Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

In an interview after he finally received the Bronze Star he was due, World War II vet Chris Christian, 84, said that he lost his faith while hiding from artillery fire. "They say there are no atheists in foxholes. But as we sat in those holes, praying that God would save us, I thought about the fact that the other side was doing the same thing. And then I wondered if God is just playing some kind of game with us. Pretty much I decided at that point there was no God."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

If God is all powerful, and he does nothing to stop wars, is he also a conservative war hawk?

"And then I wondered if God is just playing some kind of game with us....?"

This man was a participant in battle, part of a vast war.

I suppose he can get on God's case for permitting WWII in the first place. But then to be consistent he'd have to also condemn Him for permitting men, who were the proximate causes for that war.

This ex-soldier is a man. Strange to have to make a point of that.

Because it was men who waged WWII and in a vast number of cases actively wanted it or passively abetted it. It was men who built the artillery tubes that frightened him so badly and the shells that caused him to lose faith.

But it doesn't seem as if he's given up on men. Perhaps not surprising, because that would would naturally mean he'd given up on himself.

But he thinks well enough of himself to accept a medal for being an active participant (and one assumes a deadly player) in the very event he searches outside of himself to assign fault.

Before he asks God when and if He plays games, he should have the insight and honesty to recognize he's taken his turn throwing the dice a few times himself.

There is a morbid bias towards the worst variety of atheism on this site. It's shallow and depressing.

By the way, I still want ZOMBIE'S meaningless record collection.




This ex-soldier is a man. Strange to have to make a point of that.

Because it was men who waged WWII and in a vast number of cases actively wanted it or passively abetted it. It was men who built the artillery tubes that frightened him so badly and the shells that caused him to lose faith.

It was Man who invented the idea of God. Not the other way around.


I suppose he can get on God's case for permitting WWII in the first place. But then to be consistent he'd have to also condemn Him for permitting men, who were the proximate causes for that war.

What a fucking stupid thing to say. An omnipotent being could just tinker with a few leaders' minds and *pfft* you have no WWII. You believe in "miracles" don't you?

There is a morbid bias towards the worst variety of atheism on this site.

You must be referring to the kind of atheism that throws your smug self-rightousness right back in your face. I can see why you don't like it. You had better get used to it, though.

By the way, I still want ZOMBIE'S meaningless record collection.

Not for sale, chump. But thanks for making my point... meaning is entirely subjective. My albums have meaning to me, and meaning to you, but that meaning is different. There is not some all-encompassing law of the universe that tells you the meaning of Led Zeppelin III, a tomato, or a human life. Not unless you invent one out of thin air, that is.

It was Man who invented the idea of God.

And it was Man that became so enamored of his invention that he deceived himself into thinking he could not live without it.

Zed,

No offense, but you seem to be speaking in circles. If I understand you correctly, you're saying the fault lies with man for using his abilities to murder. However, you don't give a child a box of matches and a jug of gasoline and then get to act surprised when he starts a fire.

If there is an omnipotent god, and it was this god who created man, and this omnipotent god decided to gift man with the ability and desire to harm, then it seems to me that this god deserves the blame when man chooses to go to war.

Presumably an omnipotent god could have created man as pacifist, but decided to go with the aggressive, bloodthirsty model instead. Alternatively, this omnipotent god could have granted man unlimited resources so there would be less reason to go to war, but I guess that would have made our lives too easy and brought less amusement to the omnipotent god. In addition, if the god was omniscient as well, then I have no clue what kind of amusement could be derived from watching man destroy itself, except in the same way we humans might enjoy watching clothing cycle in a washing machine.

Dang former soldiers! Always messing up the rethug theory's about war.

Presumably an omnipotent god could have created man as pacifist, but decided to go with the aggressive, bloodthirsty model instead.

The Earth is a tough place to evolve on as we can see from Darwin's Law. Ya used to have to be tough, aggressive and bloodthirsty to even survive long enough to reproduce(ya still gotta be tough and aggressive and even bloodthirsty in some places to make any money).

God allegedly made Earth.

Ipso facto...it must be God's Plan. Who are we to question it? Make War! WE are God's Chosen People so He will be on our side! It says so on our weapons.

And don't forget...Our God is Stronger than Your God.... so neener neener neener!

"You don't give a child a box of matches and a jug of gasoline...."

Let me respond to you this way---At the root of much atheist resentment towards God is the notion he didn't create a purely deterministic universe that man never had any ability to effect.

God does have the power to have everything his predetermined way. That necessary means you have no free will, and you never get to make a choice.

YOU were the one that chose to have gasoline and matches and, more dire yet-since both gasoline and matches are in themselves neutral things- YOU were the one that decided Molotov cocktails might be nice.

Yes, God could have created a universe in which Molotov cocktails were impossible. He could have also created a unicerse in which you were impossible.

He chose not to. He gave you intellect, feelings, and a conscience and look at what you do. He evern instructed you on teh best way to make use of these things.

Then, at the end of it all, you blame Him for the gift of individuality and freedom of choice.
YOU fucked up. And, yes---God let you do that. Let's all cry into our beers.

"Presumably an omnipoent God could have created man as a pacifist...."

Indeed. He could have given YOU the nature of a three-toed sloth. That would certianly take care of the war thing.

Neat to second-guess God according you YOUR personal standards. But the simple fact of the matter is that there is NOTHING standing in the way of each of us being pacifists. It's a matter of simple choice.

Or maybe not choice for you. I suspect you think mankind has no choice but to be what it is, but leaving God out. Naturalistic determinism, in which it becomes an interesting mental exercise attempting to determine exactly HOW a rock is different from a human being.

As Dr. Manhattan stated (paraphrasing): "There is no real difference between a living or a dead human being. They both weigh the same".

No, no circular arguments from me. Rather, you occupy the role of a three-legged dog chasing frisbees. The fact you can't catch a damned thing you blame on the guy tosing it your direction.

But the Good News is you can change. THAT is a bloody divine miracle.


Biocentrist theories and phenomenon, exemplified by quantum entanglements, also tend to indicate a biological design to our reality.

This ex-soldier is a man. Strange to have to make a point of that.

Because it was men who waged WWII and in a vast number of cases actively wanted it or passively abetted it. It was men who built the artillery tubes that frightened him so badly and the shells that caused him to lose faith.

Rationalize rationalize rationalize.

I actually agree with you, though. I don't think God should be given credit for saving those who survived just as he shouldn't be blamed for these men going through it to begin with.

At the root of much atheist resentment towards God is the notion he didn't create a purely deterministic universe that man never had any ability to effect.

No, I think it's the Christian tendency to give God credit for the stuff they like but to rationalize away the stuff they don't.

"Meaning is entirely subjective...."

Some people make a point of asserting others are somehow mistaken in their search for meaning. Those same people hold on to what is precious to them with clawed hands.

Someone referenced circular arguments above. I often speak with people who, philosophically speaking, don't know whether they are coming or going.

You learned to be that way. You'll never really win an argument but you'll never really lose one, either. That's good enough for you.

But it lacks meaning somehow, even relatively speaking.

No, no circular arguments from me.

HA

The entire religious construct is circular and is honed through many years of implementation to be infallible so long as you swallow what it preaches.

No, I think it's the Christian tendency to give God credit for the stuff they like but to rationalize away the stuff they don't.

That tends to be their modus operandi. Give thanks to god for anything good that happens, but don't even think of blaming the bastard for the bad stuff. You're supposed to blame yourself and feel inadequate... that way you keep feeling as if you need to keep believing in god.

If only he'd have been a Republican, he'd have not only been saved but also later run for POTUS.

But seriously for a moment, bad things happen to Christians. It's certainly not uncommon to wonder where God is during tough times... and why He doesn't answer your prayer at the moment.

"Rationalize the stuff they don't..."

It's human nature to rationalize. You do it. So what's your point?

I just got through describing one big, dripping with stink, atheist rationalization that keeps them from thinking straight just as errors of thought also keep Voudun priests sacrificing chickens.

Mote meet plank. What are you going to do about it?

Give thanks to god for anything good that happens, but don't even think of blaming the bastard for the bad stuff.

I've always wondered why bother doing either?

Shit happens. Whether it's part of some 'plan' or just simply the result of the chaotic randomness that is reality doesn't really matter considering what's done is done.

"You're supposed to blame yourself and feel inadequate...."

Hell, no---Brag about whatever you do. Nothing's stopping you. Not even God.

#15

My ol' Pastor, a Stanford PhD, used to say that the first thing he was going to do when he got to Heabin' was to punch ADM out, and give God a good working watch.

"The entire relgous construct is circular...."

This is what I've learned from atheists on this site:

1) If I can't explain everything, God and religion are flawed.

2) If I can explain everything, God and religion are flawed.

Interesting you guys never notice stuff like that. You pride yourself on being thinking men. Maybe you just think poorly at times. But please don't feel inadequate.

#7

aggressive and bloodthirsty in the Garden of Eden. which one of the two there in that garden might that have been?

just trying to make some change, the pimp and the whore.

It's human nature to rationalize. You do it. So what's your point?

Do I really need to point it out?

You selectively rationalize things to fit your view of God.

I just got through describing one big, dripping with stink, atheist rationalization that keeps them from thinking straight just as errors of thought also keep Voudun priests sacrificing chickens.

Read post 17.

I don't think attributing anything to or against God is wise.


I suppose he can get on God's case for permitting WWII in the first place. But then to be consistent he'd have to also condemn Him for permitting men, who were the proximate causes for that war.


What a fucking stupid thing to say. An omnipotent being could just tinker with a few leaders' minds and *pfft* you have no WWII. You believe in "miracles" don't you?

#4 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2010-02-07 02:10 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e


Why do we all get angry when we are asked to take responsibility, especially when our worldview renders that it was all our fault anyway?

In terms of God tinkering with a few leaders minds, why would he tinker with their minds? Would he do it because they thought about killing or harming another individual? Take them out of existence because of that?

Ok, everytime you want to do something, God changes is to something he thinks is better, even though it may not necessarily make you a terrible person. Better yet, each time anyone thinks of doing anything wrong, God erases them out of existence so that they do not bring harm to anyone else. That would mean that the first time you screw up and say "fuck," in a malicious way, or any other insult, you are dead.

It is kind of funny that we expect to get a multitude of chances when we make mistakes, however when someone makes a mistake, they should be erased immediatly.

Makes sense to me. Now I see why you are all complaining against God. What a jerk for giving people a second, third, fourth chance. Man it would be better if he just killed us for good when we messed up....

Rational thinking there guys.

"You subjectively rationalize things to make it fit your view of God...."

You subjectively rationalize things to make it fit your view of no God.

If you want to take this tack, then we have a draw, a Mexican standoff. Drop it until God comes down, AGAIN, to straighten both of us out.

At the root of your arguments is this utterly strange idea you evade human psychology in your approach to life.

If that were true, I'd dart you and put you on display.

I say any god who fucks up on the first day in Eden, outwitted by a snake, can't be very smart.

You subjectively rationalize things to make it fit your view of no God.

Damn, Zed, you got me there too. I do the same thing for pagan gods too.

it would be easier to believe there was a god if he either made me a believer or there was some actual proof.

-if he either made me a believer

Most would whine about not having free will then.


-there was some actual proof.

Many wouldn't believe it no matter what it was.

1) If I can't explain everything, God and religion are flawed.

2) If I can explain everything, God and religion are flawed.

No, just religion.

All we have are our interpretations of God, which by their own assertions should be wholly inadequate.

Interesting you guys never notice stuff like that. You pride yourself on being thinking men. Maybe you just think poorly at times. But please don't feel inadequate.

I leave pompous assertions of being a "thinking man" to you Zed.

You subjectively rationalize things to make it fit your view of no God.

You assume I'm an atheist.

At the root of your arguments is this utterly strange idea you evade human psychology in your approach to life.

How do you figure?

Off to a Super Bowl party. I'll check back later.

"I leave pompous assertions of being a thinking man to you...."

I have my flaws, but I've at least learned what irony is.

"Many wouldn't believe it no matter what it was...."

Quite right. I had a moment of small epiphany when a scientist informed me he wouldn't credit the existence of God even if He showed up on instruments.

Maybe the events of this world just have to transpire as they do... no that cant be right.. it feels so much better to blame everything wrong with our world on God.

Here's a crazy idea.. this life is all just theater and the only thing that really matters is our eternal soul

I don't think that the issue is the existence of a deity, but rather an issue of why people think that somehow they are better than others. After all, if a person believes in a deity, or not, is their choice. All of the sacred texts that I have pretty much agree on that point.

I think the problem is when people allow themselves to either give up their "search for truth" or don't care to think for themselves. Whether it be religion, science, politics, etc., you will have a small group of people who will attempt to control the "masses" with their own "doctrine". And if you don't agree with them, either you are tossed from the group, or in worst cases killed.

Religion, being man-made, is probably the worst these groups. Whether it be one god, or many gods, by definition you can't fully describe it/them. And of course, one groups god(s) is better than another groups. And this can be useful if the group that you're targeting has something that you want (people, land, resources, etc.).

I'm not going to only point the finger at the leaders of these groups, but also the followers who can't/won't take the time out to study themselves, and anyone who won't take responsiblity for their own actions, but instead places it on some deity/believe system/science.

"Religion, being man-made...."

You and I diverge here, of course. I can go with "man-elaborated", at least at times.

But if there is a God who communicates to human beings, there is also something much more genuine to religous belief than what you decide to make up for the Saturday Morning Fun Club.

Of course, that "If" is the one that separates the sheep from the goats, Biblical allusion intended.

godisfemale,

Nihilism is the end result of such thinking. Personally, I don't believe that Nihilism is particularly helpful to assisting us with the human condition.


Zed,

You threw a lot of stuff out there and I have neither the time nor inclination to address it all.

Regarding your claim that we all have power to control our lives, I assume you base this conclusion on the billions of people living under the yoke of their oppressive governments. Stalinist Russia was surely a wonderful place to exercise free will.

You further suggest that it is our own fault if we choose aggression over peace. Presumably, you base this conclusion on the extraordinary power pacifism has in the face of genocidal rage. Indeed, if only the Tutsis, Jews and Armenians had known that they could face down the might and will of their respective persecutors with flower-power.

In any event, I think I have a better understanding of what you were saying initially. The mere fact that life sucks and the world is not worth two shits for the vast majority of humanity doesn't necessarily mean that god doesn't exist. The fact that god toys with us also does not disprove its existence. Rather, all of these facts merely demonstrate that god, if it does exist, is a bit of an asshole. I have to say, this actually makes sense and I agree with you. Further, I can't say I blame this alleged god too much for being a jerk as I guess the old axiom of absolute power corrupting absolutely applies to deities as well.

"when a scientist informed me he wouldn't credit the existence of God even if He showed up on instruments" I'll assume that this "scientist" exists and is not merely a straw man constructed for argument. The facts given suggest that this scientist is not so much a scientist as someone following atheism based on faith.

Personally, I don't believe that god exists, but if god showed up tomorrow in all of that god's splendor, I'd accept the existence of, but feel no need to worship, said god. Yeah, that's right, I'd judge god based on my own sense of right and wrong. If the alleged god wants to send me to burn in hell for not dropping on my knees in worship, so be it. That would make the god no different from all of the other petty dictators god decided to inflict on humanity over the ages.

Sorry, perhaps I should be more specific. I mean organized religion. For example, within Chistianity you have Catholics, Baptists, Protestants, etc. They all call themselves Christians, but they have different dogmas. Or we can even go with Judaism, Islam and Christianity, which all are Abrahamic religions. Same father, different dogmas...

Nihilism? Hardly! I happen to know there is a God and She is not in charge of everything that happens to man. We live this material life according to our free will, events will transpire as they will and in the end it's just us and our Mother, God.

We each have our own relationship with God whether good or bad. I personally dont need a middleman between me and God.. some people do..

The idea that somehow God wont accept her child because he/she didnt worship correctly or use the right prayer is just silly. We're all Her children and if we find our way to Her, we're each going to do it in our own manner

God does not have a gender. You've created this in your mind because you cannot let go. There is no him or her.

That kind of division only inhibits you.

I have my flaws, but I've at least learned what irony is.

I am fully aware of what irony is.

I quite often find myself falling victim to it.

I do not, however, accuse someone of being a sloppy thinker because their conclusions in an opinion-based conversation disagree with mine.

I do not, however, think that because a particular world view has worked for me it is superior to other world views.

You seem to fall victim to both of these transgressions.

Pride cometh...

I had a moment of small epiphany when a scientist informed me he wouldn't credit the existence of God even if He showed up on instruments.

What was it and was it based on more than a single anecdote?

At the root of your arguments is this utterly strange idea you evade human psychology in your approach to life.

How do you figure?

I'm still curious as to what you mean by this, Zed.

"God has no gender"

That idea certainly makes sense.. it's not like you have to guess God's gender correctly in order to be welcomed in to the afterlife. We live in a male-centered society and even people who dont believe in God use "him" or "he".

I myself was raised a Roman Catholic and always thought of God as a male. The bible was written by men and the churches were established by men so it stands to reason that they would refer to God in the male. Jesus himself used the term Father for God...but all of our records come from a book written thousands of years ago by men..

Anyways..when I was introduced to God, She was female.. I dont know what I cant let go of or how this inhibits me.. She was just female

"Regarding the power to control our lives...."

Didn't actually say that. I said we have the power to make choices.

You can disagree with that, and take the deterministic position, which some major proponents assert attacks even the validity of human consciousness, or you can agree with me that there is free will.

If you don't believe in free will, just say that. Then admit neither one of us had the choice to have this argument from either side of this question.

Funny thing is, if determinism is correct, you also never had the choice but to make/not make such an admission. Welcome to Hell.

"If God showed up tomorrow in all of God's splendor, then I'd accept the idea of God..."

Really? I wouldn't accept that as given for one instant. In the first place, God would have to match your personal idea of splendor. Them you'd have to convince yourself God wasn't some hyper-advanced space alien. The worth of the event would deteriorate in the minds of many starting just there.

Anyways..when I was introduced to God, ..........


you should have asked for her phone number or at least gotten her card.


"If God showed up tomorrow in all of God's splendor, then I'd accept the idea of God..."


Really? I wouldn't accept that as given for one instant. In the first place, God would have to match your personal idea of splendor. Them you'd have to convince yourself God wasn't some hyper-advanced space alien. The worth of the event would deteriorate in the minds of many starting just there.


#45 | Posted by Zed


If god is powerful enough he can manifest himself in such a way as to make me believe.

"I'd judge God based on my sense of right and wrong...."

Really, I have no doubt. Then yell when God takes his turn with you. Because, you know, making judgments like that violates your sense of right and wrong. Unless it's you making them, you special boy.

"If God is powerful enough He can manifest Himself in such a way as to make me believe..."

You under-estimate yourself by a parsec.

well than I guess god is not so powerful. sad I guess

Anyways..when I was introduced to God, She was female.. #43 | Posted by Godisfemale

....what gave Her away ?.....the PMS ?.........

7 species of humans(known)over 1.7 million years(known).
Everything in your argument, or any argument for your perverse religion, or any other, is circular.
Humans existed long before any god existed, those that invented such nonsense took the low road, when confronted with their own puny, insignificant existance. A path of parasitic existance intoxicated them, allowing for the inclusion of so called lessor human existance, i.e. lacking some beleif, as justification of intentional horror. My tribe is superior to your tribe, and so on.
Point of fact, there is no such thing as free will.
You exist with an astounding number of options, based on the entirety of human existance. Simply reasoning out your specific response, coded into your genetics, does not equate free will. Matters not what species of animal, we are all encoded with those same options.
Humans are animals.
Always have been.
Always will be.

When humans go extinct, some other, superior animal, will take our place. 50/50 chance they will invent their own "superior" being, to explain what their logic and reason fail to distinguish.

well than I guess god is not so powerful. sad I guess

#50 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 08:38 AM | Reply | Flag:

What would be powerful enough for you there Truth?

God cannot make individuals believe if he is to remain just or loving. He loves you so much that he tells you what you want is wrong, but he is not going to force you to do something. He will let you have what you choose.

I think it is funny that human beings, myself included continually convince ourselves that if it was the best choice to follow God, we would make it.

Lets think about this:

What is the best choice, be sober and in control of your body, or be drunk and out of control, not knowing what you are doing or what will happen?
Which choice do many people make, intentionally?

Which choice is better, smoking cigars and cigarettes will possibly give you lung cancer and a lifetime of emphazema, or not smoking and keeping more healthy lungs?
Which choice do many people make all the time?

Which choice is better, to show love and patience with people in tough situations, when there are disagreements, or to berates, hate and maliciously attack them with works and actions in order to prove yourself superior?
Which choice do many people make in the world and on this board?

There are many other choices I can place here. Humans do not have a track record of doing what is best for themselves, and making the better choices, what makes you think it is going to change when it comes to choose the being who is calling on you to do what is best for you?

PMS..that's funny

Anyways.. it doesnt matter how you find your way to believing in the infinite..it only matters that you believe in the infinite. Believe in a higher power and be good to yourself and others.. All the rest is just theater.

Some people wont see the infinite no matter what.. you could put the Great Mother in front of them and they would still deny her

Perhaps one day there will be a way to show people that they each have a personal relationship with God.. that She has been there all the time..They just cant SEE her

A book.. yeah.. a book

"God cannot...."


nuff said

skiz, god is female thinks that only females can love unconditionally, therefore god is female

in other words he is certifiably insane.

Which choice is better, smoking cigars and cigarettes will possibly give you lung cancer and a lifetime of emphazema, or not smoking and keeping more healthy lungs?
Which choice do many people make all the time?


hmmmm I believe we can agree that one cannot choose their DNA, which makes them susceptible to certain addictions.

One is raised in a house where the parents smoke, certainly not the child's choice.

Child is exposed to nicotine a highly addictive chemical.


Yep all about free will

Please show the quote where I said only females can love uncondtionally.. you can't

Anyways.. what I said was that children get their first idea of unconditional love (whether good or bad) from their mother

And I never used that to justify the idea that God is female..

Call me insane..whatever.. like I care.. but please quote me accurately


Jesus was an example..up until that point God was a mean, judgmental father who only talked to his children when he was mad or wanted something.. Jesus introduced people to another idea of God.. a forgiving parent capable of unconditional love.. sort of like.. a mother instead of a father


And i'm pretty sure that Jesus never told anybody to worship him..

Posted by Godisfemale at 2010-02-01 11:42 AM | Reply


Pretty clear you are saying god is a mother (female) because of this "new" concept of god being a forgiving parent capable of unconditional love"

see the logic construct is

A=B but Not C therefore A does not = C

BTW you are insane


Yet another assumption.. because I'm arguing that God is female.. I must be female.. well I am not female


I'm a male and when God introduced herself to me, she was most certainly female.. it freaked me out at first.. I was raised a Roman Catholic believing in God as a "Him" and sure enough.. God is a "Her"


If you consider the fact that we get our first sense of unconditional love (whether for good or for bad) from our mother.. seeing our relationship with God as comparable to our relationship with our mother makes sense

Posted by Godisfemale


TH:You see things


from you

My theory is that most of our personal issues trace back to our relationship (or lack thereof) with our mother ..as does our belief (or lack thereof) in God

Posted by Godisfemale


TH:you project

And I never used that to justify the idea that God is female..


AND


Jesus introduced people to another idea of God.. a forgiving parent capable of unconditional love.. sort of like.. a mother instead of a father



Sorry you are insane

He "decided" there is no God? What did he do, replace God? How does one decide such a thing? I would have been more impressed by a logical argument rather than emotional blather.

If God was female he wouldn't make menstration cycles so painful

Again I never said that only a female can provide unconditional love.. but I can see how somebody could infer that from what I said previously regarding Jesus. Well played!

So Jesus didnt bring a new idea of God to the world? People didnt look at God like a pissed off father who only talks to them when they are mad or want something?

not well played, it is simple recitation of your point. I am sorry if you are not clear in your thinking.

Yeah you're right I said precisely the words "Only a female can provide unconditional love"

You could make logical leaps an Olympic sport

dude to say that "Jesus introduced people to another idea of God.. a forgiving parent capable of unconditional love.. sort of like.. a mother instead of a father"


Therefore, according to your logic, a father is not a forgiving parent capable of unconditional love. Because without that logic, the rest of your statement makes no sense.

Either this supposed new intepretation of god is irrelevant to the gender of god (therefore not supporting your premise that god is female because a father can be forgiving and love unconditionally) or only mothers forgive and love unconditionally.

You cant have it both ways.

"God cannot...."


nuff said

#55 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 09:28 AM | Reply | Flag:

You seem to be unable to grasp the concept of consistency. There is a difference between being unable due to character and unable due to power. It is not that he cannot do it, but rather that he cannot do it and still be just or loving. You seem to miss that aspect, because it does not fit your agenda.

It is not that he cannot do it, but rather that he cannot do it and still be just or loving


so there is something go can't do.

thanks for playing.

god can't do

BTW there is nothing just and loving about creating something that will burn in hell for eternity.

Again I never said that only a female can provide unconditional love.. but I can see how somebody could infer that from what I said previously regarding Jesus. Well played!

So Jesus didnt bring a new idea of God to the world? People didnt look at God like a pissed off father who only talks to them when they are mad or want something?

#65 | Posted by Godisfemale at 2010-02-08 11:05 AM | Reply | Flag:

No, Jesus did not bring a different picture of God to the world. Jesus just emphasized what the people were failing to pick up, because they were too busy thinking that they could do everything by themselves in accordance to the law.

Here is an example of God in the OT as seen in the NT.

2 Samuel 14:13-14.

13 The woman said, "Why then have you devised a thing like this against the people of God? When the king says this, does he not convict himself, for the king has not brought back his banished son? 14 Like water spilled on the ground, which cannot be recovered, so we must die. But God does not take away life; instead, he devises ways so that a banished person may not remain estranged from him.

The woman from Tedoa who spoke to David about receiving his son Absalom properly in forgiveness rather than distance and death. Read the chapter for broader context. Focus on this: "But God does not take away life; instead, he devises ways so that a banished person may not remain estranged from him."

The God of second, third, fourth chances. People have their opportunity to stop their estrangement from God, however some people choose not to change their position.

BTW there is nothing just and loving about creating something that will burn in hell for eternity.

#72 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:24 AM | Reply | Flag:

You weren't created for Hell. You make your choice as to whether you are going there or not.

Secondly, can you kill someone? Yes, but can you kill someone according to the law? No, you can't.

There is something you can't do, but you can do it.

God does stay in accord with his own laws. People who don't believe like to make up any argument they can to make it so that God has less power, or something he "can't" do.

It is a fairly stupid argument as you are unable to see the objective nature of the question rather than your subjective understanding. The truth seems to be that you do not wan to understand. You have no desire to be corrected by any means, and anything that goes against what you already believe, you will reject.

AH SHIT here we go with the bible quotes

Let us read from Leviticus

20:10 The man who commits adultery with another man's wife, he who commits adultery with his neighbor's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress, shall surely be put to death.'

You weren't created for Hell.


no but the omnipotent god certainly knew who would go to hell and who wouldnt

at the very least by unleashing satan he had to know that at least a few of his creations would end up in hell

sorry your god is certainly not just and loving

Yes according to the law, however, there were also refuge cities set up so that one who was guilty of a law, could go to the refuge city for a time, and after a certain amount of time, he would then be unable to be prosecuted for the crime.

Also, the punishment is completely avoidable in that they do not have to commit adultery. They knew the punishment before hand. If people make such smart choices, they won't have to worry about the consequence now would the?

"BTW there is nothing just and loving about creating something that will burn in hell for eternity."
Unless God is not responsible for that and humans are.

Satan has no power to send you to Hell. Satan does not make you do anything. You want to blame it on someone else?

If you make the choice, you face the consequence. IN terms of the consequence if you are repentant, you will be forgiven in spiritual sense, you may still incur earthly punishment. Just because you forgive someone does not mean that there are not consequences in response to their actions.

God does stay in accord with his own laws. People who don't believe like to make up any argument they can to make it so that God has less power, or something he "can't" do.



So god COULD have made me a believer and remained loving and just yet chose not to.

oh wait, no he couldnt have because to remain just and loving he had to allow me free will.

but god can do anything, but not that, cause he chooses how things are going to be, he made the law after all

oh yeah, send money.


"BTW there is nothing just and loving about creating something that will burn in hell for eternity."
Unless God is not responsible for that and humans are.


#78 | Posted by Diablo


god created the heaven and the earth, god created hell and god created me. Yet he aint responsible.

god must be a republican.

Also another point of discussion, God does not describe how his omnipotent and sovereign nature work. We use some deduction to come up with our subjective understanding, however the objectivity of Gods omnipotence and sovereignty may be complete different than what we understand.

Just because you think you know what a word means doe snot make that the true meaning . You are looking solely at the subjective.

Just because you think you know what a word means doe snot make that the true meaning . You are looking solely at the subjective.

#82 | Posted by ExpsRedemption



HAHAHAHA, sounds like the perfect reason to be an athiest.

So god COULD have made me a believer and remained loving and just yet chose not to.

oh wait, no he couldnt have because to remain just and loving he had to allow me free will.

but god can do anything, but not that, cause he chooses how things are going to be, he made the law after all

oh yeah, send money.

#80 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:37 AM | Reply | Flag:

You hate that it is being explained to you, and that it doesn't fit your previous understanding so you are lashing out against the truth huh? I guess that is what you do when it hurts?

If he does it, he does not become just and loving, but he can do it, it is possible, it simply does not serve a purpose. You have to take responsibility for your own life at some point. You decide what is happening. Do the right thing, make the right choice, if you don't, don't blame it on God, or the republicans, or the democrats.

Make better choices.

nope what I hate is the inconsistency.

HAHAHAHA, sounds like the perfect reason to be an athiest.

#83 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:40 AM | Reply | Flag:

For you it does, because it doesn't fit with how you want to see things.

Just because you don't like the consequences for your irresponsibility does not mean that you are just in raging against those consequences.

You can change the situation, the fact that you refuse to says much about your character.

Are you even willing to change your position? Do you even want to understand, or are you simply trying to combat anything that is said, without looking at it past a blink?

If he does it, he does not become just and loving, but he can do it, it is possible, it simply does not serve a purpose.


he can do it (earlier you said he couldnt)

he can do it, yet he chooses not to.

so he chooses that people he created burn in hell for all eternity. and when he created those people he either knew exactly who (consitent with omnipotence and exclusive of free will) or a certain percentage (more consistent with free will yet not so omnipotent) would burn in hell for all eternity.

that makes him unjust and unloving.

Sure you do.

You want just and loving, but then complain when he rebukes you out of love for you and then enacts justice when you fail to respond to the loving reminder to change.

you sound real consistent.

You want just and loving as long as it is not just or loving.

For you it does, because it doesn't fit with how you want to see things.


well all I want is for stuff to follow logically. Wish god made me differently so I didnt have to burn in hell for all eternity. Or are you saying I should insincerely say I believe something?

Are you even willing to change your position? Do you even want to understand, or are you simply trying to combat anything that is said, without looking at it past a blink?

#86 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at


why should I I dont believe. Or should I bear false witness and lie and say I believe?

oh btw I have tried christianity, but then I grew up.

If he does it, he does not become just and loving, but he can do it, it is possible, it simply does not serve a purpose.


he can do it (earlier you said he couldnt)

he can do it, yet he chooses not to.

so he chooses that people he created burn in hell for all eternity. and when he created those people he either knew exactly who (consitent with omnipotence and exclusive of free will) or a certain percentage (more consistent with free will yet not so omnipotent) would burn in hell for all eternity.

that makes him unjust and unloving.

#87 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:44 AM | Reply | Flag:

You are trying to create a circle game.

I always said that he can do that objectively, however in the subjective sense of that actions being taken, it cannot be done and maintain justice or love.

You are unwilling to take attributes in context of attributes. He is enacting love in warning you and enacting justice in putting the consequences to you when you do not listen just because you don't like being corrected. You are the one that wants consistency.

You just want love, face it. You don't understand what justice is, you don't understand what love is, and you just don't want to be held responsible for your own actions it seems.

ure you do.


You want just and loving, but then complain when he rebukes you out of love for you and then enacts justice when you fail to respond to the loving reminder to change.


you sound real consistent.


You want just and loving as long as it is not just or loving.

#88 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


does god want me to lie and say I believe?

If yes, what does that say about him?

if no, why did he create me to burn in hell for all eternity. I cannot MAKE myself belief something.

why should I I dont believe. Or should I bear false witness and lie and say I believe?

#90 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

Trying to get to a true understanding is not the same as believing. Due to your inability to separate the two, you will never be able to attain either.

You cannot "try" Christianity. It would seem you obviously had no grasp of what it was, and still don't

You are trying to create a circle game.

TH: I didnt create that game, I am explaining it.

I always said that he can do that objectively, however in the subjective sense of that actions being taken, it cannot be done and maintain justice or love.

TH: god can do anything he wants. he chooses to allow either an individual or a certain percentage of HIS creation to burn in hell for all eternity. that type of divinity should not be worshipped.

You are unwilling to take attributes in context of attributes. He is enacting love in warning you and enacting justice in putting the consequences to you when you do not listen just because you don't like being corrected. You are the one that wants consistency.

TH: he would have shown more love by not creating me to burn inhell for all eternity.

You just want love, face it. You don't understand what justice is, you don't understand what love is, and you just don't want to be held responsible for your own actions it seems.

#92 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


TH: dont tell me what I want. and I know what justice is. god is the one who is not held accountable for his actions.

Trying to get to a true understanding is not the same as believing. Due to your inability to separate the two, you will never be able to attain either.


You cannot "try" Christianity. It would seem you obviously had no grasp of what it was, and still don't

#94 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


hahahaha, so EITHER I accept what i cannot accept or I burn in hell for all eternity.

thanks god

does god want me to lie and say I believe?

If yes, what does that say about him?

if no, why did he create me to burn in hell for all eternity. I cannot MAKE myself belief something.

#93 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:47 AM | Reply | Flag:

Again, you try to detract any responsibility from yourself.

You can't believe if you are unwilling to listen, or attempt to understand. You cannot believe if you are unwilling to listen to any correction, you cannot believe if you think you are always right. You are creating the stopping point, not God.

He does not create you to burn in Hell for all eternity. You know the consequences. You could try to understand it rather than lashing out when someone is trying to help you understand something better.

Since you don't do these things, what does it say about you?

So here i am living my life. I would love to believe in this whole christianity thing to assure my place in the heavens for all eternity.

Problem is I can't. I physically am unable to believe.

I can lie and SAY I believe. I can try and believe, I have tried.

Something in my DNA, something in my experience prevents me from believing. The thing that makes choices in my head does not allow me to commit to believing.

Therefore I must burn in hell for all eternity.

yet god is loving and just.

Another assumption.. anybody who believes in God must believe in the bible and attribute historical accuracy to anything that is in it.. Here's a news flash..it was written by man thousands of years ago.. they projected their morals and ideas on to God just like we do today

The reality as it was presented to me is that there is no need for middlemen..no need for a church to provide you with a relationship with God.. you already have it.. like any child with his/her mother

All these smart people around here and I'm the one who is insane...

hahahaha, so EITHER I accept what i cannot accept or I burn in hell for all eternity.

thanks god

#96 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

I do not know how you expect to understand anything when you over simplify any points to absurdity, and seem to be responding emotionally due to your recognizing that it may be your fault and not the fault of another.

gain, you try to detract any responsibility from yourself.


You can't believe if you are unwilling to listen, or attempt to understand. You cannot believe if you are unwilling to listen to any correction, you cannot believe if you think you are always right. You are creating the stopping point, not God.


He does not create you to burn in Hell for all eternity. You know the consequences. You could try to understand it rather than lashing out when someone is trying to help you understand something better.


Since you don't do these things, what does it say about you?

#97 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at


I am listening, I am reading, i have knowledge, I have prejudices, I have experience, I have history, I have education, I have my own DNA I have all these things. I cannot make myself open to believing. I am incapable. If I were capable I would believe.

THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN SAY OR DO THAT CAN CHANGE WHO I AM. same goes the other way.

So here i am living my life. I would love to believe in this whole christianity thing to assure my place in the heavens for all eternity.

Problem is I can't. I physically am unable to believe.

I can lie and SAY I believe. I can try and believe, I have tried.

Something in my DNA, something in my experience prevents me from believing. The thing that makes choices in my head does not allow me to commit to believing.

Therefore I must burn in hell for all eternity.

yet god is loving and just.

#98 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

You are in a conundrum for sure. If you don't think God exists or this God, then don't worry about it, you can't burn in Hell. Based on your assertions it seems that you are somewhat concerned about this.

From what I see in your posts, you make no effort to understand what individuals are saying, and thus just simplify their arguments to absurdity creating a false and more limited understanding of the situation. Then you base your concepts, ideas and understandings on those false constructs in your mind.

You do that, no one else doe sit for you.
Blame your DNA, blame God, blame republicans, but don't blame yourself even though you are the one that is aware that your DNA may predispose you. If someone has the DNA that makes them likely to be an alcoholic, they don't always become alcoholics. When you know the factors you can change the situation.

I do not know how you expect to understand anything when you over simplify any points to absurdity, and seem to be responding emotionally due to your recognizing that it may be your fault and not the fault of another.

#100 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


than perhaps you can explain how a human being can will himself to believe something that he does not sincerely believe in.

I hear what you are saying, I read all the arguements, I have read the bible. It just does not strike me as feasible or realistic.

Just believe?

of course like a typical religous person you blame me, but I am what I am, I cannot choose other than what I am. I cannot make myself believe something.

I can lie, yes I can do that.

I am incapable. If I were capable I would believe.

That is a false construct, as just because you are capable of something, does not mean you will do it. You are capable now, however, you have not believed.

You are making mockery of any point rather than understanding it. Unless of course you are just showing off for people. Again, this probably has something to do with you being unable to do what you want to do as opposed to what others are making you do.

To quote Roger Waters: What G-d wants, G-d gets G-d help us all.

You are in a conundrum for sure. If you don't think God exists or this God, then don't worry about it, you can't burn in Hell. Based on your assertions it seems that you are somewhat concerned about this.

TH: I dont worry about it but I enjoy debating it.

From what I see in your posts, you make no effort to understand what individuals are saying, and thus just simplify their arguments to absurdity creating a false and more limited understanding of the situation. Then you base your concepts, ideas and understandings on those false constructs in your mind.

TH: F U. YOUR ARGUMENTS LACK LOGIC AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY. Your response is that I oversimplify etc, but without your "faith" you know belief in something without proof your arguements fail completely. yet I am to be accused of basing my concepts on false constructs.

You do that, no one else doe sit for you.
Blame your DNA, blame God, blame republicans, but don't blame yourself even though you are the one that is aware that your DNA may predispose you. If someone has the DNA that makes them likely to be an alcoholic, they don't always become alcoholics. When you know the factors you can change the situation.

#102 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


TH: I would be happy to blame myself. I hereby blame myself for not believing in the christian god. does that make you happy. I will burn in hell for not believing in something and it will be my fault.

only problem is I am incapable of choosing other than what I choose. I am incapable of believing. I could SAY I believe. I can be open to believing, but without changing who I am I cannot believe.

#103 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:59 AM | Reply | Flag:

Just take a breath, stop responding emotionally and think for a second. It takes time to understand things, more than a minute or two. If you want to truly understand what is going on in history, you have to study it for many, many, many, years as with any profession, or anything you will "believe".

You think that just because you were involved with someone that you therefor understand all there is to do with it? That is wrong, and it restricts you from looking at things.

If you are going to understand anything you have to be able to look past your preconceived ideas. You have to look at the other perspectives, you have to look at a broader scope. I went through this, I have who went through this. If you have understood something falsely in the first place, it will turn you off to even the truth concerning that subject.

You must take time. I am not telling you to lie about something, I am not trying to get you to believe here, I am simply telling you where you are understanding concepts of Christianity wrong, whether you believe in it or not.

Whether it is true or not, there are still things that are true and false in terms of understanding it.

Irony Defined: the Atheist in the Foxhole was named "Christian."

That is a false construct, as just because you are capable of something, does not mean you will do it. You are capable now, however, you have not believed.


You are making mockery of any point rather than understanding it. Unless of course you are just showing off for people. Again, this probably has something to do with you being unable to do what you want to do as opposed to what others are making you do.

#104 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


Bullshit, I will not accept responsibility for not believing something unbelievable. I refuse to believe that 1+1=3. If god wanted me to believe 1+1=3 he should have either made it logically clear that 1+1=3 OR made me such that I can believe 1+1=3.

I am mocking? bullshit you are whining. I am calling you on the bullshit you spout and you cannot even come close to a logical and cogent argument

Truth, you are continuing to miss the point. I am not getting you to blame yourself, but rather take responsibility. If you are always looking at everyone else being the problem you will never understand why anything happened.

You must have taken 30 seconds to think about almost anything that I wrote, and yet you say you read it, understand it, and thought about it? I don't think so.

You try to point out flaws and mistakes before you try to get what is actually being stated. Ask questions in a civil fashion rather than a mocking fashion, Speak more so to understand the persons point rather than to make you own point.

I understand what you are saying, but your points are very much so wrong. In regard to both myself and godisfemale. You have reactionary responses, rather than thought out and rational responses.


#103 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 11:59 AM | Reply | Flag:


Just take a breath, stop responding emotionally and think for a second. It takes time to understand things, more than a minute or two. If you want to truly understand what is going on in history, you have to study it for many, many, many, years as with any profession, or anything you will "believe".

TH: hahaha, this debate is the most logical I have had on the subject in quite a while.

You think that just because you were involved with someone that you therefor understand all there is to do with it? That is wrong, and it restricts you from looking at things.

If you are going to understand anything you have to be able to look past your preconceived ideas. You have to look at the other perspectives, you have to look at a broader scope. I went through this, I have who went through this. If you have understood something falsely in the first place, it will turn you off to even the truth concerning that subject.


You must take time. I am not telling you to lie about something, I am not trying to get you to believe here, I am simply telling you where you are understanding concepts of Christianity wrong, whether you believe in it or not.


Whether it is true or not, there are still things that are true and false in terms of understanding it.

#107 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at

TH: we have all the time in the world. I aint going anywhere. god will kill me when he so chooses. Hope he doesnt kill me the day before I might believe in him. NOW THAT would be cruel.

There is no Hell.. You're a good person and dont find God in your lifetime; She gives you another chance.. and another.. Her patience is as infinite as Her love.. She gives you an immortal soul and then throws away a good child because you didnt do precisely what She wants? That wouldnt make sense

Why dont good, smart people believe in the God of the bible or in Jesus? Because it doesnt make sense to them and they dont grasp the concept of an infinite being.

Heck.. I believe in God but the idea that Jesus as her son would be sent down to earth back then doesnt make sense to me. Yeah.. God sent our savior to Bronze age Judea and then said "doh!" when the Romans and Jews had him killed.. cmon!

Bullshit, I will not accept responsibility for not believing something unbelievable. I refuse to believe that 1+1=3. If god wanted me to believe 1+1=3 he should have either made it logically clear that 1+1=3 OR made me such that I can believe 1+1=3.

I am mocking? bullshit you are whining. I am calling you on the bullshit you spout and you cannot even come close to a logical and cogent argument

#109 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 12:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Well, considering that this has nothing to do with what we are currently discussing it seems that you are simply looking to combat anything that you might appear to be trying ti understand.

You won't even interact with what people are saying without bashing it, simplifying everything to absurd levels, or mocking it.

I imagine you meant to say 1+1+1=3. You must be talking about the Trinity? Another concept that must have a lot of prerequisite information in order to be dealt with, however you are unwilling to take the time.

You have proved thus in this conversation.


Truth, you are continuing to miss the point. I am not getting you to blame yourself, but rather take responsibility. If you are always looking at everyone else being the problem you will never understand why anything happened.


You must have taken 30 seconds to think about almost anything that I wrote, and yet you say you read it, understand it, and thought about it? I don't think so.


You try to point out flaws and mistakes before you try to get what is actually being stated. Ask questions in a civil fashion rather than a mocking fashion, Speak more so to understand the persons point rather than to make you own point.


I understand what you are saying, but your points are very much so wrong. In regard to both myself and godisfemale. You have reactionary responses, rather than thought out and rational responses.

#110 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


sorry dude you are the one with the inconsistencies in your argument. I have pointed them out and your response seems to be that I just dont get it, that I oversimplify, that I miss the point, that i am responding too quickly etc etc etc.

of course these things apply to you.

There is NO logic that accepts an omnipotent god and free will.

There is no logic that accepts a loving and just god and the concept of hell.

A human being cannot will himself to believe something. belief is the fruit of genetics and environment. yes a person's belief can change upon experiencing more things, but even that capacity for change is based on genetics and experience.


There is no Hell.. You're a good person and dont find God in your lifetime; She gives you another chance.. and another.. Her patience is as infinite as Her love.. She gives you an immortal soul and then throws away a good child because you didnt do precisely what She wants? That wouldnt make sense


Why dont good, smart people believe in the God of the bible or in Jesus? Because it doesnt make sense to them and they dont grasp the concept of an infinite being.


Heck.. I believe in God but the idea that Jesus as her son would be sent down to earth back then doesnt make sense to me. Yeah.. God sent our savior to Bronze age Judea and then said "doh!" when the Romans and Jews had him killed.. cmon!

#112 | Posted by Godisfemale


well isn't that convenient

www.biblebb.com

I imagine you meant to say 1+1+1=3. You must be talking about the Trinity? Another concept that must have a lot of prerequisite information in order to be dealt with, however you are unwilling to take the time.


You have proved thus in this conversation.

#113 | Posted by ExpsRedemption



noooooo what I am saying is that religon is ILLOGICAL. if god wanted me to believe, he should have either made it logical OR made me to believe illogically.

You're a good person and dont find God in your lifetime; She gives you another chance.. and another.. Her patience is as infinite as Her love.. She gives you an immortal soul and then throws away a good child because you didnt do precisely what She wants? That wouldnt make sense



so hitler got another chance? mighty nice of her.

You tell me what justice is to you

Also tell me what love is to you.

As well as what the purpose of discipline and correction are.

I do believe Hitler is in Heaven as I believe there is no other place for a soul to go. I believe Hitler acted according to what G-d placed him here to do. The fact that we still talk about him so many years after his death and after so many other honestly evil people have come and gone shows the value of Hitler as example; and never underestimate the value of extreme examples.

noooooo what I am saying is that religon is ILLOGICAL. if god wanted me to believe, he should have either made it logical OR made me to believe illogically.

#116 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 12:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sure, when you don't try to understand it it is. the concept of the trinity is not as simply as 1+1+1=3. People have simplified it as thus because they do not want to understand what it is. Plus they think it quite and clever.

Was Hitler a good person? No.. so Hitler would not get another chance. Hitler's soul would go to chaos or if you'd rather I use terminology you say you dont believe in..hell

Not all of Her children turn out to be good

What defines a good person Fema?


I do believe Hitler is in Heaven as I believe there is no other place for a soul to go. I believe Hitler acted according to what G-d placed him here to do. The fact that we still talk about him so many years after his death and after so many other honestly evil people have come and gone shows the value of Hitler as example; and never underestimate the value of extreme examples.

#119 | Posted by kanrei


so it matters not what we do here on earth? GOOD!

#119.. Hitler is in Heaven? Yikes! I can't even wrap my brain around that one..

.

"If there is no God, all things are permissible!"

.

...and isn't that really what Progressives really want, and why they so hate the subject of God?

.

why not GIF? Shouldn't he have the same option of pardon? what if he was repentant at the end of his life?

now that would be weird, hitler hanging out with some of the jews he killed. talk about awkward.

so it matters not what we do here on earth? GOOD!

#123 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 12:36 PM

In my beliefs, not to G-d. Let us stick with the "Hitler example." Did Hitler's actions have a cost even if he is in Heaven? Well, the names Adolf and Hitler both, when spoken, are always used to refer to a single person, regardless of how many "Adolf"s or "Hitler"s there may have been or what good acts they may have done. He was far from the only Adolf or Hitler, but his actions overshadow anything good that can be done by an Adolf. That is his punishment.


I was taught that we are given our name clean and it is our duty to keep it that way through our lives so that we pass it to our children clean. My name has no shame attached to it and I can wear it with pride. The same is not true of any "Adolf"s or "Hitler"s out there.

It is those who screw up who need the second chances as those who did not screw up got it right the first time and have no need for another try.

He was far from the only Adolf or Hitler, but his actions overshadow anything good that can be done by an Adolf. That is his punishment.


6 million dead jews, 40 or 50 million dead world wide

vs

people not liking hte name hitler

kharma is a bitch.

You have a very narrow field of comprehension TH.

then please enlighten me because I am fascinated to hear how hitler is in heaven and his punishment was that people think the name adolf hitler is bad.

Adolf was a respected name pre-Hitler.

en.wikipedia.org


Look at all the famous Adolfs and notice not one was born after ww2. Because of one man's actions, an entire name and the thousands of those with it were cast with shame.

Assuming that Hitler killed himself as the story goes; it would be a logical leap even TH couldnt make to suggest that he was repentant in the end.

It's laughable to think that we can somehow trick God by being sorry at the very end like She didnt know what was in our heart our whole life.

It's just us and God. No middlemen, no excuses and certainly no hiding

I am fascinated to hear how hitler is in heaven


There is no where else to go according to Judaism. When a person dies, the spirit returns to G-d. There is no judgment associated with this.

wow fascinating. I am sure hitler is crying tears of shame for that!

He was far from the only Adolf or Hitler, but his actions overshadow anything good that can be done by an Adolf. That is his punishment.

#128 | Posted by kanrei

That is his punishment? I suppose if ol' Adolf had low self esteem, such a punishment might mean something. But for those who enjoy diminishing evil, I'm sure such a statement gives some kind of self satisfaction, and "pride."

To those who see past such drivel, it's nothing but a sick joke!


Assuming that Hitler killed himself as the story goes; it would be a logical leap even TH couldnt make to suggest that he was repentant in the end.


It's laughable to think that we can somehow trick God by being sorry at the very end like She didnt know what was in our heart our whole life.


It's just us and God. No middlemen, no excuses and certainly no hiding

#133 | Posted by Godisfemale


im just curious, how could old adolf have made a free choice, i believe the theory is that he had gone insane and was heavily medicated with mind altering drugs. how could he make a choice in that situation?

I would have been more impressed by a logical argument rather than emotional blather.
-Diablo

That's rich coming form the king of emotional blather.

Sometimes restricted emotions and personal characteristics come out most effectively and truly during a time when the body cannot be controlled by the persons cognizance to suppress something of their character.

It is possible that Hitler was repentant the whole time, yet suppressed a kinder and gentler side in order to appear strong and commanding.

Hitler may not have been as "bad" as we think inside, however suppressed "good" and we only saw one perspective. Just presenting possibilities

GIF it sounds like you would not be able to handle Hitler in Heaven.

So he was insane his whole life and none of the things he set in motion where his own idea?

didnt say that (though that may be the case), at the end I think it arguable that he was insane and certainly using serious mind altering drugs. if you take away his free will can he be held accountable as he didnt have the opporunity to repent for h is actions.

I didn't make the rules. According to my faith, when a body dies, the soul returns to G-d. Hitler was a body that died. What then becomes of the soul, per my faith? He returns to G-d. What is "Heaven" defined as? Being with G-d according to my faith. Therefore, according to the rules, where does Hitler's soul go after teh body dies?

He shouldve started repenting after the first person was killed by his orders then

If God doesnt tell people to murder for Her why would She let Hitler get away with telling people to murder for him?

Hitler's soul went back in to chaos..it would seem like our mortal idea of hell.. you had the oppurtunity to merge with the infinite in the afterlife for eternity but no you decided to whack millions of God's children instead. Sorry

you had the oppurtunity to merge with the infinite in the afterlife for eternity but no you decided to whack millions of God's children instead.

It is no more a choice than a fetus has to be born or not IMHO.

But what really is the consequence in your model there GIF? Wouldn't all those children be either a0better off, or b) getting a second chance?

So what trouble did Hitler cause if good people get a do-over.

All souls will be judged when the Messiah returns. I think that is what is confusing some of you. He does not escape G-d's judgment, but none of us are judged until all of us are per Jewish faith. Until that time, we are returned to G-d.

Who knows if we chose to be born before we were born Kan.

What happens based on Messiah's judgment per Jewish faith?

The "name game" I was refering to is why you we should be good people and I used Hitler as an extreme example. Adolf was a common name before Hitler came around and it is no longer because of the actions of one man. It doesn't take much to kill a name and attach a stigma to all those who share it.

"All souls will be judged when the Messiah returns."

I thought he was stuck in DC because of all the snow. Or do you mean when he returns to Chicago?

Exp,
What happens upon the Messiah's return is part of what divides Jews into warring tribes. Does He create a Hell to punish the sinners? Does He take the good with him and leave the sinner Earth? Does he forgive the sinners as they acted in accordance to His plan? Much debate there.

"So what trouble did Hitler cause if good people get a do-over."

I considered that also. All those people getting sent to a better place ..that should negate Hitler's evil right? Nope. Hitler's actions were murder plain and simple. If God doesnt murder her children why should it be OK for man to do it?

*cough* abortion *cough*

*cough* abortion *cough*


#153 | Posted by Godisfemale at 2010-02-08 01:42 PM


I didn't think the morning after pill worked that way.

G-d murders His children all the time; just look at Haiti.

Mankind is petty, jealous, bigoted, warlike, murderous, short-sighted, and made in G-d's image. What should that tell you about G-d?

We were not created to be perfect so why would God expect perfection from us?

God knows everything but doesnt take in to account that we are gonna get things wrong no matter how hard we try to get it right? Yet another part of alot of religions that dont make sense.

Sin is a mortal term.. a laundry list of things that will make God mad.. the problem is that man is creating the list via religion.. so the list is pretty much guarenteed to be inaccurate

Posted by kanrei at 2010-02-08 01:50 PM | Reply


He voted for "W"?

God knows everything but doesnt take in to account that we are gonna get things wrong no matter how hard we try to get it right? Yet another part of alot of religions that dont make sense.

Actually, you are not making sense if one follows your posts.


Based on this most recent statement of yours, G-d KNEW Hitler would do what Hitler did and therefore is a party to those actions. Why would G-d punish Hitler for doing what G-d knew he was going to do? Pretty petty of G-d IMHO.

I think image gets taken out of context there.

We can have many attributes of God and use them incorrectly.

I also think it is foolish to discount Hitler repenting later on in life just because you would hate to see the guy in Heaven.

GIF, what indicates a good person to you then?

God doesnt send earthquakes and tornados to kill people.. just another silly idea people use to justify events out of their control.. either the Haiti earthquake was proof that God is mad or God doesnt exsist in the first place... maybe it just happened.. duh

I think image gets taken out of context there.

I always viewed it as a "Spiritual image," not a physical one.

So Pat Robertson was right?

I was going to make the same sort of statement Kan.

according to GIF, God does not kill "her" children, Hitler did and therefore he does not get to be with "her".

However, God did not lie to "her" children, or commit adultery against "her" children, or steal from "her" children either. Do all those people who have done those things go to "Chaos?"

That is still a muddy concept there with spiritual image Kan.

nothing just happens, all part of god's plan, let his will be done etc.

therefore, ipso factso god is a sadistic sob.

Also spoke, yes, Pat Robertson is partly right. Bad things bring more gad things. The world becomes in turmoil because of what is called "sin." However it was not an immediately special judgment as the natural course of the earth has disasters mixed in with it, it is part of the natural cycle at this point, to us at least.

He only caused it based on making it a consequence of the origin of "sin". He did not immediately cause it for judgment on Haiti, as far as we know.

Actually, according to the Christian faith, G-d does commit adultery as Mary was married when G-d impregnated her.

G-d must lie as every faith claims to be the "one true faith," yet G-d never bothers to clarify WHICH of the many is honest about it since there can be only ONE TRUE FAITH. This means G-d loves the chaos it creates and lives with the lie.

-We were not created to be perfect so why would God expect perfection from us?


He/she doesn't expect perfection. As a matter of fact, that's what the Law was about, to show mankind that he could not attain spiritual perfection while in the flesh.

What Jesus is about, is to show that a spiritual aspect of God making "a tent of human flesh", could be perfect in the flesh in our stead.

What Paul said, is that "righteousness" is a gift of God for our faith, not anything of ourselves, and is the same today as in Abram's time before the Law.


That is still a muddy concept there with spiritual image Kan.

#165 | Posted by ExpsRedemption

I agree, but too many try to say "G-d is white; G-d is black; G-d is male; G-d is female" and for us to be in his image, then only some of that is true and the rest are not in his image. However, we are all spiritually the same at birth until the world corrupts us. This is why Taoism tries to keep you looking at the world through a child's eyes I believe.

Truth, I think Kan attested to the same fact that I did against you, that you "have a very narrow field of comprehension."

Also a one track mind if I might add.

At the least, this is how you make yourself appear. They can do gene therapy now, you can get that fixed.

Free will is quite the trap.. if She lets Hitler do what he has in his heart then millions die.. if She stops Hitler by breaking that tiny nerve that controls his heartbeat then She takes away his free will.. the answer is that human events have to transpire as they do according to free will

As to what makes a person good, I dont presume to know how God makes a final determination of good or bad ,but, it doesnt take a rocket surgeon to figure out that murdering another human would be frowned upon by God. She's the final judge of the balance of our soul


Also spoke, yes, Pat Robertson is partly right. Bad things bring more gad things. The world becomes in turmoil because of what is called "sin." However it was not an immediately special judgment as the natural course of the earth has disasters mixed in with it, it is part of the natural cycle at this point, to us at least.


He only caused it based on making it a consequence of the origin of "sin". He did not immediately cause it for judgment on Haiti, as far as we know.

#167 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at


so babies are just getting what they deserve because of all the sin in the world.

does god not accept any responsibility for anything that happens?

god created the world
god created sin
god created the devil
god created temptation
god created people
god created free will
god created his (or her) plan

god is not responsible for the bad things that occur.

why are religious people so afraid of calling god out on his bullshit.

Kan, as well as Christ talking about accepting the Kingdom as a child. Humble like a child, faith like a child, etc.

I would say that world corrupts, or at least awakes corruption in us. We can do different, however, we cannot.

why are religious people so afraid of calling god out on his bullshit.



Umm....what? When have I ever attributed bad things to anything other than G-d?

Here is my very first post in this thread:


To quote Roger Waters: What G-d wants, G-d gets G-d help us all.

Posted by kanrei at 2010-02-08 12:02 PM

refering to GIF and exps

#174 | Posted by ExpsRedemption

I think this is why all faiths also believe children get free passes to Heaven.


Truth, I think Kan attested to the same fact that I did against you, that you "have a very narrow field of comprehension."


Also a one track mind if I might add.


At the least, this is how you make yourself appear. They can do gene therapy now, you can get that fixed.

#171 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


blah blah blah blah

bullshit

now you are saying I can alter my genes to make me believe in god?

wow what a scary world god has made

Hey truth, sin is not a tangible, physical thing that can be created there buddy. Try again.

Sin is missing the mark. It is not created, it is conducted. If you miss the mark, you sin. Most people do not understand what "sin" really is.

It is a concept, there really is no good and evil, there is the choice of God or not God. Anything that is not God would be sin in a way.

At this point, if God exists, the possibility for sin exists. There is the possibility to choose not God.

You make that choice.

Also, GIF, that is not very accurate information, So you are using pure conjecture to figure out the standard of who will end up with "her" and who will go to chaos? How do you know that Hitler would not be able to go to Heaven? Do you? Why does it bother you for Hitler to go the heaven? You can't forgive others?

These are serious questions. If you were part of a vote on part of the "good" ones to let Hitler into heaven or not, what would you vote?


Also spoke, yes, Pat Robertson is partly right. Bad things bring more gad things. The world becomes in turmoil because of what is called "sin." However it was not an immediately special judgment as the natural course of the earth has disasters mixed in with it, it is part of the natural cycle at this point, to us at least.


He only caused it based on making it a consequence of the origin of "sin". He did not immediately cause it for judgment on Haiti, as far as we know.

#167 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


BTW this is amoungst the most disgusting things I have read on the DR, ok hyperbole aside, this is pretty disturbing.

in all the flowery language this says mankind brought on the haitian earthquake through its sinning. that kind of thinking is just plain bizarre

Truth has a false concept of sin and righteousness, good and evil, etc. It is the small scope of understanding that Truth is willing to conduct that is limiting the ability to think about such things.

Emotional responses.

Truth, that is because you do not want to understand what it means.

You cant look past your own selfish subjective concepts. You are only concerned about yourself and your immediate standing.

You are responsible. You do not have to worry about such things if you make the right choices, as everything will be covered for you. You might still go through difficulties, however you will know that things after that will be all good, without fear of conseque3nce.

You are stuck in the immediate context in all things it seems.

Sin is missing the mark. It is not created, it is conducted. If you miss the mark, you sin. Most people do not understand what "sin" really is.


It is a concept, there really is no good and evil, there is the choice of God or not God. Anything that is not God would be sin in a way.



again bullshit
god is all things is he-she not? isnt every "choice" choosing god? if it is god's plan than it is to choose god, correct? Hitler fulfilled god's plan for him, therfore he chose go, correct?

anything that is not god does not exist.

You would be incorrect Truth.
Check your narrow perspective at the door and try to understand somethings here.


Truth has a false concept of sin and righteousness, good and evil, etc. It is the small scope of understanding that Truth is willing to conduct that is limiting the ability to think about such things.


Emotional responses.

#181 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at


dude you make me laugh.

i am only spouting your beliefs back at you showing you your own inconsistencies.


You would be incorrect Truth.
Check your narrow perspective at the door and try to understand somethings here.

#184 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


i guess I just need that gene therapy you suggested. Well I suppose if i were someone else i would believe.

#185 |

I don't believe that you are, because you do not even understand the "beliefs" that you are showing the inconsistencies of. You think you know, and you are showing the inconsistencies of the things that you think you understand, however you are only showing that your own mental constructs or inconsistent, as would be expected.

You need to learn to think outside of your own subjective experience. However it seems as though it is all about the now. You refuse to look at things objectively.

Do you still that that understanding is believing? You are not making your position look any better here truth.

You gotta know when to hold em
Know when to fold em
Know when to walk away
Know when to run...


Truth, that is because you do not want to understand what it means.


You cant look past your own selfish subjective concepts. You are only concerned about yourself and your immediate standing.


You are responsible. You do not have to worry about such things if you make the right choices, as everything will be covered for you. You might still go through difficulties, however you will know that things after that will be all good, without fear of conseque3nce.


You are stuck in the immediate context in all things it seems.

#182 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


I caused the Haitian earthquake? I am responsible for it? Cause that is what you seem to be saying.

I've met God and everything I know about Her; She told me.

We each have our own interface to God.. some of us guess that God is there and get to move on to the afterlife..others need to be shown that God is there but since they havent seen her, they dont get it correct enough to move on

I can teach every single person that suspects God is there how to SEE God is there

You did not cause it. The Haitian earthquake was a retort to GIF's " G-d doesn't kill her children."

I can teach every single person that suspects God is there how to SEE God is there

#191 | Posted by Godisfemale at 2010-02-08 02:22 PM | Reply | Flag: Thinks G-d is alive and well and living in a sugar cube

I don't believe that you are, because you do not even understand the "beliefs" that you are showing the inconsistencies of. You think you know, and you are showing the inconsistencies of the things that you think you understand, however you are only showing that your own mental constructs or inconsistent, as would be expected.


You need to learn to think outside of your own subjective experience. However it seems as though it is all about the now. You refuse to look at things objectively.

#187 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


hahaha, you need to create this elaborate construct to bridge the illogic of ominipotency and free will, god, love and hell and all you have to offer is that I dont understand it. sorry if god were as you say, the concept would actually make sense without having to leave your brain at the door.


I've met God and everything I know about Her; She told me.


#191 | Posted by Godisfemale


and how do you know that just wasnt the voices in your head?

You understand the post incorrectly. You are responsible as to whether you need to worry about dying or not. If you are in the right standard, and you die, you have nothing to worry about. You just think it is unfair because you are focusing on God causing an earthquake that make people die before they could believe.

If they were following and trying to hit the mark (as sin is missing the mark) they would have no worries.

My posts are collaborations of what you have been spitting out in broken, simplified response.

You are the one who dictates whether a natural disaster is a horrible or inconsequential thing for you.

kan look at exps 167 post and than reread my 190 post.

he is the one saying Haiti is because humans are sinners.

how do you know that just wasnt the voices in your head?

Posted by truthhurts

Who's to say the voices in our heads isn't G-d?

I can teach every single person that suspects God is there how to SEE God is there

#191 | Posted by Godisfemale at 2010-02-08 02:22 PM

You're about 2 beers short of a six pack.

You need your own "gaaaawd" TV show on cable the same time all the infomercials are on.

You could make some serious money.

TH,

He isn't blaming it on you.

He did not immediately cause it for judgment on Haiti, as far as we know.


#167 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at



He is saying that the more bad we put into this world, the more bad we can expect from it.

You see truth, you are unwilling to take things slowly, piece by piece and understand the small parts before trying to understand the larger parts.

You look at the whole and say "ridiculous" and yet the smaller pieces being understood individually will better help you understand the whole picture and how it works.

Just like physics to theoretical physics, philosophy, and logic itself, you need to understand that basics before you look at and judge the whole.

Things don't make sense when you simplify them to absurdity.

That is what you are doing. You add a new thing to discuss each time you respond. You get to 7 or 8 things that you don't think can mix, yet you have no clue because you do not know what those 7 or 8 things are really saying to begin with.


how do you know that just wasnt the voices in your head?


Posted by truthhurts


Who's to say the voices in our heads isn't G-d?

#198 | Posted by kanrei


medicine shouldnt be able to cure god

He is saying that the more bad we put into this world, the more bad we can expect from it.

#200 | Posted by kanrei


yet god is not sadistic? how many infants dies in Haiti-they got what they deserve?

It is a common logical fallacy to over simplify things in order to make them sound ridiculous or comical.

yet god is not sadistic? how many infants dies in Haiti-they got what they deserve?


Another leap or is this a strawman?

You speak of logic and yet seek it not.

There are some faiths that believe we come back again and again until we get it right. Once then, we die and move on to the next level of existence. Maybe those kids in Haiti were really close in their last lives and didn't have THAT much to do? =D

-Who's to say the voices in our heads isn't G-d?

Internal dialogue is common enough, it's incorporeal voices outside one's head that is a sure sign of schizophrenia.

Unless you are Sarah Palin, and someone tell you to use your telepalmtor.

Another leap or is this a strawman?

#205 | Posted by kanrei at 2010-02-08 02:32 PM |


No. It was a legitimate question.

Where was "gaaawwwd"?

You can look this up if you want.. each of us is built to look 1/10 of a second in to the future..

So when we die, what happens in that 1/10 of a second? it's in that time that we either see God or dont see God. I can connect you to the source of that 1/10 of a second and you'll be able to see God if you're looking for Her

how do you know that just wasnt the voices in your head?


Posted by truthhurts



Who's to say the voices in our heads isn't G-d?


#198 | Posted by kanrei



medicine shouldnt be able to cure god

Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 02:30 PM | Reply

Does god sound like Lady GaGa or Bob Dylan?

If god sounds like Blind Willie McTell, I can hear him/her/it now!!!!


You can look this up if you want.. each of us is built to look 1/10 of a second in to the future..


So when we die, what happens in that 1/10 of a second? it's in that time that we either see God or dont see God. I can connect you to the source of that 1/10 of a second and you'll be able to see God if you're looking for Her

#210 | Posted by Godisfemale at 2010-02-08 02:36 PM

Early a.m. cable

You'd make a killing.

Where were you?


You speak of logic and yet seek it not.

#206 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


I ask for nothing more from believers and all I get is just believe. If i dont I lets see

a. oversimplify
b. am to emotional
c. being subjective
d. simply dont understand
etc

of course I am arguing with someone who thinks they talk with god (and god answers them).

now who should I believe

If we as human beings had taken some more initiative in helping fellow human beings we could have helped make sure there were better conditions for those people, or better standards for their buildings.

Did we... no.

kan

do you accept the assertion that bad things happen in this world because of sin? that sin begets bad things?

if so please answer my question regarding haitian babies.

if not than I believe I have misrepresented exp's position.

of course I am arguing with someone who thinks they talk with god (and god answers them).


#214 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 02:39 PM

Hey. The Bushling had gaaawwwd's ear and look at the shit we're in now.

I googled looking 1/10th second into the future and got this result so........

Gazing into college football's crystal ball and predicting the ...Jan 22, 2010 ... So much can change in 10 years. The past decade brought us instant ... Here's a look at what might transpire in college football over the next decade: ... long to turn the Mustangs back into winners, improving from 1-11 in 2008 ... You might feel old when hearing the names of potential future stars: ...
sports.espn.go.com/ncf/
columns/story?
columnist=schlabach... - Cached

ask for nothing more from believers and all I get is just believe. If i dont I lets see

a. oversimplify
b. am to emotional
c. being subjective
d. simply dont understand
etc

of course I am arguing with someone who thinks they talk with god (and god answers them).

now who should I believe

#214 | Posted by truthhurts at 2010-02-08 02:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

The problem is Truth that you are making judgments in concern to things that you do not understand. I am not telling you to believe, so you misunderstood that right off the bat.

I am telling you to actually try and understand what a person is saying, and by not being able to pick that up and simplifying my statements to "just believe" you have proved that you are only simplifying what people are saying.

You got the Haiti thing wrong, you were told by Kan that you have a narrow view of comprehension, others have attested to your habits in here.


And again, you oversimplify it away.

#218

You do have a narrow view of comprehension

www.msnbc.msn.com

Second option to click on that came up upon the Google search. Maybe you oversimplified your search.

Women have a special link to God via their ability to conceive a baby.. its where your soul came from when your mother conceived you (except TH haha)

I can also connect women to that special link to the very first mother.. God

Off to get some food.. it's been fun

do you accept the assertion that bad things happen in this world because of sin?

No. As silly as the source for this is, I have to admit I like Oh G-d, Book 2's answer to this question.


God: [answering Tracy's question about why there is so much suffering in the world] I know this sounds like a cop-out, Tracy, but there's nothing I can do about pain and suffering. It's built into the system.
Tracy Richards: Which You invented.
God: Right. But my problem was I could never figure out how to build anything with just one side to it.
Tracy Richards: One side?
God: You ever see a front without a back?
Tracy Richards: No.
God: A top without a bottom?
Tracy Richards: No.
God: An up without a down?
Tracy Richards: No.
God: OK. Then there can't be good without bad, life without death, pleasure without pain. That's the way it is. If I take sad away, happy has to go with it.

The problem is Truth that you are making judgments in concern to things that you do not understand. I am not telling you to believe, so you misunderstood that right off the bat.


TH: when did i say you were telling me to believe. I assert that xtians believe that if you dont believe you burn in hell for eternity. If that is wrong, please show me.

I am telling you to actually try and understand what a person is saying, and by not being able to pick that up and simplifying my statements to "just believe" you have proved that you are only simplifying what people are saying.

You got the Haiti thing wrong, you were told by Kan that you have a narrow view of comprehension, others have attested to your habits in here.

TH: ahhhhh the repeat of the blah blah blah.

And again, you oversimplify it away.

#219 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


TH: do you think that the haitians deserved what they got because the human race sinned? or failed to be god like? do you think humans deserve to be crushed by falling concrete? do you not hold god responsible for the pain inflicted?


#218


You do have a narrow view of comprehension


www.msnbc.msn.com


Second option to click on that came up upon the Google search. Maybe you oversimplified your search.

#220 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at


actually they are looking at the past because what they observe already happened, please try again.

Google this guy Mark Changizi and you'll see that he found that we're built to look in the future..

If you've ever seen an optical illusion you've seen it also.. our brains project to us what we expect to see 1/10 of a second in to the future

That is the same things as these issues being a result of "sin".

As if you choose God you have a more capable construct of handling the problems, and understanding why they happen, if you don't, you don't want to understand why they happen and you blame them on God rather than a consequence of choosing the wrong choice.

Or being a necessary part of the construct.

God: Right. But my problem was I could never figure out how to build anything with just one side to it.

Well, there goes the "God can do anything" lie.

I'm smarter than god

Man truth, you sure do hate to be corrected. That is what GIF was talking about, I believe it is the same article.

You are wrong sir, and read the article.

You just don't know how to word things I guess, thus you oversimplify them and lack results.

Women have a special link to God via their ability to conceive a baby..

It's called a "penis"

You can describe it however you want but the idea is that we have the ability to look in to the unknown for 1/10 of a second.. in the world of light that is a loooooooong time

we have the ability to look in to the unknown for 1/10 of a second

LSD gives you a few hours there.

Goat, it would be limited to understand can and can't simply from our perspective without looking at it further.

this is something that is dependent on God, because God exists, the option of not God also exists, therefore two sides.

God is of course restricted by his own character out of integrity for that character and consistency of that character.

When people say that "God can't" they are not fully understanding what it means in terms of the situation. I don't know why people say that God can do everything. All powerful does not mean God has no restrictions. It is an oversimplification to think that because you show God "can't" do anything that you are proving some wonderful point.

not quite sure how the time delay between your brain and the real world applies to the existence of god.

suppose that is something I have to take on faith.


Goat, it would be limited to understand can and can't simply from our perspective without looking at it further.


this is something that is dependent on God, because God exists, the option of not God also exists, therefore two sides.


God is of course restricted by his own character out of integrity for that character and consistency of that character.


When people say that "God can't" they are not fully understanding what it means in terms of the situation. I don't know why people say that God can do everything. All powerful does not mean God has no restrictions. It is an oversimplification to think that because you show God "can't" do anything that you are proving some wonderful point.

#233 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


dude you sure use alot of words to saying nothing.
you sure you aint related to Zed?

TH I hold humans responsible for the pain inflicted. We could have made sure they had better building codes, better lives, better situations better safety standards etc... but we didn't. Let's blame it on God, it must hot have been in our genes to help them out, after our country screwed them in terms of their land.

#234 |

It was a false correlation by GIF to her comments regarding seeing "her" however it does prove that you have a narrow view of comprehension, as you oversimplified your search and were unable to find anything worth while, when it is in fact very easy to find.

Then, when you could not find it, you decided to make a mockery about it, then lie that it had anything to do with seeing anything in terms of future. Now you say, eh, so what, what does it have to do with anything.

You don't want to understand.

dude I can actually get behind what you are saying in 236! That is the athiest's creed. why wait we are all in this together live for today, etc.

Changizi, a cognitive scientist at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, approaches the field of vision from a different perspective than most scientists do: he is interested not in how our eyes work but in why they work the way they do. Why, for instance, did primates evolve color vision, whereas other animals did not? Changizi argues that color vision did not evolve to help us pick out edible leaves or fruitsa theory that has held ground for decadesbut rather that we began to see greens, blues, reds and yellows because doing so helped us to distinguish among hues of skin. Skin color changes slightly when we are happy, angry, embarrassed or sick, and our primate ancestors' ability to detect these subtle changes helped them socially.

In case overturning one venerable hypothesis isn't enough, Changizi offers more: for instance, our eyes face forward to help us see "through" objects, he argues. The fields of vision from each of our eyes overlap, so one eye can sometimes see behind an object when the other eye cannot. This overlap allows us to see layers in front of us. What is more, our eyes predict the future, he says. Imagine a game of catch: by the time your eyes process the sight of a ball a meter away flying toward you, it will already have passed you. We tend, then, to perceive moving objects as farther along their trajectories than they really area quirk that explains why so many visual illusions work the way they do, Changizi suggests.

www.scientificamerican.com

Seems to be a biocentrist view. Velly interesting.

It was a false correlation by GIF to her comments regarding seeing "her" however it does prove that you have a narrow view of comprehension, as you oversimplified your search and were unable to find anything worth while, when it is in fact very easy to find.

TH: dude I was making a joke. I was fully aware of the 1/10th second thing. IIRC GIF was attempting to make some sort of point vis a vis god about it.

Then, when you could not find it, you decided to make a mockery about it, then lie that it had anything to do with seeing anything in terms of future. Now you say, eh, so what, what does it have to do with anything.


You don't want to understand.

#237 | Posted by ExpsRedemption

TH: understand? yes believe without proof? no

-live for today

Is actually a very Jesus-like thing to say.

Or the, "Grassroots", either one.

believe without proof? no

Proof denies the reason to believe. Once something is proven, you know it. Belief is needed where proof cannot reach.

I don't live today, maybe tomorrow. I just can't say- Jimi Hendrix

live for today


Is actually a very Jesus-like thing to say.


Or the, "Grassroots", either one.


#241 | Posted by Corky


HOW DARE YOU!

I am not talking about believe. Again. I can't do anything to help you believe. all I can do is hope to help you understand so that you can at least look for proof less self restricting.


believe without proof? no


Proof denies the reason to believe. Once something is proven, you know it. Belief is needed where proof cannot reach.

#242 | Posted by kanrei at


you appear to be confusing belief and faith

All scientists believe without proof, then you hypothesize, then you get a theory, eventually a law, and yet there are still things you do not know and have to believe based on your scientific laws.

I may be...

To me-

Faith is the security in what you believe.

Belief is what you think without knowing.

You can't have faith in something you do not believe in.

Therefore belief comes before faith.

Nice one Kan. Same idea, same time, in response to the same false conclusion.

I don't agree with Belief comes before faith. Since you can have faith in a belief, then I find faith the security one has in their beleifs. You can believe something, but not have faith in it; thus self-doubt. There are many things we believe we can do, but doubt when push comes to shove- that is a crisis of faith.

I don't agree with Belief comes before faith. Since you can have faith in a belief,

Scratch that. I guess I do. Belief is the thing and faith is the belief in that belief.

faith is belief that is not based on proof

belief is a conviction or opinion

of course as in most things words have meanings and the art of rhetoric is important in debating.

So you are saying that you do agree that belief comes before faith then...

"You can believe something, but not have faith in it; thus self-doubt. There are many things we believe we can do, but doubt when push comes to shove- that is a crisis of faith"

LSD gives you a few hours there.

#232 | Posted by kanrei at 2010-02-08 02:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

Been to a Dead concert lately, Kanrei? ;)

Yeah Exp, I am. I got mixed up. Belief is the main thing. Faith is the confidence in that belief, so belief comes before faith.

Lol, nice Kan, I was posting what I posted while you were submitting that. I thought you might go back on that.


To you Truth, that is not correct.

To have faith in something is to trust in something, I don't know about you, but I do not trust in something until it proves itself worth trusting in to some degree. I may not know everything, but based on my original belief being reinforced, I then have faith in that thing.

For faith to be real, there must be an object of faith and a reason for faith in that object.

belief - 5 dictionary results
Belief
be⋅lief  /bɪˈlif/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [bi-leef] Show IPA
noun 1. something believed; an opinion or conviction: a belief that the earth is flat.
2. confidence in the truth or existence of something not immediately susceptible to rigorous proof: a statement unworthy of belief.
3. confidence; faith; trust: a child's belief in his parents.
4. a religious tenet or tenets; religious creed or faith: the Christian belief.


faith - 8 dictionary results
faith  /feɪθ/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [feyth] Show IPA
noun 1. confidence or trust in a person or thing: faith in another's ability.
2. belief that is not based on proof: He had faith that the hypothesis would be substantiated by fact.
3. belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion: the firm faith of the Pilgrims.
4. belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc.: to be of the same faith with someone concerning honesty.
5. a system of religious belief: the Christian faith; the Jewish faith.
6. the obligation of loyalty or fidelity to a person, promise, engagement, etc.: Failure to appear would be breaking faith.
7. the observance of this obligation; fidelity to one's promise, oath, allegiance, etc.: He was the only one who proved his faith during our recent troubles.
8. Christian Theology. the trust in God and in His promises as made through Christ and the Scriptures by which humans are justified or saved.

You cannot have blind faith, it is not possible. You must have faith in something. If you do not know what you have faith in, there is no object, and no reason to have faith in that object and therefore no faith. It may be a belief, but it is not faith.

soooooo exp I believe I have proven that I am correct. Therefore I BELIEVE I am correct. You have faith that I am incorrect.

For faith to be real, there must be an object of faith and a reason for faith in that object.

#257 | Posted by ExpsRedemption


an object and reason are not the same thing

Right TH.

Belief is an opinion or conviction
Faith is confidence or trust in a person or thing.


You have faith in your beliefs.

Faith in God only comes through certain things that he has done. Thus creation being a testimony as to why we should have faith in God.

Faith in incumbent upon an object or reason.

You cannot have faith in something that you do not believe is there. There has to be a reason as to why you believe that something is there. Once your believe renders more reason to trust it fosters faith.

no no no

belief is an opinion or conviction

faith is belief without proof

you can be confident in a belief without it being a faith.

My belief in gravity is not a faith.

No, I do not have faith that you are incorrect. If you proved that you are correct you should know that you are correct.

You believed that you were correct before you looked in the dictionary, after looking in the dictionary, you now have faith that you are correct, eventually you will say that you know you are correct.

My belief in gravity is not a faith.


But your belief that gravity will always be there is. You believe the sun will set today. You have faith it will rise tomorrow. You believe the bridge will catch you. You have faith it was built correctly to do so.

Faith is the belief in a belief.

You don't have faith in gravity? I guess if I throw you in the air you will be scared to death that you might fly up to space.

Thus creation being a testimony as to why we should have faith in God.

Assuming god exists, that is... and while your on the topic, do you mind explaining which one?

How does one believer demonstrate that his bit of superstitious claptrap is any better than the next guy's?

This has been a really interesting thread and I am enjoying the debating without fighting. This is what this place should be like!

I Believe we can do it, but I don't have Faith we will.

You don't have faith in gravity?

That ain't faith... that's knowledge. An example of faith in gravity would be claiming that the attraction between massive bodies is mediated by the Flying Spaghetti Monster's Noodly Appendage.

No I believe in gravity. I have the conviction, I am under the opinion that gravity works and will work.

I know that it will work when you throw me in the air and that knowledge is based on the fact that every time you thrown me in the air it works.

I believe the sun will rise tom because the proof is there that it has always risen, it is a conviction based on proof.

I dont need faith in gravity I have knowledge of gravity. Knowledge allows me to not be afraid.

in fact if all I had was faith that gravity would work THAN I would truly be afraid, because that BY DEFINITION would be a conviction or opinion based on nothing.

I believe the sun will rise tom because the proof is there that it has always risen,


Logic error! Logic error!


Just because something has always doesn't mean it always will. You believe that it will and you live your life according to that belief- faith. You have no contingency plans if the sun doesn't suddenly rise and have never given it a second thought. Why? Because you have faith it will.

You do not have knowledge that gravity will work every single time. You have faith it will work every single time, but you do not know. You have faith based on the belief you started with of gravity always working being proven more and more true as time goes on.

Faith does not deal with religion at all in its complete context. Zombie does not lie that.

Zombie entered the conversation trying another logical fallacy by trying to move the goal posts to talk about creation and how that predicates God and then what specific God and how can you tell, when we were actually talking about something completely different.

You can't use a statement outside of its perspective when talking with certain people.

The statement proves a point whether it is objectively true or not. It was not a statement of truth based on the fact that it really does give testimony to God's existence, bur that it is true that this is a biblical concept in which faith is used.

wrong, my belief (my conviction or opinion) is based on the fact that the sun rose today, rose yesterday, the earth continues to spin on its access. those are all facts ie proof.

Faith-a belief held without proof.


again we are talking past each other, of course since my terms are defined I BELIEVE I am correct.

I can do better than telling you God is there or telling you should believe God is there.. or even that you should have faith that God is there..

I can tell you how to SEE that God is there.. She has been there all along.. you just havent seen Her

Lets just say for argument's sake that I'm right.. If you're a "good" person and believe in God (the infinite.. supreme being whatever) you move on to the afterlife after you die..that would mean that any soul that is still on this planet either hasnt had a chance yet or has had a chance already and didnt get it right..but the soul is good enough to deserve another go around.. either way you havent seen God yet so you wouldnt know what to look for..

If none of you have seen God yet.. how do you know that I'm wrong?

You do not have knowledge that gravity will work every single time. You have faith it will work every single time, but you do not know. You have faith based on the belief you started with of gravity always working being proven more and more true as time goes on.



simple not true

I hold a belief based on proof. therefore that is BY DEFINITION not faith.

I can tell you how to SEE that God is there



PLEASE do so.

#258 |

What is the fifth result for belief? You only listed 4.

proof  /pruf/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [proof] Show IPA
noun 1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.
2. anything serving as such evidence: What proof do you have?
3. the act of testing or making trial of anything; test; trial: to put a thing to the proof.


here is the definition of proof.
i believe that sufficient proof exists to establish that the sun WILL rise tommorow

since my terms are defined I BELIEVE I am correct.


But your ability to comprehend what you read has been brought up more than once by many people. This is what your definitions say:

Belief is an opinion or conviction
Faith is confidence or trust in a person or thing.


Faith is the confidence of a belief.

there was only 4

were only 4 that is

Is trust synonymous with belief and faith?

How about confidence?

Why do we say that someone is faithful if they prove themselves to be trustworthy?

FOr the record, my "But your ability to comprehend what" said to TH was a joke. I forgot to add my =P at the end, but it WAS ONLY A JOKE!

When they speak of religions using faith and belief, the dictionary must be wrong then, because in religions, belief comes before faith, as you would not have faith in something that you do not believe is there.

TH,

Proof denies belief PER YOUR DEFINITION:

confidence in the truth or existence of something not immediately susceptible to rigorous proof


That is the second definition of belief.

Considering almost every definition of faith has the word "belief" in it, it stands to reason belief comes before Faith as you cannot define a word with that word. To define belief as faith shows belief comes first and is already defined.

-I have knowledge of gravity

Really?

Where does it originate?

Why is it considered a weak force?

Is the QM theory that gravity is a weak force because it leaks into our dimension from another a correct one?

What you have is the "experience" of gravity.

Also, the faith thru experience that when you hang you feet over the edge of the bed in the AM, they will fall down, not up.


In the Bible, faith is mostly a verb, an action word. Faith is, then, Action, based upon Belief, sustained by Confidence.

The ABCs of faith.

knowl⋅edge  /ˈnɒlɪdʒ/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [nol-ij] Show IPA
noun 1. acquaintance with facts, truths, or principles, as from study or investigation; general erudition: knowledge of many things.
2. familiarity or conversance, as with a particular subject or branch of learning: A knowledge of accounting was necessary for the job.
3. acquaintance or familiarity gained by sight, experience, or report: a knowledge of human nature.
4. the fact or state of knowing; the perception of fact or truth; clear and certain mental apprehension.
5. awareness, as of a fact or circumstance: He had knowledge of her good fortune.
6. something that is or may be known; information: He sought knowledge of her activities.
7. the body of truths or facts accumulated in the course of time.
8. the sum of what is known: Knowledge of the true situation is limited.
9. Archaic. sexual intercourse.


yes I have knowledge of gravity. do I (we) know all there is to know about gravity? no. Science is the pursuit of understanding the unknown. Religon is (IMO) giving up on the pursuit and asigning god as the unknown.

You have had sexual intercourse with gravity? How long did it take? 9.8f/s squared?

It was on the moon so it was slower.

Since you were talking about things in terms of scripture, God, and my perspective from the Bible you will seemingly have to use the construct which came before webster that faith was acting on beliefs, and therefore faith was putting trust in some object of which you believed to exist. An object that proved itself worthy of putting faith into it and then acting on said faith.

That seems kind of risky, I guess you believed that she did not have a VD? You barely knew anything about her!

Although I am sure after you got that case of craters you no longer had faith in that belief huh? She was unfaithful.

I couldnt help myself I was drawn to her.

She was quite magnetic

300!

What was your reason for believing her?

Im a sucker for things that happen every single time I do something

So what's so news worthy of a soldier becoming an atheist while pinned down in a foxhole, if there is a God he let him live to tell about it, didn't he??????????

O'Loudmouth proved to ALL that he has always been an atheist even after receiving the honor of becoming the first illegit Potus of the U.S.

Can Obama be an atheist since he believes in his own godhood?


Im a sucker for things that happen every single time I do something

#302 | Posted by truthhurts

You are referring to every time you say something stupid, someone says that you're a dumbass?

This thread simply proves that there are atheists in foxholes.

In any event, I think I have a better understanding of what you were saying initially. The mere fact that life sucks and the world is not worth two shits for the vast majority of humanity doesn't necessarily mean that god doesn't exist. The fact that god toys with us also does not disprove its existence. Rather, all of these facts merely demonstrate that god, if it does exist, is a bit of an asshole. I have to say, this actually makes sense and I agree with you. Further, I can't say I blame this alleged god too much for being a jerk as I guess the old axiom of absolute power corrupting absolutely applies to deities as well.-Analingus

What makes you think that God interferes in any way in our lives? We have free will which means He left us to do what we will. I don't believe in the God that Christians believe in. I believe in a Supreme Entity that created souls and the universe and had man evolve to house those souls for reasons of learning and growing.

I definitely believe we live on in spirit form when we die on another dimension. I have no doubt about this in my mind. It's best to be a good person while on earth because you will end up in a better place when you enter the spirit world. Plus you will be further along in your spiritual learning and growth. Might sound crazy, but that's what I believe.

This thread simply proves that there are atheists in foxholes. - Buffalo Bob

Discrediting just one more myth that the "believers" have been pounding on us with for generations.

There are so many incorrect ideas about God, I would suggest you read the Bible through once to find the truth.

God does not like war and killing, he is going to wipe out sin in a few months. The plgues are in Revelation to remove the "merchants of the earth" and the corrupt worldly global system and the crooks and thieves that run the bnks nd countries.

They will all be removed soon nd the ones beaten down will be released and there will never be sin (selfishness) or McDonalds/wallmart/chinese imports again.


An unbbeliever is just one who would rather die than unselfishly help others nd love their fellow man.

So, that is a choice, though I do not understand why you want to die.

It must be HORRIBLE to you to give up sin and become good and kind and loving in our eyes.

If so, you shouldn't be here, can't have a world of love with rapists and drunks running around ripping off people nd molesting children.

The wealthy of the earth will have their systems removed this year.

" I would suggest you read the Bible through once to find the truth."

You mean the moon really IS a light?!?

Of course it is light for the night person we have been camping for years and on a full moon it gives its light

use google to find out.

Pagan proust says so
as the moon light glistens you feel the peace hear a whisper

your mental abilities are weak, you don't even know what an allegory is, the Bible is full of them, but you can read proust and die. your choice

Because you don't udnerstand what you read you choose to die.

You watch too much TV, your mind is gone.

Goodbye then.

I am going to wake you up, don't be shocked now:
ready?

Star trek is NOT REAL.

No, seriously. Neither is star wars. They never happened and never will

Neither did Avatar.
It isnt real, did not happen and CANNOT HAPPEN we cant star travel in our physical condition, cannot
ever
happen
yet you live in a dream world while your last chance to live in a real heaven is flitting away.

Really intelligent, bobo.

#311 | Posted by Danforth

I made a comment the other day about darkness being the absence of light. Some poster (who's name escapes me) postedd back a really funny idea about how darkness is trapped in a light bulb. When it burns out it releases the darkness into the room. There was more to it, but it was funny and witty.

All the world has to offer is lies.
Star wars, avatar voyage to the bottom of the sea, brady bunch, lassie, MASH, Beverly hillbillies Green acres, pallidin, Johnny uma the rebel, and cartoons are not real either
Bugs bunny is not real
honest.

But the Bible is.
Go to anywhere in the palestine area there are ROAD signs with all the bible cities still there.

You have totally lost reality and chosen the big lie and are soon to loose your chance to be converted to being a nice guy

Religion is about one thing
about STOPPING BEING A BAD GUY
and STARTING BEING A NICE GUY
and God will protect you this summer as the plagues take out this world,

very simple, pray, read your bBible througha at least once 10 chapters a day takes three months and pray and you can be saved
otherwise you will disappear with all the movie theaters. and their trash.

There is no darkness in a light bulb. You should not believe lies. Untruth is not funny.
You are training your mind to entrtaining error.
True light is the creator he IS light.
He comes from the light bulb.
Photons are the only particle that turn 360 degrees, create a path immediately ahead, remove the path behind and rotate again.
they create and destruct trillions of times a second, build their own road and travel at the fastest speed in the physical universe.
The creator is God, all light is his creation and destruction,

John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

H is the creator of truth and light

Satan is the creator of all lies like Avatar.

God has rules.
He promised if you heat metal to 1500 degrees he would create light. This is a blessing to us.

We just heat metal he creates the light.

lots of rules, like Gravity, it is a blessing.

thank God for the light from the light bulb man cannot create light he has to rely on physics and rules so that God will complete his promise to create all light.
many rules to making light
God keeps his promises and his rules intact.

You dont like his rules? Too bad, they still are there.
Heat metal to 1500 degrees and keep the light away
you can't
God has rules.

Live a selfish life and try and survive the plagues.
You cannot
God has rules.
All who remain mean and selfish will soon die.
God has had enough.
Revelation rules have started, all 7 of them.
Sin will soon be completely removed. You can let go of sin or you will disappear with it.
Everyone has a choice.
Promise that everyone can become good if they start right now, if you wait, it will be too late for you.

Do not be in this group who at the end of this summer will say:

(Jer 8:20 KJV) The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.


Don't be there
Can't you see what is happening around you? This is a drop in the bucket of what is coming. I would get off the islands now while you can.

This is the summer.
Get ready.

John 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
John 6:38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
John 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
John 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.

He will nNOT reject you NO MATTER WHAT YOU HAVE DONE and no matter even if you are a witch in the highest leve of wicca signed in a blood pact, makes no difference.

All power is given to him even to break the blood pact.
And you will not be harmed, yo must believe it.
This is why holywood hates christians, because they know they are weaker and they wil loose.

John 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
John 6:38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
John 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
John 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.


He will never reject you if you covenant with him (Promise to follow him the best you know
You are protected.

Believe it
Mark 1:25 And Jesus rebuked him, saying, Hold thy peace, and come out of him.
Mark 1:26 And when the unclean spirit had torn him, and cried with a loud voice, he came out of him.
Mark 1:27 And they were all amazed, insomuch that they questioned among themselves, saying, What thing is this? what new doctrine is this? for with authority commandeth he even the unclean spirits, and they do obey him.


this is the summer of pfreedom for everyone who desires freedom

I can do all things through Christ who strengtheneth me..
Walk ye in the light.

Dude, if the world does not end in a couple months, you are a false prophet and therefore will be anathema. I would be careful what you "predict."

Remember, "she" told us that you can only really see 1/10th of a second into the future.

RICHARDDRHINE, Since you are so fascinated by the Bible, let me throw some other verses out:

- Deuteronomy 20:10-14
As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.

- Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT
If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

- Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NAB
If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife.

That sure is some nice deity you worship.

Don't be distracted by anything

Remember, JEsus LOVES you, he died and lost his Godlke body forever and took on a human body forever so your penalty is paid, your ticket is in hand
(Prov 8:17 KJV) I love them that love me; and those that seek me early shall find me.

(Titus 1:2 KJV) In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;

JESUS CANNOT LIE and he said he loves you more than hi own life so he will not trick you and try to kill you after paying this great price to save you

This fact is stronger than all doubts, God gave his son becaue GOD loves you as much as his only son,

Acts 10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
He loves everyone the same and becaue he loves his universehe will cleanse it from sin now.
LAst call.

You must use a King Jame to get through the plague. You can be SAVED with a NIV or other, but key verses you NEED to get through thi summer are only in the king james.

(You can study this look up NEW AGE BIBLE VERSIONS on you tube it is a 2 hour video, but dont need to look at it just get a king james, pray to God and read it to learn who he is.

You have time if you start now.

At the end of this summer it will be too late.
If you are still even around.


"on a full moon it gives its light"

So if you have one candle in a room, and bring in a mirror, do you now have one light in the room, or two?

"you don't even know what an allegory is, the Bible is full of them"

Oh, so if it's factually incorrect, now that's just an allegory?

It s sad you play with your last invitation of mercy and instead doing the work of the enemy to make a mockery of your last chance for your soul, you will be sorry, and the blood of those who listened and followed you will be required at your hand, unless you repent...

Mat 13:19 When any one heareth the word of the kingdom, and understandeth it not, then cometh the wicked one, and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart.


This is serious and final and you play with candles.

Be it known unto you

Mat 18:3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Heb 3:12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.
Heb 3:13 But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.
Heb 3:14 For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end;
Heb 3:15 While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.

Heb 3:19 So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.

Luke 11:50 That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;
Luke 11:51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
Luke 11:52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

repent for the kingdom of heaven (peace and love) is at hand, sin will be removed.


Hmmmm. Some poster upthread thinks that because life is hard and things seem to play with us at times, that's no reason to believe in God.

When actually these seems perfect, obvious reasons not to believe in human beings. Which is interesting, because Jesus believed in people enough to love them, and spent most of His time attempting to teach these ideas.

Interesting to see some children, er, people whining about having free will. These same people won't commit to asserting such choice doesn't, has never existed. Cutely dishonest way of arguing both sides of an issue.

When actually these seems perfect, obvious reasons not to believe in human beings.

Well except for the handful of us oddballs who adhere to the tenet "seeing is believing"

"Seeing is believing...."

You only accept that principle within your own skull. I've seen and believed, but from your point of view, that's just my skull. It seems, when you think it through, there might be one or two limitations on your approach to things.

So, GOATMAN has seen and believed whatever it is GOATMAN has seen and believed. From GOATMAN'S own perspective, that should provoke just a Great Big So What from any other living human being.

The sermon was based on what he claimed was a well-known fact, that there were no Atheists in foxholes. I asked Jack what he thought of the sermon afterwards, and he said, "There's a Chaplain who never visited the front."

~Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., Hocus Pocus, pg. 182

Yes, obligatory.

Be Well.

Very proud of this Vet for saying what everyone knows is true.

Why does somebody who believes in God almost always says that they also WORSHIP God? Does God require our worship? If we dont worship Her in the proper way, She wont accept us?

If we're talking about a supreme being that sees every thought we've ever had.. She would already know that we believe in Her and wouldnt require our worship in order to please Her.

Of course some people need to offer their worship to God in order to feel safe,but, here's a crazy idea.. maybe we dont need to worship God to reach the afterlife, we just need to believe in God

You only accept that principle within your own skull.

Yes, I've seen, heard, touched, smelled, and even tasted (enter m'boor, itsy, or furio with their predictible gay related childish response) and the data gathered from these senses convinces me that humans exist. If you don't want to accept that, I've no issue with it, but I do find the premise odd

Clancifer, Can you please expand on what you said about "Proud of this vet for saying what everyone knows is true"?

Do you mean to say that "everyone" knows there is no God?

WOW! This thread is still going! Is it still polite?

Religion fools your mind into thinking you're free while binding your hands, feet and soul.

This soldier in the article "woke up" and realized the truth.
Prayer is wasted time and effort, when you could get off your a$$ and actually do something.

Ancient Middle Eastern crazy-men wrote the 3 Abrahamic Religions and sadly people still follow this insane nonsense.

War because of religion is inexcusably illogical and evil.

Quit letting the "self-chosen" dictate what your reality should be via religious superstitions.

"Loving your enemies" only makes your enemies stronger while (in turn) you weaker.
Keep turning the other cheek? Suckers.

The US would be better if the three Middle Eastern religions were no longer practices in the US and banished back to the Middle East where they belong.

The Middle East will never know peace, nor should it, when it continues to support and practice beliefs built on madness.

Is organized religion madness or is belief in God madness? I ask because I believe in God but I dont participate in an organized religion. Am I mad?

Is organized religion madness or is belief in God madness?


IMHO, organized religion is madness. Belief in G-d is personal and private, but organizing it gives it an identity separate from G-d. Suddenly, you are following a Priest, Rabbi, or Iman and what they think of G-d rather than what you were born knowing of G-d.

Some people need to be part of a crowd to feel God and others get there just fine on their own. It really only matters THAT we get there not HOW we get there.

Unfortunately man's influence on organized religion pollutes the idea that we each have our own personal relationship with God.

Some people need to be part of a crowd to feel God and others get there just fine on their own. It really only matters THAT we get there not HOW we get there.

Unfortunately man's influence on organized religion pollutes the idea that we each have our own personal relationship with God.

#340 | Posted by Godisfemale at 2010-02-09 11:11 AM | Reply | Flag:

So, I have heard you say that it is only about knowing that God exists and believing in God, but not necessarily having faith in God or worshiping God, or necessarily acting on that belief. You also state that it just matters THAT we get there and not HOW we get there.

So Hitler is in Heaven so long as he believed in God? He did not have to worship God outwardly for him to go. It just matter THAT he believed, not HOW he believed?

Are you sure you want to take that stance. Make sure to ask him why he did it when you see him up there. Do you mind if he is standing next to you and wants to be your friend?

what a stupid ass story, who gives a shit what happened to this old bastard?

When people attempt to attribute characteristics to God, threads like this one are the result.

God is beyond our comprehension. We make take pleasure or comfort in contemplating His existence or imagining what He might be like, but in the end that type of contemplation is all just self serving bullshit. God is beyond our comprehension. And either you have faith that God (whatever God may be) actually exists, or you don't.

You're really stuck on Hitler..

Allow me to clarify.. Hitler would not be in Heaven eventhough he believed in God because Hitler had people murdered which God frowns upon.

God doesnt require our worship in order to validate our belief or our faith. God knows our belief whether we worship or not. Praying to God but not believing in God doesnt get you in the door

The guys name was Chris Christian...I think the name may have pushed him over the edge as much as the war did.
Either way, I agree with #342.

If only he was caught, captured, and tortured to death. That way I could have avoided that retard "Zed's" illogic in the first 10 or so posts.

GIF, So it does matter HOW you get there not just THAT you get there?

One of your statements have to be true.
Also, I imagine that God frowns upon a lot of things. I would imagine that God would frown upon lying, as it is in a way killing the truth at least for that individual. I would also imagine that your God is all about the truth, since you keep mentioning that.

Have you ever lied? Doesn't "she" frown upon that? Don't you now have no hope?

no you're mad because you think god talks to you.

BTW did you ever tell us how to see god? You promised you would

"I do find the premise odd...."

No odder, GOATMAN, than I find your solipsism. You've got something that works for you, I understand that. The point is the generalizeability of it's usefulness, which has awfully punishing restrictions.

Put another way: I don't doubt anyone can become convinced they have a paper bag over their head if that's what there. That's pretty much materialism in a nutshell.

Christ complained about paperbags atop heads constantly, though he never used that particular metaphor. The more things change....

i swear to god if zed ever expressed a clear and definitive point I think my head would explode

i swear to god if zed ever expressed a clear and definitive point I think my head would explode

He does spend more time tapdancing than expressing lucid thoughts.

I JUST FIGURED IT OUT

ZED IS REUBEN FROM ICARLY!!!!!!!!


Ruben said...
"It's like you were born sideways, over the moon, with two scoops." to sam

"There's my raspberry soccerball!" to sam

"You don't need bubble wrap to know when its chowder time" to sam

Wow, you can make a dog bark faster than a fish can climb a tree.

Ya might as well tie a knot around two kangaroos, know what I'm saying?

You don't need bubble-wrap to know when it's chowder time.

How much faith do you have in that claim that you made there truth?

I have very muy confidence in reuben er I mean zed

"Lucid thoughts...."

To a catfish eating shit seems lucid. I'm glad we're speaking of this, because catfish illustrate my point. Hard to think of a more materialistic creation than a catfish. It just knows the mud it's got it's barbels sunk into.

YEAH

cause you dont need bubble wrap to know when its chowder time.

I think, sincerely, that if I began to agree with you fellows I'd be seen (by you fellows) as a very clear thinker indeed. Catfish just loves them some catfish.

dude that's my rasberry soccerball

"Dude that's my raspberry soccerball...."

Why should you care? You just suck on the damned thing when you have it.

It can be sucked, therefore it's real. The corollary being: You suck therfore you are.

Yet another nutshell for materialism, placement into.

You might as well tie a knot around two kangaroos, know what I mean?

Wow, you can make a dog bark faster than a fish can climb a tree.

Behind the deep cylinder prevails a stationary romantic

I already told you gomers... God who is really female can be seen in the future 1/10 of a second ahead of us. Fortunately, we are all built to look 1/10th of second in to the future. So each one of us is built to see God. The problem is that some of us either dont want to see her and others dont know how to see her.

Luckily there is a way to gain access to that 1/10th of a second and you can see God if you are willing

Just wondering, what makes you think God is a woman?

Last known photo of God

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable