Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

GOP candidate Scott Brown has an extremely slim lead in the Massachusetts U.S. Senate race over Democrat Martha Coakley, according to a new Suffolk University/7News poll. His four percent lead in the poll of 500 likely voters is within the margin of error, indicating the race is in a virtual tie. The special election occurs Tuesday.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

vernon

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Coakley is such an awful candidate, at a time when 74 percent of Americans oppose the Democrat health care takeover.

If Brown can pull this off it means the Republicans in the Senate can filibuster health care and every other wretched Democrat bill.

Which is the role and duty of the opposition party.

"Which is the role and duty of the opposition party."

Except when Republicans are in the majority, then all we hear from them is "up or down vote!" Reid should stop everything right now and change the Senate rules.

BTW, just like the REpublicans threatened to do when they held the majority.

There is going to be dancing in the streets Tuesday night!

Except when Republicans are ....

#2 | Posted by danni at 2010-01-15 08:54 AM | Reply | Flag:

What a fucking whiner!

It's politics. This is the way it is. Why do you have to act so godam indignant and surprised? Both parties play their advantages, and at the moment the advantage is to the Republicans.

You whine as though there used to be some magical time, long ago, when everybody made nice. But now the Republicans have peed in the soup.

I guess whining all the time is easier than facing reality and being honest with yourself.

I guess whining all the time is easier than facing reality and being honest with yourself.
#5 | Posted by vernon

You don't just guess it, you guzzling geezer, you live it.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2010-01-15 09:08 AM | Reply | Flag:

The Drunk_Dwarf proves the adage: "It's noon somewhere."

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2010-01-15 09:08 AM | Reply | Flag: TOO DRUNK AT 9 AM TO UNDERSTAND THE THREAD TOPIC

I am not sure he will pull it off, either way it is bad news for the dems. Brown should be getting his hat handed to him, but he is making it a race. Any dem in a close race in any other part of the country should learn real quick, the POS known as a HC bill is a chain around their necks.

Caroline Kennedy could have beaten Brown. Coakley is a hack.

This is dumb. Four fucking points. Meaningless until the election. As history has shown. Prognosticate all you want. I'll watch the reality unfold as it unfolds.

That said, I'm also not against losing the majority. Sometimes, things are more effective when the POTUS and Congress are not in sync. (I will now have my leftie membership card summarily revoked, I know.)

"Why do you have to act so godam indignant and surprised?"

You just don't like it when people point out your own hypocrisy.
Where am I not honest with myself or where am I whining by just pointing out that you saying "the duty of the opposition party is to filibuster" now after demanding an up or down vote when Dems were the minority???
If anything you are the whiner because you can't stand to have your own hypocrisies pointed out.

This is dumb. Four fucking points. Meaningless until the election. As history has shown. Prognosticate all you want. I'll watch the reality unfold as it unfolds.

#11 | Posted by pragmatist

The fact that the race is even close in a state that is considered an easy win for dems is huge news.

You just don't like it when people point out your own hypocrisy.
Where am I not honest with myself or where am I whining by just pointing out that you saying "the duty of the opposition party is to filibuster" now after demanding an up or down vote when Dems were the minority???
If anything you are the whiner because you can't stand to have your own hypocrisies pointed out.

#12 | Posted by danni at 2010-01-15 09:54 AM | Reply | Flag:

You toss out 'hypocrisy' because it's the Dem hand grenade.

I never said it is "the duty of the opposition party is to filibuster". I said it is the duty of the opposition to oppose. Big diff.

You can't retort without making up lies and trying to attribute them to me. Your "quote marks." Not my quote.

And what fucking difference does it make if the opposition is done as filibuster, obstruction, or killing it in committee? It's still an accepted tactic.

With health care, it now has to be filibuster.

Not so long ago you, Danni, were praying that the Dems use the nuclear option, or some other tactic -- anything to pass Obama's agenda despite the will of a majority of Americans.

Now that the tactics might work against you, it is suddenly sinister?

No Vernon, you said:

"If Brown can pull this off it means the Republicans in the Senate can filibuster health care and every other wretched Democrat bill."

I use the term HYPOCRIT because it fits you perfectly.

Butbutbut it's TEDDY'S seat!

Sure hope they buy him a new one once elected.

"Not so long ago you, Danni, were praying that the Dems use the nuclear option, or some other tactic -- anything to pass Obama's agenda despite the will of a majority of Americans."

That's the difference between you and I, I still am hoping Reid and the Dems will use the nuclear option, I make no bones about it, I want them to do everything they can to further the Dem agenda.
In hindsight, I wish the Dems would have called the Republicans bluff on the nuclear option back when the they held the majority. In the end, the Republicans got what they wanted back then anyway and if we had called their bluff we wouldn't be dealing with their filibusters now.

Democrat will steal the election if necessary. The Obama agenda is too important to be held up by some upstart Republican gunning for Kennedy's seat.

Not that any of the libbies here will care.

With the race for Ted Kennedy's Senate seat nearing a nail-biting conclusion, Democrats claim they gained a major boost Thursday night after Republican Scott Brown said he opposes a proposed tax on big banks that is designed to regain TARP funds and curb compensation practices.

The Massachusetts state senator, who vaulted ahead of his opponent, Attorney General Martha Coakley in one of several late-stage polls, told the Wall Street Journal that he is "opposed to higher taxes, especially in the midst of a severe recession."

"Raising taxes will kill jobs," Brown's campaign added in a statement. "Martha Coakley's tax-raising policies will make it harder to get our economy back on the right track."

In coming out against the big-bank tax, Brown joins the ranks of other conservatives including Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele. But it may be dangerous political terrain. In the minutes after Brown's position went public, the Democratic Party machinery trumpeted it as a revelation of his proximity to both the financial industry and the far right. A strategist working on the race emailed the Huffington Post with the following synopsis:

This is significant marker... this is Brown giving up the populist ground that was fueling his campaign. It also undermines his central argument that he's not a lockstep Republican who will put Wall Street ahead of middle class families. Look for us to highlight and make him pay the price for this choice [Friday].

Democrats appear intent to use the big-bank tax as a political cudgel in the weeks and months going forward. On Thursday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs all but dared Republicans to oppose the measure, which would raise an estimated $180 million in revenue per firm per year.

"If you want to be on the side of big banks," Gibbs said, "this is a great country, you're free to do so."

www.huffingtonpost.com

Oops!

"I never said it is "the duty of the opposition party is to filibuster". I said it is the duty of the opposition to oppose. Big diff."

I completely agree. Did you believe that and assert it back when Bush was working with a Dem Congress? If so, good for you. I remember lots of people (here and otherwhere) asserting that they should not be doing that, and that citizens should line up and sign up (not in so many words). But yes, we need a loyal opposition at all times. It keeps discussions going, and from conflict comes things that are good for all. (He said idealistically.)

+++++

Yeah, RIR, Dems really cornered the market on election-stealing. Republicans have never been accused, nor corruption of that sort exposed or investigated. Come on. Sometimes the lockstep partisanship here (both sides of the aisle) just brings me down.

#7 | Posted by vernon

I apologize. My observaiton seemed unambiguous so I understandly thought I made it clear the first time around. But I realize you're painfully slow to the grasp even rudimentary points, so I'll see if I can clarify matters for you, ol' fella.

I guess whining all the time is easier than facing reality and being honest with yourself.
#5 | Posted by vernon

To which I replied, "You don't just guess it, you guzzling geezer, you live it."

If you still don't get it, please, don't bother me again. Ask anyone who has the misfortune of knowing you and they'll be happy to drum it into your hairless noggin.

In hindsight, I wish the Dems would have called the Republicans bluff on the nuclear option back when the they held the majority. In the end, the Republicans got what they wanted back then anyway and if we had called their bluff we wouldn't be dealing with their filibusters now.

#17 | Posted by danni at 2010-01-15 10:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

But the Dems did not call the bluff, did they?

Sorry. My crocodile tears are all for you ... just as you would have crocodile tears for the other side. If the Dems lacked the gonads to do the job, then you elected ineffectual losers.

Your problem.

"....dealing with their filibusters now."

What filibusters now? Are you on drugs or just stupid? Until Brown wins in Massachusetts, there is no filibuster.

Wait til next week to float that whine.

#21 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2010-01-15 10:36 AM | Reply | Flag: GONE FROM ANNOYING TO TIRESOME

"But the Dems did not call the bluff, did they?"

Unfortunately they didn't recognize that bipartisanship is over, doesn't matter who is in charge it won't be bipartisan any longer on anything. Therefore, they should have realized they may as well play hardball like the Republicans. They need to recognize it now, finally. Everyone knows that if the roles were reversed the Republicans would have no problem using the nuclear option so the Dems ought to go ahead and do it.

"Until Brown wins in Massachusetts, there is no filibuster."

Tell Joe Lieberman that....I think he's get a laugh.

"An Even Worse Story on Coakley: Let Guy Off For Raping His 23-Month-Old Niece With Hot Curling Iron"
ace.mu.nu

"Democrat Admits Cheating in 2004 Scott Brown Race"
"We cheated, and he still beat us."
wizbangblog.com

Ummm . . . has there been a filibuster that hasn't made the news?

Always worried about the boogeyman under the bed, these libbies.

Quick show of hands for you libbies: how many of you, if you lived in Barney Frank's district, would vote to send him back to Washington?

"In 2004, Brown won a special election to become state senator, despite the state Democrats scheduling the election to coincide with the Presidential primary, when Democrats would be flocking to vote for John Kerry."

That constitutes cheating????
Perhaps they should have held a second, special election and let the taxpayers pay for it.

"But in the aftermath of the crime, a Middlesex County grand jury overseen by Martha Coakley, then the district attorney, investigated without taking action.
It was only after the toddler's mother filed applications for criminal complaints that Coakley won grand jury indictments charging rape and assault and battery."

Two links KBM and both are utter bull shit, I guess I should have expected that coming from you.
Pathetic.
If that is the type of stuff Brown is using to campaign (I don't live in MA so I don't know) then he is a POS.

The Boston Herald reporting on this story is ridiculous. Brown doesn't have a lead if 4 percent is within the margin of error. That indicates the race is a tie. The headline "Scott Brown surges ahead in Senate race" is completely bogus.

I will grant that the poll indicates the race is close and Brown has a statistically insignificant lead in this particular survey. But reporters who write about polls should figure out what the margin of error means.

With the democratic machine in place in that state a republican will not win.

"In 2004, Brown won a special election to become state senator, despite the state Democrats scheduling the election to coincide with the Presidential primary,

Last week the righties were whining when Blago wouldn't schedule a special election to coincide with another election.
More rightwing sucking and blowing at the same time. The dancing in the street Tuesday will be Dems.

Brown is down by 15 in real polling.

My brother works for JPM up in Boston. He will be voting for Brown. Normally he doesn't vote in elections in Mass. He didn't even vote last year because he knew Osama Obama would win in Mass.

More rightwing sucking and blowing at the same time. The dancing in the street Tuesday will be Dems.


Brown is down by 15 in real polling.


Yes and I heard Corzine was going to win by 10 points by you libbies. Oops. That never quite happend

No, Rcade, its to sucker us into reading it. I interpret as Brown surges ahead of where he's been, but not ahead of Cockley.

This race will depend on turnout.

Oh, and the gov't just decided there will be a Financial Bailout Responsibility Fee College Addition - remember that college loan you had? They want a 15% fee for bailing your ass out.

:P

The ACORN buses are fueled up and ready to go. Brown doesn't have a chance.


I guess whining all the time is easier than facing reality and being honest with yourself.
#5 | Posted by vernon


You don't just guess it, you guzzling geezer, you live it.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2010-01-15 09:08 AM | Reply | Flag: Doc's daily attempt to top Yesterday's Self-retorting retort.

What a coup this would be!!
I do hope Brown wins, but even if it is within 5pts., it will be a wake up call for the dems.
The saddest part here that is almost always overlooked is the fact that our elected sens. & reps. are not doing their job.
It is their job to represent what their constitutes want & they are not doing that. They are more interested in Obama's wants/needs.
America, as a whole, is NOT for this gov't. take over of health care. It is just that simple.

I'll be voting for him

The more I read about this Martha Coakley, tells me she's a despicable person. She kept people in jail she knew was innocent; she let off this POS policeman who raped his 23-month old niece.

She sounds like a perfect replacement for Ted Kennedy, and an ideal counterweight to Barney Frank in the House.

Only in Massachusetts.

The story of the Amiraults of Massachusetts, and of the prosecution that had turned the lives of this thriving American family to dust, was well known to the world by the year 2001. It was well known, especially, to District Attorney Martha Coakley, who had by then arrived to take a final, conspicuous, role in a case so notorious as to assure that the Amiraults' name would be known around the globe.

online.wsj.com

The more I read about this Martha Coakley, tells me she's a despicable person.

How surprising, you think someone with a (D) next to their name is despicable. Color me shocked.

A lot of Republicans are despicable too Taxi. McCain included, which is why I didn't vote for him.

But fear not. Fortunately, there are enough knee-jerk libbies just like you in Massachusetts to send Coakley to the Congress, and Bawney Fwank back to the Congress.

"The lyin of the senate is about to have his legacy swirl down the porcelain abiss."

Baldy, SD

This is way too important to the Dems, they will be pulling out all stops and cheating like never before.

If Brown wins or if this race is close, either way it's not good news for the dems but great news for the country---actually, it may not be bad news for moderate dems since it will no longer tie them to Obama and the leftists--it'll provide them cover to vote more to the moderate/conservative positions. The bad news is along with the 2010 election results it'll neutralize Obama and possibly save his skin in 2012---we need a competent person in the WH in 2012 whether another dem or repub.

The congress and senate are everything. POTUS has become a figure head. That is why I didn't care if O won as long both houses were in Dem control. They would simply bury themselves eventually and the people would see it and not give them a majority for another 15 years. It's happening.


The congress and senate are everything. POTUS has become a figure head. That is why I didn't care if O won as long both houses were in Dem control. They would simply bury themselves eventually and the people would see it and not give them a majority for another 15 years. It's happening.

#47 | Posted by fishpaw

You could be very prescient---I can't tell you the number of people that have admitted voting for Obama and have said it's the worse voting mistake they ever made---what the dem leadership and Obama have done is to scare the pants off of the majority of Americans and they won't soon forget.

RCADE and others

here is another poll. I notice that there are some other things here talking about how the numbers may not be completely as they appear and OF COURSE today tomorrow and monday..this is all just an exercise that we all like so much.
tuesday is the day


newsmax.com

The writing was on the wall that he was a great speech maker but with no substance. The two morons Reid and Pelosi are trying to run the show but people are really starting to see how corrupt they are.

They would simply bury themselves eventually and the people would see it and not give them a majority for another 15 years. It's happening.

#47 | Posted by fishpaw at 2010-01-15 02:19 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e



BINGO BABY!

nice post

I'm waiting for Celasary to call me a FUCKING FOX WATCHING RACIST. Can't wait.

The more I read about this Martha Coakley, tells me she's a despicable person. She kept people in jail she knew was innocent; she let off this POS policeman who raped his 23-month old niece.

#40 | Posted by rightisright at 2010-01-15 12:41 PM

That kind of stuff is only despicable if a Republican does it!

--Massachusetts

All you good people in Mass get out and Vote fro Brown...... The rest of the country is with you.

COAKLY insults brown and others for standing outside fenway shaking hands with the people

what better example of pointy headed elitists goddamn dems


www.redstate.com

short day today boys

have a great weekend

hasta laredo

me too fish

what better way to know just how right we are than to be attacked by celisary.

#53..

now you arent saying that dems and thier lapdogs in the media are biased ARE YOU?????

OHHHHHHHHHHHHH


IM telling celisary on you....

If Brown wins it's just icing on the cake, they met their goal, which was to make this race close so the Dems would have spend precious resources(ones that will be needed in races they know will be close) on this race

Gas up Airforce 1! Obama's gotta do work, son.


Gas up Airforce 1! Obama's gotta do work, son.

#59 | Posted by phys_ill

They're mentioning Obama going the last minute to the race in Mass but feel it'll hurt Coakley more then it'll help her.

"Therefore, they should have realized they may as well play hardball like the Republicans. They need to recognize it now, finally."

The problem is that they fear the outcome will be a decrease in service and/or an increase in cost. The dems haven't really put much forward other than blame heathcare costs on the usual corporate suspects. The problem is that anyone with the ability to read a financial statement recognizes that this neither a strong, nor entirely truthful argument. They have completely disregarded many of the common sense measures that have been proposed.

In other words, they have hitched their wagons to and ideological horse that may very well go backwards instead of forward. Acting alone, they would be remembered as the party that killed healthcare in the US, something that would almost certainly affect their electability in the near future. Of course if it turns out that healthcare quality and/or service improves, the likely outcome would be that they would be remembered as the party that saved American healthcare. What's undeniable in this one is that there is no middle ground. It's an all-or-noting win.

What I haven't figured out is why large self funded groups haven't stood up for themselves yet? They actually insure their workers and the ins. co only processes the claims (therefore claims payments are independent from profit because the ins co provides only adimistrative services and does not pay the provider out of its own pocket). If you work for a large self funded company, do you feel your employer is really as evil as the liberals would tell you?

With all these new regulations, all of these self funded groups (i.e. majority of covered Americans and co's like US Air, Food Lion, Goodrich, etc etc etc) will have to pony up whereas they were excempt from state mandates that raise costs under ERISA.

Do the supporters of the bill have any idea what this means? You will.... You will....

APNewsBreak: AP sources: Obama to Massachusetts
Jan 15 02:54 PM US/Eastern

By GLEN JOHNSON and LIZ SIDOTI
Associated Press Writers

BOSTON (AP) - His health care bill at stake, President Barack Obama plans a trip to Massachusetts to campaign for endangered Senate Democratic candidate Martha Coakley amid release of a poll showing an edge for the Republican Party in the race to fill a Senate seat Democrats have held for over a half-century.


Looks like Hussein is getting desperate....

All anyone needs to know about Croakley (I live here) can be summed up in one true story.

A yr or so ago, an ILLEGAL immigrant was molesting a 4 (5?) yr old boy in the bathroom of a local store. The kid's dad punched-out the shitbag. Three guesses who was taken into custody. You got it! The father for assault battery.

I will never, as long as I live, forget the video of this state's arrogant, lying, ignorant, utter zero of a socialist attorney general in the press conference which followed:
"... well, we really discourage self-help..." We'd prefer that these kinds of things be handled by the authorities. She's running virtually nothing but neg ads (as there's absolutely nothing positive in her record to tout). The state's highest ranking law officer. What a freaking disgrace!

OK, now a lesson for Danni...
Your posts are difficult enough to read as it is without adding errors in grammar on top of it. In your #17 post -- "...That's the difference between you and I.." should be between you and ME! Damn, that is SOOO irritating.

and Mysterytoy #10...
Caroline Kennedy?? Holy shit.. and her qualifications are what again?? That she's a liberal with the name Kennedy? Don't you get it -- working, tax paying, English speaking, law abiding people have HAD IT with this shit.

GO Scott Brown. I've donated twice. MASS voters -- get yourself out on Tuesday and make this thing happen!!


JM

Brown is down by 15 in real polling.

Sorry, my hopeful little douche.

Even her internals have her down, now.

stevekornacki.blogspot.com

And seeing as how this election is turning into a referendum on Chocolate Carter's socialized health care, it doesn't help that Obamacare's polling marks are even lower than Martha Coakley's in the Bay State.

www1.whdh.com

hee hee

GO Scott Brown. I've donated twice. MASS voters -- get yourself out on Tuesday and make this thing happen!!

Fuckin' A, brother.

If you'd asked me a year ago whether I'd ever send money to a goddamn yankee politician in Massachusetts of all places, I'd of told you to go eat a bowl of dicks.

But the time they are a changin'....

If you'd asked me a year ago whether I'd ever send money to a goddamn yankee politician in Massachusetts of all places, I'd of told you to go eat a bowl of dicks.

But the time they are a changin'....

#66 | Posted by Jak_Se_Mao at 2010-01-16 12:33 AM |

Seems to me Brown is a old school yankee politician.

I mean really. A pro life fiscal conservative in MA sounds like a old school traditional democrat to me.

Brown is just that. He did not leave the democratic party. They left him.

I don't care if he sounds like a member of Alien Abduction and Cosmic Sodomy party.

If his vote kills this stupid fucking "health care" fascism, I'll send him money to win.

A Senate seat held by Edward Kennedy in danger of being won by a Republican who says he stands for "family values," but who actually began his career in the public eye posing naked in Cosmopolitan.

This country has gone absolutely stark, staring mad.


A Senate seat held by Edward Kennedy in danger of being won by a Republican who says he stands for "family values," but who actually began his career in the public eye posing naked in Cosmopolitan.


This country has gone absolutely stark, staring mad.


#69 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore

If that's true, when are we going to get some "normal" people into politics?

"If that's true, when are we going to get some "normal" people into politics?"

Perhaps when it doesn't cost millions to run for a Senate seat. When those with lots of money can't buy popularity and votes. When lobbyists can't dictate how bills are written.

this race and the recent Virginia/New Jersey results seem to have really shaken things up with the "insiders" of both parties . . .

while outwardly GOP leaders smile, behind closed doors leaders of both parties are peein' their pants - - -
The Times . . They Are A'Changing

in reality, a very small % of the American Electorate are dumb sheep, easily led - - - even tho historicly, a large % have acted like sheep


WTF? - - my Dem congressman has suddenly mutated into a HUMBLE PUBLIC SERVANT

I expect, soon he'll be offerin' to fetch coffee for us "constituents"
(thanks John . . . that's 1 cream, hold the sugar)


"If that's true, when are we going to get some "normal" people into politics?"

Perhaps when it doesn't cost millions to run for a Senate seat. When those with lots of money can't buy popularity and votes. When lobbyists can't dictate how bills are written.
#71 | Posted by danni

or perhaps when sheep quit voting for the suit with the most money whose "image" was created by a team of handlers & stategists . . . just sayin'

+1 vote for Brown from me here in MA

:D

The independents are breaking big for Brown---they're representative of other independents in the US---they're scared to death of what the Obummer and his leftist friends are doing to this country--even moderate dems are breaking his way--as this poster has said many times, the American people in the form of independents and moderate dems are waking up and realizing the damage an unqualified and incompetent Obummer is doing to the country---2010 elections will speak loud and clear---there are 1 million more democratic registered voters in Mass. ---that's why a win or close loss will send a chilling message to the Obummer and Washington. You're getting a total reversal of the election of 2008.

The fact that the race is even close in a state that is considered an easy win for dems is huge news.

It might be but there's also a perfect storm of events.

Ted Kennedy is dead, that right there creates a huge opening and wipes the slate clean. Boston has a history of racial strife which might trickle down from Obama to his party. And the unions are in an odd place, traditionally strongly Democratic but now worried about something that really matters -- saving their Cadillac health plans.

It might just be the last gasp, the official end of Kennedy politics. Unless somehow Arnold pulls it out.

A lot of the tightness of this race has a lot to do with the personalities more than anything. Scott Brown is a good looking guy with a charismatic personality where Coakley is much less so. Her campaign clearly was taking this election for granted and Brown supporters are pumped up and are receiving a lot of outside support as well.

As for me, I'm in a bit of a quandry. I voted against Coakley in the primary and I'm not terribly fond of her. In particular I think that the way she handled the Fells Acre / Amirault case was despicable and that she was definitely persecuting this family based on flimsy / questionable evidence that was later found to be false. Although I agree with her on probably most issues, she does seem to be hand in hand with parts of the NOW crowd that I don't like all that much. I really wish that Capuano or one of the other Dems had won the primary but Coakley had the money going into that campaign.

On the other hand, I'm not prepared to hand a 41st Senate seat to the Republicans. I think that would be a terrible thing for this country. I agree with him on a few issues and he is personal friends wiht some friends of mine but by and large he is just another lockstep Republican rightie.

So I'm not sure where I'm going on this one on Tuesday or if I'll sit it out.

A lot of the tightness of this race has a lot to do with the personalities more than anything.

LOL.

"Personalities", huh?

Its got nothing to do with atrocious piece of shit "health care" legislation and the usurpation of the proper role of government in it citizens' lives as has been understood for 200+ years?

Just a personality contest.

Certainly not a wholesale, grass-roots rejection of what's going on in Washington...

"Its got nothing to do with atrocious piece of shit "health care" legislation and the usurpation of the proper role of government in it citizens' lives as has been understood for 200+ years?"

Not really; health care reform has majority support in Mass by all polling data.

Not really; health care reform has majority support in Mass by all polling data.

That's a flat-out crock of shit, too.

www1.whdh.com

You're 0 for 2.

And Coakley is not being helped by her pledge to help pass the Democrat's national health care bill. Fifty-one percent of likely voters here say no to it while 36% say yes. Sixty-one percent think Washington can't afford it.

Oops.

I can't wait for evil Texans like yourself to be forced into paying for the healthcare of others.

Is it "personality" that has SEIU members out campaigning for Brown?

www.redmassgroup.com

I can't wait for evil Texans like yourself to be forced into paying for the healthcare of others.

LOL.

We already do, lil' chickenshit.

I didn't read all the posts on this thread. That said, I have questions for anyone who cares to play.

Given that Obama has recently been in Mass to campaign for Oakley... here are some thoughts/questions.

1. Does his appearance mean she's in trouble?
2. Given his past "success" campaigning for candidates in VA and NJ, is BHO a help or hinderance?
3. Given BHO's active support and support from other Dem heavy hitters, if there's a Brown win, what does that mean... to healthcare, to the public's support of Dem initiatives, etc? In other words, is an Oakley defeat a reflection on BHO? Because if one says an Oakley win is a reflection of support for BHO and Dems, then the oppposite holds, no?
4. Does the fact that this race is too close to call give Dems/libs/BHO supporters any pause for concern? If not, why?

#69 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2010-01-16 03:42 AM | Reply | Flag: HAS TO PAY OTHERS TO LOOK AT HIM NAKED

Sure got kinda quiet on this thread.

I hear lots of Bitch Crickets.

Bitch Crickets...gotta remember that one...FF!

Gas up Airforce 1!

"November India Six Six Echo Romeo climb and maintain flight level three five zero, proceed direct to Go Fuck Yourself, You Marxist Cocksucker intersection contact Houston Center 128.07 and have a good day."

Flag: HAS TO PAY OTHERS TO LOOK AT HIM NAKED
#86 | Posted by vernon | Flag: PROJECTING...AGAIN

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable