Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

In a particularly pugnacious move, the GOP insisted Monday evening on a 60-vote threshold for a fairly middle-of-the-road nominee to be solicitor general at the Department of Labor.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Corky

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.


The GNOP (soon to be known as the GOTP) proves yet again that there is no issue smaller than their petty partisan political power struggle.

when the fuck is Brown going to be seated? What a disgrace!


Repubes found out that he is a pro-choicer who voted for RomneyCare..... and they are going to filibuster his seating.


when the fuck is Brown going to be seated? What a disgrace!

#2 | Posted by member2586

The Party of Cowards needs to ram a few bills thru first.


Yeah, that was cowardly of Obama to go into the Elephant's Den the other day and and shove his size 13 so far up their asses that their eyes popped out and Fox News had to cut the grisly feed.

Dems could have held up Brown's seating and pushed thru health care, but did not.


"when the fuck is Brown going to be seated? What a disgrace!"

Then the vote would have been 33 - 60, the filibuster would still have been broken so your stupid whine about Brown is irrelevant.
One would think that even simpletons like you might begin to question why every appointment needs to be filibustered but I notice you NEVER question anything the Rethugs do.

"Republicans have asked President Obama to withdraw her nomination after documents surfaced contradicting her testimony at her confirmation hearing."

"No one opposes enforcing minimum wage or overtime laws. However, businesses began to suspect that "wage watch" had less to do with fighting malfeasance and more to do with giving unions a way to target unorganized firms. Union organizers deputized by the state can create a public relations nightmare for targeted firms by reporting spurious violations to the government for investigation.
As the program unfolded, many union organizers applied to join. Curious. Then a union local wrote down its plan to use wage watch in "all of our organizing campaigns."

"It's possible that Patricia Smith didn't knowingly mislead the Senate. But if that's true, she must have been completely ignorant about how her subordinates implemented her departments' signature initiative.
Here's the more likely scenario: Smith knew how her department implemented wage watch but didn't want the controversy to hinder her nomination, so she misrepresented the facts to smooth her confirmation.
Either scenario is damning: On the one hand, could an administrator so ignorant of her subordinates' actions be trusted with the third ranking spot in the Department of Labor? On the other hand, a nominee who misleads the Senate has made a mockery of the confirmation process."

www.foxnews.com

Now, how can anyone say 'no' to that?

And yes, it is an Obama "Routine Nomination"

A far more complete story that has not been candy coated can be found here:

theweeklystandard.com


Righting paranoia of unions used as an excuse not to confirm a legit admin appointee is just another example, as if another were needed, that moving on with the People's business instead of gridlocking the system so they can say that nothing is getting done is the GOTP goal.


"HuffPost spoke to three GOP senators after the vote and two -- Sen. Orrin Hatch (Utah) and Jeff Sessions (Ala.) -- said they weren't familiar enough with her nomination say why she deserved to be filibustered, but both voted with leadership anyway. (Sessions said he was aware there were "strong feelings" among Republicans on the committee.)"

Lock-steppers, baby, lock-steppers.


Maybe a little bit of research as to why folks don't think she is an apporpriate nominee is oder--

The first order of business has been rolling back those pesky union transparency regulations that allowed watchdog groups, the media and union members to know how union dues are spent.

Next, rather than getting out of the way and allowing the private sector engine to create jobs, the Obama Administration is hiring hundreds more OSHA and Wage and Hour inspectors with their job descriptions revised away from helping companies comply with the law to strictly writing citations for as much fine money as can possibly be warranted.

Believe it or not, in spite of record lows in workplace injuries, OSHA inspectors are now financially incentivized to write citations with heavy fines encouraged. This is akin to making a police officer's income directly related to how many tickets he/she writes. If you have the misfortune of getting pulled over, you know that it is going to cost you big time.

Continuing on the enforcement front, it is instructive that President Obama's appointee to be the top lawyer in the Department is Patricia Smith who currently serves as the head of the New York State Department of Labor. In New York, Smith created a program that empowers unions to conduct wage and hour inspections of employers typically, non-union employers. This powerful coercion tool is conducted under the guise of ensuring that employees are treated fairly, but actually allows a union to target employers for organizing programs using this threat as a cudgel against that business.

The theme of expanding private sector union membership permeates the entire Obama labor agenda from the recently announced deal on the health care bill which exempts union members from paying a tax on what is deemed to be Cadillac health care insurance, to the Orwellian named Employee Free Choice Act that strips employees of secret ballot union elections, to Obama appointees changing union election rules that have stood for 75 years in order to help unions organize Delta Airlines.

This emphasis on expanding union membership, even at the expense of job creation, can be seen in one of the Administration's early acts to require Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) for federally funded projects. PLAs require scale union wages be paid on all federally funded construction at an estimated cost of between 16-18%.

www.conservativeblogwatch.com


She also prefers to close down businesses rather than work with the owner to correct concerns.

is in order---lol

Dems could have held up Brown's seating and pushed thru health care, but did not.


#5 | Posted by Corky

Right. The only problem is the Democrats who jumped into the life boats with the women and children.

"The first order of business has been rolling back those pesky union transparency regulations that allowed watchdog groups, the media and union members to know how union dues are spent."

What a crock of shit. I belong to three Unions, and any day of the week, I can see how Union dues are spent.

I belong to three Unions

Good Grief!!

"Good Grief!!"

You're telling me. But, if you're going to do stage, radio, and film, you're stuck.

"when the fuck is Brown going to be seated? What a disgrace!"

Then the vote would have been 33 - 60, the filibuster would still have been broken so your stupid whine about Brown is irrelevant.
One would think that even simpletons like you might begin to question why every appointment needs to be filibustered but I notice you NEVER question anything the Rethugs do.

#6 | Posted by danni at 2010-02-02 11:52 AM

If you're going to call others simpletons, you might note that Brown is taking a Dem held seat, and so it would have been 33-59, assuming he voted with the Repubs.

"on a 60-32 vote"

I just quoted the article, perhaps a Republican voted with the Dems??

There should up or down votes for candidates after screening.

This isn't new.

These parties have interferred with nominating people to posts that need to be filled.

How long have courts sat without a judge because these parties get in the way of the President's authority to appoint judges, etc?

I agree they need to be vetted. Once that is done - let there be a vote, up or down.

Problem is, vetting hasn't been done very well.

Does this nominee owe taxes? Has inappropriate ties?

This is great news. Now Smith can take her NY Snitch program national.

Funniest 'goes around-comes around phrase..."Up or down vote"...GOP

Always fun to see Dorky talking about Repubs blocking health care when the Dems can't get the votes from with in. WTF Dorky, you have a majority, what is the problem? How many house Dems are members of the no party? Must be a bunch because they can't get anything done.

"...filibustering a nominee like Smith for a position most people have never heard of in a department that is rarely in the news still requires some justification. "

Sounds like the Department of Labor is just as important as the Energy, Commerce, HUD and a bunch of others

I belong to three Unions, and any day of the week, I can see how Union dues are spent.

#13 | Posted by Danforth at 2010-02-02 12:13 PM | Reply | Flag: GETS TO RIDE THE PRIVATE JET

could an administrator so ignorant of her subordinates' actions be trusted with the third ranking spot in the Department of Labor?

Why does this sentence make me think of Reagan?

This "60 vote" nonsense that has dominated Washington for the last 6 years or so is a perfect example of why we MUST lose the parties we currently are suffering. They BOTH have so placed party over country that they BOTH commit treason with every act. They are now holding up everything in the name of partisan politics; regardless of the American people's desires.

maybe they are sick of having CRAP rammed down their mouths. business as normal, works both way, tell the libtards to stop pushing crap, and maybe the GOP will stop. dam libtards , Hope and Change we can do with out.

works both way, tell the libtards to stop pushing crap, and maybe the GOP will stop.


The "60 votes" nonsense did not start in 2009. The DNC threatened EVERY Bush nominee as well. "Tit-for-tat" and "defining your actions by the actions of those you oppose" are the new rules.

"The DNC threatened EVERY Bush nominee as well."
Yea, but that was because Bush was real stupid.

The Left

IMHO, the Left totally abused the filibuster rules and now the Right are doing the same for even more petty reasons. The Left did it because they hated Bush; the the Right are doing it because the Left did.

IMHO, the Left totally abused the filibuster rules and now the Right are doing the same for even more petty reasons. The Left did it because they hated Bush; the the Right are doing it because the Left did.

#29 | Posted by kanrei

Kanrei, check your math. There are been more filibusters in the last year than in the entire history of the senate...combined. Dems threatened filibusters for insane candidates but only a few. They used it even less. 70% of business has been filibustered by the NOPers since Obama took office. I think thats a slight difference.

The GNOP (soon to be known as the GOTP) proves yet again that there is no issue smaller than their petty partisan political power struggle.


#1 | Posted by Corky at


oh how you smarter than God leftists have a memory problem when it comes to shit like this

do I REALLY have to come up with a list of bush appointees that were kept from a simple vote??

and in addition..some of the appointees who democrats used RACIAL insensitive comments to block???


"and the music goes round and round and round and it comes out here"

I have one simple question for those in favor of her nomination. If there were no question about her intentionally being misleading... should she hold any position, regarless of how obscure it may seem?

Personally, I wouldn't hire her to mow my lawn based on what I've read about her.

AND HOW many months has it been since the media and lapdogs here told us that the gop was dead dead dead and not to return.
carville told us that the dems would be in power
"for generations"..

carville told us that the dems would be in power
"for generations"..


Rove also spoke of the GOP doing the same. Cheerleaders....

and they both "would be wrong" not wouldnt they?
so THAT means that ONCE AGAN>..IM right and you are wrong..

see how that works?

Ok, so how is this different than Bush's judicial appointments that were held up? I'm not trying to equate the two; I really don't know.

the only difference is that dems can dish shit like this out
but cant take it
they instead become whiney little assholes.

FURTHER PROOF of my rant yesterday

DONT Change the TONE republicans

youve got the goddamn democrats on the floor.
you dont let them up
you keep your foot right on thier throat and STOMP

department of what, labor? we hate labor. why do we need another government agency?

btw, is my gas pedal fixed yet? what? my trucks aren't Toyotas? why not, i hear they're the best?

One would think that even simpletons like you might begin to question why every appointment needs to be filibustered but I notice you NEVER question anything the Rethugs do.

#6 | Posted by danni

Considering his track record on appointies, every one needs to be looked at very close. Even a person like you should be able to see that.

He has the largest collection of looser commies around him that has ever been assembled in the US. They have been comming out of the woodwork.

If there is a prize for impeding progress at any cost, the Repubs, the Grand Obstructionist Party, wins hands down. Maybe the snipe will explain what a "looser commie" is. Looser than the snipe? If Only your LEGITIMATELY elected president did have a few bona fide lefties around him, we might get somewhere. herm

Umm Herm, you have the votes to pass anything, again you have the votes to pass anything, you DON'T NEED the rebublicans, so why can't your party get anything done?????? So who is the party of no?

You cry babys keep blaming everything on everyone else. It is getting real old and the people are on to it. People forgot how bad Jimmy Carter was but this administration and house are bringing back those memories in a hurry.

Only your LEGITIMATELY elected president did have a few bona fide lefties around him, we might get somewhere. herm

I guess that explains what political doctrine you believe in.

Fish, you are right, the dems control DC and all they can do is re-name post offices. They are all running around tripping over their dicks.

Considering that they represent numb nuts like Herm it makes sense. I just want to get this bad experiment over with and get rid of them.

"The DNC threatened EVERY Bush nominee as well."

No they didn't, they threatened to filibuster Roberts for SC but backed down (as always) when threatened with nuclear option by Republicans. Democrats did not play politics with every nomination for office, many Bush appointed federal attorneys are still serving BTW.

"People forgot how bad Jimmy Carter was but this administration and house are bringing back those memories in a hurry."

Exactly the opposite is happening, people are beginning to get how terrible Reagan was and that Carter was actually a very good president.
Sure wish we had kept his energy plan.
Sure wish we hadn't started borrowing instead of taxing to fund the government, you know Reaganomics.

Danni,


The Dems never threatened a filibuster of Roberts. Never.

They DID filibuster Alito, but lost the cloture vote.

The big show-down you are thinking of (when the gang-of-14 rightly put the smack-down) pertained to 10-stalled appointments to lower courts.

Sure wish we had kept his energy plan.

His energy plan? He exacerbated the oil embargo unneccessarily with his stupid price-controls.


Sure wish we hadn't started borrowing instead of taxing to fund the government, you know Reaganomics.

Reagan actually included massive spending cuts to coincide with his tax-cuts. But, the Dems running congress wouldn't have it so deficits was the comprimise.

PS - how do you feel about these endless trillion+ deficits that Obama and the Dem congress are poised to run?

Does that shit even matter now that Dems are running everything?

I recall a lot of Bush nominees being blocked by the dems - so what's your point?

"PS - how do you feel about these endless trillion+ deficits that Obama and the Dem congress are poised to run?

You assume they will be endless, I disagree. Raising taxes and ending the recession can get the budget back under control. It is REpublican talking point propaganda to pretend there is only one way to look at the problems.

"The big show-down you are thinking of (when the gang-of-14 rightly put the smack-down) pertained to 10-stalled appointments to lower courts."

Oh, so you think a similar measure should be done now to prevent all the Republican filibusters?

Oh, so you think a similar measure should be done now to prevent all the Republican filibusters?


No.

I think a similar measure should be enacted to prevent the excersize of current filibusters. The gang-of-14 prevented the senate from circumventing the filibuster - and with good reason.

If you recall, I supported this smack-down - it was the sensible thing to do.

"The gang-of-14 prevented the senate from circumventing the filibuster - and with good reason."

The gang of 14 preserved the filibuster so that Republicans can use it today, the Democrats would have been far better off to let the Republicans do the nuclear option. Today, they would not be able to be obstructionists. The gang of 14 proved one thing, cooperating with Republicans is usually a losing proposition.

"The DNC threatened EVERY Bush nominee as well."

No they didn't, they threatened to filibuster Roberts for SC but backed down (as always) when threatened with nuclear option by Republicans. Democrats did not play politics with every nomination for office, many Bush appointed federal attorneys are still serving BTW.

#46 | Posted by danni

Pull your head out of your panties sweetie. There were many judges that were never apointed because of the dems. Your memory is about as long as a dem's dick.

Raising taxes and ending the recession can get the budget back under control.

#51 | Posted by danni

What is the 10 year projection on the budget? $20 trillion in debt and that is assuming that they will pass cap and trade to collect all thoes taxes. That is from the little o hiself.

There are been more filibusters in the last year than in the entire history of the senate...combined.

#30 | Posted by Sycophant

Link? or did you mean threatened filibusters but didn't really do them and weren't challenged to try?

The GNOP (soon to be known as the GOTP) proves yet again that there is no issue smaller than their petty partisan political power struggle.


#1 | Posted by Corky

Corky, corky, corky...

All they need to do is to hold out for another 11 months and the Progressive danger will have passed.

What is the 10 year projection on the budget? $20 trillion in debt and that is assuming that they will pass cap and trade to collect all thoes taxes. That is from the little o hiself.

#56 | Posted by Sniper


What fucking taxes are they going to collect if they pass Cap and Trade?

None!

All the corporations would have left! Rich people too. Gone!

Happy to see this happen. The less Washington does, the more prosperous we all are. Let's hope for complete gridlock.

Routine nomination? Bullshit! Union lawyer named to Department of Labor. Ending union thuggery and graft is the only way to go... and it is coming. The people are never going to allow this nation to get in this condition again. Votes and whatever it takes to make sure, even going back to counting paper ballots if machines are being used to cheat honesty from an election. The people are angry and see clearly.

Betty Orangutan, It is your party that steals elections not ours.

when the fuck is Brown going to be seated? What a disgrace!

#2 | Posted by member2586

Took Franken how long to get seated? Was that a disgrace,too? Or just Gov. Goodnplenty brushing up his con street cred?

There were not as many Filibusters under Bush because all the Dems had to do was say they would Filibuster, and the Limp Dicked Repubs backed off over and over again.

Now that they are out of power, all of a sudden the Repubs grow a spine?

If Cap and Tax are passed, say hello to a FULL BLOW DEPRESSION!!

No Jobs, No Taxes, No Services. Get ready for Bread Lines.



Pull your head out of your panties sweetie. There were many judges that were never apointed because of the dems. Your memory is about as long as a dem's dick.

#55 | Posted by Sniper Flag:Should have been a Comedian. Good one Sniper. :@))

look
this is just more typical shit from democrat asses..
when the presidential vote doesnt come out the way they want..they talk about doing away with electoral college and now that this isnt in thier favor...doind away with the 60 vote thing is all over the place.
JUST LIKE talk radio..they cant win...they will try and change the rules.

Your memory is about as long as a dem's dick.

#55 | Posted by Sniper at 2010-02-03 03:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

Black people are no longer dems?

I'm willing to bet that 'Long Dong Silver' didn't vote republican.

Your memory is about as long as a dem's dick.
#55 | Posted by Sniper | Flag: Dem Dick Expert

ugly but true words...
#65 | Posted by vernon | Flag: Dem Dick Aficianado

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable