about the fact that the Japanese have destroyed one of our ships (the Ady Gil in 2010), they've thrown concussion grenades at us, hit us with water cannons and laser beams.

"It seems to be a very one-sided opinion."

"The whole thing is irrelevant," Mr Watson said.

"This is beyond the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit Court of the United States."

The ruling came as Japan's fisheries minister Yoshimasa Hayashi compared his country's whaling to Australians eating kangaroo meat.

more

www.theaustralian.com.au

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-28 07:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

The Japanese will stop hunting whales when whales stop being tasty.

#14 | Posted by ness_gadol at 2013-02-28 07:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Inspires Attendees at Sea Shepherd's National Press Club Briefing on Monday

www.seashepherd.org

www.seashepherd.org

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-28 07:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sea Shepherd crew not 'pirates' - expert

www.nzherald.co.nz

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-28 07:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

since the 9th court ruling

Sea Shepherd Shut Down Japanese Whaling 2013

www.youtube.com

#17 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-28 08:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sea Shepherd tricks Japan into selling $2 million ship for use against whaling

Japan's whaling industry is going to be so pissed when it finds out what animal rights group Sea Shepherd has just done. The Paul Watson led activists have tricked the nation into selling it a $2 million government ship, which will be refitted and in turn be used against Japan's whale hunt this year.

japandailypress.com

#18 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-28 08:12 PM | Reply | Flag:

Japanese whaling ships would be a good target for drones. That's drone warfare you can believe in!

#19 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-28 08:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

#19 lol!

I've wondered why they haven't used them, at least for aerial surveillance if not for dropping butter acid.

I offered to buy them a drone if they would name it the USS Corky.

#20 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-28 08:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

Serious question: Which is worse? The Japanese killing whales, or the US using mistreated Chinese labor to make our cool electronic toys?

#21 | Posted by ness_gadol at 2013-02-28 08:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

Good question, Ness. The "American way of life" is enabled by imperialism, including slave labor.

#22 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-28 08:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

Serious question: Which is worse? The Japanese killing whales, or the US using mistreated Chinese labor to make our cool electronic toys?
-- Sent from my i-Phone

#23 | Posted by uglyblinddate at 2013-02-28 08:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

Ugly: If I wanted words put in my mouth, I would eat a dictionary.

#24 | Posted by ness_gadol at 2013-02-28 08:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

"-- Sent from my i-Phone

#23 | Posted by uglyblinddate

Well there's Mr. TuQuoQue back in action, and still clueless as to what his favorite logical fallacy entails.

#25 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-28 08:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

Oh, I know. I once thought that if you were serious about not having your gizmo money going to slave labor, you could have bought a Motorola or a Samsung instead of an i-anything. But too many cool liberals have Apple junk, so they don't like hearing jokes about Foxconn suicide rates and stuff like that.

Party on. Keep forgetting that in the world of libbies, every argument is purely rhetorical.

#26 | Posted by uglyblinddate at 2013-02-28 08:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sea Shepherd crew not 'pirates' - expert

You mean they didn't rape, pillage and plunder the Japanese?

Arrrrr!

#27 | Posted by donnerboy at 2013-02-28 09:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm not entitled to wreck your property just because I think you're full of it and don't agree with some of your positions.

Your tune changes when you think somebody might have WMD.

#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 09:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

want my grandchildren to grow up in a world where whales still exist.

The right-wingers don't much care either way.
There's your fundamental difference on this issue.
They can't put a price tag on how much it's worth for whales to exist or not.
So they fall back on things they do understand: The rule of law and deferring to the interests of the wealthy.

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 09:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

Ugly: My phone is a Motorola.

#30 | Posted by ness_gadol at 2013-02-28 09:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

watch the Cove and then tell us what you think.

#31 | Posted by donnerboy at 2013-02-28 09:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

"They can't put a price tag on how much it's worth for whales to exist or not. So they fall back on things they do understand: The rule of law and deferring to the interests of the wealthy."

Is it any more than what a deer is worth? What about a squirrel?

A cow?

And if hunting whales pisses you off so bad, the place to start is right here in the US, where the indigenous people of Alaska are still allowed to do do. The Sea Shepherd would have no problem plowing through the hull of the tiny boats the eskiomos use, sending all the whale haters to the bottom of the briny depths.

Surely Diane Feinstein could attach something to her anti-gun ban that would prohibit americans from hunting whales. But then again, you'd probably want the measure to pass.

#32 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-28 09:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

#32.

Well done.

#33 | Posted by uglyblinddate at 2013-02-28 09:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

Madbomber: Excellent point.

#34 | Posted by ness_gadol at 2013-02-28 09:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Excellent point."

Really? What point was that?

#35 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-28 09:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

#32 the magnitude of those two whale hunts would have to be taken into account for your point to be meaningful.

It's not the hunting that's the problem, per se, it's the impact of the hunt on the ecosystem. Biodiversity is necessary for a healthy and more resilient environment. This means deer should be hunted, preferably by wolves and other large predators, but since we've removed them it's up to us.

Whales don't have much in the way of natural predators. Some small amount of hunting can be tolerated. But the Japanese are lying when they say it's for research; it's for meat.

#36 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 09:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

Blue whales are the largest mammals, and possibly the largest animal of any kind to have ever lived on Earth. Blues were hunted to the brink of extinction during the 20th Century, before being protected. Fin whales are the second largest living animal after the blue whale and are also endangered.

The International Whaling Commission was founded in 1946 to regulate and protect the giant mammals, which had all but been hunted to the edge of extinction, In 1986, it caused a blanket moratorium on commercial whaling.

The Japanese have continued to slaughter whales for what they claim are "scientific purposes," despite the international ban on commercial whaling that came into effect in 1986. Japan says it conducts scientific research using a loophole in the international ban, but its no secret that the mammals end up as food.

More than 25,000 whales worldwide have been slaughtered by Japan and a handful of other countries since 1986.

The US Court of Appeals says the research is legal, and that the fleet has a right to be there. However,the court has no jurisdiction in the part of the Southern Antarctic Ocean where whaling takes place and the Sea Shepherd uses Australian and Dutch-flagged ships. The court also ignores Australian law which prohibits whaling in Australian waters.

Madbomber's point about indigenous people is irrelevant as they are already excluded from the moratorium.

#37 | Posted by Sord at 2013-02-28 09:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

And if hunting whales pisses you off so bad

You're projecting your make-believe reason as to why anyone who opposes hunting must do so.

It's not the act of hunting. It's the size of the take, and how that impacts the ecosystem.

The problem on Easter Island wasn't that they chopped down trees to move those giant stone statues around, it's that they chopped down too many of them.

See Also: Forests in Haiti vs. forests in Dominican Republic. Papa Doc saw them as his personal cash cow, Trujillo bothered to care for the fate of his people after he was gone. Compare to Japan, where 150 years ago some smart leader realized forests resources had to be preserved if they were going to continue to be productive.

#38 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 09:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

"It's not the hunting that's the problem, per se, it's the impact of the hunt on the ecosystem. Biodiversity is necessary for a healthy and more resilient environment. This means deer should be hunted, preferably by wolves and other large predators, but since we've removed them it's up to us."

I guess I don't understand why it would be preferable for wolves or cats to hunt deer, but not humans.

"Whales don't have much in the way of natural predators. Some small amount of hunting can be tolerated. But the Japanese are lying when they say it's for research; it's for meat."

If you are arguing against wanton destruction of a species, that's certainly one thing. You're not going to find many who support the utter extinction of any animal. And in many cases, hunters are also some of the greatest conservationists, because they want there to be animals to hunt in the future. The Sea Shepherd Pirates act not out of concern that whales may become extinct (at least not entirely-some species of whale are not at all endangered). They do it out of a sense that it is immoral for someone to kill marine mammals. In that way, they aren't much different than the anti-abortion activists who use direct action against abortion providers.

"Madbomber's point about indigenous people is irrelevant as they are already excluded from the moratorium."

If your concern truly was to prevent whales from becoming extinct, then there should be no exemptions. In fact, some conservationists have already called for an end to indigenous hunting in the US out of fears that the hunts are unsustainable given the population totals of the whales that are being harvested.

#39 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-28 10:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You're projecting your make-believe reason as to why anyone who opposes hunting must do so. It's not the act of hunting. It's the size of the take, and how that impacts the ecosystem."

So you're concern is more about sustainability. That's legitimate. Like I said, You're not going to find too many hunter who want to be the the guy to kill the last elk, or even the last black rhino for that matter.

But in that regard you are different from the Sea Shepherd pirates, who attack dolphin hunters, regardless of the fact that dolphins are in no way endangered.

#40 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-28 10:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

To hunt a species to extinction is not logical.
--Mr Spock

#41 | Posted by madscientist at 2013-02-28 10:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

"To hunt a species to extinction is not logical...

Except to POS capitalists. Profits today, screw nature and future generations.

#42 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-28 10:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

Dolphins are intelligent mammals. And many species are endangered and there are laws to protect them.

#43 | Posted by donnerboy at 2013-02-28 10:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nulli: My big problem with what these people do is not that they do it, it's that they don't seem to realize that Americans are just as guilty of depleting species as the Japanese.

#44 | Posted by ness_gadol at 2013-02-28 10:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

I guess I don't understand why it would be preferable for wolves or cats to hunt deer, but not humans.

Because they do a better job of it, and manage to do it without dumping toxic lead in the environment?

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 11:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

You're not going to find many who support the utter extinction of any animal.

About 150 years ago in this country there was a great push to remove the buffalo from the Great Plains.
This was seen as an effective way to remove the Indian from the Great Plains.
You think human nature has changed so much in a century and a half?

#46 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 11:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

So you're concern is more about sustainability. That's legitimate.

My concern is entirely about sustainability.
Sustainability of the entire ecosystem, in which each organism has a role to play and a niche to fill.

#47 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 11:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's funny how none of the right-wingers have lambasted the opinion of the "ultra-liberal" "most overturned on appeal" Ninth Circuit.

#48 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 11:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Madbomber's point about indigenous people is irrelevant as they are already excluded from the moratorium."

If your concern truly was to prevent whales from becoming extinct, then there should be no exemptions. In fact, some conservationists have already called for an end to indigenous hunting in the US out of fears that the hunts are unsustainable given the population totals of the whales that are being harvested

#39 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-28 10:04 PM

The Japanese are slaughtering the whales with very large factory ships supplying faster smaller ships that are armed with grenade tipped harpoons that fired from the bow of the ship and explodes inside the whale. The death of these whales is a dreadful thing to behold. Sometimes it can take hours. The Japanese are violating the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling by killing whales for "research purposes".

Indigenous people are not armed in such a barbarous manner and their catch is relatively small so the whales populations can be harvested sustainable.

On the other hand, why don't we allow open slather on the hunting of whales so that any country in the World that wants to can do it. Why should the Japanese (and the Icelanders, the Greenlanders and Norwegians) be the only ones to enjoy a whale burger. What right do they have to exclusivity over any other country? I'm sure they wouldn't object if we all started doing it. But we'd better be quick about it because there won't be any left for anyone in short order.

#49 | Posted by Sord at 2013-03-01 12:09 AM | Reply | Flag:

I support the activities of members of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. They are very brave people, unlike some U.S. judges.

If the few episodes of Whale Wars that I've seen is any indication, they're spotlight seeking loons.

In the final episode I saw they got two of their people aboard a whaling vessel via a small boat that pulled up close enough for them to jump on.

When the dumb schmucks were tied up (instead of being thrown overboard...) the [...]hole leader immediately called some reporter to say two of their guys had been taken hostage.

They're nuts. Period.

#50 | Posted by jpw at 2013-03-01 12:56 AM | Reply | Flag:

I'm not sure of the legal definition of piracy but I associate it with theft and or hijacking. I think of the Sea Shephers more as vandals and vigilantes.

#51 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2013-03-01 01:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

What's up with these Sea Shepherds?

Don't they know everything in nature is free to be taken on a first come, first served basis?

#52 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-03-01 03:15 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Because they do a better job of it, and manage to do it without dumping toxic lead in the environment?"

So that's your argument?

If hunters were to suddenly start using cartridges that didn't contain lead, you'd be cool with it? Or would you come up with some other excuse as to why wolves and cats do a better job. BTW, I think if you shared a living space with wolves, you wouldn't be such a fan. Let's just say they've experienced something of a miraculous rebound in the mountain states. SO next time you decide to go to Sun Valley for the weekend, you might want to leave your purse dog at home. Or he might wind up a wolf snack.

"You think human nature has changed so much in a century and a half?"

A) Most whales aren't facing extinction

B) which enemy can we defeat by killing all the whales, if we wnated to? Japan? Did that already. Used a slightly more effective method.

Sustainability of the entire ecosystem, in which each organism has a role to play and a niche to fill.

Including humans? Look at the number of animals harvested every year, specifically by Japan. Humans have hunted whales for millenia. Probably at a lwer rate now than ever before in history.

"In the final episode I saw they got two of their people aboard a whaling vessel via a small boat that pulled up close enough for them to jump on."

"Indigenous people are not armed in such a barbarous manner..."

They use the same tools. Mainly Harpoons. They are the american successor to Captain Ahab.

...and their catch is relatively small so the whales populations can be harvested sustainable. about 50 whales per year out of a population of over 10,000. Conservationists say this is not sustainable.

Off the coast of Smalia, that is definitely called piracy. Maybe the Somalia pirates should begin emulating the Sea Shepherd crew.

#53 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-03-01 08:14 AM | Reply | Flag:

If the Japanese are doing nothing wrong, why are they lying about what they are doing?

And why are their people here white-knighting for people who can't even be honest about they are doing?

Weird.

#54 | Posted by Sully at 2013-03-01 09:29 AM | Reply | Flag:

The Japanese managed the insertion of language in the Treaty that allowed for some whales taken as "research", and then lie saying they are doing research... while they process the whale meat for consumption right on the ship.

#55 | Posted by Corky at 2013-03-01 09:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sounds to me as if this judge (in the liberal 9th circuit!) just opened a door that the Japanese can exploit when they defend themselves from a pirate attack with force. Piracy is an international crime and any vessel engaged in piracy can be destroyed without repercussion. In fact, the whalers don't even have to defend themselves - other entities can provide the defense. That means that if a US Navy vessel is in the area and the whaler says "Mayday! I'm being attacked by pirates!", the US Navy vessel can render assistance (in the form of sending the pirates to Davy Jones). I expect that the JMSDF might find a Kongo-class DDG that needs some cold-weather training, for that matter. I hope the Shepherd's are streaming their video live, because if the JMSDF decides to sink them, there won't be any recorded video evidence left.

#56 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2013-03-01 09:58 AM | Reply | Flag:

Because they do a better job of it, and manage to do it without dumping toxic lead in the environment?

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-02-28 11:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

Gee, I didn't know my bow left extensive amounts of toxic lead everywhere. I better start cleaning up after it.

#57 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2013-03-01 10:08 AM | Reply | Flag:

"I hope the Shepherd's are streaming their video live, because if the JMSDF decides to sink them, there won't be any recorded video evidence left."

I doubt they would do that. Between China going crazy over those useless islands and North Korea being North Korea, they are crapping in their pants. The last thing they would do is use their military against American citizens right now.

#58 | Posted by Sully at 2013-03-01 10:10 AM | Reply | Flag:

The islands may be useless, but the waters around them are what is really in dispute. China would claim territorial waters around those islands and thus gain all the fishing rights, which a major part of why they want them. Part two is their 'long game' strategy, which could be viewed as knocking down dominoes. If they get their hands on the Senkaku Islands and the waters surrounding them, they now have the waters strategically north of Taiwan, between Taiwan and the air bases on Okinawa. It's part of their Second Island Chain strategy. As part of "The First Chain", they genuinely believe that they own not only the waters and islands of the South China Sea, but also the Philippines. That strategy extends north to Taiwan and includes all the smaller Japanese Islands, including Okinawa, and all the waters between there and mainland China. The Second Islands extend clear out to Palau, Saipan and Iwo Jima.

#59 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2013-03-01 11:01 AM | Reply | Flag:

Another victory for the murderers of the planet. Idiots everywhere will rejoice. International sanctions should have been placed on Japan a long time ago.
#2 | Posted by nullifidian

I agree with the judge. That's his job. He called it correctly.

A pirate is a pirate no matter what their motive is.

I just happen to agree with the pirates too.

#60 | Posted by RonPaul at 2013-03-01 05:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I agree with the judge. That's his job. He called it correctly. "

Of course you do, Eddie. Rightwing libertarians will always side with capitalists vs. the environment. It's in their nature, like the scorpion...

#61 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-03-01 05:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I agree with the judge. That's his job. He called it correctly. "
Of course you do, Eddie. Rightwing libertarians will always side with capitalists vs. the environment. It's in their nature, like the scorpion...
#61 | Posted by nullifidian

You are mistaken on the two points I made.

No. I don't think you understand the nature of a judge's job. He's supposed to interpret the law. According to the law, they are pirates.

I also happen to agree with the pirate's motive. I believe in what they are doing, but they are crossing the line.

#62 | Posted by RonPaul at 2013-03-01 05:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

.... CorpoRat Bench Man!

**** What does Chief Judge Alex Kozinski think of all these lawless,gluttonous BIG BIZ Fishing Corporations that are steadily "Raping & Pillaging" all the wildlife in the world's oceans to extinction?

#63 | Posted by AntiCadillac at 2013-03-01 08:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

"That strategy extends north to Taiwan and includes all the smaller Japanese Islands, including Okinawa, and all the waters between there and mainland China. The Second Islands extend clear out to Palau, Saipan and Iwo Jima."

Saipan is part of the CNMI. A few miles away is Guam, which is a US territory, and one of the largest military bases outside of the continental US. It perpetually hosts a detachment of long range bombers, as well as the HQ for Naval Forces, Marianas.

That's not a fight China wants. Ever.

#64 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-03-01 10:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

Including humans? Look at the number of animals harvested every year, specifically by Japan. Humans have hunted whales for millenia. Probably at a lwer rate now than ever before in history.

You're thinking like an accountant, you need to think like an economist.
History only goes back a few thousand years.
To say the lowest rate ever in history narrows the discussion to hunting habits.
So now you're not really talking about whales any more.
You're ignoring all the other interactions we have with their ecosystem.
If you want to make this exclusively about hunting, that's like reading just one chapter of a book.
For example, it's probably relevant that the oceans are ever more polluted by the same people doing the hunt.

#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-03-01 11:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

Snoof,

You're comparing apples (sustainability) with oranges (Sea Shepherd's moral argument against hunting whales). Presumably, based on their own stated mission, SSI would fight against whale hunts even if you couldn't swing a dead cat without hitting a whale. Just like there are those that would fight against hunting anything.

My father shares a lot of your sentiments. Yet he is also a hunter. And he's not alone. One of the things I have been hearing about for years is how ranchers have trashed out much of the public land in this country. You don't come off as much of an outdoorsman, but I would challenge you to find an alpine meadow in this country that wasn't littered with cow patties. Most of the time, these grazing rights are purchased for pennies per acre. In at least one case that I know of where cattle were being grazed on righted public lands inside military operating areas (protected airspace where military aircraft can operate freely), a rancher successfully sued the Air Force on the basis that aircraft noise was harming the livestock. The government paid out a lot of money in damages, yet still allowed the ranchers to graze on those lands.

#66 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-03-01 11:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

I wouldn't be comfortable hunting or killing dolphins or whales, but that's because of who I am. If I were Japanese, and I had generations of ancestors who had hunted and eaten marine mammals, my position would probably be much different. Just like an Indian (dot, not feather) would be very uncomfortable with the thought of eating beef. Should the rest of the world refrain from eating beef because it creeps out the folks in Delhi?

#67 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-03-01 11:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

Should the rest of the world refrain from eating beef because it creeps out the folks in Delhi?

If these were farm-raised whales it would be a different story.

#69 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-03-02 02:21 AM | Reply | Flag:

farm-raised whales

One of Reitze's new business ventures.

#70 | Posted by Zatoichi at 2013-03-02 02:23 AM | Reply | Flag:

You don't come off as much of an outdoorsman, but I would challenge you to find an alpine meadow in this country that wasn't littered with cow patties.

I'm not seeing the relevancy. As I alluded to in my last post, cattle are domesticated livestock. Whales... not so much.

Presumably, based on their own stated mission, SSI would fight against whale hunts even if you couldn't swing a dead cat without hitting a whale.

That's ridiculous reasoning.

First, whales simply aren't that plentiful.

Second, it's unlikely they could ever become so, especially while we hunt them. It's observed throughout nature that the larger animals simply exist in smaller numbers. A whale might be a million times the size of a krill. That's why it eats a million of them.

So your deat-cat argument presents an a priori invalid hypothetical scenario. Conclusions drawn from invalid positions aren't ones I can get behind, and you shouldn't either.

I see what you're saying. It would be ridiculous for people who oppose hunting bears to still oppose it if bears were as plentiful as deer and nibbling away at our suburban gardens and jumping in front of cars. But that's not a scenario which is likely to come to pass.

#71 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-03-02 02:35 AM | Reply | Flag:

I see what you're saying. It would be ridiculous for people who oppose hunting bears to still oppose it if bears were as plentiful as deer and nibbling away at our suburban gardens and jumping in front of cars. But that's not a scenario which is likely to come to pass.

#71 | Posted by snoofy at 2013-03-02 02:35 AM | Reply | Flag:

That goes on in New Jersey. "Environmentalists" have been protesting the new Bear hunts since they started 3 years ago.

#72 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2013-03-02 08:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2013 World Readable

 

Advertisement