Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Sarah Palin's daughter has filed for sole custody of her son with ex-boyfriend Levi Johnston, according to The AP.

Bristol Palin has reportedly requested full custody of 1-year-old Tripp with visitation rights for Johnston.

Her request to keep proceedings private was allegedly denied by a judge, although a temporary order allowed the use of pseudonyms while the court considered the request.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

NoGov4Me

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

I guess all of that shit riiight wing about gay marriage and adoption being terrible because it's better if the child grows up with a mother and a father only applies if your last name isn't Palin.

In an affidavit, 19-year-old Johnston reportedly said: "I do not feel protected against Sarah Palin in a closed proceeding. I hope that if it is open she will stay out of it. Bristol's attorney is her attorney."

Smart kid fer a redneck.

He'll lose, of course.

Palin name or no the courts are predisposed to side with the mother in these cases.

Palin will either try to crush him under legal papers or bribe him here.

Those options failing she's always got the helicopter and M16 option.

Be Well.

Double standard?

I would have thought that meant that the media is bulllshit for even reporting this shit.

But some libtard who posted this thread took it another direction.

I think Sarah Palin in a dope and republicans should be ashamed their party selected her to be a nominee but the media's attention to this is nothing more that an illustration of their own double standard to attack her.

So are you saying that the riiight isn't all about the kid being better off when both the mother and the father are around, but at the same time filing court papers to keep the father out of the kid's life is not a contradiction?

Also, highlight the line in the piece where SARAH! was attacked. While you look for that I'll pull up about 100 other famous people who have had their divorces put out there on front street. I bet I know who can fulfill their end of it 1st. SHE used these people as props when it was convient, she just can't turn it off now that it's not.

Ready? GO!

Look at how the media "attacks" these people. Oh, the horror!

www.google.com

Also, highlight the line in the piece where SARAH! was attacked. While you look for that I'll pull up about 100 other famous people who have had their divorces put out there on front street.

oh please, this was all over the networks this morning. the fact that this is a news story fit to make the national networks in the AM proves the agenda of the media.

when you pull up the other 100 famous people's children going through a custody battle then fine. This isn't Sarah's divorce or custody battle.

as far as the hypocrisy goes....keep spinning on that. what is your issue?? is it about gays not being able to adopt??

SHE used these people as props when it was convient,

I agree.

but this is a complete non story being overreported.

To be fair, a lot of Sarah worshippers lap this shit up so the media will report this stuff because it is news to some of them.

when you pull up the other 100 famous people's children going through a custody battle then fine. This isn't Sarah's divorce or custody battle.

#6 | Posted by eberly at

Roughly 1 week ago there was a headline up right here on this site about Tim Robins' "bastard children", were you the one who posted that?

Also, isn't Bristol the head of the national abstinance for teens who had unprotected sex and got knocked up or some shit like that? I remember seeing her all over the news talking about that a few months ago.

I love the way you people think. See, they are allowed to be on the tee vee machine when it suits them and only when it's something positive, even though it might not make any sense at all to anyone with half of a fucking brain. As soon as it's bad news we all ought to be ashamed of ourselves for even daring to mention it.

www.google.com

They have no one to blame but themselves.

Roughly 1 week ago there was a headline up right here on this site about Tim Robins' "bastard children", were you the one who posted that?


no. but that relates to his divorce, not the divorce of one of his children.

I love the way you people think.

"you people"?

do you even know what you are saying?

I'm not saying this should be ignored but, again, at 7:30 AM on MSNBC?

what bullshit.

Keep obsessing Nogov.....

......nobody is noticing.......

LOL

#11 | Posted by eberly at

We only do it because we are scared of her, seriously.

Like I said, only when they feel like it and only when it's good news. Any other time and SARAH'S fan base will throw a tantrum.

Like I said, only when they feel like it and only when it's good news. Any other time and SARAH'S fan base will throw a tantrum.


As I said, I am not a Sarah fan and the RNC is fucking nuts for ever recognizing her in the first place and I have no sympathy for her.

but her kids, despite being on stage, was not their idea and it is disheartening to see them plastered in the media.

-it is disheartening to see them plastered in the media.

I agree. Sarah should stop using them that way.

You are a LIAR!

www.google.com

So someone who went on a national talk show/news show tour didn't want to be "plastered in the media"?

You can not go on every news show who will allow you on to talk about whatever whack job idea you have and then say you want to be left alone by the media. It is NOT the same thing, it's not even close.

was not their idea and it is disheartening to see them plastered in the media.

#13 | Posted by eberly

www.zimbio.com

Here she is on the cover of People. I'm sure she abducted, drugged, and forced to pose for that picture, since none of it was her idea.

So someone who went on a national talk show/news show tour didn't want to be "plastered in the media"?

yes. people want to have their cake and eat it too.

NOgov, just stick to your issue of gays and adoption (which is why you posted this thread).

If you feel it necessary to post another Palin thread claiming they deserve it then be my guest.

Fred Phelps can turn any issue into his hate of homosexuals...I guess you can try the same thing except in reverse.

I still can't quite see how attacking the daughter of Sarah Palin is so much fun for liberals. It strikes me how they get so much enjoyment out of an out of wedlock child in which both parents are irresponsible. I understand your desire to see Sarah Palin crushed after she stood up to the Messiah, but this is not about Sarah - this is about her daughter. With all the Lib gladhanding about 'women's rights' and 'breaking the glass ceiling', it is strange to see how happy you all seem to be trying to destroy a strong, successful woman.

With that said, I think Palin is a turd because I think the "women's rights" movement is pure bullshit that is tearing down the country. I would much rather see no out of wedlock children and all households be 2 parent households (with the man working and the woman staying at home to raise children). So, if that is what the Libs want, I can see their point in tearing down Sarah - but, I doubt that is the case....

#19

Jew basher, holocaust denier. Check

Racebaiter extraordinaire. Check.

Malingering misogynist. Check.


as far as the hypocrisy goes....keep spinning on that.

This is an extension of the hypocrisy that has been ever present in Palin's background since she was unfortunately introduced to us on the national stage.

The problem is that instead of admitting it and moving on, Palin has kept on the moral-high road path and has tried to roll over this little problem with all sorts of ploys and justifications.

2 parent households (with the man working and the woman staying at home to raise children).

awwwww how quaint.

Are you one of those guys who gets pissed off when their wife makes more than them?

Jew basher, holocaust denier. Check Nope, I am neither.

Racebaiter extraordinaire. Check. Nope, I just accept that fact that there are differences between the races as backed by scientific evidence. You choose to base your reality on what 'feels good' vs. what has been demonstrated by every cross sectional study of IQ. If someone is 4'5" tall, do you spend all of your money trying to make the person into the world greatest high jumper or do you instead, spend your money on finding that person a profession where they can succeed and contribute to mankind? Your drug addled liberal mind seems to think that if the government spends enough money, you can make that person into world greatest high jumper - and hell, you can always handicap those that aren't 4'5" to make it 'fair' if you fail.

Malingering misogynist. Check. Nope, I just accept that 6 billion years of evolution has made the genders specialize differently. As a male, I can not nurse a child and no government law or PC movement will make my breasts produce milk. I accept that reality and cede that women are more fit for that activity. You seem to think the liberal BS that has been preached at our universities over the last 40 years is better than what evolution has produced over 6 billion. The soaring divorce, incarceration, drug addiction rates in addition to the falling standard of living say that you are wrong.

awwwww how quaint.

Are you one of those guys who gets pissed off when their wife makes more than them?

Never had that problem as I make more than my wife. Why do you feel so compelled to have women in the workforce? Do you hate women so much that you would rather see them suffer and struggle with the same career related crap men do? Or is it that you value your chinese imported plastic crap more than you do the time your children would spend with a parent?


I just accept that 6 billion years of evolution has made the genders specialize differently.

LOL what an idiot.

You're comparing breast feeding (biological process) with women as homemakers (social process)? You see why those are apples and baseballs right?

You seem to think the liberal BS that has been preached at our universities over the last 40 years is better than what evolution has produced over 6 billion.

Given your poor reasoning skills, I'd guess you haven't actually been to a university to obtain anecdotal information.

The soaring divorce, incarceration, drug addiction rates in addition to the falling standard of living say that you are wrong.

Yes, all of that because women work. LOL

Never had that problem as I make more than my wife.

How much of that is your doing?

Why do you feel so compelled to have women in the workforce?

Because they are just as capable as men in many fields and often have made significant contributions.

Why are you compelled to exclude them?

Do you hate women so much that you would rather see them suffer and struggle with the same career related crap men do? Or is it that you value your chinese imported plastic crap more than you do the time your children would spend with a parent?

LOL man you are one patronizing fuck.

And no, I don't value plastic Chinese crap, period. I prefer not to buy it.

However, I see that situations differ and many women can work (don't have children) or can balance work and family.

You're comparing breast feeding (biological process) with women as homemakers (social process)? You see why those are apples and baseballs right?

You are an idiot. Motherhood is not 100% breastfeeding and I was just providing one example of the millions that show a woman is better equiped to raising children than a man. If you can not understand that I was just providing a single example, then you are stupid to the point that you should just stop reading this post now.

Given your poor reasoning skills, I'd guess you haven't actually been to a university to obtain anecdotal information.

Actually, I have a both undergrad and graduate degrees from 2 top 10 US universities - very liberal ones at that.

Never had that problem as I make more than my wife.

How much of that is your doing?

100% is my doing - I worked very hard and succeeded as a result. I know the concept of hard work is foreign to the drug addled liberal mind. However, if you actually get off your dead ass and stop waiting for the government to give you a handout, it is still possible to make something of yourself in this world.

Why do you feel so compelled to have women in the workforce?

Because they are just as capable as men in many fields and often have made significant contributions.

Just because someone is physically capable of doing something does not mean that they should do it. Hell, you are capable of lighting yourself on fire, but I would advise against it. Further, the negative effects of women in the workforce (lower wages for all workers, family instablity, etc) far outweigh the positives. I would liken it to Walmart - while the prices seem low at first, the societal costs make the products uncompetitive to the point that the store simply should not exist.

However, I see that situations differ and many women can work (don't have children) or can balance work and family.

There is no such thing as 'balancing' work and family. If you truly love your kids and would do 'anything' for them, you would not work and spend your time with them. Tell me honestly - are children better off spending time with their parents or at daycare? The reason why people put their kids in daycare is because they are too selfish to truly sacrafice for their children - and their children and society suffers as a result.

#24 | Posted by goodlittlenazi

Some people's kids are such idiots!

Some people's kids are such idiots!

If calling me an idiot makes you feel better about your selfish decision not to raise your children then you are more than welcome to do it. I hope you got full enjoyment out of that imported chinese crap that you just 'had' to have....

......nobody is noticing.......

LOL

#11 | Posted by eberly at 2009-12-30 09:57 AM | Reply | Flag

He SURE got your attention.........

3 | Posted by eberly
6 | Posted by eberly
#7 | Posted by eberly
#10 | Posted by eberly
#11 | Posted by eberly
#13 | Posted by eberly
#19 | Posted by eberly

Thanks for NOT noticing?

Frank

you missed the satire in that obviously.

libtards are always insisting they have a sense of humor.

liars

#29 | Posted by eberly at 2009-12-30 03:21 PM | Reply | Flag:Pretending to know about "Sense of Humor"-and FAILING......

If you can not understand that I was just providing a single example, then you are stupid to the point that you should just stop reading this post now.

I understand full well it was a single example. However, (evidently your reading comprehension sucks) it was a shitty example and one meant to support your position given it is a biological not a societal function.

Actually, I have a both undergrad and graduate degrees from 2 top 10 US universities - very liberal ones at that.

Of course, just like everyone else on the internet.

100% is my doing - I worked very hard and succeeded as a result. I know the concept of hard work is foreign to the drug addled liberal mind. However, if you actually get off your dead ass and stop waiting for the government to give you a handout, it is still possible to make something of yourself in this world.

LOL strong statement to make considering you don't know me.

You seem rather full of yourself and your opinions, despite that fact that you seem like a complete idiot.

There is no such thing as 'balancing' work and family. If you truly love your kids and would do 'anything' for them, you would not work and spend your time with them. Tell me honestly - are children better off spending time with their parents or at daycare? The reason why people put their kids in daycare is because they are too selfish to truly sacrafice for their children - and their children and society suffers as a result.

Like I said, full of yourself and your opinions.

I know a lot of people who grew up with both parents working and they are extremely successful.

#26 | Posted by goodlittlenazi

Must have hit a nerve...lol

#1 | Posted by NoGov4Me

Not sure what gay marriage has to do with anything in this situation??

Adoption is always better than abortion.

And they have a child and want some stability.

They head off to mediation anyway to sort this all out.

Most courts order mediation to come up with visitation and then the judge approves it.

Not sure what gay marriage has to do with anything in this situation??

#33 | Posted by MURPHY at

Isn't the argument against it, one of them, that kids need to have a mother AND a father? Someone who holds that belief and at the same time files papers with the court to shut their child's father out of the kids life is called a __________________.

A. wrist watch
B. chia pet
C. mite thatlives in the band of a shriner's hat
D. hypocrit

A couple of thoughts:

1. Where is Bristol or Sarah attacked in this article. I must have missed it. Well, Levi made a crack--but wouldn't he know?

2. Didn't these people put themselves out there, at least via Gov. Palin (ret.)? Oh, wait, Levi went and posed in Playboy, and he went on Oprah or something, didn't he? Face it, folks, these people are celebrities, and we live in a celebrity-obsessed culture. Even if Sarah Palin disappeared, the others would continue to get coverage for at least a month or so. And even if Sarah dropped her political aspirations, she'd still get attention for a while.

3. Not relevant to this article, but I saw an old Letterman ep last night and he had a pretty funny bash re-editing some Oprah footage. And it occurred to me--people don't make fun of Palin because they hate her or are scared of her; they make fun of her 'cause it's so damned _easy_. Doesn't make it right, but I figure that's why. At least for people like Letterman.

Some people's kids are such idiots!

#25 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-12-30 01:44 PM

goodlittlenazi has some serious issues to contend with. One of which is an education.

With that said, I think Palin is a turd because I think the "women's rights" movement is pure bullshit that is tearing down the country. I would much rather see no out of wedlock children and all households be 2 parent households - I agree

(with the man working and the woman staying at home to raise children).- moron

As a male, I can not nurse a child and no government law or PC movement will make my breasts produce milk.
- wrong hormone injections is all it takes. - moron

If you truly love your kids and would do 'anything' for them, you would not work and spend your time with them. Tell me honestly - are children better off spending time with their parents or at daycare? The reason why people put their kids in daycare is because they are too selfish to truly sacrafice for their children - and their children and society suffers as a result.
Both parents working is a sacrifice for the children to give them a better life than the parents had - moron

Just so you know nazi...I raised my 2 kids by myself from the time they were 2 and 3 respectively. They are successful, have families of their own, and best I can tell, love me very much and hate narrow-minded morons like you. Oh between the 2 of them I now have 8 grand children. Not a bad life for a man to play the father/mother roll. I would recommend you try it but not so sure that would be a good idea in your case.


Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable