please, the vet initates such things.

you've lost it Reitze, get help.
incompetent/pschatrically invalid should not possess guns. and you counter that with: if the police ve them such a person as described should have them.

you read from schiester, yet don't really believe in the constitution-al system.

If you're promoting a philosophy then at least consider its trend. Like... anyone who is too irresponsible to own a gun should be locked up.
Like if they're really that dangerous then no way are we safe from them having knives, gasoline, or even vinegar.

FULLY BAKED IGNORANCE, FOR YOUR FELLOW IGNORANT.

as far as vets go, i have such conditions, so i DO KNOW.

the FEDS only do a criminal BG check to insure you are a felon, for a carry permit. other laws are local.

...and it all started with Reagan.

no one who takes psychotropic medications should own a gun.

so that disqualifies nearly everyone in this thread, except myself and Doc. :-p

i can see an ignorant vet trying to scam the system by stating that he can't handle himself, i.e., his own finances, i.e., his disability check.

this info comes from the vet or if you been n some trouble, same for civilians, an adjudication.

but then, locales are all vastly different concerning gun laws.