Other headlines from the linked website:

"Proof That President Obama Has Accomplished A Lot, Despite Obstruction"

"Republicans Getting It Wrong: It's The Message, Not The Messaging"

"Republicans Outdo Each Other For Idiocy At Clinton Benghazi Hearing"

"Massachusetts Takes The Lead Once More And Recognizes The Rights of Transgender Students"

Obviously a rigorous standard of objectivity at this "news" source. And they complain about Fox??
This article does not cite any report. It merely asserts things not in evidence. It DOES cite, as if legitimate, the "International Tribunal on Crimes of Church" whose own website says:

"The abuse, trafficking, torture and murder of children appears endemic to European culture, and continues to be actively practiced, and condoned and protected, by church, state, judicial and police forces around the globe.

"These same institutions are equally responsible for the historic genocide of indigenous peoples at the hands of European Christendom: an enormous crime against humanity which has never stopped, and continues to ravage and destroy the innocent and the earth."

Come on, Brucebanner, this is like citing the Klan for a reference!

Oh, the article also cites the Centre (note the French spelling! The organization does not use it but the linked article does.) for Constitutional rights, founded by William Kunstler, a rabid marxist and church hater.
This is rank bigotry, Bruce. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Hey! I just found a website for an impressive sounding organization called the "Institute for Historical Review." Every article seems to demean Jews but hey, with a name like that it has to have some cred, right? Just like the Center for Constitutional Rights or the International Tribunal on Crimes of Church sound like, y'know, gravitas.
So maybe if I start a thread like Bruce's using that heady sounding 'institute' for holocaust denial....I mean, historical review... as a reference, we can have a holocaust denial thread at the Drudge Retort and it will not be punished by Rcade....as Bruce's bigoted thread should be.

Who has denied there has been clergy abuse, Snoof? Name names.

"Surely it is at least possible that the current Pope is resigning because of some impending legal charge that would bring scandal to the Papacy."

It's possible Obama was born in Kenya, too. Trust those news sources?

"By the by, would you care to explain just how this thread is bigoted?"

Look at the sources cited (cf. my above post on that) and the fact the linked article makes no effort to substantiate the premise of the article.

"I didn't say people deny the abuse.
I said people deny the cover-up."

Okay, Snoof, so who has done that? Name names.
I just recently posted how glad I was Mahoney is stripped of diocesan duties. I also have several times noted it was conservative Catholics like me complaining for the past three decades about relaxed clergy standards and homos in the Church. We were called nazis by the same people eating up the stories now and glorying in the scandal, mostly ex-Catholics the likes of which post here.
So name names. I am waiting to hear.

Oh no, Snoof dodged #27. Whatever am I to do?