Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, February 20, 2013

The CEO of a U.S. tire maker send a French government official a letter saying he would have to be stupid to take over a factory where employees only put in three hours of work a day. Titan International's Maurice Taylor told the French industry minister Arnaud Montebourg in a letter published by the media Wednesday that he had no interest in rescuing a plant set for closure. "The French workforce gets paid high wages but works only three hours. They get one hour for breaks and lunch, talk for three and work for three," Taylor wrote. "Titan is going to buy a Chinese tire company or an Indian one, pay less than one Euro per hour wage and ship all the tires France needs. You can keep the so-called workers."

Advertisement

Menu

Advertisement

Subscriptions

Author Info

boaz

 

Advertisement

MORE STORIES

 

Advertisement

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you have comments about site moderation, contact the site publisher in email.

"Sir, your letter states that you want Titan to start a discussion. How stupid do you think we are?" he wrote. "Titan is the one with the money and the talent to produce tires. What does the crazy union have? It has the French government."

LOL.

This is the path the unions want the U.S. to travel.

#1 | Posted by boaz at 2013-02-20 10:09 AM | Reply | Flag:

Another CEO looking for a new location for a sweatshop. Boo Hoo! These people are too smart to get exploited by multinationals!
All this story reminds me of is how the productivity of the American worker has increased for the last thirty years while wages have stagnated.
But I'm sure those moochers sucking on the teat of the government-military-industrial complex have no complaints.

#2 | Posted by DRJIMMIES at 2013-02-20 10:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Whatever DrJim,

No one is buying the "I need to take an hour break, then sit around and "talk" for two hours, and then get about two actual hours of working in" bullcrap France is talking. The day of the Union is long gone.

France is about to learn people may have to work for a living, otherwise, they will become a 80% import nation.

#3 | Posted by boaz at 2013-02-20 11:23 AM | Reply | Flag:

"The French workforce gets paid high wages but works only three hours. They get one hour for breaks and lunch, talk for three and work for three,""

Why are French workers so much smarter than American workers?

#4 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-20 11:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Why are French workers so much smarter than American workers?

You consider that smart? Going to "work" to sit on your ass and "talk" for three hours with two hours for lunch and break? Then what the hell is the company paying for?

I consider the company stupid for allowing such a thing? Do you like being basically a bum?

#5 | Posted by boaz at 2013-02-20 11:37 AM | Reply | Flag:

Do you like being basically a bum?

#5 | Posted by boaz

Do you like being basically a mercenary?

#6 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-20 11:40 AM | Reply | Flag:

Do you like being basically a mercenary?

Nothing to do with the topic, please stay focused. If you have nothing to say and realize that what I am saying is correct, please just acknowledge it..

#7 | Posted by boaz at 2013-02-20 11:43 AM | Reply | Flag:

Do you like being basically a mercenary?

#6 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN AT 2013-02-20 11:40 AM | FLAG:

Boaz loves killing innocent Muslims.

#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2013-02-20 11:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Nothing to do with the topic, please stay focused"

Then don't call me a bum, mercenary.

#9 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-20 11:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

Then don't call me a bum, mercenary

Wanting a life of being able to sit around talking and getting paid to do it is the life of a bum. Not wanting to work and get paid for it. It has alot to do with the topic. Your name calling of me, unfortuantely, does not.

And I guess I shouldnt have called YOU a bum, rather the childish, unionized French workers. My apologies.

#10 | Posted by boaz at 2013-02-20 11:58 AM | Reply | Flag:

Wanting a life of being able to sit around talking and getting paid to do it is the life of a bum.

Your hero, Rush Limbaugh, does just that.

#11 | Posted by 726 at 2013-02-20 12:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

"France is about to learn people may bla,bla"

What does a sad-sack, potato peeling government employee know about work??

#12 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2013-02-20 12:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your hero, Rush Limbaugh, does just that.

So does YOUR president.

What does a sad-sack, potato peeling government employee know about work??

Three combat tours, 16 moves in 20 years, duty in 8 foreign nations, PVT to MAJ, I would say I know a lot about work..

#13 | Posted by boaz at 2013-02-20 12:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

So does YOUR president.

Your president too. And your CiC.

#14 | Posted by 726 at 2013-02-20 12:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Three combat tours"

How many hours spent in "combat" every day, average? More than 3?

#15 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2013-02-20 01:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

I hate going to bat for Boaz. But c'mon, the guy has served in the military over the past twenty years and been to this nation's warzones in a combat capacity. Cut the guy some major slack.

#16 | Posted by moder8 at 2013-02-20 01:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

The day of the Union is long gone.
#3 | Posted by boaz

Great!! Maybe we can return to the glory days of humanity before they came along.

#17 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2013-02-20 01:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

How many hours spent in "combat" every day, average?

During the first year tour, maybe 1 hour as I was in safer Bagram. Second tour, Kandahar, rocket attacks everyday. Third one, rarely, maybe once a month.

Your president too. And your CiC.

He doesnt represent me else the budget would be balanced, we wouldnt have national healthcare and the country would be run more to the right. He is my CIC, but he hardly represents me.

#18 | Posted by boaz at 2013-02-20 02:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

I didn't say he represented your regressive wishes, but he IS your president.

Just like Bush was mine. Funny how the right who embraced and loved W said nothing of his deficits.

It would be very interesting to see how you would have embraced Mittens deficits.

#19 | Posted by 726 at 2013-02-20 04:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

Does the Republican House represent you?

#20 | Posted by 726 at 2013-02-20 04:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

Great!! Maybe we can return to the glory days of humanity before they came along.

#17 | Posted by TFDNihilist

legalized slavery? Yup! Good times!

That will sure be fun...for the 1%.

#21 | Posted by donnerboy at 2013-02-20 05:01 PM | Reply | Flag:

The French better learn to define the word "work" sooner then later if they expect their usual daily fare of baguettes/croissants.

#22 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-20 05:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

"legalized slavery? Yup! Good times!"

Okay, but we'd have to give them(slaves) more rights than we did the last time, otherwise what would be the risk for the owners?

more commercial insurance premiums that way............HUGE risk.

#23 | Posted by eberly at 2013-02-20 05:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

Three hours a day?

No way such a factory exists.

If it does PLEASE let me know.

#24 | Posted by Tor at 2013-02-20 06:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

#24 They existed at GM. The management and the union was in on the scam. And that's why they both should have paid.

Here's what they did. Shift workers would pay $3 a day to the supervisor. He would punch their time cards for them, they came and went as they pleased. With 900 plus worker shift managers made boat loads, Union workers skated off, scamming GM shareholders. Both parties were guilty as sin, neither ended up being responsible. Obama saved them, and tried to make critics/investors feel guilty.

#25 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-02-20 06:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

When was that Dave? The 70s? They drove that kind of stuff out of the company a long time ago. It has been gone decades now. I'm not saying it didn't happen or was 'right'; but it hasn't been that way for a long time.

#26 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2013-02-20 06:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

I've been told it happened right up to the end

#27 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-02-20 06:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

@ #25

Did you read this or hear it?

#28 | Posted by Tor at 2013-02-20 06:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

Why would a company pay a worker a lot of money to do a little work whe they can pay a worker a little money to do a lot of work? No one wants to pay someone to make a meal for them in a restruant and then not cook it or pay them 100 for a hamburger because it takes 4 hours to prepare it with all the breaks and talking. So what is the difference with a tire company?

#29 | Posted by Olivenhain at 2013-02-20 06:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

Unless this is really true and not exaggerated, we just pissed off a lot of French people.

#30 | Posted by fresno500 at 2013-02-20 06:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

Why would an executive make stuff like this up? Maybe he was being a little pissy but it costs boat loads of money to move established opperations to a new country.

#31 | Posted by Olivenhain at 2013-02-20 06:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

If workers are getting paid for "sitting around and talking" for three hours a day and don't have that right in their contract, then the problem is poor management, not a union.

#32 | Posted by REDIAL at 2013-02-20 06:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

#25 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-02-20 06:15 PM | Reply

Having been associated with a GM plant of 3000 that was to be closed in the 90s, the workers by contract had to deliver on a certain number of parts in 8 hours by contract. Needless to say they had their rearends parked in the cafeteria by 10-11 AM where they played cards, lounged and kibitzed for the rest of the day until they had to punch out.

#33 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-20 06:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

He doesnt represent me else the budget would be balanced, we wouldnt have national healthcare and the country would be run more to the right. He is my CIC, but he hardly represents me.
#18 | POSTED BY BOAZ AT 2013-02-20 02:10 PM | FLAG:

Sounds like typical Partisan talk to me.... Here I thought you were better than that ... Oh Well

#34 | Posted by cmbell73 at 2013-02-20 06:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

Lets be Real Here for a second. If this Businessman was so Successful, then why on Earth did he choose to set up shop in France, of all places. Then this Bastard had the balls to yell at a Country that is Union heavy, and taxes the Crap out of Anything and Everything.... What a Moron

#35 | Posted by cmbell73 at 2013-02-20 07:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

"All this story reminds me of is how the productivity of the American worker has increased for the last thirty years while wages have stagnated."

Actually, it's labor productivity that has increased, primarily due to new capital inputs the reduce the number of people required to create a specific amount of a product. And wages for those responsible (engineers, programmers, etc) have gone up and continue to go up. Wages for the unskilled or low skilled workers who operate the machinery are essentially no different than they were 30 years ago, or more to the point, it is not something they are doing that is leading to greater output.

"Why are French workers so much smarter than American workers?"

A better question would be "why are French employers so much stupider than american employers" WTF would you pay someone to work seven hours when they only work three...?

"Your hero, Rush Limbaugh, does just that."

So do Thom Hartmann, Stephanie Miller, and the whole Serius XM America Left lineup.

It's a rhetorical question, of course. We already know the answer. they don't have a choice in the matter.

#36 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-20 07:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

Actually French workers are some of the most productive in the world.

I know that doesn't fit your stereotype but the numbers don't lie.

The main problem the French have is that their labor laws are so strict that it's almost impossible to fire someone - making employers extremely picky about who they'll hire.

#37 | Posted by MajorKong at 2013-02-20 08:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Actually French workers are some of the most productive in the world."

So productive that they can accomplish in three hours what would take an American a full work day?

"I know that doesn't fit your stereotype but the numbers don't lie."

What numbers are those? Is it labor productivity or something else?

#38 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-20 09:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

So, just because some guy says they only work 3 hours you actually believe it?

France ranks #6 in worker productivity. Just behind the US and ahead of Germany and the UK.

#39 | Posted by MajorKong at 2013-02-20 09:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

If that's true, then the French should have no problem finding a buyer.

#40 | Posted by uglyblinddate at 2013-02-20 09:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

Three hours a day? At least they work harder than they fight!

#41 | Posted by Federalist at 2013-02-20 09:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

#17 | POSTED BY TFDNIHILIST

I guess you liv in a mud hole and hunt your food with a stick.

#42 | Posted by Federalist at 2013-02-20 09:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I guess you liv in a mud hole and hunt your food with a stick."

Now that's the kind of well-reasoned, articulate commentary that keeps me coming back here.

#43 | Posted by MajorKong at 2013-02-20 09:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

Well welcome back.

#44 | Posted by Federalist at 2013-02-20 09:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

So, just because some guy says they only work 3 hours you actually believe it?

Did you read the article?

#45 | Posted by Federalist at 2013-02-20 10:01 PM | Reply | Flag:

While this executive makes a good point, he should stick to mocking the French as a whole and not subdivide them. It is an insult to their (lost) culture.

#46 | Posted by Diablo at 2013-02-21 12:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

Article:
Despite having per-head productivity levels that rank among the best in Europe, economists blame France's rigid hiring and firing laws for a long industrial decline that has dented exports. Many also fault the country's 35-hour work week for diminishing competitiveness with Germany.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co's Amiens Nord plant employs 1,250 people, who have been battling demands they work more shifts or accept layoffs. The site now faces closure.
Talks last year with Titan over a possible rescue fell down after a failure to reach a deal with unions on voluntary redundancies.
------------------------------
----------------------

Clips:
Per-head productivity levels that rank among the best in Europe.
hiring and firing laws blamed for a long industrial decline.
35 hour work week .. diminishing competitiveness with Germany
1250 employees battling demands they work more, now face closure.
Talks with Titan over a RESCUE fell down ... union voluntary reductions.
-------------
So they have good productivity on a per head basis, OK, but the plants need rescuing and the workers are resisting anything that might help them. Take some cuts or be cut yourself is being responded to with UP YOURS YANK.

The French Industry Minister is asking for help and Titan is telling them why they will not help. Seems that the French need to listen up or stop asking for help. If the French Tire industry is so great, why are their plants closing?

#47 | Posted by Marty at 2013-02-21 11:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

"pay less than one Euro per hour wage and ship all the tires France needs"

This is the problem.

They can make their tires in China but they can't sell them there because the Chinese won't let them. Why wouldn't the French put up the same barriers?

Countries where labor earns a decent wage should tax the hell out of goods that are made in in places where working in a factory borders on slavery and that puts up extreme barriers to foreign goods the way China does.

The French aren't stupid for wanting to have a middle class. They are stupid for grating access to their market to companies that manufacture in places that don't partake in fair trade. All developed countries are guilty of this stupidity.

See how smug these jergovs are when they are sitting on a pile of cheap tires they can't sell anywhere.

#48 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 12:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

All developed countries are guilty of this stupidity.
See how smug these jergovs are when they are sitting on a pile of cheap tires they can't sell anywhere.

#48 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 12:26 PM | FLAG:

Yea, what all smart developed nations should do is ensure that no other nations can become developed. If any of those tin-pot s_ _ t hole countries want to try build their nations middle class and empires on cheap labour (slavery) like the rest of the us (developed nations) did, then screw them.

Let's see how they like trade barriers to help minimise their one and only competitive advantage.

A fair world for everyone, if your born in an already developed nation...

Don't worry, I'm sure all of the Chinaman, Indians, Africans and South Amercians won't mind another century or two of sucking the hind tit scraps that the civilized world is willing to let them have.

#49 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 12:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

The response letter from the frog is text book classic socialism,.promising extra intensive scrutiny of said companies products at the French border.

Not a single sentence about productivity or cost benefit analysis of the plant. Let the French buy put the French! Enjoy

#50 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-02-21 01:02 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Yea, what all smart developed nations should do is ensure that no other nations can become developed."

Stopped reading after your strawman of a thesis statement. Work on your reading comprehension.

#51 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 02:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

"The response letter from the frog is text book classic socialism,.promising extra intensive scrutiny of said companies products at the French border.

Not a single sentence about productivity or cost benefit analysis of the plant."

Well, what this master of business learned is that its not a good idea to screw with and insult your customers. He loves China so much, he should see if they'll let him sell their tires there. Companies that don't have mutually beneficial relationships with their customer base deserve to fail.

#52 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 02:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

Stopped reading after your strawman of a thesis statement. Work on your reading comprehension.

#51 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 02:04 PM | FLAG:

I'm sure you stop reading things all of the time...

I wouldn't be so proud of that...

#53 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 02:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

""Yea, what all smart developed nations should do is ensure that no other nations can become developed."

What do you think imperialism does every day, deliberately or not? Does Nigerian oil fuel development in Nigeria or fuel cars in the industrial West?

#54 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 02:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I'm sure you stop reading things all of the time..."

I'm not going to argue with someone who is assigning me positions. You seem to feel entitled to waste peoples' time with your foolishness.

Nothing to be proud of yourself.

#55 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 02:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

"A fair world for everyone, if your born in an already developed nation..."

It's nice to be part of the privileged 5% of the global population whose lifestyle is made possible by sucking the wealth out of the rest of the world.

#56 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 02:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Does Nigerian oil fuel development in Nigeria or fuel cars in the industrial West?"

It should be doing both. If its not and that bothers them, they have the potential to change things. Sitting around waiting for someone else to act in their interests for them isn't going to help. Maybe a temporary stoppage to hacking one another with machetes over religious and tribal stupidity would be a nice start.

#57 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 02:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm not going to argue with someone who is assigning me positions. You seem to feel entitled to waste peoples' time with your foolishness.
Nothing to be proud of yourself.

#55 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 02:23 PM | FLAG:

You said "Countries where labor earns a decent wage should tax the hell out of goods that are made in in places where working in a factory borders on slavery and that puts up extreme barriers to foreign goods the way China does."

You're advocating that all of the nations that already have high paying jobs should restrict access to their markets to the other nations with factories that "border on slavery", to try to what? Protect their "middle class"? I'm not assigning anything, You said it.

I simply said that they won't like that too much, since you're trying to keep them in poverty, by taking away their only competitive advantage, cheap or "slave" labour.

We built our nation on it and you want to pull up the ladder, so that they can yap for 3 hours a day, in this specific case. You said "The French aren't stupid for wanting to have a middle class". No they're not stupid for that. They're stupid for thinking that they'll be able to compete on a global stage with this attitude. The problem being is that America is following the same mentality. This isn't just a French thing, as much as you would like to think so. And you're... not very bright for advocating that they should erect tariffs to help continue this gross mis-allocation of capital.

No assigning here. The words came from your text, not mine.

I can assure you, I take no pleasure in wasting anyone's time, especially mine.

#58 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 02:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

" If its not and that bothers them, they have the potential to change things. "

They are. The indigenous people whose environment is being destroyed is waging guerilla war against Shell and their Nigerian puppets.

#59 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 02:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Maybe a temporary stoppage to hacking one another with machetes over religious and tribal stupidity would be a nice start."

If you don't have an answer, just call them savages like a good imperialist.

#60 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 02:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

A true capitalist profiteer would immediately see the profit potential in this company. It is currently only operating at 1/3 capacity. Look at the growth potential.

#61 | Posted by donnerboy at 2013-02-21 03:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You're advocating that all of the nations that already have high paying jobs should restrict access to their markets to the other nations with factories that "border on slavery", to try to what? Protect their "middle class"? I'm not assigning anything, You said it."

Read the quote you are responding to again. I also mentioned that China does not engage in free trade. But you keep ignoring that. Because you want to blather against a strawman. Go play in traffic. I'm not interested in explaining myself over and over when what I said was pretty simple the first time..

#62 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 03:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

"They're stupid for thinking that they'll be able to compete on a global stage with this attitude. The problem being is that America is following the same mentality. This isn't just a French thing, as much as you would like to think so. And you're... not very bright for advocating that they should erect tariffs to help continue this gross mis-allocation of capital."

The French only working 3 hour days was never true, fool. I never advocated that and assumed that people knew it wasn't true. It was a gross exageration that some idiot put in an obnoxious letter, nothing more.

The average American works very hard. I'm not going to bother with someone who doesn't know this because he'd rather crap on his own countrymen than admit that our government gleefully allows other countries to take advantage of us.

#63 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 03:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

The French only working 3 hour days was never true, fool. I never advocated that and assumed that people knew it wasn't true. It was a gross exageration that some idiot put in an obnoxious letter, nothing more.
The average American works very hard. I'm not going to bother with someone who doesn't know this because he'd rather crap on his own countrymen than admit that our government gleefully allows other countries to take advantage of us.
#63 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 03:32 PM | FLAG:

I never said that they did. I said "so that they can yap for 3 hours a day, in this specific case", like the article said, even if it wasn't a hundred percent accurate. Fool. Learn to read.

Oh, well if China does something, I guess that makes it right. They're not trying to promote free trade a capitalism around the world, like we pretend to. Next up, crushing any domestic "disturbances" with brutal government force, because China does it, and apparently that's the barometer for what's right and wrong.

Well you did a s _ _ t job explaining yourself the first time, so I thought I'd give you another crack at it. And I just said I hate wasting my own time... silly me.

Yea, that "idiot" who operates at an elite level in a multinational firm. What he said lacked tact, but it doesn't detract form the merits of his statement. I lived in France for four months. That is how they operate. Any of the locals simply said that that's how it's done. Slow and steady. The famous quote they always had roughly translated to "Work to live, not live to work". While that's warm and fuzzy and all, an industrial super power it does not make.

Yea, many do. Many don't. I'll bet you a dollar that if you took the average American and pitted them against the average Chinaman, the Chinaman would win, given the same "reward" or pay. Hell, the U.S. worker wouldn't even show up to work for the same $ as a Chinaman would work for in an entire day.

Besides, talk about strawmen. I didn't crap on American workers. I'm simply saying that other nations are hungrier for the same low skill labour jobs that most Americans are "too good" to do, unless they get paid far above FMV.

Yea, other nations always take advantage of poor little old American all of the time,just because we won't protect low skill jobs. It's not like we haven't plundered the world a couple times over. Give me a break.

#64 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 04:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Oh, well if China does something, I guess that makes it right"

If they are engaging in unfair trade practices with us, why would we engage with fair trade with them? You don't correct their bad behavior by ignoring it, Einstein. A little tit for tat goes a long way....

"I lived in France for four months. That is how they operate."

Well I guess that trumps the studies that say otherwise.

finance.yahoo.com

Because I'd hate to let facts get in the way of your vast four months of experience....

"I'll bet you a dollar that if you took the average American and pitted them against the average Chinaman, the Chinaman would win, given the same "reward" or pay. Hell, the U.S. worker wouldn't even show up to work for the same $ as a Chinaman would work for in an entire day."

They'd probably be equal at repetitive tasks and the Chinese would be worse at anything that requires a thinking.

"Besides, talk about strawmen. I didn't crap on American workers. I'm simply saying that other nations are hungrier for the same low skill labour jobs that most Americans are "too good" to do, unless they get paid far above FMV."

So you don't crap on American workers, then you proceed to crap on American workers with your "too good" BS. Stop whining about being pegged accurately.

"Yea, other nations always take advantage of poor little old American all of the time"

I'm not going to argue with someone who wants the US to play by the rules of fair trade with countries who don't. You're a fool if you think the US should. I don't care about your plunder the world garbage either. If you're anti-American, screw off. Your opinion matters not to real Americans.

#65 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 04:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

"If they are engaging in unfair trade practices with us, why would we engage with fair trade with them?"

Once again, we're the ones trying to promote free trade and democracy, not them. I'm guessing you're a liberal (strawman). You'll play by the rules, donate, etc. only if everyone else is forced to do the same. Otherwise, you'll just play the same rules as everyone else and keep your greedy money all to yourself, but it's those damn Chinaman and Republicans doing all of the bad stuff in the world. Try leading for once.

"They'd probably be equal at repetitive tasks and the Chinese would be worse at anything that requires a thinking."

Yea, repetitive tasks, like manufacturing tires and cars. "Critical thinking" jobs are still done better here. That's why we have them still. No one is crying about low wages for knowledge based work. We get paid well enough.

"So you don't crap on American workers, then you proceed to crap on American workers with your "too good" BS. Stop whining about being pegged accurately. "

You're a goof ball. Why do you think Mexicans are cutting everyones lawns and picking fruit? Try looking at reality for once in your life.

"I'm not going to argue with someone who wants the US to play by the rules of fair trade with countries who don't."

Yea, I'm sure the US plays one hundred percent by fair trade practices. Riiiiight. Just because they don't protect every little industry in this nation you crap you pants and say "erect tariffs, that'll show them". You're a joke.

"I don't care about your plunder the world garbage either. If you're anti-American, screw off. Your opinion matters not to real Americans."

How imperialistic of you. Do you self identify as a neo-con or?

I'm not anti-American, I'm pro reality. We have the potential to be the greatest nation on earth, but protecting low paid, un-skilled labour, while having large social programs is a sure fire way to change that. All thanks you dummies like you.

#66 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 05:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Once again, we're the ones trying to promote free trade and democracy"

This is meaningless blabber. You don't promote free trade by allowing China to profitably engage in anti-free trade measures. Promoting free trade would mean that we make China play by the rules of free trade. By not doing so, we are working against free trade. Undeniably. You can't "lead by example" when the people you are trying to "lead" are beating you by cheating. That I had to explain this to you in such painful detail does not speak well for your intelligence.

"Why do you think Mexicans are cutting everyones lawns and picking fruit?"

Because they work for less than minimum wage off the books. Duh.

"Yea, I'm sure the US plays one hundred percent by fair trade practices"

When we don't, we are taken to court. China is never even challenged.

"Do you self identify as a neo-con or?"

No and no. I want what is best for my country. Things are headed in the wrong direction. Unfortunately, we can no longer politely induldge idiots like you. You have to be put in your place on the margins so that better people can get things moving in the right direction.

Allowing China to play by one set of rules why we play by a set of much more strict rules is stupid and its killing us. If you can't see that, you're too stupid to matter. That's all.

#67 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 05:12 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sully, we've never played by the rules in our lives; the rest of the world is catching up. You don't think having the world's reserve currency and being able to print unlimited amounts of money is not an unfair advantage----it's our way of constantly tilting the playing field in our favor. However, it's not going to last since the rest of the world is finally making moves to drive a wedge into our dollar(s).

#68 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 05:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

I don't care about your plunder the world garbage either. If you're anti-American, screw off. "

America has been plundering the world at least Europeans slaughtered the natives of the Americas, then went on to Mexico, then the Philippines, then the rest of the world. Your lifestyle is enabled by plunder, whether you admit it or not.

Also, people who use the phrase "anti-American" are generally McCarthyites.

#69 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 05:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Sully, we've never played by the rules in our lives; the rest of the world is catching up."

It isn't the job of the US government to "even things up" for "crimes real and imagined". So any Americans who feels "American guilt" or whatever can start a big fund privately and pile all their money into it and send it wherever they want. Fair enough?

Meanwhile, the job of our government is to look out for our interests. And there is nothing unethical about calling China out where they are not playing by the rules. In fact, it is unethical for our politicians to claim to be looking out for our interests while wilfully ignoring this crap. All I am advocating is that our politicians do the job they have promised to do.

#70 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 05:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Your lifestyle is enabled by plunder, whether you admit it or not."

If you feel guilty about this, do something about it. Until then, don't worry about me, you hypocrite.

"Also, people who use the phrase "anti-American" are generally McCarthyites."

Blabber. The word has a meaning just like any other.

#71 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 05:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your lifestyle is enabled by plunder, whether you admit it or not.

#69 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 05:28 PM | Reply

E.Q. Iraq and Libya. And then we use all kinds of marketing techniques for justification----weapons of mass destruction, humanitarian necessity.

#72 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 05:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You don't promote free trade by allowing China to profitably engage in anti-free trade measures."

Oh, so you promote free trade by restricting free trade, because China won't blink first. That makes sense... Thanks for clarifying.

"we make China play by the rules of free trade."

Yep, definitely a liberal. If you don't like how some people are playing "the game" by the definition of your rules, just make them.

"Because they work for less than minimum wage off the books. Duh."

Yea, ALL Mexicans working garbage jobs are working entirely off of the books. That's a lot of jobs. You should tell that to the IRS. Pull your head out of you @33. Some, yes. All, you're a idiot. It's because little Timmy doesn't want to work in the fields, pump gas or work some crummy job for low pay. Same reason why everyone looks down on McD's workers. They're above it.

"When we don't, we are taken to court. China is never even challenged."

Really? Never. Google came up with one right away. Funny enough, it's about autos.

www.freep.com

Never say never, or you'll look like a dummy, again.

Yea, things are headed in the wrong direction and it's being driven by moronic dems, of which I'm almost certain you're a part of.

"Allowing China to play by one set of rules why we play by a set of much more strict rules is stupid and its killing us."

I guess you like anarchy then. Criminals play by their own rules. Screw it, I'm just going to do the same....

#73 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 05:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your lifestyle is enabled by plunder, whether you admit it or not. - Nulli

Lets not forget its your lifestyle too......

If you weren't in denial you would have said "Our lifestyle....." whether its true or not, if you believe it at least accept responsibility for your beliefs.

You are like a football fan, good season "We won", bad season "They suck"......

#74 | Posted by AndreaMackris at 2013-02-21 05:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

Meanwhile, the job of our government is to look out for our interests.

#70 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 05:31 PM | Reply

Agree, and the Chinese and every other government looks out for their own interests as well, whether it is through rules or outside of the rules agreed to. Just look at the Japanese and the depreciation of the yen. There'll be more breaking of the "rules" as the global financial system deteriorates more.

#75 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 05:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

Meanwhile, the job of our government is to look out for our interests. And there is nothing unethical about calling China out where they are not playing by the rules. In fact, it is unethical for our politicians to claim to be looking out for our interests while wilfully ignoring this crap. All I am advocating is that our politicians do the job they have promised to do.

#70 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 05:31 PM | FLAG:

Well, there you have it. All nations should look out for number one, themselves.

Hello WW3.

#76 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 05:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

One thing I ponder a lot. Why do lefties criticize the Chinese for not playing by the "rules" and are critical of the sending of jobs over the seas to help the pathetic lives of millions when they profess to care about people and believe in globalalization and one community.

#77 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 05:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your lifestyle is enabled by plunder, whether you admit it or not. - Nulli

Lets not forget its your lifestyle too......"

Of course it is, never said it wasn't. Membership [in the imperial center] has its privileges. I'm willing to vote for a $5 dollar gasoline tax, which I would have to pay and can't afford. How about you?

"If you weren't in denial you would have said "Our lifestyle....."

This is the world wide web, not the U.S. web, so the noun "our" is rather nebulous, but if it makes American-centric posters happy, then maybe I won't use it.

#78 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 05:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

Well, there you have it. All nations should look out for number one, themselves.

Hello WW3.

#76 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 05:41 PM | Reply

And that is what is occuring-----it's unavoidable. A physical WW3; probably not but instead a WW involving currency depreciation with Japan sending the first large salvo across everyones' bow.

#79 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 05:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

All I am advocating is that our politicians do the job they have promised to do.
#70 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 05:31 PM | FLAG:

They are. They're preventing a world war, by allowing other nations to at least somewhat catch up.

Otherwise governments, who, you know, govern the remaining 6.7 billion people on this rock, will do what they have to level the playing field. Like starting trade wars, refusing to use the green back and or simply destabilizing the entire world, via a world war, just to shake things up a bit, in the hopes that they'll get a little bit more of the pie when the dust settles.

#80 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 05:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

Matsop - I'm not a lefty. Never claimed to be. But that globalization is about helping all the poor wretches in the world is a load of horsehit you know it.....

I have to go but I'll me around tomorrow. Have a good night.

I'm not responding to the idiot anymore. He jumped the shark with "WWIII"......

#81 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 05:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

In fact, it is unethical for our politicians to claim to be looking out for our interests while wilfully ignoring this crap. All I am advocating is that our politicians do the job they have promised to do.

#70 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 05:31 PM |

There is one problem with calling out your creditors, Sully. It's called suicide. They own a lot of our crap (dollars--bonds) and if we get too insolent and they don't appreciate it then the obvious ramifications would not be pretty for our "self-interest".

#82 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 05:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

"don't worry about me, you hypocrite."

I'm no hypocrite and unlike you, I'm not delusional. I admit I benefit from imperial plunder and you deny it.

#83 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 05:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

Matsop - I'm not a lefty. Never claimed to be. But that globalization is about helping all the poor wretches in the world is a load of horsehit you know it.....

#81 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-21 05:54 PM | Reply

I know it and I was just making a point for some of the other folks on the DR.

#84 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 05:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

One thing I ponder a lot. Why do lefties criticize the Chinese for not playing by the "rules" and are critical of the sending of jobs over the seas to help the pathetic lives of millions when they profess to care about people and believe in globalalization and one community.

#77 | POSTED BY MATSOP AT 2013-02-21 05:45 PM | FLAG:

I've wondered the same. They never come up with an answer.

I likened it to us (the U.S.) to being the fictitious "old rich white man" and everyone else (the world) being some oppressed minority, which dems are complaining about all of the time.

Apparently repubs are evil when this fictitious white man protects his own, but when the dems do it for "the good of the nation" and try to surpress everyone else (the world), it's all cool. Hypocritical to say the least.

#85 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 05:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm not responding to the idiot anymore. He jumped the shark with "WWIII"......

#81 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-21 05:54 PM | FLAG:

I know it's hard for people like you to think past one move.

Best to leave it at that, I would too.

#86 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 06:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

Hypocritical to say the least.

#85 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 05:59 PM | Reply |

But most of their positions are untenable and smack of wanton hypocrisy. And when you point it out, they avoid the obvious since it doesn't fit their agenda.

#87 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 06:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

I admit I benefit from imperial plunder and you deny it.

#83 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 05:55 PM | Reply

We do benefit from imperial plunder and have for years. What drives me crazy is when one team's guy does it, the other team jumps his bones; but when their guy does it, he does it for noble reasons and it's okay. And that's why I spend a lot of time on the DR pointing out people's hypocrisy and double standards even though I may agree with their position.

#88 | Posted by matsop at 2013-02-21 06:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

But most of their positions are untenable and smack of wanton hypocrisy. And when you point it out, they avoid the obvious since it doesn't fit their agenda.

#87 | POSTED BY MATSOP AT 2013-02-21 06:04 PM | FLAG:

Yep, hence Sully's withdraw. Cognitive dissonance does that to people.

#89 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 06:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

#52 You are right about that Sully, he should have respectfully declined. I reviewed their annual report and it looks like they have some minor interests over there...though mostly Western Hemisphere domiciled.

#90 | Posted by DavetheWave at 2013-02-21 06:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I'm no hypocrite and unlike you, I'm not delusional. I admit I benefit from imperial plunder and you deny it.

#83 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 05:55 PM | Reply | Flag"

What you see as "imperial" plunder, I see as advancement of the species. The natives of this country were backward thinking and rather unsophisticated, like the Neanderthal, they were doomed. If it wasn't Europe, it would have been someone else. You really wanna live in tent, hunt deer and buffalo, and dance around praying for the rain, please.

A real hypocrite, like you, blast prosperity and advancement yet continues to feed from the trough. Man-up and go live in the woods like a good Eco-Nazi, if that's what you believe, and leave the modern world to those that appreciate and contribute to it.

#91 | Posted by danv at 2013-02-21 08:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

"What you see as "imperial" plunder, I see as advancement of the species. "

Advancement of what species? Don't you mean "advancement of a particular tribe of a particular species?

#92 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 08:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You really wanna live in tent, hunt deer and buffalo, and dance around praying for the rain, please."

Your ignorant racism doesn't help your argument. Let me guess. White boy, right? And Christian?

#93 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 08:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

Re #92 and 93

We are all one species, so I don't get your point.

What is ignorant about that statement or racist? They lived in tents, hunted local game, and had tribal rituals to call forth rain. (Broad generalization mind you)

Meanwhile across the Atlantic, physics, math, chemistry were beginning to flourish. The natives didn't even write. They had an inferior culture, they lost, I call how I see it.

So what if I am white, should I be ashamed of my heritage? Maybe you are, but I am proud of my heritage and all the joys and wonders it has brought to the world.

My hope is that someday all humans can enjoy a level of prosperity and peace seen in developed countries. My hope is that someday stupid crap like race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality will be put aside as we all call ourselves HUMAN.

It is people like you that like to label and divide humans.

#94 | Posted by danv at 2013-02-21 08:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

" but I am proud of my heritage "

What da hell does that mean, boy?

#95 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 08:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

"They are. The indigenous people whose environment is being destroyed is waging guerilla war against Shell and their Nigerian puppets."

So your argument is that the oil should be left in the ground?

I'm not disagreeing with you, but what happens when 90% of the population wants to better their lives by selling off mineral rights. Which is a very easy way to generate revenues.

"America has been plundering the world at least Europeans slaughtered the natives of the Americas, then went on to Mexico, then the Philippines, then the rest of the world. Your lifestyle is enabled by plunder, whether you admit it or not."

Which, at the very worst, puts them in the same class with every other great civilization. How many millions did Lenin kill? What about Stalin? Mao? Che? Castro?

And to make the statement that our lifestyle is only possible due the the fact that we are geographically located in North America implies that ANY people located here would have had the same standard of living. Probably not true, given the fact that, while societies from across the globe were making incredible technological advancements, Native Americans were huddled in groups on the open desert or using sagebrush for shelter. There's not a lot there to suggest that, left to their own devices, the Sioux would have ever developed into a society to rival any in Europe, Asia, or the middle east. They would have had Papua New Guinea beat, maybe, but not by much.

"Also, people who use the phrase "anti-American" are generally McCarthyites."

Kind of like people who use the phrase reactionary are generally socialists. I can buy that. Anti-liberty would be a better term.

"I'm willing to vote for a $5 dollar gasoline tax, which I would have to pay and can't afford. How about you?"

Is someone proposing a $5 gasoline tax? You may as well propose a $20 gasoline tax. It would drive up the cost of consumer goods to the point where the black market would be the primary means of buying fuel. I dunno, Nulli, it almost sounds like you are saying you would vote for a tax on gas for tax's sake. Don't make much sense to me.

#96 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-21 09:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I'm no hypocrite and unlike you, I'm not delusional. I admit I benefit from imperial plunder and you deny it."

Plunder?

You act as if the entire world hasn't plundered back. Virtually every technological advancement on this planet has originated in the US. One has to wonder what the answer would be if Nigeria was given the choice between keeping their oil in the ground, or having cars, cell phones, computers, internet, and medical care. Not to mention millions/billions in foreign aid.

#97 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-21 09:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

"But that globalization is about helping all the poor wretches in the world is a load of horsehit you know it....."

Do you think that the poor wretches of the world were better off before or after globalization. Suggestion-before you answer, read Thomas Friedmann's "The World is Flat."

The answer is they are far better off. FAR better. Because globalization has provided opportunity where previously there was none.

#98 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-21 09:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Which, at the very worst, puts them in the same class with every other great civilization. How many millions did Lenin kill? What about Stalin? Mao? Che? Castro?"

What's the price of rice in China? We are talking about the most lethal empire and resource hog in history, whose actions are destroying the biosphere and you want to babble about Cuba?

Go to McDonald's and buy yourself another hamburger. The Amazon rain forest is being burned away for grazing land to make your cheap hamburgers. Your lifestyle and that of every other American is totally dependent on resource depletion and environmental destruction and violence against those who don't particularly care about America's resource "needs."

#99 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 09:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Suggestion-before you answer, read Thomas Friedmann's "The World is Flat.""

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...let me catch my breath...Thomas Friedmann?
...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You talking about the liberal-corporate-hack of record? That Friedmann? lol

#100 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 09:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

"The answer is they are far better off. FAR better."

Suicide is painless, it brings on many changes...

Well, if you're a peasant whose livelihood has been destroyed by Shell or Monsanto or another corporate pillager and you commit suicide you get to go to Heaven and hang with Jeebus, so maybe they are far better off in that sense.

#101 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 09:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

"What's the price of rice in China? We are talking about the most lethal empire and resource hog in history, whose actions are destroying the biosphere and you want to babble about Cuba?"

Not following. Are you addressing the 75 million killed by Mao in China? Lethal? Yes, but those days are behind them. They've moved forward. Hopefully in time Cuba will too.

"The Amazon rain forest is being burned away for grazing land to make your cheap hamburgers."

Wrong. The Rainforest is being burned away (assuming what you say is true) so that the locals can enjoy a much higher standard of living than they did previously by selling beef cattle to the US. Several decades ago these were impoverished primitive farmers. Now they enjoy some semblance of a decent standard of living. Of course they're going to cut forest if it means a higher standard of living. They don't answer to you, and if you want to preserve the rain forest, then fork out cash and pay them not to burn it down. Your choice.

"Your lifestyle and that of every other American is totally dependent on resource depletion and environmental destruction and violence against those who don't particularly care about America's resource "needs."

You'll have to point out a resource we get from a source overseas that we don't have locally in the US. People don't care about our needs. They care about their own. Which is why they sell us oil, fruit, ore, whatever. Because without us, these products would be a lot less valuable, and their standard of living a lot lower.

#102 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-21 09:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

YGFSM. You quote Derrick Jensen for Crissake! The bin Laden of eco-terrorism!

Anyway, you might not like the guy, but his data and his methods are sound. Unless you disagree with the fact that there were 20 workers in Indonesia applying for each outsourced job, or that a professional in India working for an MNC can enjoy a much higher standard of living on a lower wage in Delhi that an American could on a much higher salary in Manhattan.

"Well, if you're a peasant whose livelihood has been destroyed by Shell or Monsanto or another corporate pillager and you commit suicide you get to go to Heaven and hang with Jeebus, so maybe they are far better off in that sense."

Your 'peasant' just bought a new iphone. Right now he's shopping for an Otter Box cover on Amazon.com

#103 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-21 09:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

#102
#103

There's a ton of BS in those bloviations. I don't waste time on responding to bloviators and endlessly long posts. Give me the Reader's digest version next time.

#104 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 09:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

There's a ton of BS in those bloviations.

Such as?

#105 | Posted by JeffJ at 2013-02-21 10:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

"There's a ton of BS in those bloviations. I don't waste time on responding to bloviators and endlessly long posts"

Bill O'Reilly would be happy that a leftist such as yourself had borrowed his favorite term. And the posts weren't particularly long. Take another look tomorrow. Maybe you just a hold of some bad bud.

"Give me the Reader's digest version next time."

I did:

Your 'peasant' just bought a new iphone. Right now he's shopping for an Otter Box cover on Amazon.com

#106 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-21 10:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Your 'peasant' just bought a new iphone."

And you think the person who dies with the most gadgets wins. You're one of these techno-fetishizing imperialists who think Western culture is by definition superior due to its gadgetry. Unfortunately, its technology is destroying the biosphere, the life support system of humans and all other species.

As to who is happier or more truly prosperous, well, don't most American mass killers these days have iphones?

#107 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 10:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Such as?"

I could write tons of text in rebuttal, but my hands won't allow it. Sorry, I only parcel out my wisdom one or two sentences at a time, as you know, Jeff.

#108 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 10:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yes, you are quite stingy when it comes to doling out your vast wisdom, Null. ;-)

#109 | Posted by JeffJ at 2013-02-21 10:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

"And you think the person who dies with the most gadgets wins."

Winning or losing, ultimately, is something that lies in the eye of the beholder. But trends would suggest that yes, technology leads to a higher standard of living. If it didn't, we'd still be living in caves.

"As to who is happier or more truly prosperous, well, don't most American mass killers these days have iphones?"

Everyone has an iphone. Be they a mass killer or NorCal Hippie Anarchist.

#110 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-21 10:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

"There is one problem with calling out your creditors, Sully. It's called suicide. They own a lot of our crap (dollars--bonds) and if we get too insolent and they don't appreciate it then the obvious ramifications would not be pretty for our "self-interest"."

Nah, we have alot more leverage with China than you think. If we stop buying Chinese crap, lots of Chinese who moved from the farms to the factory are out of work. And they are likely to turn on the people running China. The Chinese ruling elite knows this very well. Nothing scares them more than the Chinese people.

#111 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 09:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Yep, hence Sully's withdraw. Cognitive dissonance does that to people.

#89 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-21 06:19 PM | Reply | Flag:"

Gotta love the DR: Where having something else to do other than going back and forth with some unstable idiot indefinitely means you're wrong.

Yes, you were making great points about China being very scary and WWIII and whatever other inapplicable nonsense you were spewing. Our lives are enriched from having read all about your paranoid, pants-pissing fears. China would certainly start a war whose best outcome would be mutual annihilation if we no longer allowed them to make our Happy Meal toys. I'm sure of it not too. You've convinced me!

#112 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 09:15 AM | Reply | Flag:

Re #95 "" but I am proud of my heritage "

What da hell does that mean, boy?

#95 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-21 08:49 PM | Reply | Flag"

Guess you never learned English, let me help you ignorant one, it means that I am proud of heritage.

People like you nully are just full of hate and contempt, you whine about "imperial America", yet still suck its tit.

Put your money where mouth is and go live somewhere else, and leave America to those that look to the future versus people like you mired in the past.

#113 | Posted by danv at 2013-02-22 09:34 AM | Reply | Flag:

Yes, you were making great points about China being very scary and WWIII and whatever other inapplicable nonsense you were spewing. Our lives are enriched from having read all about your paranoid, pants-pissing fears. China would certainly start a war whose best outcome would be mutual annihilation if we no longer allowed them to make our Happy Meal toys. I'm sure of it not too. You've convinced me!

#112 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-22 09:15 AM | FLAG:

That fact that you think it isn't applicable tells me exactly how short sighted you are.

Yea, I'm paranoid. WW2 was so long ago and it's not like anything like that can happen again. We evolved so much since then and there's no more senseless wars going in the world as we speak.

I didn't say WW3 was coming to your door step, but if you think other nations are going to stand ideally by so that we can live the type of life that we do, at their expense indefinitely, than you are moron.

Mutual annihilation? No, those are old weapons. Nukes, while they make a big bang and work well for fear, they would be one of least effective ways to wage a war, nowadays. Why destroy all of that infrastructure when you can just wipe out the population with controlled super bugs or genetically engineered diseases. Or, use cyber warfare.

I'm tired of you... go stick your head back in the sand.

#114 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 11:13 AM | Reply | Flag:

Is that a joke? Most USA CEOs are greedy, overpaid and with an iron clad solid platinum labor contract written expressly to protect their job in the event of incompetence or inability to perform, and/or make profits, and they tell other countries that their labor is lazy.

These dudes/dudesses like Carly Fiorina generally can't be fired unless they get a massive compensation payout. USA corporate CEOs have a vastly overstated opinion of their own worth, ability and competence and arrogant view of the labor that makes their company what it is.

Opps ......I better watch my talk on the internet or Obama, Homeland Security and their corporate masters/partners will accuse such anti CEO talk as blasphemy and domestic incitement.

#115 | Posted by Robson at 2013-02-22 01:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Mutual annihilation? No, those are old weapons."

In a conventional war, the US armed forces would wipe the floor with China. And they know it. There is zero chance of China ever starting a war with the US - conventional or otherwise.

You can sleep at night now. You're welcome.

#116 | Posted by sully at 2013-02-22 01:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

All that first world nations like the USA, France, Germany, had to do to stay viable was protect their own economy, energy supplies, and markets from predatory wannabee nations using virtually unprotected slave labor. They had the option to protect their economy with tariffs on all imports but they were bought off by globalists. The USA had the upper hand and had the USA done that 40-50 years ago, we'd still be the manufacturing giant and much less indebted and China and India would be riding bicycles trying to expand their economy selling their own third rate products into their own third world market. We successfully funded the USA with tariffs until the immigrant "European bankers" created the Fed and income tax in the early 20th century for only their own benefit.

We were hustled then, just as we are now by the same gang of conniving overly rich thieves that you see on CNBC, that are running the Fed, that run Goldman, etc, that Obama hired as revolving door regulators and czars and trade reps. They are responsible for "free trade" that was never free. These hucksters have consistently been leading us down the rosy path into bad situations, wars and economic depressions.

#117 | Posted by Robson at 2013-02-22 01:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

All that first world nations like the USA, France, Germany, had to do to stay viable was protect their own economy, energy supplies, and markets from predatory wannabee nations using virtually unprotected slave labor. They had the option to protect their economy with tariffs on all imports but they were bought off by globalists. The USA had the upper hand and had the USA done that 40-50 years ago, we'd still be the manufacturing giant and much less indebted and China and India would be riding bicycles trying to expand their economy selling their own third rate products into their own third world market. We successfully funded the USA with tariffs until the immigrant "European bankers" created the Fed and income tax in the early 20th century for only their own benefit.
We were hustled then, just as we are now by the same gang of conniving overly rich thieves that you see on CNBC, that are running the Fed, that run Goldman, etc, that Obama hired as revolving door regulators and czars and trade reps. They are responsible for "free trade" that was never free. These hucksters have consistently been leading us down the rosy path into bad situations, wars and economic depressions.
#117 | Posted by Robson at 2013-02-22 01:23 PM

Awesome factual post. NW flag.

Titan is attempting to wedge in a poverty-wages (oxymoron no-more) workforce in Europe simply to profit the offshore shareholders. Unlike American workers Europeans probably won't put up with the destruction of their unions by bloviated, de-humanizing profiteers.

#118 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2013-02-22 01:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

" There is zero chance of China ever starting a war with the US - conventional or otherwise."

You can sleep at night now. You're welcome.

#116 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-22 01:22 PM | FLAG:

You're right, the world is going to stay as is, in terms of global supremacy, for the rest of time.

The arrogance of your statement highlights a major weakness in the mind set of many Americans. Complacency.

But you're right, the U.S. will be last Empire to ever rule the earth and no one will ever challenge us. To point out the obvious, we will be the first Empire to accomplish this in ALL OF RECORDED history. D@mn, we're awesome and everyone should bow down to our superiority.

Also, I only used China as an example. They're not the only nation out there that isn't exactly a fan of our decadent western lifestyle, while they wallow in their own filth, or "riding bicycles" as Robson so delicately put it.

#119 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 02:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

Correction - All of history, recorded or not.

#120 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 02:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

"But you're right, the U.S. will be last Empire to ever rule the earth and no one will ever challenge us. To point out the obvious, we will be the first Empire to accomplish this in ALL OF RECORDED history..."

I never said any of that. I said we shouldn't sell ourselves out to China. And your using the threat of Chinese military action as a reason to support the US selling itself out is craven and silly. In reality, there is no reason for the US to act against its own interests.

You keep attacking new strawmen and moving the goalposts because you've dug a hole and lack the sense to stop digging.

#121 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 02:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Titan is attempting to wedge in a poverty-wages (oxymoron no-more) workforce in Europe simply to profit the offshore shareholders."

Titan wasn't attempting to do anything. The French went to them. And Titan, predictably, laughed at the offer. Why would you pay so much more for so much less? Why should the shareholders be forced to accept less than they have to.

It would be like one Girl Scout trying to sell me cookies at $20 a box, when another will sell them for $4 a box. Thank you, but I'm going to pay as little as possible while achieving my desired end-state. In this case, procurement of a box of caramel delights.

#122 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-22 02:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

"But you're right, the U.S. will be last Empire to ever rule the earth and no one will ever challenge us. To point out the obvious, we will be the first Empire to accomplish this in ALL OF RECORDED history..."
I never said any of that. I said we shouldn't sell ourselves out to China. And your using the threat of Chinese military action as a reason to support the US selling itself out is craven and silly. In reality, there is no reason for the US to act against its own interests.
You keep attacking new strawmen and moving the goalposts because you've dug a hole and lack the sense to stop digging.

#121 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-22 02:27 PM | FLAG:

You solution - erect tariffs

Their response - erect tariffs on the things that they purchase from us and jack up the price of things that we want, like rare earth for example.

Then we erect more tariffs on other goods, manipulate our currency more etc.

Their response - similar to the first time.

We decide to purchase goods from India, or whoever is next in line, as far as cheap labour. So, we pay more for our goods than when we bought them from China, but less then it would cost to produce in America. Same problem.

So, we keep doing this until it we've alienated all of the other nations who don't pay their workers the same as we pay our over-paid low-skill labour jobs.

All the while, we end up paying a lot more for our goods, but it all "stays in the US", is that right? We'll just close off our borders until it's beneficial for us?

All the while, China's economy takes a huge hit, since we won't trade with them. What do you think they're going to do? Just sit there and say, "oh well, it was fun while it lasted", while their society starts to crumble? No, they'll take retaliatory measures, much like Japan did in WW2 when we imposed stiff economic sanctions on them and tried to strangle their economy.

So, basically, you want everyone in the world to pay more for everything, so that we can keep over-paid, low-skill labour jobs here and can continue to support our over indulgent lifestyle?

In reality, everything doesn't happen in a vacuum and actions have consequences. Like you said, the US has no reason to act against it's own interest. Well, I gotta tell you, China doesn't have a reason to act against theirs either, but, obviously, not everyone's interests align.

What do you expect to happen if the US erected tariffs on such goods coming from China or ANY OTHER NATION where labour is cheaper than ours, which you advocated for? They'll simply raise minimum wage to whatever ours is? HA HA Seriously, what do you think would happen? Nothing at all, something?

#123 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 02:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You solution - erect tariffs

Their response - erect tariffs on the things that they purchase from us and jack up the price of things that we want, like rare earth for example."

What do they buy from us? What they like most is our movies and music and they just steal that.

Put up tarriffs until they play by the rules. Theyn remove them. Everyone is happy. Your back and forth forever scenario will never happen just like your Red Scare scenario.

"So, basically, you want everyone in the world to pay more for everything, so that we can keep over-paid, low-skill labour jobs here and can continue to support our over indulgent lifestyle?"

Stop with the sad strawmen. My position is to deal with the Chinese on a level playing field and to force them to be fair when they try to cheat. That's it. You don't know me. You have no idea how I live. All you know about me is that I have a better argument than you on this topic and its making you pissy.

I have no idea why you want to bend over for the Chinese and why you will invent one assinine excuse after another to do so. First it was that they are going to kick our asses if we don't fall in line. Then its some silly never ending trade war. Next it will be God-knows-what. Probably something to do with aliens.

Enough already. There is no reason why we need to bend over for China. They can learn to play by the rules too and it would be easy to incent them to do so. End of story.

#124 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 03:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

"What do you expect to happen if the US erected tariffs on such goods coming from China or ANY OTHER NATION where labour is cheaper than ours, which you advocated for? They'll simply raise minimum wage to whatever ours is? HA HA Seriously, what do you think would happen? Nothing at all, something?"

We already know what would happen. FDR did it during the depression, for many of the same reasons that people argue in favor of them today. You won't find any economist (that I know of) who thinks that Smoot-Hawley did any favors for the economy, or the American people. Some believe that it had little to no effect. many believe that it actually prolonged the depression.

If we enact tariffs on country X, country X will return the favor and erect tariffs on US goods. This what happened during the depression, and it trashed the economy. That's why we don't do tariffs anymore. And even without Tariffs, goods made using extremely expensive US-based unskilled labor could only be sold to customers who were A) forced to buy them (US Citizens) or B) not price sensitive. So, you would go from having a potential marketplace that spans the globe and consists of the 3 billion or so people considered to be middle class, or the 300 million that live in the US. All to protect and coddle the unskilled segment of the labor market. A segment, BTW, that could easily get a trade or skill and earn higher wages without government intervening on their behalf.

#125 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-22 03:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

"What do you expect to happen if the US erected tariffs on such goods coming from China or ANY OTHER NATION where labour is cheaper than ours, which you advocated for?"

We went over this already. I said to erect tariffs for the cheap labor nations who don't engage in fair trade. You quoted the statement several times yourself yet to continue to misrespresent it with strawman positions that clearly weren't there.

Grow up already. This was dealt with already and your dishonesty was exposed.

#126 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 03:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

"If we enact tariffs on country X, country X will return the favor and erect tariffs on US goods."

We're actually talking about countries who already put up barriers to our goods. Currysmell just keep trying to pretend otherwise when his arguments for bending over fail.

#127 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 03:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

"My position is to deal with the Chinese on a level playing field and to force them to be fair when they try to cheat."

Exactly how are they cheating? And what do you think the net result would be for consumers if we did enact tariffs? More or less spending power?

China and India both are getting much better at the art of war, but they have little to no power projection capability. I don't think they'd be able to successfully invade Guam, much less the mainland US. They just don't have the tools. The worst thing China could do to us is stop issuing us credit cards and force us to live within our means. This probably would lead to war, but it would be a war between americans.

#128 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-22 03:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

Grow up already. This was dealt with already and your dishonesty was exposed.

#126 | POSTED BY SULLY AT 2013-02-22 03:30 PM | FLAG:

My dishonesty?

"When we don't, we are taken to court. China is never even challenged". - Sully

It took me ten seconds to show you a link showing that this is false.

Then you say I'm dishonest?

Well, I just pointed out your dishonesty. Show me mine, in any of my statements.

Standard goof ball move. When you can't actually beat someone's argument, call them a liar and a big poopy head. Real mature.

What exactly is China doing that is not adhering to fair trade practices, IN RELATION TO THIS ARTICLE? Nothing. They simply have cheaper labour inputs and they'll continue to produce things much cheaper than they are here.

Google Smoot-Hawley Act, as madbomber brought to our attention. Then you can see how well protectionist practices work for everyone. And try reading it all, for once.

#129 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 03:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

And I agree with the bomber, they're not coming to kick in your front door, as a I already said above, but they do have their own tools and hurt the US economy. Things like, I don't know, the about $1-2T is US debt and Cash. If we cause their ship to start sinking, they're not going to go down alone.

#130 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 03:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

The U.S. "cheats" [whatever that nebulous term means this week] as much as China, so most of the denunciation of China's trade policies from within the U.S. is pure hypocrisy.

That being said, tariffs are a good mechanism to accelerate the decline of rapacious, job-killing, planet-poisoning corporate globalism.

#131 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-22 03:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sully has a point to, though. China does impose heavy tariffs on US goods. Vehicles, for one. That being said, most US made products would be priced too high for the average Chinaman regardless of how you sliced it.

A few years ago I heard about how China was replicating US Luxury vehicles with the intent of selling them at a much lower cost. Imagine if you could purchase an exact copy of an Escalade, but for $40K instead of $80K. I don't know how successful they will be-they have a big problem with quality control, but much of the modern Chinese military is comprised of reverse-engineered Russian weaponry. They've been ripping them off for years.

#132 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-22 03:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Google Smoot-Hawley Act, as madbomber brought to our attention. "

A rightwing myth believed by no one except Randroids and Austrians.

"For a complete myth, it is astounding how much this one gets repeated. Sharp observers have probably already noticed there is a problem with dates. The stock market crashed in October, 1929, but Hoover did not sign the tariff into law until June 17, 1930. So more sophisticated conservatives have refined the story: the tariff turned an otherwise ordinary recession into a full-blown depression.

But even this is a gross exaggeration, and top economists reject it out of hand. Peter Temin, an economic historian at MIT, told The Wall Street Journal on February 22, 1996 that this historical revisionism is "wrong," according to the consensus of the nation's most respected economists. Paul Krugman, one of the world's top international trade economists, and one who is expected to win a Nobel Prize for his revolutionary theories in favor of free trade, calls the Smoot-Hawley theory "incredible."
www.huppi.com

#133 | Posted by nullifidian at 2013-02-22 04:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

Huppi.com? Sounds legit.

Let's see what a more reputable source has to say about it:

"In fact, few economists think the Smoot-Hawley tariff (as it is most often known) was one of the principal causes of the Depression. Worse mistakes were made, largely out of a misplaced faith in the gold standard and balanced budgets. America's tariffs were already high, and some other countries were already increasing their own.

Nevertheless, the act added poison to the emptying well of global trade (see chart). The worldwide protection of the 1930s took decades to dismantle. And bad monetary and fiscal policies were at least based on the economic orthodoxy of the day: economists would tear each other apart over the heresies of John Maynard Keynes. On protection, there was no such division. More than a thousand economists petitioned Hoover not to sign the Smoot-Hawley bill. Bankers like Lamont sided with them; so did editorialists by the score."

"www.economist.com"

#134 | Posted by madbomber at 2013-02-22 04:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Stop with the sad strawmen. My position is to deal with the Chinese on a level playing field and to force them to be fair when they try to cheat. That's it. You don't know me. You have no idea how I live. All you know about me is that I have a better argument than you on this topic and its making you pissy." - Sully

What strawman are you talking about? The fact that if we force the Chinese to play by our wage laws that the cost of everything produced there, which is nearly everything, check you shirt tag for an example, will go up. Yep, that's a fact.

How exactly? Raise tariffs? That's all you got? They'll do it right back, as I already pointed out and so it goes.

You have a piss poor, ill informed argument, that's all I know about you. That I know for sure.

#135 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 04:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Put up tarriffs until they play by the rules." - Sully

Again, I asked you once and Bomber did the same, what are they doing that violates free trade in relation to this article?

They have cheaper labour, that's it. Nothing unfair about it. It's called competition.

#136 | Posted by curisemssl at 2013-02-22 04:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Exactly how are they cheating? And what do you think the net result would be for consumers if we did enact tariffs? More or less spending power?"

Tariffs. Pirating intellectual property. Knockoff goods. Using banned/poinonous substances in products while claiming otherwise. Telling US companies "You can't manufacture here unless you also move your R&D here", which is a clear violation of fair trade. Currency manipulation. Government putting pressure - both publicy and privately- on Chiese firms to only use Chinese suppliers.

The list goes on and on. It is common knowledge and not really my responsiblity to educate you on it. If you're unqualified to discuss it then don't.

#137 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 05:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Show me mine, in any of my statements."

I've pointed them out every single time. You assign me a position, I quote it back to you and point out I never said that. Numerous times. You're completely full of crap when you claim I haven't shown you exactly where you've been dishonest.

#138 | Posted by Sully at 2013-02-22 05:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2013 World Readable

 

Advertisement