Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Vice President Joe Biden said that the Senate handed the president a big victory by moving forward with debate on sweeping legislation to overhaul the nation's health care system. "Tonight we have more momentum than we've ever had in the history of health care discussions," Biden told a group of Iowa Democrats. "Those who voted for reform with be rewarded and those who voted against it will be held accountable."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

GOOD DEAL

Why I Voted NO
by Dennis Kucinich

But instead of working toward the elimination of for-profit insurance, H.R. 3962 would put the government in the role of accelerating the privatization of health care. In H.R. 3962, the government is requiring at least 21 million Americans to buy private health insurance from the very industry that causes costs to be so high, which will result in at least $70 billion in new annual revenue, much of which is coming from taxpayers. This inevitably will lead to even more costs, more subsidies, and higher profits for insurance companies - a bailout under a blue cross.

www.commondreams.org

Guess we'll see how the Senate version turns out.

Re: Why I voted No

If Republicans spoke this way about the issue instead of making ideological over generalizations and mischaracterizations.... well, I can dream can't I?

#3 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-22 06:02 PM | Flag: Keep Dreamin™

Superscript?

I thought that stuff got stripped out?

I guess my point was that we'd have a much more honest and open debate.

is that possible? perhaps I've become too cynical

The bill was written by the Insurance Industry. Therefore it is business as usual.

Those who voted for reform will be rewarded, with a pink slip come election...

Re: Why I voted No

If Republicans spoke this way about the issue instead of making ideological over generalizations and mischaracterizations.... well, I can dream can't I?

Yeah no shit. Why is the party of alleged fiscal conservatives so silent about health care economics?

The never say "You know, we spend 17% of our GDP on health care, other modern nations about 10%. They must be doing something better than us. Oh look they all have single payer. Hmmm, well I'm ideologically opposed to socialism, but I can't argue with these real-world cost savings."

How many, like LA's Mary Landrieu, can simply be called whores for blatantly selling their vote? There isn't so much a desire for health care reform as there is a money grab from brain-dead Democrats bent on increasing their own power. Never has there been such an over wrought cry of emergency that was in reality a power and money march to destruction. But crap, go ahead and pass the damn thing, I'll plan ahead and make sure I'm ready for the crash of a lifetime.

But crap, go ahead and pass the damn thing, I'll plan ahead and make sure I'm ready for the crash of a lifetime.

Republicans said very similar things about Social Security and Medicare.

Those who voted for reform with be rewarded and those who voted against it will be held accountable."

What????

Your going to penalize states where senator's disagreed Biden??

You one baaaaad muthafucka there mister veeeep!!!!!!!!!!

I guess my point was that we'd have a much more honest and open debate.

#6 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-22 06:27 PM | Flag: Keep Dreamin'™

BTW, not superscript, just a special char

& t r a d e ;

So there are 40 pieces of shit that voted solely to deal a defeat to a political party with ABSOLUTELY ZERO CONCERN for what the majority of their constituents want.

2010 is the start of a blood bath. A third of these scum will be shown the door. With extreme prejudice.

RIP Republicans. You will never have a majority anywhere other than a klan meeting. EVER.

"Republicans said very similar things about Social Security and Medicare"

And they were correct. These entitlement programs are mismanaged, misapplied, and BROKE!

Yeah, just what we need, another behemoth of a social program that costs more than they said it would, accomplishes less than they said it would, and adds another stone around the neck of he average American.

I hope the senate kills this piece of shit legislation deader than last week...

The blood bath will be on the LEFT side of the aisle. Reid, Pilosi, and the rest of the lefty loonies that are spending my great grand-children's money will be run out on a rail in '10.

The GOP doesn't get it. This should trouble them:

APPROVE/DISAPPROVE/NOT SURE/CHANGE FROM LAST WEEK

PELOSI:
40 (39) 51 (52) 9 (9) 2
REID:
32 (32) 58 (57) 10 (11) -1
McCONNELL:
14 (15) 68 (67) 18 (18) -2
BOEHNER:
13 (14) 65 (65) 22 (21) -1

CONGRESSIONAL DEMS: 42 (41) 53 (52) 5 (7) 0
CONGRESSIONAL GOPS: 13 (14) 71 (71) 16 (15) -1

DEMOCRATIC PARTY: 44 (43) 50 (49) 6 (8) 0
REPUBLICAN PARTY: 23 (22) 67 (67) 10 (11) 1

It's beginning to look to me like the stone walling of the Republicans is going to make Kuchinich sound like the only one left with the truth of the matter. This BS of a bill is an outright scam without a public option, better yet a single payer system like Obama understood was the only salvation of the terrible mess the private insurance companies have made of the American system of pain makes for profit. Thanks a load you cockroaches on the right. May you all rot in hell next time it is your turn to get decent medical care. You tea baggers really worked hard to screw up health care reform. Just don't even try and blame Obama.

Hopefully we get a little bit of what we want this time. Each Dem administration we inch closer and eventually we get single payer.

ringmasterbater wrote,

"This BS of a bill is an outright scam without a public option, better yet a single payer system like Obama understood was the only salvation of the terrible mess the private insurance companies have made of the American system of pain makes for profit.

Please explain how the insurance industry which makes an average profit of 2.2% caused the problems with the health care system?


Thanks a load you cockroaches on the right. May you all rot in hell next time it is your turn to get decent medical care. You tea baggers really worked hard to screw up health care reform. Just don't even try and blame Obama."

Conservatives democrats are the ones standing in the way of this bill not republicans. Democrats have 60 in the senate enough to pass anything they want. Obama's bullshit bill which will socialize health care and bankrupt our economy is the problem. Its going to gut Medicare and leave seniors in a more vulnerable state than they already are now. How can any democrat possible support ripping 500 billions dollars from Medicare?

How can you hate insurance companies when they reimburse hospitals at a higher rate than government medicare and they cover more procedure with a lower denial of coverage rate.

Axe wrote,

"2010 is the start of a blood bath. A third of these scum will be shown the door. With extreme prejudice.


RIP Republicans. You will never have a majority anywhere other than a klan meeting. EVER."


You were obviously out of the country for the most recent elections. We kicked your liberal ass in both Virginia and New Jersey. Yes NEW JERSEY, land of liberal cocksuckers. Yes, even they said fuck the democrats and kiss our ass Obama. Obama's 5 trips there before the election didn't mean shit.

I suspect liberal outrage will have to go back in the closet in November of 2010.

You will never have a majority anywhere other than a klan meeting. EVER.

What evidence do you have that the political pendulum has stopped swinging for the first time EVER in American history? Less than one year of a loser in the White House who has yet to accomplish anything of note? LOL. You are craziliy and stupdliy optimisitic, axe. Get a grip on reality, son.

Since government subsidies and insurance protections don't start until 2013 under the House bill and 2014 in the Senate version, both bills would set aside $5 billion to provide insurance for people who can't get coverage now because of health problems. But the budget office estimates that the money would be used up before the end of 2011.

so where will the rest come from?

For the last couple of months, rwrs have been telling us how Obama will never pass healthcare legislation and it will be his "waterloo".
And I kept saying:

It ain't over til it's over.
Yogi Berra


Now, that it's obviously going to pass, and their repug reps stonewalled it, rwrs are saying it's not good enough. LOL


Whatever bill the senate comes up with will have to be compromised with the house bill.

It ain't over til it's over.
Yogi Berra

RIP Republicans. You will never have a majority anywhere other than a klan meeting. EVER.

#15 | Posted by axe

And you will NEVER know freedom.

"Republicans said very similar things about Social Security and Medicare."

Anyone here planning on relying on Social Security for their retirement? Anyone? How many wish to volunteer for Medicare? Anyone. If both are so great, why have so many alternatives been created? Anyone relying on the government to provide for them in their old age will get exactly what they deserve.

"Just don't even try and blame Obama"

If Obama would actually do something other than spend huge volumes of money the country doesn't have, then maybe I would support him. But adding trillions of more in government run health care, when the government couldn't run a lemonade stand and break even in Grand Central Station, I'm hardly supportive of its running health care. Manipulation of figures to make the cost seem less than a trillion is nothing less than fraud. 10 years of taxes and cuts but only 6 years of spending? What happens when there's 10 years of actual spending? Absolute fraud on the citizens.

"So there are 40 pieces of shit that voted solely to deal a defeat to a political party with ABSOLUTELY ZERO CONCERN for what the majority of their constituents want."


Just 38% of voters now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That's the lowest level of support measured for the plan in nearly two dozen tracking polls conducted since June. - Rasmussen Reports

I guess the poster meant 60 pieces of shit, rather than 40. Simple typo, I will assume.

Anyone relying on the government to provide for them in their old age will get exactly what they deserve.

like it or not, most people will never have enough respect of this problem to change their lives so they aren't relying on the government for everything.

spending habits
poor life choices
etc..

of course, some will have circumstances outside of their control that will force this problem too.

"You were obviously out of the country for the most recent elections. We kicked your liberal ass in both Virginia and New Jersey. Yes NEW JERSEY, land of liberal cocksuckers. Yes, even they said fuck the democrats and kiss our ass Obama. Obama's 5 trips there before the election didn't mean shit."

Not to sidetrack this thread, but this is obviously spoken by someone who has never been to NJ in their life. NJ has been and always will be a deep purple state. Outside of the Manhattan professionals that live there, NJ is mostly composed of Morally VERY conservitive and politically moderately conservative Italian families with a large amount of asians, such as Koreans (they even have a dedicated Korean station in NJ), who also happen to be extremely conservative as well. You get out of Newark and Trenton, and the entire state is basically one massive suburbia where everyone has massive homes, big cars and trucks, and churches everwhere, many with big "NO ABORTION" signs on them. They are mostly working class, doing jobs like plumbing, contracting, etc. They just happen to make good money because they work in the city.

The fact that Corzine lost really means nothing. Nothing. He had 30% aproval before obama touched im, he had 45% of the vote when he lost. The mere fact that obama sided with him gave him a 50% boost in popularity. That is how popular obama is in NJ. But in most local and state elections, its a mix of conservatives and libs; the state as a whole just happened to take aliking to obama.

The fact is, the one true test was the NY 23, where tea-baggers and the anti-RINO crowd managed to lose themself a seat that hadn't seen a dem in 100 years. The fact that a rich, out of rouch ibanker who happens to be governor during the worst economic era in the last 80 years lost an election he went into with a 30% approval rating should not be surprising, its just business as usual.

The dems have a plan that is so good that they had to give the senator from Louisiana 100 million pieces of silver to put party over country.

To the contrary, our COUNTRY voted in Nov 08 for a platform of healthcare reform.....it is the repugs who refuse to understand what is in the best interests of their constituents.....oh, wait, repug constituents ARE the healthcare/pharma corps......and not the PEOPLE of the USA....

Nevermind

They did but.......... they gave it to the American tax payer in the ass without any ky.

#33, then riddle me this, Batman, why does Harry Reid have to bribe other Senators just to get enough votes to get the bill to debate? Why do only 38% of "PEOPLE" support the bill? Why do they have to play with the costs - 10 years of taxes and cuts but only 6 years of spending = almost 900 B? Everyone wants health care reform, duh, but they don't want this governmental tax, cut, and kill bill.

The truth is they arn't reforming helthcare. They are taking it over to mess up like every other government program in existance. Including the two that are required by the constitution. Military and Post Office. The country is bankruped and China is holding the morguage.

Even Biden knows that this "victory" is Obama's. Nobody else's.

38%, and still falling.

Riddle you back "JIM"

Why do you hate the American system of govt and want to change it and/or destroy it? I'm thinking of Grover Norquist's bathtub quotation.....are you familiar with it?

Every bill ever passed has had some compromise.

Many senators are beholding to healthcare/pharma corps for election money. Dems and Repugs, eh?

btw, Bribery is paying someone to do a bad/wrong thing. Positive reinforcement is paying someone to do the right/good thing.

I know that's difficult for lock step, all on the same page, same ideology folks like rw neocon supporters, but the rest of the country.....which is a significant amount of people considering how many have defected from the repug party thanks to failed neocon policies AND how many never even bother to vote......the rest of the country believe in individual thought and freedoms, not those prescribed by a particular ideology only.

When all think alike, no one thinks very much. Albert Einstein


btw, I find the faux outrage at providing healthcare for all Americans for less than a trillion humorous, considering their support of unnecessary invasions/occupations that cost 2 TRILLION and counting......and that money did NOTHING for any Americans, except for giant global war/oil corporations.......and simultaneous tax cuts for the richest 1%, who don't need them....(141,000 people who average $7.4 million a year income)



Republicans are screwed. Say what you will about President Obama. He's doing better than Reagan was with a milder recession than we're in right now. Republican party ID is in the basement. Party of "NO!", and nothing more. After W it'll be decades before the GOP can hope to crawl out of their holes.

Thanks to the GOP the whole country is in a hell of a mess and ass deep in debt. You think America has THAT short a memory?

Guess again.

The country is bankruped and China is holding the morguage.

#36 | POSTED BY SNIPER AT 2009-11-23 12:33 PM


Again, where was your outrage for the last 8 years?


What has gone unnoticed over the past two and a half years is the Bush Administration and the Republican Congress ignoring that its
fiscal policies have resulted in a colossal increase in the federal debt.
Increased interest payments mean higher taxes on Americans next year and every year thereafter, but this reckless increase in federal debt has also exposed a very troubling aspect of the Administration's budget plan passed by a Republican House and Senate --Asian countries are purchasing our debt in record amounts, with China registering the most rapid increase.

These developments not only adversely impact our economy, but leave our country susceptible to a potential national security threat. According to the Treasury Department, major foreign holdings of U.S. Treasury securities total $1.38 trillion. Over the first seven months of 2003, Mainland China and Hong
Kong have accumulated $177 billion of U.S. debt.

Currently, China is the world's secondlargest buyer, exceeded only by Japan. Furthermore, China's purchases of U.S. government
securities rose 20% over the first half of this year and have exploded by more than 105% since the beginning of 2001.

This situation is dangerous because it is how the Bush Administration is in part funding the federal government by selling our debt to the Chinese.

Rep. John Tanner, D-Union City (blue dog dem)

answers.yahoo.com

btw, Bribery is paying someone to do a bad/wrong thing. Positive reinforcement is paying someone to do the right/good thing.


LOL

That is a new one.

In any case, you need to read the definition of "bribery" and see if it says "bad/wrong thing".


legal-
dictionary.thefreedictionary.c
om


But who knows, maybe that satisfies the definition of bribery in the 3rd world country your live in.
BTW, how long have you not lived in the US?

wok, our form of government that was laid out in the constitution dosen't exist anymore. If the framers came back they would organize another revolution against an opressive government that is FAIR to none.

Our original for of government died a quick death at the end of the Civil War under the ultimate 'big government' president lincoln. That is when state lost their rights and the feds took over.

"Why do you hate the American system of govt and want to change it and/or destroy it? " - What kind of idiocy is that? Never said any such thing. But I'm not sure that bribing other senators with perks and pork is the "American system." Neither do I believe senators and representatives completely ignoring their constituents, tea parties or no, is part of the "American system." Do you?

"Bribery is paying someone to do a bad/wrong thing. Positive reinforcement is paying someone to do the right/good thing." - Absolute bullshit. Right/Wrong is purely subjective, unless there is a legal component. Bribery is getting someone to do something you want them to do by giving them consideration that they likely would not do otherwise. Senators holding out until Biden gives them something are either whores or being bribed. Your choice.

"providing healthcare for all Americans for less than a trillion" - more bullshit. It's not less than a trillion, try thinking a bit more deeply. 10 years of taxes and cuts, but only 6 years of spending. What happens when there's a full 10 years of spending.

"unnecessary invasions/occupations " - even more bullshit. Dems love this argument, as if had we not spend that money it would have been used elsewhere. Anyone who actually thinks this knows nothing about who government works. The conservative argument against government-run health care lies with governmental power and excess taxes for reduces services, not with a pure economic cost. Again, try looking a little deeper than moveon.org talking points.

Eb, are you sure that isn't the "freeper" dictionary? LOL



Isn't using positive reinforcement to strengthen behavior the same as bribery?

Absolutely NOT!

The dictionary definition of bribe is "Something, such as money, offered or given to induce or influence a person to act dishonestly." As such, other than situations in which a positively reinforced behavior is dishonest or illegal, eg one parent giving money to the child to hide something from the other parent, positive reinforcement cannot be termed bribery.

We live in a society where using positive reinforcement to motivate children is less familiar than using punishment and other methods of aversive control. Therefore, when someone proposes using positive reinforcement in a context where punishment is typically used, there is a tendency to compare positive reinforcement to bribery.

www.growingwell.com


The difference between rewards and bribes
A reward is something that you give your child after a behavior is completed. The reward should be fair. It should not be too big or too little. A reward is something that fits the behavior.

A bribe is different, though. It is something that you promise your child before he completes the behavior, but it is not part of a plan. It is also something that is big and valuable and does not fit the behavior. In general, it is better to give your child a
reward rather than a bribe.

Sources:
Keep Kids Healthy (2003). Discipline
Guide. Retrieved November 2003
from www.keepkidshealthy.com
parenting_tips/discipline/
BBCi Parenting Site. Changing
Discipline. Retrieved November 2003
from www.bbc.co.uk


Our govt is of, by and for the PEOPLE.


The people have spoken Nov 8, 2008


Live with it.

Get over it.


Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

Our original for of government died a quick death at the end of the Civil War under the ultimate 'big government' president lincoln. That is when state lost their rights and the feds took over.

#42 | POSTED BY SNIPER AT 2009-11-23 12:45 PM

I see.
Those damned republicans, eh? LMFAO
How dare Lincoln end slavery, eh?


Why don't you and your 20% group of American govt haters SECEDE and begin your own fkn govt in Wyoming or Montana or off shore with those giant global war/oil/pharma/health corporations you love so fkn much?

Bribe:

Marriam-Webster (online):
1 : money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust
2 : something that serves to induce or influence

Dictionary.com
money or any other valuable consideration given or promised with a view to corrupting the behavior of a person, esp. in that person's performance as an athlete, public official, etc.:
2. anything given or serving to persuade or induce:

Nobody told sniper that if it wasn't for Lincoln he would be living in a slave state run by the Mexicans Texas was stolen from.

Reid gave concessions to other senators in order to get them to vote in favor of moving the bill forward. This is not positive reinforcement. Positive reinforcement comes after someone does what they were supposed to do in the first place. No doubt many of the voting senators and representatives will get first hand experience of negative reinforcement come next fall.

Woke,

you display your increased level of delusion more every day here.

you are so fucked up in the head you can't even accept what bribery really is because of your deep seeded ideology.

Repubs = bribed
dems = reinforced to do good.

I fucking love it!!!!!!

How can you hate insurance companies when they reimburse hospitals at a higher rate than government medicare and they cover more procedure with a lower denial of coverage rate.

Dude, you really are one stupid hick. Besides being a toilet mouth like most pubbies, you actually think 40 million uninsured Americans is a better plan then universal health care. You should be the poster boy for the terminally ill and homeless. With any luck you will be someday.

Why don't you and your 20% group of American govt haters SECEDE and begin your own fkn govt in Wyoming or Montana or off shore with those giant global war/oil/pharma/health corporations you love so fkn much?

maybe they could just quit and give up and move to a 3rd world shithole and sit on their fatass all day long and blog about how much they hate America.

Lincoln had nothing to do with Texas independence (1836), and nothing to do with it's entrance into statehood (1845). "Stolen" seems a strong word, I guess this would include practically every country and region in the world. Did Russia steal Alaska from the natives? Did Spain, France, Portugal, Great Britain, and other European nations steal the entirety of the New World? Or was all this simply the culmination of millennia of anthropological migration of various peoples across the world?

The people have spoken Nov 8, 2008. Live with it.
Get over it. Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

#44 | Posted by woke

Ehat the people did that day was have a reaction against Bush that was agressavly fanned by the madstream media. It was not a vote for socalism. The little o campainged on change without saying what that was. He campainged on transparency which has yet to happen. He is ruling us and driving us into socalism and bankrupcy so fast that very few realize what is happening.

This will change in Nov. 2010 unless he buys enough votes from people on the dole to get re-elected. 40% of the people in this great country pay no INCOME taxes at all. They should not get to vote because they have no skin in the game.

Get over it. Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

#44 | Posted by woke

Hey Dumbass....

The 'People' are still speaking....

From Rasmussen Reports

Just 38% of voters now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That's the lowest level of support measured for the plan in nearly two dozen tracking polls conducted since June.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 56% now oppose the plan.


Welcome to 2009 sport...
.

Bribery = AMA's support in exchange for "Doctor Fix"
Bribery = AARP's support in exchange for no more Medicare Advantage


Hey Dumbass....
The 'People' are still speaking....
From Rasmussen Reports

Welcome to 2009 sport...


#54 | POSTED BY 2008ATL AT 2009-11-23 01:24 PM


Tell you what, "sport".....when a ratsmelly poll means more than our election results, get back to me.....

Welcome to 2009, 2010, 2011......LOL.

Sniper


So, if election day was a referendum on bushco and the failed neocon policies of the last 8 years (actually nearly 40, dating back to nixon), then tell us, WHY has your failed party not adopted some new ideas?

GOP=Status Quo/Stay the Course


Sorry, not good enough after the total abject failures of those policies.

#56 | Posted by woke at 2009-11-23 02:12 PM |


ROFL!!!


Yeah Right Champ....


Thanks to your boy Hussein and his cronies in Congress and the arrogant fashion in which they ignore the will of the people 2010 should be a Fantastic year......


Who knew the libtards would implode so quickly

Too Funny
.

I agree with Timex' statement above. The GOP just doesn't get it. Maybe they have been spending too much time listening to rightwing pundits, and actually believet that most Americans oppose health care reform. If that is their belief, it will cost them dearly.

B.O. won the election with Smoke and Mirrors (hope and change, whatever) that has yet to materialize.

There is still no transparency, spending is still out of control, partisanship is the rule of the day, and he has tried everything to demonize and marginalize dissent. Polar opposite of his stated missions.

Presidency "by committee" with the expressed wish not to "offend" anyone has proven to be a massive failure.

While a majority of Americans agree that there needs to be something done about health care in this country, there is no clear consensus about what the solution should be. Unfortunately for the Dems in power, it seems as if the nation lacks the stomach for the liberal attitude of "a trillion here and a trillion there" as if all of this money they are spending will not be flayed from our backs in the end.

These FACTS seem to indicate that the Dems are poised for major losses in the next election cycle.

This era in our history will be reviled in hindsight, if we survive as a nation.

"Those who voted for reform with be rewarded and those who voted against it will be held accountable."

Is the reward still set at $300M or will it go up?

SoRRY JOE

but you have to be wrong...dems all day long yesterday and today are still saying that this was just a 'proceedural' vote when in fact well over 70% I believe I read of bills getting this far are passed.

How dare Lincoln end slavery, eh?

#45 | Posted by woke

That was a side issue. The real issue that started the Civil War was states rights. Do you realy want to know what lincoln thought about slavery? Read on.
The relative unimportance of slavery as a cause for war was made clear by Lincoln himself during his campaign for the Presidency in 1860, and he repeated that message in his first inaugural address:

"Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States that by the accession of a Republican administration then- property and their peace and personal security are to be ndangered.... I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

Even after the outbreak of war in 1861, Lincoln confirmed his previous stand. He declared:

"My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could do it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that."

It may come as a surprise to learn that, by strict definition, Abraham Lincoln was a white supremacist. In his fourth debate with Senator Stephen Douglas, he addressed the subject bluntly:

"I am not nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black racesthat I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."
Thoes are the words of the great lincoln on slavery. Do you still love him?

While Lincoln does remain my favorite president, it is important to note that he did not declare the Emancipation Proclamation because he was morally opposed to slavery, but because it would have a major economic impact to the South. Arguably it had no impact at all. It was directed only to those states in rebellion, so did nothing to border states that remained "loyal." Of course those states in rebellion weren't particularly interested in following Lincoln's orders. Slavery was not ended by Lincoln, or even during his administration.

Sniper

States rights?

Repugs are for state's rights?

Not when their legacy candydate gets APPOINTED by his daddy's scotus cronys after they stopped a legal recount approved by a STATE supreme court, eh?


It is what it is.

A govt OF, BY, and FOR the people. It's a FEDERAL GOVT.

If you don't like what it is, try forming a party to change it.

The repugs had control of scotus, potus and congress for 6 years, ....how'd all that work out for us?

Got anything NEW, besides those same FAILED policies?

Repugs=What a bunch of whiny asses......

Even after aWol allowed 911 to occur on his watch, 90% of Americans rallied behind him, until he invaded/occupied a country that didn't attack us and didn't respond to katrina victims for 5 days........

At least get behind the potus that inherited his foreign and economic policy disasters until he fails...


GOP=party over country....

WOKE, you misunderstand the Supreme Court Decision in 2000. The Supreme Court decision was specifically made in order to maintain state's rights. There is no such thing as a "national" election, each state must hold its own election, according to its own laws. If an election has national ramifications, such as the presidential election, the Supreme Court may be utilized to ensure that the states are following their own laws. [there was no argument or indication that there was any unconstitutional issues present] All the Supreme Court did was to decide that Florida had to follow its own rules. That seems to be the essence of states rights, doesn't it?

GOP=party over country....

#65 | Posted by woke


and oh, yeah, if you got nuthin new to say, stfu...eh?

#62 | Posted by woke at 2009-11-03 04:00 PM |

Good advice. Take it, hypocrite, eh? LOL

"A govt OF, BY, and FOR the people. It's a FEDERAL GOVT."

Another typical misunderstanding of the federal government. A "federal" government is one that has separation between the national government and individual state governments. Both federal governments and national governments (think GB or France) are in theory "OF, BY, and FOR the people." What's been happening in our government is an erosion of the separation between the national government and the state governments. No Child Left Behind is an excellent example, as well as many other unfunded mandates.

I realize you're only really trying to insult republicans and other conservatives, but at least get your facts straight. Maybe try reading a 5th Grade social studies book or something.

Bush's daddy's scotus cronys stopped a legal recount approved by the state of Florida's supreme court.

To pretend that a the FEDERAL court ruled for state's rights in that case is ludicrous.

The state ruled for a recount.

The FED scotus overturned the STATE ruling.


And then a whole bunch of dems began whining and crying on national tv and holding tea parties all over America, whining and crying about losing the election and then when aWol allowed the usa to be attacked on his watch, those dems said, we told you so and demanded he be impeached for incompetence......

Oh, wait, none of that last part happened.....eh?


In fact, 90% of Americans still rallied behind our potus.

(until he screwed the pooch again and again.....iraq, delayed katrina response, outing our own cia ops, torture, etc...)


What has changed?

Are we better off now? Less debt? Decreased terrorist threat?
Still have troops in harm's way?

What has changed is a dem potus and a group of sour grapes, party over country repug/neocon supporters are unable to support our countries potus because of their partisanship.

eh?


At least get behind the potus that inherited his foreign and economic policy disasters until he fails...

#65 | Posted by woke at 2009-11-23 04:24 PM | Reply |


LOL!!!!


What a simple minded dim-wit you are.....


Hussein did not 'Inherit' a thing you idiotic dope.......PrezBo ran for the offfice and knew damn well just what the conditions were sport

BTW he Already is failing.......you're just too fucking stupid to realize it

EH?
.

Considering that the failed neocon repugs still have nothing new, just the same old, same old policies that already failed, same old same old....insults, smears, etc and now that party is busy eating itself up from the inside........welcome to 2009, 2010, 2011.....and beyond, eh?


Every potus since Teddy Roosevelt has given lip service to the need for healthcare assistance and reform for citizens of the USA, and now, finally, we are on the brink of history, as that will soon occur, thanks to Barak Hussein Obama.

Meanwhile, the do nothing repugs did their usual obstructionist, no plan, party of no, schtick......


Hilarious!

70


Stay the course, ATL, stay the course....that's all we heard from you for the last what?, 5 years or so?

deregulate banks, corps, utilities, no oversight, reform welfare and bankruptcy on the poor individuals but never on the corporations, tax breaks for those who avg $7.4 million.....bust the American working people's unions, allow outsourcing, free, not fair trade, let energy corps set policies, let pharma/health corps set policy, off shore tax offices, many giant global corps pay no taxes at all, lie us into unnecessary wars for profit of a few, torture interrogations, indefinite detention, rendition, spying on Americans with on probable cause, double the national debt to 10 TRILLION, out our own cia ops for retribution on having lies outed, attempted politization of justice dept.....harriet miers for scotus......

shall i go on?


Obama's got a long way to go to get anywhere near the bar that your neocon heroes set below sea level, "sport"; you'd be smarter to just stfu, eh?


LMFAO

Barak Hussein Obama
MMM MMM MMM
Barak Hussein Obama
MMM MMM MMM
Barak Hussein Obama
MMM MMM MMM

And the Obamabots continue their messianic obedience to blind government obedience....

And the Obamabots continue their messianic obedience to blind government obedience....


#73 | Posted by SpokaneJim at 2009-11-23 05:26 PM |


Absolutely......


Brain washed pitiable dolts......the entire lot of them
.

Well, that's interesting, because from where I'm standing, you partisan neocon supporters have not waited for Obama to fail, you are cheering for it, wishing for it and screaming it's already occurred, while totally ignoring the fact that your party FAILED miserably for the country and for the republican party.

Either propose some new ideas and not the status quo neocon policies that put us where we are, or get behind some chance for success.

I mean, here you are on a "liberal" blog, still championing the same failed policies and slamming any changes as failures.


Stay the course, right off the cliff, eh?

That your idea of a good plan?


Well, that's interesting, because from where I'm standing, you partisan neocon supporters have not waited for Obama to fail, you are cheering for it, wishing for it and screaming it's already occurred, while totally ignoring the fact that your party FAILED miserably for the country and for the republican party.

What do Bush's past failures have to do with Obama's current ones? Does it seem unusual to you to focus on things we can change instead of the ones we can't?

I see no gain in playing the blame game since we can't change the past. However, we can forge the future, so I think it is just and fitting that we be critical of the Messiah.

Stay the course, right off the cliff, eh?

That your idea of a good plan?

Nope. That is why I am so disappointed Obama is doing it.

Vice President Joe Biden said that the Senate handed the president a big victory


LOL!!

The immigration bill passed with 64 votes to move forward on the debate and didn't pass in the end.

Same with this pos--

Start over!

Blanche and Lieberman will not vote for this.

Nelson says he won't vote for it.

Mary is a tough call since they bribed her with 100M dollars or was it 300M?? It's hard to be a politician ya' know!

Anyway even if they put the trigger amendment in and Snowe votes for it--they are still short.

This bill is a tax bill and what is the percentage who don't like it now??

"Just 38% of voters now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That's the lowest level of support measured for the plan in nearly two dozen tracking polls conducted since June.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 56% now oppose the plan. ""

www.rasmussenreports.com

It won't pass.

No body pays any attention to Joe "foot in mouth" Biden.

He's a joke.

Does it seem unusual to you to focus on things we can change instead of the ones we can't?

not to losers like Wokeback who aren't interesting in anything except bitching about "neocons" rather than focus on real solutions going forward.

Bitching about Bush keeps the faithful foaming at the mouth and diverts their attention from the idiocy being perpetrated by the lefty loonys.

wish we could get them to see Pilosi, Reid, Dodd, Waxmann, etc., for what they really are...

POND SCUM

"Those who voted for reform with be rewarded and those who voted against it will be held accountable."


And herein lies the main problem with our politics today. It's just like they are little kids. If you disagree with someone and vote against them, they seek revenge and want to "get you back". It's an on going playground fight with these guys and they really do act like children. I wish we could fire everyone of them and replace them with people from the ages of 25 to 45.

Every potus since Teddy Roosevelt has given lip service to the need for healthcare assistance and reform for citizens of the USA, and now, finally, we are on the brink of history, as that will soon occur, thanks to Barak Hussein Obama.

Meanwhile, the do nothing repugs did their usual obstructionist, no plan, party of no, schtick......

Hilarious!

#71 | Posted by woke

Please show me where in our constitution government provided healthcare is authorized.I guess that doesn't matter to you.

85


Our constitution allows for taxation to fulfill whatever things the PEOPLE decide.

1. forming a more perfect UNION enables us to come together to collectively bargain>
2. to promote the general WELFARE

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


Now, tell me. WHY do you people HATE the US Constitution and American WORKING people?

Our constitution allows for taxation to fulfill whatever things the PEOPLE decide.

Not on a federal level.

Pick up the document and read it for yourself.


Article 1, Section 8 outlines what the federal government can spend treasury dollars on. To a small extent the 9th, and certainly the 10th ammendments add further clarity. Spending powers not enumerated in the constitution are deferred to the states.

In short, programs like Social Security, were blatantly unconstitutional on a national level, but were viable on a state level.

A lot of ambiguities exist within the constitution, particularly when attempting to apply the ideas fomented within the document to situations that founders couldn't have even envisioned. What astounded me was when I recently re-read the document, the level of clarity and specificity that pertained to the federal government and spending of tax-dollars.

Blah, blah, blah......state's rights=unless the feds stop a legal recount approved by a state supreme court....Blah, blah, blah, we can't provide health insurance for Americans, but we can do it for iraqis, afghanis and the very terrroists who attacked us, Blah, blah, blah, social security is a failure=but if it fails it will be due to reagan/bush/bush RAIDING it's funding......., Blah, blah, blah, we know what the founding fathers believed, Blah, blah, blah.....we know better=except our neocon policies have been overwhelmingly implemented for nearly 40 years and have been total, complete, abject failures.....Blah, blah, blah....listen to us....Blah, blah, blah.


IKE saw the neocons coming, but didn't believe Americans were stupid enough to fall for their bs.....


"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes that you can do these things. Among them are a few Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or businessman from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
Dwight David Eisenhower


I guess he didn't realize they would join forces with the military industrial complex he also warned us about....


In most communities it is illegal to cry "fire" in a crowded assembly. Should it not be considered serious international misconduct to manufacture a general war scare in an effort to achieve local political aims?

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

Only Americans can hurt America.
We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security.

Dwight David Eisenhower


Hopefully, most Americans have woke up from the neocon nightmare.......

We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security.


Funny - given that 3 programs - Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security consume almost 50% of our current budget and look to explode in the next 20 years.

Not on a federal level.


Pick up the document and read it for yourself.


Article 1, Section 8 outlines what the federal government can spend treasury dollars on. To a small extent the 9th, and certainly the 10th ammendments add further clarity. Spending powers not enumerated in the constitution are deferred to the states.


In short, programs like Social Security, were blatantly unconstitutional on a national level, but were viable on a state level.


A lot of ambiguities exist within the constitution, particularly when attempting to apply the ideas fomented within the document to situations that founders couldn't have even envisioned. What astounded me was when I recently re-read the document, the level of clarity and specificity that pertained to the federal government and spending of tax-dollars.

Posted by JeffJ at 2009-11-24 05:38 PM | Reply


You can spew Your garbage until the cows come home and it won't change the facts that You are so very wrong on this. Congress CAN pay for things through taxation that the majority of the people want.

Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 8 - Powers of Congress


The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

continued....................

situations that founders couldn't have even envisioned
Jeff J


Homework for you Jeff J


List ALL the things occurring NOW, that you believe there is no way the founders could have envisioned........telephones to cell phones to nukes......nearly everything has changed in that time.....

let me guess....do you also read the bible LITERALLY only?

Do you understand that throughout the last 230 years, our government has added to and subtracted from the document to make it a living breathing thing that allows our govt to function better than any other country and that it is the of, by and for the PEOPLE who decide?

Wait, maybe you believe some other form of govt is better?
Fascism for instance= preemptive invasions/occupations, nation building, allowing torture interrogation, denigrating dissent, no due process, spying on Americans with no probable cause, claiming you are the only true patriots........

en.wikipedia.org


This narrow view was later overturned in United States v. Butler. There, the Court agreed with Justice Story's construction, holding the power to tax and spend is an independent power; that is, the General Welfare Clause gives Congress power it might not derive anywhere else. However, the Court did limit the power to spending for matters affecting only the national welfare. The Court wrote:

" [T]he [General Welfare] clause confers a power separate and distinct from those later enumerated, is not restricted in meaning by the grant of them, and Congress consequently has a substantive power to tax and to appropriate, limited only by the requirement that it shall be exercised to provide for the general welfare of the United States. It results that the power of Congress to authorize expenditure of public moneys for public purposes is not limited by the direct grants of legislative power found in the Constitution. But the adoption of the broader construction leaves the power to spend subject to limitations. [T]he powers of taxation and appropriation extend only to matters of national, as distinguished from local, welfare. "

The tax imposed in Butler was nevertheless held unconstitutional as a violation of the Tenth Amendment reservation of power to the states.

Shortly after Butler, in Helvering v. Davis,[22] the Supreme Court interpreted the clause even more expansively, conferring upon Congress a plenary power to impose taxes and to spend money for the general welfare subject almost entirely to its own discretion. Even more recently, the Court has included the power to indirectly coerce the states into adopting national standards by threatening to withhold federal funds in South Dakota v. Dole.[15]

Jeff J

Extra credit homework:


Compare those social expenditures and their benefits with spending HALF A BILLION dollars annually for DECADES on unnecessary invasions/occupations and pentagon expenditures....

Let me ask you.....did spending half a billion a year for decades keep us safe?


It damned sure kept a handfull of war/oil profiteers RICH, though didn't it....

Time to anne' up to the taxpaying American working people for a change now......

Buck up boys....

#91 | Posted by woke


Wipe the spittle off your face.

I DO agree that a fair amount of ambiguity exists when it comes to applying the Constituion to modern realities. Having said that, they were remarkably clear when it came to limiting the powers of the federal government to spend tax-dollars.

Shortly after Butler, in Helvering v. Davis,[22] the Supreme Court interpreted the clause even more expansively, conferring upon Congress a plenary power to impose taxes and to spend money for the general welfare subject almost entirely to its own discretion. Even more recently, the Court has included the power to indirectly coerce the states into adopting national standards by threatening to withhold federal funds in South Dakota v. Dole.[15]


And if a contrary opinion were cited by Scalia, your panties would be in a massive knot.

Pick up the text and read it for yourself. The degree of clarity that the founders went into regarding federal spending powers is remarkably clear. In fact, the first 150-years of case-law backs this up.

Your constitutional interpretation is completely dependent upon cherry-picking the text to suit your ideology.

You have to pretend that almost ALL of Section 8 doesn't exist as well as scrubbing away the 9th and 10th ammendments.

It's ridiculous.

Yawwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnn time to go yet again. More of JeffJ's balderdash. Herein lies the rub. Until the Supreme Court reverses itself it's the law of the land buddy. Until then You are just whistling dixie.

Larry

PS got Your email I'll do some googling Jeff and get back to You.

www.google.com

Jeff interprets things in a way that benefits his lies. Everything Jeff says is based on his greed. If Jeff ever gave a shit about his fellow man he wouldn't say what he does but he only cares about his wallet.

Your constitutional interpretation is completely dependent upon cherry-picking the text to suit your ideology.

#94 | POSTED BY JEFFJ AT 2009-11-24 06:11 PM


Ok, then show me where it says your neocon heroes could use my tax money to invade/occupy/destroy a country that never attacked the usa, which just coincidentally also filled (and continues to fill) the coffers of giant, global, oil/war profiteer corporations, one of the biggest of which was directed no bid contracts from the veep who used to be their CEO.

??


No problem for you, eh?

But provide healthcare for 45 million Americans, most of them the WORKING POOR(thanks to the failed policies of the last 8 years) , including 9 million kids, and insure those who are covered are not screwed over by insurance companies, oh, that's just fkn terrible, eh?

WHO THE FK are YOU people??

Mary Landriu may not make the completion of her current term because of her vote. She just had her latest corruption scandal swept under the rug...or so she thought. Her constituents did not want this vote. And truth be told, the $100 mil in bribe money will actually cost the state. As someone who has voted for her in the past, I hope she burns in hell.

100

What's that? Landrieu is a DINO? I didn't know that.


Louisiana lawmakers among earmark leaders

By Associated Press
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 - Updated 258d 6h ago

NEW ORLEANS - Louisiana's U.S. senators added hundreds of millions of dollars in pet projects to the $410 billion spending bill awaiting President Barack Obama's signature, ranking them near the top of the list of lawmakers who placed so-called "earmarks" in the measure, according to a nonpartisan watchdog group.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, a Democrat, ranked second with more than $332 million worth of earmarks in the bill, according to the analysis from Taxpayers for Common Sense. Republican David Vitter ranked fifth, with more than $249.1 million.

www.bostonherald.com


Shore glad those Louisiana folks don't like that federal govt money.......eh? Just think how much fed money they'd gobble up if they were socialists, eh? LOL

Red States Gobble Up Omnibus Earmarks
March 2, 2009 05:11 PM
www.huffingtonpost.com


END red state welfare and pork

END red state welfare and pork

#101 | Posted by woke

So I guess you are in favor of Blue State welfare and pork, eh??

shove your faux outrage Wokeback.

Didn't say that, stalker.

When will you ever begin to speak for yourself instead of trying to misrepresent what is posted by another?

misrepresent my ass. that is an art perfected by you and everybody here knows it.

"speak for myself" is all I do.

We must have government health care....
We must have government health care....
We must have government health care....
We must have government health care....
We must have government health care....
(imagine the walking dead stumbling forward as they near the White House)


And the Obamabot zombie mantra continues....

Until the Supreme Court reverses itself it's the law of the land buddy. Until then You are just whistling dixie.


Larry

#95 | Posted by LarryMohr

I completely agree when it pertains to thoroughly-entrenched policies like Social Security. We, as a society, are so heavily invested in it that if it's constitutionality were questioned now, I would seriously hope that Stare Decisis would reign supreme.

Having said that, the fact that the constitution was flouted before is NOT an excuse, or a floodgate, to continue to flout it now.


Ok, then show me where it says your neocon heroes could use my tax money to invade/occupy/destroy a country that never attacked the usa, which just coincidentally also filled (and continues to fill) the coffers of giant, global, oil/war profiteer corporations, one of the biggest of which was directed no bid contracts from the veep who used to be their CEO.

I'll answer your question once you phrase it as a question, in lieu of assigning a position to me that I haven't necessarily taken.

BWAAAAHHAAHAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAH
AAAA, assign you a position.

Well, let's ask the DR regulars. Did jeff have any problem with invading/occupying/staying the course in iraqnam?


Again, Jeffy

It's perfectly fine, (no tea parties, no complaints, no problem) about "nationbuilding"=(invading/
occupying/destroying/killing/
maiming/displacing hundreds of thousands to the tune of 2 TRILLION and counting), with all that money going into the pockets of giant global war/oil profiteering corporations....

But God forbid any of our tax money might go to help American citizens, most of whom are WORKING poor.....


You are so transparent, eh?

I think Woke would like to see some more entitlement programs. Maybe some Stimulus money thrown to the poor and down trodden. Maybe some free handouts based on skin color. Of course, he won't be required to pull out a pen to write a check, being a 4-Star General, close advisor on Afganistan and all.

Maybe some Stimulus money thrown to the poor and down trodden.

like him.

Actually, it wouldn't help his nasty disposition one single bit. If we threw trillions more at whatever program he wanted, he would still hate at least half of the people in this country.....

Even if GWB signed the checks himself.....

there is no helping someone with issues like Woke's

But God forbid any of our tax money might go to help American citizens, most of whom are WORKING poor.....

You are so transparent, eh?

#107 | Posted by woke


If the House and Senate made the minimum wage above the level of POOR, then the gov't would have to step in to help them.

Who has the power in the House, Senate, and WH to make this change a reality?

The same party that keeps blaming the minority party.

Funny, Bush got everything he wanted in the last two years of his term - and his party was a minority in the House where bills originate.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable