Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Saturday, February 25, 2012

Matt Taibbi: Was that GOP debate crazy, or what? Throughout this entire process, the spectacle of these clowns thrashing each other and continually seizing and then fumbling front-runner status has left me with an oddly reassuring feeling, one that I haven't quite been able to put my finger on. In my younger days I would have just assumed it was regular old Schadenfreude at the sight of people like Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich suffering, but this isn't like that ... This is justice. What we have here are chickens coming home to roost.

Advertisement

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Doc_Sarvis

MORE STORIES

Special Features

More

[Having run out of enemies to blame, Taibbi observes, they now look for someone, anyone to blame for the fact that the fantasy America of the paranoid delusions they envision hasn't materialized.]

There was only one possible answer, and we're seeing it playing out in this race: At themselves! ...

This is the last stage in any paranoid illness. You start by suspecting that somebody out there is out to get you; in the end, you're sure that even the people who love you the most under your own roof, your own doctors, your parents, your wife and your children, they're in on the plot. To quote Matt Damon in the almost-underrated spy film The Good Shepherd, they became convinced that there's "a stranger in the house."

This is where the Republican Party is now. They've run out of foreign enemies to point fingers at. They've already maxed out the rhetoric against us orgiastic, anarchy-loving pansexual liberal terrorists. The only possible remaining explanation for their troubles is that their own leaders have failed them. There is a stranger in the house!

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

As Taibbi points out: "This current race for the presidential nomination has therefore devolved into a kind of Freudian Agatha Christie story, in which the disturbed and highly paranoid voter base by turns tests the orthodoxy of each candidate, trying to figure out which one is the spy, which one is really Barack Obama bin Laden-Marx under the candidate mask!"

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 07:45 AM | Reply | Flag:

"[I't's gotten so ridiculous that even Santorum, as paranoid and hysterical a finger-pointing politician as this country has ever seen, a man who once insisted with a straight face that there is no such thing as a liberal Christian – he's now being put through the Electric Conservative Paranoia Acid Test, and failing!"

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 07:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

Noting that Ron Paul, the joker at the table, described Santorum with the line "He is a fake," Taibbi observes, "These candidates are behaving like Stalinist officials in the late thirties, each one afraid to be the first to stop applauding."

And finally:

"These people have run out of others to blame, run out of bystanders to suspect, run out of decent family people to dismiss as Godless, sex-crazed perverts. They're turning the gun on themselves now. It might be justice, or it might just be sad. Whatever it is, it's remarkable to watch."

Indeed.

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 07:47 AM | Reply | Flag:

Santorum....a man who once insisted with a straight face that there is no such thing as a liberal Christian

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

It is a form of justice. I had thought, by simple observation, that there are millions of liberal Christians. But Rick Santorum doesn't believe in us and so, ho-hum.....Good luck in November, Rick.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2012-02-25 09:18 AM | Reply | Flag:

So-----Newt Gingrich is a mean hypocrite.....Willard Romney is a pandering hypocrite.....And Rick Santorum------I'm sorry to say this kids------Causes us to doubt his mental health almost every time he opens his mouth.

Karl Rove says no brokered convention. Karl Rove is an interesting man.

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2012-02-25 09:20 AM | Reply | Flag:

This guy does a good job of eviscerating Ron Paul. I've never, never thought of Paul as a viable candidate. He lives in his head. If he ever stumbled into the presidency, it would be four years of an old-man fumbling with his breakfast and whining.

#6 | Posted by Zed at 2012-02-25 09:25 AM | Reply | Flag:

Well said!

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 10:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

"He lives in his head."

Ex-asolutely-actly.

I see Ron Paul hearing, reading, seeing something that doesn't quite dovetail with his fun-house mirrors perspective and mumbling, "Well, no, that can't be" and the reordering the ethereal props on the stage in his mind he perceives as reality.

#8 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 10:14 AM | Reply | Flag:

As usual, Matt Taibe gets it exactly right and describes the radical conservative movement as what it is, a bunch of angry old idiots who have been whining since the voting rights act of 1965.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2012-02-25 10:52 AM | Reply | Flag:

Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 07:45 AM | 9 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry

9 COMMENTS

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 07:45 AM | Reply | Flag:
#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 07:46 AM | Reply | Flag:
#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 07:47 AM | Reply | Flag:
#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 10:12 AM | Reply | Flag:
#8 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 10:14 AM | Reply | Flag:

#10 | Posted by vernon at 2012-02-25 10:59 AM | Reply | Flag:

As usual, Matt Taibe gets it exactly right and describes the radical conservative movement as what it is, a bunch of angry old idiots who have been whining since the voting rights act of 1965.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2012-02-25 10:52 AM | Reply | Flag:

As usual, Danni is still locked into some idealized America from 1956, when everyone had a union factory job. Meanwhile, her fantasy ignores the racism of the era that she so adores.

#11 | Posted by vernon at 2012-02-25 11:03 AM | Reply | Flag:

-idealized America from 1956,

lmao! OF course, it's the Rwing who dreams of returning to the Good Old Days of the "moral America" of the 1950's.... the idolized "Happy Days" of their youth.

You know, before Civil Rights when they had segregation and before the women's movement and contraception to protect them from uppity black folk and uppity women folk.

They are still in denial about top tax rates of 90 percent in the '50's, but that's another story.

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2012-02-25 11:16 AM | Reply | Flag:

I'm too out of it, too fat, too lazy, far too ignorant, and way too stupid to say anything about whatever whoever wrote whatever this thread is linked to for me to offer anything even remotely like an intelligent response.

So - fucked seven ways from Sunday, as usual - I'm sending this, instead.

#10 | Posted by vernon, LLC, Tennessee

#13 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 11:28 AM | Reply | Flag:

still locked into some idealized America from 1956...
#11 | Posted by vernon

Which, of course, is one of the major points in the article Vermin was too out of it, too fat, too lazy, far too ignorant, and way too stupid to actually read and comment upon.

Irony, thy waters run much too broad and far too swift for the likes of Vermin to keep his pointed little head above the tide.

#14 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 11:30 AM | Reply | Flag:


Taibbi: GOP Chickens Home to Roost

Excellent article.

#15 | Posted by DARTHCHENEY at 2012-02-25 12:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

Quack Sarvis takes too many liberties posting on his own post.

- by the way, only by accident, Matt Taibbi has not gone the way of
OWS ingrates. He is naive and his lily-white environment has destroyed
his ability to reason or get in touch with his survival instincts.

#16 | Posted by dean_buvia at 2012-02-25 01:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

"As usual, Danni is still locked into some idealized America from 1956, when everyone had a union factory job."

the union jobs would be fine but the segregation, lack of women's right, etc. you can keep in your dreams.

#17 | Posted by danni at 2012-02-25 01:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

Matt is a great writer....it's too bad he is dead wrong.

Despite what Matt has wrongly been taught the GI bill was not taken advantage of by the majority of servicemen after WW2. To imagine that America was able to prosper because a bunch of veterans came home and sat on their asses in a class room is nothing short of delusional. Hard work and limited government is what allowed businesses to prosper and fortunes to be made.

Same thing happened in The Guilded Age. Guess what no big Government hand out then either.

"These candidates are behaving like Stalinist officials".

An unhinged partisan hack is the only word that comes to mind when reading this. He must have been wasted when he wrote this late in the evening as his work is typically a hell of a lot better.

There have been many times in this country when the purchasing power for Americans has been much stronger and the bloated Federal Government had not a thing to do with it.

#18 | Posted by Dirk at 2012-02-25 01:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

Despite what Matt has wrongly been taught the GI bill was not taken advantage of by the majority of servicemen after WW2. To imagine that America was able to prosper because a bunch of veterans came home and sat on their asses in a class room is nothing short of delusional. Hard work and limited government is what allowed businesses to prosper and fortunes to be made.

Because of the GI bill, the percentage of Americans who went to college rose exponentially, and most bought homes. Neither of which would have happened without the GI bill. It was responsible for making the middle class possible. One Republican, in 1946 "warned that most Americans were not yet ready for "the education of a free man," and that higher education "used as a substitute for a dole or for a national program of public works" would only create "educational hobos."

The number of degrees awarded by U.S. colleges and universities more than doubled between 1940-50, and the percentage of Americans with bachelor degrees or more rose from 4.6 percent in 1945, to 25 percent a half-century later. By 1956, when it expired, the education-and-training portion of the GI Bill had disbursed $14.5 billion to veteransâ€"but the Veterans' Administration estimated the increase in federal income taxes alone would "be several times...[that] cost."

#19 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2012-02-25 01:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

This thing called a 'debate" happens when people are trying to pick a candidate from a large group of people.

As for the front-runner status changing hands several time, it stands to reason that as the candidates travel around the country they will meet various groups of people with different idea and needs in the forum of a debate.

With that in mind each candidate can/will/should have the backing of the majority of the people who answered polls on who they support.

That is how the system was set up and is supposed to work, exactly how its supposed to work.

But for some reason the left thinks that shows confusion or foolishness.
That thinking shows just how corrupted the left has become, in that the way the Govt. in their country is supposed to work is foreign to their way of thinking.

That the model of Govt. they think is best is the model that has got the other side of the world hanging on by their fingernails over the abyss of total collapse is quite stunning.
No amount of evidence will sway the left from its idea that it it right.
Not history, the economic collapse of the last 4 years , nor the events taking place right now, in real time around the world.

Remember what ever is being told to you by the left only has to be believed as the truth till November 6, 2012.

I do not think the majority of the people America believe anything he is saying.

......NOPE IN NOVEMBER.....

#20 | Posted by MENSAKOOK at 2012-02-25 02:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

The GOP have nothing to run on but claims they can get us out of the hole with more of the same policies that got us in this mess to begin with.

Look at their eventual nominee:

"The best thing that Mitt Romney could do is actually run a campaign that said something," Bruce Haynes, one of the founding partners of Purples Strategies and a veteran of GOP campaigns. "It's a Seinfeld campaign. It's a campaign about nothing. It was good for nine years of TV. But Mitt Romney is going to to have to deliver a commitment and a promise to voters. If he is delivering one, it's not breaking through."

Romney's favorability numbers are lower (27%) - much lower - than any other frontrunner candidate of either party at this point in the race in recent presidential elections. They won't go up as more Americans begin to tune into the Presidential race and see what he's actually done as a 'businessman'.

#21 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2012-02-25 02:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

Doc's postings are right on, but so far we haven't seen the unlimited corporate cash that convinces people doggy poop is chocolate candy and it is in their best interest to vote against their own best interest, herm

#22 | Posted by herm at 2012-02-25 02:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

Hard work and limited government is what allowed businesses to prosper and fortunes to be made.

Look, somebody who still believes in "trickle down."
It's like the past forty years never happened, How quaint!

Since 1996, dividends and capital gains have grown faster than wages or any other category of after-tax income

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2012-02-25 02:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

Libs are getting a hearty belly laugh at the political sausage making process, forgetting their own mess that continued into June of 2008 and resulted in the worst POTUS in the history of our country. Laugh it up! The grown ups will take care of things shortly.

#24 | Posted by justanoversight at 2012-02-25 03:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

"and resulted in the worst POTUS in the history of our country."

What did all the Republicans drink that made them lose all memory?

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2012-02-25 03:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

What did all the Republicans drink that made them lose all memory?

#25 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Sorry Dan, but I wasn't around for the Harding administration.

#26 | Posted by justanoversight at 2012-02-25 03:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I wasn't around for the Harding administration."

Did you miss the received-surplus-budgets-but- missed-by-$15-trillion-while- invading-the-wrong-country- and-melting-down-the-economy administration?

#27 | Posted by Danforth at 2012-02-25 03:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

Did you miss the received-surplus-budgets-but- missed-by-$15-trillion-while- invading-the-wrong-country- and-melting-down-the-economy administration?

#27 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Man, you guys hang onto BS talking points like Obama hangs onto his 3-iron. Seriously, how many times are we gonna have this discussion? Get over it and deal with the fact that you help elect the worst, most incompetent president in history.

#28 | Posted by justanoversight at 2012-02-25 04:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Quack Sarvis takes too many liberties posting on his own post.
#16 | Posted by dean_vulva

When you start your own blog - which will no doubt be an incredibly lonely place - then you can start making the rules. Until then, you'll have to made do with Mr. Cadenhead's playground.

#29 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 04:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

'Chickens home to roost'? REV Wright gonna be pissed Taibbi five fingered a sermon of his.

#30 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2012-02-25 04:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

"that continued into June of 2008 and resulted in the worst POTUS in the history of our country."

Obviously you thinking of either 2000 or 2004, because one of the favored contenders for "Worst President, Ever" left office in January 2009.

Amnesia, much?

#31 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-02-25 04:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

Goatfat_1, are you sure you want to play the RevWright card?

After all your hero Rmoney was post president of the Mormon Church (equivalent of somewhere between an Archbishop and a Cardinal). He personally stood at the veil and fondled young nude boys and girls back before they changed the Temple Endowment Ceremony. He is a GOD, you know.

#32 | Posted by axe at 2012-02-25 04:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Get over it and deal with the fact that you help elect the worst, most incompetent president in history."

Let me know when this guy invades the wrong country, misses the budgets he was given by $15 Trillion, and melts down the economy.

Your single biggest bitch is the guy has a particular letter after his name. If it were an (R), you'd be crowing how he staved off a Great Depression, added jobs instead of bled jobs, and got bin Laden.

#33 | Posted by Danforth at 2012-02-25 04:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

#28

Translation: Yeah, I missed it.

#34 | Posted by Danforth at 2012-02-25 04:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

Libs are getting a hearty belly laugh at the political sausage making process

#24 | Posted by justanoversight at 2012

I think the point is that your candidates are not so much making sausages as being sausage. I'm really glad you feel that "the grown-ups" will be here shortly to take care of things". It's just a crying shame none of them are running for president on the Republican ticket this year.

#35 | Posted by Zed at 2012-02-25 05:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Aren't all of Odummy's speeches pathetic? He pretends to be so ABOVE our pay scale intellectually when he is actually a true idiot? I mean, come on!

#36 | Posted by patriotwoman23 at 2012-02-25 06:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

"he is actually a true idiot?"

Riiiiiiiiiiiight. Because it takes a "true idiot" to graduate Magna from Harvard.

Feel free to tell us where you graduated in your community college by comparision.

#37 | Posted by Danforth at 2012-02-25 07:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Oooh, you "conservative" bitches, get back in line!:

Two opinion pieces on Friday in The Wall Street Journal - whose editorial page is typically a barometer of the thinking of the Republican Party establishment - blasted Santorum ’s brand of conservatism.

One article said the former Pennsylvania senator’s focus on religion and social issues could make it more difficult for the eventual Republican nominee to appeal to independent voters, the keys to victory in the Nov. 6 election.

Another article said Santorum has “potentially fatal general-election liability issues,” and that his social policies - which, among other things, seek to end abortion and increase childbirth - would increase the role of government in Americans’ lives. One of the key tenets of the Republican platform is to reduce government’s influence on citizens.

“Voters will wonder what other values he’d seek to institute via government,” columnist Kimberly A. Strassel wrote in that article.

#38 | Posted by northguy3 at 2012-02-25 07:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

Rather catty of Mr. Tabbi. I thought it was women who were expected to be catty. He does seem to enjoy the discomfiture of others-or is it just that of Republicans?

#39 | Posted by Donald at 2012-02-25 09:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

Fuck the GOP..the gene that drives shit stains to be GOP should be eradicated from the human species.

#40 | Posted by Legio at 2012-02-26 05:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable