Book: O.J. Simpson's Son Did It

Sunday, February 24, 2013

A new book titled by private investigator William C. Dear, O.J. Is Innocent And I Can Prove It, claims that evidence suggests O.J. Simpson's son Jason Simpson killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman in 1994. Dear writes that Jason was prescribed Depakote after diagnosed with "intermittent rage disorder" and had stopped taking it two months before the killings. The book has a photo of Jason wearing a knit cap like one found at the crime scene.

Posted by rcade at 01:58 PM | 20 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Front Page
Breaking News
Comments
Flagged Comments
User Blogs
Write a Blog Entry
Create a Poll
Edit Account
Weekly Digest
Stats Page
RSS Feed
Back Page

Subscriptions

Read the Retort using RSS.

RSS Feed

Author Info

rcade

Joined 2003/04/04
Visited 2013/05/25

Status: editor

MORE STORIES

Snooki Beefs with Chris Christie (6 comments) ...

Robinson: A Mission on Climate Change (5 comments) ...

Dem Senator: Immigration Bill Lacks Votes (11 comments) ...

California Details Obamacare Insurance Plan (7 comments) ...

Obama Shifts from 'Perpetual War-Footing' (4 comments) ...

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

If the glove doesn't fit, you must... at least find out where Jason Simpson is now.

"One of Dear's colleagues told BI that Jason Simpson's whereabouts are currently unknown; O.J. has been in prison since 2008 (for armed robbery)..."

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-24 04:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm calling bull[...].

OJ's DNA is NOT identical to his son's DNA.

#2 | Posted by dean_buvia at 2013-02-24 05:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

So, Jason Simpson was taking meds to control "intermittent rage disorder" and he once (at the very least) wore a knit cap. Well, that's good enough for me. Release OJ and clear his name.

Oh wait. OJ pled "no contest" to a charge of domestic violence in 1989 (that would've been against violence against Nicole who separated from OJ that same year).

Unless some slightly more incriminating evidence--something that actually shows Jason was anywhere near the home at the time (instead of "oh, he wore a knit cap once in a photo")--I think that Mr Dear might be due for a little bit of investigating to see what ties he has to OJ.

#3 | Posted by Anotherjoe at 2013-02-24 07:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

...and it was just a coincidence OJ left town with cuts all over his hands soon after the murders. Watching him try "so hard" to put the glove on was priceless.

#4 | Posted by nutcase at 2013-02-24 07:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Jesus did it"

The left

#5 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-02-24 07:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

Imagine OJ is catholic...

#6 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2013-02-24 09:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

Black Catholic priest? Then he'd be married.

#7 | Posted by Harry_Powell at 2013-02-24 10:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Jesus did it"

He smited the whore.

The right

#5 | Posted by Diablo

Just kidding Diablo

#8 | Posted by bruceaz at 2013-02-24 10:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

**** Good maybe for another low grade Movie of the Week.. or Miniseries?

#9 | Posted by AntiCadillac at 2013-02-24 10:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Bush did it." The left

#10 | Posted by fishpaw at 2013-02-25 07:39 AM | Reply | Flag:

"The book has a photo of Jason wearing a knit cap like one found at the crime scene."

Here's another possibly suspect, also wearing a knit cap like one found at the crime scene - www.bagnewsnotes.com

#11 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2013-02-25 07:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

I don't know what this author is up to but I looked at his "evidence" and I didn't see anything that would hold up in court.

I was a committed trial watcher back then and I've read every book written on the subject. I recall that Jason's alibi was checked out and he was cleared as a suspect by his employer. [He was a "cook" or a "chef" at the time I recall].

Mr. Dear better be a better author than he is a detective if he expects this witch hunt to earn him any money.

I was in the minority that didn't think the jury would find O.J. guilty but in the court of public opinion he's doing his time and the public seems satisfied.

#12 | Posted by Twinpac at 2013-02-25 08:20 AM | Reply | Flag:

O.J is too much the narcissist to take the fall for
anyone.

#13 | Posted by tiger150 at 2013-02-25 08:55 AM | Reply | Flag:

If the evidence presented is true, it is certainly compelling. Ain't it gonna be fun if they were killed because they changed restaurant plans?

#14 | Posted by kudzu at 2013-02-25 10:41 AM | Reply | Flag:

I keep thinking of the look on OJ's face when he heard the Not Guilty verdict. I always thought he seemed to have the expression of someone who was happy for the good fortune of someone other than himself, almost a parental gratitude of sorts.

And then I remember the televised police chase.

#15 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2013-02-25 10:48 AM | Reply | Flag:

-I recall that Jason's alibi was checked out and he was cleared as a suspect by his employer. [He was a "cook" or a "chef" at the time I recall].

The author questions his alibi by saying the time card Jason turned in that night was hand written instead of punched on the clock that was working.

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2013-02-25 11:43 AM | Reply | Flag:

I would at least say, given the claims, that there would be a compelling reason to go obtain a DNA sample from Jason Simpson. Assuming that the super-duper quality LAPD still has the DNA evidence to compare it to, of course. I thought the police were supposed to be all about justice....

#17 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2013-02-25 12:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

Here's the next question: if the case is reopened and DNA puts Jason Simpson at the scene, what happens to the sham civil suit? Does he take the Goldman's and Brown's back to court and sue to get his money back? After all, if someone else is convicted, he surely cannot be found liable for wrongful death. You could argue that OJ having to essentially give everything he owns to Nicole's family is what nudged him toward the incident he is currently serving time for, too, and I would say there might even be some 'pain and suffering', interest lost, etc..he could hit them up for. Intrigue, intrigue....

#18 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2013-02-25 12:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

I don't know whether OJ did it or not. But I have always thought that Nicole Brown's parents were pathetic closet racists. Thier concern was never for justice. It was for money and faux revenge. The judge in the civil trial should have taken the opportunity and put OJ and Nicole's combined estates in trust for the kid(s) and told the grandparents to have a good cry and then go back to work.

#19 | Posted by bogey1355 at 2013-02-25 07:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

#19

I never thought about it that way and don't know about the racism part but I have to agree with the suggested civil judgment.

#20 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2013-02-25 07:23 PM | Reply | Flag: