Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, January 27, 2012

The winner of a $14.3 million Iowa lottery has withdrawn a claim to the money rather than identify himself. The winner tried to get the prize as Hexham Investments Trust, a corporation in Belize, but Iowa law requires winners' names and addresses to be made public. "It doesn't get much weirder than this," said Iowa Lottery spokeswoman Mary Neubauer.

Advertisement

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

A fugitive.

#1 | Posted by dean_buvia at 2012-01-27 05:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

Mitt. Couldn't be bothered with collecting chump change.

#2 | Posted by northguy3 at 2012-01-27 06:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

A fugitive.

#1 | Posted by dean_buvia

Dumb sumbitch coulda give it to me! (I'd still have split it with him! Honest!)

#3 | Posted by American1st at 2012-01-27 06:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

Fugitive, or someone who walked away from a former life, started a new one, and does not want the two connected.

#4 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-27 07:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

WOW! Something just doesn't pass the sniff test with this one.

JM

#5 | Posted by dockj at 2012-01-27 09:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

DockJ:

There are some legit reasons why someone would not want to claim a lottery prize under the Iowa Lottery's rules, which state that a claimant's name must be public information.

Let's say the winner was a woman who fled a stalker and has been hiding from the guy for some years - she could be so terrified that losing the prize would be preferable to having her name made public, perhaps eventually leading her stalker back to her.

Nothing wrong with that, except that it would be a shame and a pity that someone was that terrified of someone else, and had no faith in police or the law to address the situation.

#6 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-27 11:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

Lotto Winner Gives Up $14 Million Claim

He owns a corporation in Belize. Likely already owes $20 million to the IRS in unpaid taxes and doesn't want his identity known.

#7 | Posted by CalifChris at 2012-01-27 11:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

Let's say the winner was a woman who fled a stalker and has been hiding from the guy for some years - she could be so terrified that losing the prize would be preferable to having her name made public, perhaps eventually leading her stalker back to her.

With $14 million in her pocket, hiring some guy to make sure her stalker doesn't bother her again won't be a problem.

#8 | Posted by CalifChris at 2012-01-27 11:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

Belize is beautiful--went there and Cozumel on a cruise.

Belize though is quite poor. We took a bus to the pyramids and everyone along the way was doing their laundry as it was all hanging out on the clothes lines. Lots of trash in the streets--which many were dirt inside the city.

This lotto thing is likely some person who bought the ticket and then got a divorce--lol

Same thing tried before and it didn't work.

They even have the person on video tape buying the ticket.

Now they could give the ticket to someone else--like it was bought as part of the pool at work.

#9 | Posted by MURPHY at 2012-01-28 12:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

"With $14 million in her pocket, hiring some guy to make sure her stalker doesn't bother her again won't be a problem."

Never been stalked, have you dear?

Your stalker appears every time you least expect it. You can't open your email without bracing yourself. You go to the grocery store with friends for protection and there he is, smiling that Goddamn "I'll get you" smile, but doing nothing else so that your friends see nothing they can do anything about. You get odd signals - stuff on your patio rearranged, a window forced but nothing disturbed, just to show you he can.

Much of stalking is a mind game, and if you'd ever been subjected to it, you'd now how insanely creepy it is - like being in a Halloween movie that never ends.

Trust me, you'd gladly forfeit $14 mil to get past it and know for sure it was over.

#10 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-28 12:29 AM | Reply | Flag:

I remember when McDonald's had a game and the grand prize winner never came forward to claim the $1 million.

A week later the ticket was in the mail for St. Jude hospital, no name attached.

If you can't claim it for whatever reason, let it do some good.

Also, it seems that several states have removed the 'public information' rule just because it aided stalkers and con men.

#11 | Posted by vernon at 2012-01-28 03:09 AM | Reply | Flag:

"A week later the ticket was in the mail for St. Jude hospital, no name attached."

Later discovered to be Jerome P. Jacobson, a fraud.

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2012-01-28 03:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

Maybe the winner just wanted to avoid the hassle of all the greedy scrum oozing out of the woodwork wanting some of the money.

#13 | Posted by fwthom at 2012-01-28 09:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Nothing wrong with that, except that it would be a shame and a pity that someone was that terrified of someone else, and had no faith in police or the law to address the situation."

It's a shame but it is how it is for many people. I know that I would not depend on the police were I in that situation, I've seen people depend on them before but the protection just wasn't there.

#14 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-28 09:21 AM | Reply | Flag:

Obama's class warfare scum would be there with their hands out.

#15 | Posted by fwthom at 2012-01-28 09:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Hoffa?

#16 | Posted by squinch at 2012-01-28 09:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

Why did the person purchase the ticket in the first place?

#17 | Posted by matsop at 2012-01-28 11:29 AM | Reply | Flag:

Never been stalked, have you dear?

Your stalker appears every time you least expect it. You can't open your email without bracing yourself. You go to the grocery store with friends for protection and there he is, smiling that Goddamn "I'll get you" smile, but doing nothing else so that your friends see nothing they can do anything about. You get odd signals - stuff on your patio rearranged, a window forced but nothing disturbed, just to show you he can.

Much of stalking is a mind game, and if you'd ever been subjected to it, you'd now how insanely creepy it is - like being in a Halloween movie that never ends.

Trust me, you'd gladly forfeit $14 mil to get past it and know for sure it was over.

#10 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-28 12:29 AM | Reply |

Either extremely paranoid or a veteran of the stalking club.

#18 | Posted by matsop at 2012-01-28 11:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

Most likely Danforth or his Mother in law.

#19 | Posted by Tedly at 2012-01-28 11:43 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Most likely Danforth or his Mother in law."

LOl... I doubt danforth would spend the $10.00 to get his MIL an ID to collect the lotto money.

#20 | Posted by crispee_oc at 2012-01-28 11:45 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Either extremely paranoid or a veteran of the stalking club."

The latter. I was lucky; the son-of-a-bitch got T-boned at an intersection by someone fleeing the cops and killed instantly.

#21 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-28 12:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

Making someone's name and address public is bullshit. They should respect people's privacy. All that does is paint a target on the winner's back so that all the family leeches come out of the woodwork.

#22 | Posted by phesterOBoyle at 2012-01-28 02:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Making someone's name and address public is bullshit. They should respect people's privacy."

The problem with that is that you would never know for sure if anyone actually won or not. This system helps keep lotteries honest.

#23 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-28 06:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

RE: #23 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-28 06:25 PM

I see your point, but it seems there could be some way to verify the lottery results without public disclosure.

Besides being a fugitive or 'stalkee', other possibilities exist:
1. In witness protection program
2. Member of the local lottery commission (who, I believe, are not permitted to participate [and that includes their immediate families]. It's possible an individual might have purchased a lottery ticket without being fully aware of the details of the non-participation clause)

#24 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2012-01-28 08:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

Never had it to begin with.

#25 | Posted by bph320 at 2012-01-29 01:38 AM | Reply | Flag:

Lotto winners must prove their identities to get the dough... Just like voters do at the polls. Oh wait... Scratch the voters part. That's not important enough to require I.d.

JM

#26 | Posted by dockj at 2012-01-29 09:09 AM | Reply | Flag:

Advertisement

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable