Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Providence Bishop Thomas J. Tobin has forbidden Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy (D.) to receive the Roman Catholic sacrament of Holy Communion because of his advocacy of abortion rights, the Rhode Island Democrat said Friday. "The bishop instructed me not to take Communion and said that he has instructed the diocesan priests not to give me Communion," Kennedy told the Providence Journal.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Foot meet gun. When will the church realize they are doing all they can to turn people away!?
I love it.

abortion is a sin?

The Roman Catholic Church has inserted its nose where it doesn't belong, effectively saying Kennedy takes orders from Rome. That doesn't work here. Kennedy represents people other than Catholics, and he represents them to a secular government.

Catholic Church lost their way years ago...Kennedy probably could care less about their religous leanings & probably more interested in social agendas & earth justice issues as well as just looking good to the folks he grew up with

Can you say "The Episcopal Church welcomes you"?

Seriously, what would Kennedy lose by leaving and joining another denomination?

#4 "The Roman Catholic Church has inserted its nose where it doesn't belong"
Not really, the church simply has forbidden him from receiving communion (which only deals with what happens within the confines of the church). He can still support abortion rights. The church simply said he can't support abortion and still claim to be a catholic by receiving communion. The Kennedy clan has spoken out of the sides of their mouths for decades and this is the most evident. How 'bout we build a windmill farm, just not where we can see it.

#6 "Seriously, what would Kennedy lose by leaving and joining another denomination?"

He may claim he's a Catholic but make no mistake, he's a politician first......however, he also knows that the minute he becomes an Episcopalian he's booted out of office by all the Catholics in Massaachusetts. As I said above, the Kennedy's have spoken out of both sides of their mouths for decades.

The same goes for all the Catholics in Rhode Island.

Yeah, Bishop! You can't have it both ways, Pat....

Answer to #2-Is the Pope Catholic?

tax the fuckheads and they'll shut up quick

As soon as you start thinking for yourself, the church has no use for you.

Too much 'word'
will do that to one!

Quietus ~ the ultimate cure for tinnitus?

www.tinnitusmiracle.com

Or is Quietus just another forgetable Roman emperor?

The Roman Catholic Church (and all others) should be deprived of their exemption from taxation.

The Catholics who would oppose him based on his abortion stance are unlikely to have voted for him in the first place. Most Catholics do oppose abortion. That being given, most Catholics do not necessarily follow what their Bishops or for that matter the Pope, advise on political matters. Honestly, Kennedy can probably leave the Catholic Church and still be elected.

What are you guys bugging about? The church's position has been clear, they can refuse you the sacraments if you are outspoken on issues that run contrary to church teaching.

It's a potential problem every Catholic has to come to terms with.

Although it's good that Catholics believe that Jesus is their Savior, at times I feel that they ignore some of His teachings and take matters into their own hands. This is one of those times.

1 Cor 27-32 clearly states that man must examine HIMSELF prior to Communion NOT to have man judge him to see if he is worthy by having a clean and pure heart.

It does not say to "take and eat" or "take and drink" unless you are a homosexual or unless you are pro choice.

And those who withhold this command made by Jesus will be the ones who are judged.

This is what I was trying to get across to Booj a while ago. This branch of Christianity has taken it upon themselves, thinking they know better than Jesus and try to "rewrite" what Christ had done by ignoring Scripture, the meaning of this practice and deny followers of Jesus who THEY feel have sinned so unforgivably.

It was argued that Catholics do read the Bible outside of having the priest read it to them.

Then I fail to understand how they don't recognize some of their practices to actually go against Scripture.

And millions of souls are in jeopardy because of it.

It's a potential problem every Catholic has to come to terms with.

Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-22 08:11 PM | Reply DEFINITELY NOT A CATHOLIC SINCE ABORTION IS ONE OF MY FAVES

Lisa, you may find through further research that almost every church practice is alien to the so-called teachings of Jesus Christ, whoever he was. But they are the ones who "believe" in him.

The Quakers may be the only real Christians we have.

Sitdown:

I strongly disagree with you.

There are many branches of Christianity that follow the teachings of Jesus. It is a way of life for us....not just something we do on Sundays.

My husband and I are Blessed to have found a church that does not include man made rules and twisting of Scripture.

We are not perfect, Sitdown and we do fall short at times from living a life of Christ. Jesus was the only perfect person to ever walk this earth.

As Christians we pick ourselves up after sinning, repent, ask for forgiveness and move forward continuing to strive to walk Jesus walk.

I think it's unfair of you to claim what you had without attending every church of Christianity on order to make such a proclamation.

This is what I was trying to get across to Booj a while ago. This branch of Christianity has taken it upon themselves, thinking they know better than Jesus and try to "rewrite" what Christ had done by ignoring Scripture, the meaning of this practice and deny followers of Jesus who THEY feel have sinned so unforgivably.
It was argued that Catholics do read the Bible outside of having the priest read it to them.

Lisa,

There are Catholics who dive into scripture and there are those who don't. It's really not a matter of policy as you continually try to assert on the DR.

The zealousness of this Bishop is related to his conviction that this man is not worthy to receive the bread and wine due to his ongoing open advocation and support of what is truly murder if you are a true Christian. I don't see any 're-writing' going on here

Don't you think of it as murder too?

If you were administering bread and wine as either a preacher, adminisister would you on at least a weekly basis continue to give it to him? Or would that make you rather a hypocrite????

IF you believe each human has a soul and it is sacred, does that soul ENTER the person at a certain point in gestation? Or is that sacred soul there a conception, whether between a loving husband and a wife who want to raise children, or a teenage boy and a teenage girl in the backseat of his daddys car having unprotected sex and him accidentally blowing a full wad into her.

Still gotta soul, don't it?????

4 "The Roman Catholic Church has inserted its nose where it doesn't belong"
Not really, the church simply has forbidden him from receiving communion (which only deals with what happens within the confines of the church). He can still support abortion rights. The church simply said he can't support abortion and still claim to be a catholic by receiving communion. The Kennedy clan has spoken out of the sides of their mouths for decades and this is the most evident. How 'bout we build a windmill farm, just not where we can see it.

#7 | Posted by Kspeck3

You hit the nail on the head---I'v got to congratulate the Catholic church for not being political and upholding what they believe and teach---the kennedys' have been hypocrites for years (my disclaimer--I'm not a catholic).

The Roman Catholic Church just as any other church of any denomination has the right to make and enforce whatever policies it feels like to uphold whatever their interpretation of whatever the tenets of their theology are. If a member of that church objects to the policies of the church they are free to leave that church for another more to their liking or none at all irregardless of whether their name is Kennedy.

"disclaimer--I'm not a catholic)"

Do you belong to any church .at? Believe in God/Jesus?

Just curious.

What this boils down to is whether or not any other church's "communion" is actually the body and blood of Jesus other than the Roman Catholic Church. If Episcopalian communion is also the body and blood of Jesus Christ then he can sort of tell the Catholic Church to go fuck themselves. If Episcopalian communion isn't the real thing though then the Bishop might be someone you really do need to listen to. This is sort of a religious conumdrum. I know a lot of divorced Catholics though.

Well hello Gimme!

I hope you are doing well!!

Actually Danni, we were instructed to do this by Jesus regardless of what someone thinks of it's meaning.

Catholics do this because they are concentrating on the actual sin which is why they have no problem with an adulterer, liar or thief accepting communion. They believe homosexuality and abortion to mean murder as being worse than any other sin....again thinking their word is of higher authority than God's since no sin is worse than any other but one. And it isn't either of those two.

And there is ONE reason we are allowed to divorce.

They believe homosexuality and abortion to mean murder as being worse than any other sin....#28 | POSTED BY LISA

WTF! Homosexuality is the same as murder?? Worse than any other sin?? What about the Idi Amins, Ethnic cleansers from Bosnia, Stalins, Hitlers? How can we doubt that those people and their imitators committed the worst sins? And how many were allowed to continue to take communion through it all?

Mad:

I'm just trying to explain that Catholics single out those two reasons for not allowing one to receive communion.

Truth is...no sin is any worse than the other except for one.

This is a non story. Last I heard there is still freedom of religion in this country. The Bishop has every right to do what ever he wants in his diocese.

If Patrick Kennedy don't like it, tough shit. Find another religion.

How do we know that Christians (and all other religionists) are delusional?

www.youtube.com

#32

LMBO

So saeth Brother Bong.

"So saeth Brother Bong."

That's your usual retort. That "you're a pothead" rebuttal really doesn't advance your bullshit arguments, you know. But if that's all you have...

Kennedy represents people other than Catholics, and he represents them to a secular government.

#4 | Posted by YAV at 2009-11-22 04:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

Wow. I didn't see the Bishop tell Kennedy he couldn't govern. The Bishop told Kennedy he is not welcome in the church because he advocates things the church does not. Very simply covered in the 'right to associate'.

I found it hysterical that someone who uses drugs the way you do didn't see the irony in using the word "delusional".

Go fire up another one!!

LOL

#26 | Posted by danni at 2009-11-22 09:13 PM | Reply | Flag

The 'communion' wasn't defined or created by the Roman Catholic church. It is very clearly described in the New Testament. Any one who thinks the blood and break become the actual flesh and blood of Jesus has missed the point.

break == bread

LOL

And all YOU have is atheist after atheist insulting religion.

Well....duh!!!

LMBO

Lisa,

What Kennedy is doing through his pro choice advocacy is saying that he doesn't believe that abortion is a sin. That's the basis of the church's exclusion. In this he is being very vocal in stating that he is not catholic. He's trying to have his cake and eat it. I'm no longer part of the Holy Catholic and Apostolic, but I have to agree with them here.

" found it hysterical that someone who uses drugs the way you do"

Drugs? No, I'm not religious. I'm not addicted to Jeebus.

Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-22 08:11 PM | Reply DEFINITELY NOT A CATHOLIC SINCE ABORTION IS ONE OF MY FAVES

#19 | Posted by The_Chapel at 2009-11-22 08:19 PM | Reply | Flag: LOL, YOU FOOL! I'M DEFENDING THE CHURCH HERE!!!

Proving that "God's Plan" is impossible

www.youtube.com

"And all YOU have is atheist after atheist insulting religion."

No. I post rational critiques of theist ideology. If you consider that "insulting" it just demonstrates a whiny victimization mentality common to monotheists.

LOL

Whatever Null!!!

LMBO

"What Kennedy is doing through his pro choice advocacy is saying that he doesn't believe that abortion is a sin. That's the basis of the church's exclusion. In this he is being very vocal in stating that he is not catholic. He's trying to have his cake and eat it. I'm no longer part of the Holy Catholic and Apostolic, but I have to agree with them here."

If you think Kennedy is making a statement, what do you think the Catholic church is saying to God, HC?

That Jesus didn't know what He was talking about?

That we don't think your commands are important?

He's a sinner. As we all are. Who gave the Catholic church the authority of God to say who is and who isn't forgiven? In fact, who gave them the power to sit in judgement of what's in a person's heart or what that person may have discussed with God in prayer??

"HOLY Catholic and Apostolic..."????

I don't find going against Scripture as Holy, HC.

10 questions that every intelligent Christian must answer...

www.youtube.com

Oh Null...taking a "man's" book and using it to discredit the Bible and God's word is a hoot!

Thanks for playing though.

LOL

I watched about 3 minutes of it and saw the problems with it.

But....hate away!!!

"He's a sinner. As we all are. Who gave the Catholic church the authority of God to say who is and who isn't forgiven?"

From what I remember, yes, we're all sinners, but if you don't feel guilty about your sin, if you go out and publicly attempt to justify your sin, that is grounds for the Church to refuse you the sacraments.

"In fact, who gave them the power to sit in judgement of what's in a person's heart or what that person may have discussed with God in prayer??"

Again, its been over 20 years since I've been an active member of the Church, but Jesus did, through Peter. The Acts are full of judgments.

"HOLY Catholic and Apostolic..."????
I don't find going against Scripture as Holy, HC.

I don't think they're going against Scripture in this instance.

Oh Null...taking a "man's" book and using it to discredit the Bible and God's word is a hoot!

What in the hell does that mean?

disclaimer--I'm not a catholi
Do you belong to any church .at? Believe in God/Jesus?


Just curious.

#25 | Posted by Lisa

Absolutely and unequivocally

www.youtube.com
#47 | Posted by nullifidian

Faith is about accepting what makes no sense. If it was a rational truth, faith would be unnecessary.

It was an interesting link, btw. Especially how it appealed to the viewers "pride of intellect".

"I don't think they're going against Scripture in this instance."

Ok. Then show me in this section of Scripture where you see that anyone else should sit in judgement of the one receiving communion?

Show me where Jesus states that we should only take and eat or drink unless one is homosexual, divorced or are pro choice.

"23 For I received from the Lord that which I also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus on the same night in which He was betrayed took bread; 24 and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, "Take, eat;[a] this is My body which is broken[b] for you; do this in remembrance of Me." 25 In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me."
26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death till He comes.

27 Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood[c] of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner[d] eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord's[e] body. 30 For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many sleep. 31 For if we would judge ourselves, we would not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are chastened by the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world.

Seems to me that Jesus put NO restrictions on who can receive it, but it does state that one must examine HIMSELF. AND...the punishments are laid out for those who don't.

Sorry HC. I was raised Catholic. I'm well aware of their practices and some of them are not Scriptural, actually going against them while they beleive they are in a higher authority than Jesus.

"Absolutely and unequivocally"

Awesome Brother!! : )

Clearly, HC...this is NOT up to the church to decide.

"Show me where Jesus states that we should only take and eat or drink unless one is homosexual, divorced or are pro choice."

I'd say its in the story of mary magdalene where Jesus says "sin no more".

Good grief HC!

Does Jesus state that no sinner can accept communion?

Wasn't he sitting around a table with sinners who He had SHARE in that?

"actually going against them while they beleive they are in a higher authority than Jesus."

No they don't. They just believe they are in a higher authority than any other so called christian denomination. Even Luther didn't want the schism.

"Does Jesus state that no sinner can accept communion?"

No, of course not, but the implication is that one must believe that they are a sinner. Kennedy doesn't believe that his stance on abortion qualifies.

"No they don't. "

If that were true than why did they modify Jesus's command?

Why did they not follow the last part of that Scripture instead of putting themselves as judge and jury, thinking Jesus's way wasn't good enough?

" Kennedy doesn't believe that his stance on abortion qualifies."

Can you show me where Kennedy states he doesn't think abortion is murder?

Or is he one of the folks that think abortion is morally wrong but feels the government shouldn't decide what a woman can or can not do with her body?

And can you show me where Kennedy states he is not a sinner?

Even the Apostle Paul said that he does what he does not want to do, HC.

Or is he one of the folks that think abortion is morally wrong but feels the government shouldn't decide what a woman can or can not do with her body?
#62 | Posted by Lisa

A distinction without a difference, IMO.

"And can you show me where Kennedy states he is not a sinner?"

Every time he stands up for choice, he advocates sin, therefore sins in his own right.

Well HC, I'm against abortion. Can I control the government in their decision to stop them?

Would your opinion be that since they still continue even though I am against them, mean that I am for them?

And get this, I think its wrong, but give tepid support to choice. The difference between me and Kennedy is that I believe that position disqualifies me as a Christian.

And more to the point, disqualifies me as a Catholic.

Ok HC....let's take a different view:

Is advocating abortion worse than lying, stealing, murder, adultery, etc?

"Can I control the government in their decision to stop them?"

No more than your vote and your lobby allows.

Is advocating abortion worse than lying, stealing, murder, adultery, etc?

#69 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-22 11:56 PM | Reply | Flag: Goal Post Move. Not Playing that Game.

How is that moving the goal post, HC?

It's a VERY valid point.

Who are they to decide if one sin is worse than another especially when Scripture says this:

"And the scribes who came down from Jerusalem said, 'He has Beelzebub,' and, 'By the ruler of the demons He casts out demons.' 'Assuredly, I [Jesus] say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they may utter; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is subject to eternal condemnation;' because they said, 'He has an unclean spirit'"

BTW...Do you think those people issuing communion or the others that are receiving it, only commit the sins they have commited once? Repented and never did them again?

"And get this, I think its wrong, but give tepid support to choice. The difference between me and Kennedy is that I believe that position disqualifies me as a Christian."

Christians are suppose to be perfect?

I'm heading to bed...we have painting to do tomorrow.

Thanks for the discussion.

I remember a few years back when St. Patrick's day happened to fall on a Friday during Lent and the Bishop gave us an exemption so that we could eat corned beef and cabbage.
The Catholic church is a joke.

While not a Catholic, I note the irony of those inserting their noses where they don't belong by advocating taxing or censoring the RCC because they say the RCC is "inserting its nose where it doesn't belong."

more christian sharia

Not really, the church simply has forbidden him from receiving communion (which only deals with what happens within the confines of the church).

A. The Church needs to stop involving itself in politics or give up it's tax exempt status.

B. How many other politicians have been denied the sacrement for support of war, death penalty, etc?

Yea, it's so much worse than Islam.

"Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (Surah 5:51)

"Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and God's religion shall reign supreme." (Surah 8:36-)

"...make war on the leaders of unbelief...Make war on them: God will chastise them at your hands and humble them. He will grant you victory over them..." (Surah 9:12-)

"Fight against such as those to whom the Scriptures were given [Jews and Christians]...until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." (Surah 9:27-)

"Muhammad is God's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another." (Surah 48:29)

"Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and God's religion shall reign supreme." (Surah 8:36-)


I see your point in chastizing Christians.

i'm not mocking christianity

just the followers of christ who have lost their way. When i start quoting the bible falsly then you can have criticism. I've yet to do that.


don't quote my book without knowing the context of the original arabic

islam also says that only the original arabic is correct.

all translations are just for the ease of non arabic speakers but are not cannon.

so lisa... find me the quote in arabic and lets examine that. It will show you that your translations are wrong.

nuff said.

christian sharia..
ie ... certain extreme christians imposing their illogical interpretation of the bible on others.

islamic sharia..
ie ... certain extreme muslims imposing their illogical interpretation of the koran on others.

can't take criticism that fellow christians are making your religion look bad.

i take the opposite everyday.

guess it hurts to know that everyday christians aren't doing shit about it either.

LOL

Of course Kliff.

Everything anyone EVER says or quotes about your faith is wrong.

Yet...you offer nothing to back up your stance.... just think that denying it is enough to make others believe.

" certain extreme christians imposing their illogical interpretation of the bible on others."

LOL

You know so much about the Bible and it's meaning to make a statement like that??

Odd you know so much about a faith your people want to kill for, yet you can't back up your denials about your own, with quotes that are factual for your beliefs.

#78/726
I agree.

Turnabout's fair play.

Isn't it about time to end tax evasion for these multibillionaire churches that believe it's ok for them to get involved in politics?


I'm for ending blanket tax exclusions for churches. Let them get their exclusions from any good works/charity they do, and not just blanket exemptions because they are organized religions. Not limited to the Catholic Church, but especially, those frickin mulitmillionaire TV evangelists......who tell their "followers" how to vote, etc.

I'd say its in the story of mary magdalene where Jesus says "sin no more".

#56 | POSTED BY HAGBARD_CELINE AT 2009-11-22 11:34 PM


Isn't that really a story about JUDGE NOT, rather than the idea of never sinning again?


Jhn 8:4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.


Jhn 8:5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?


Jhn 8:6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with [his] finger wrote on the ground, [as though he heard them not].


Jhn 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.


Jhn 8:8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.


Jhn 8:9 And they which heard [it], being convicted by [their own] conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, [even] unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.


Jhn 8:10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?


Jhn 8:11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more


Now, I'm not sure who hasn't sinned, but I know Jesus preached FORGIVENESS OF SINS, not that he or anyone else was without sin...


Mar 10:17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?


Mar 10:18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? [there is] none good but one, [that is], God.


Interesting that you focus on the "go and sin no more" and not on the forgiveness and judge not, which is the central tenet of Jesus' teachings.


How many times do you think we should forgive others or can be forgiven?


"BTW...Do you think those people issuing communion or the others that are receiving it, only commit the sins they have commited once? Repented and never did them again?"
#72 | Posted by Lisa

The point hinges on his public advocacy for which he has not demonstrated admission of sin or sought forgiveness.

"Christians are suppose to be perfect?"

No, but they are supposed to be honest about their sin.

"I'm heading to bed...we have painting to do tomorrow."

Have fun. Remember to keep the windows open.

:)

I'm for ending blanket tax exclusions for churches

Damn. I agree with woke on this one.

"B. How many other politicians have been denied the sacrement for support of war, death penalty, etc?"

That's not an unreasonable question as it points out the church's inconsistency.

I'd argue that they should refuse the sacraments for all who take public positions contrary to the Catechism.

Again, I'm no longer a Catholic.

"Interesting that you focus on the "go and sin no more" and not on the forgiveness and judge not, which is the central tenet of Jesus' teachings."

God requires acknowledgment of sin and the desire for repentance before forgiveness.

Oh my God I am heartily sorry for having offended thee
And I detest all my sins because of your just punishment.

But most of all because they offend You, my God
Who are all good and deserving of all my love.

I firmly resolve with the help of Your grace
To sin no more and to avoid all near occasion of sin

-Act of Contrition

A. The Church needs to stop involving itself in politics or give up it's tax exempt status.


B. How many other politicians have been denied the sacrement for support of war, death penalty, etc?


great point and great question.

I heard a debate on this back when Bush and Kerry were campaigning in 2004. A prolife political person came into an RCIA class (process to becoming Catholic) and B was pointed out to this person. She determined that war was not necessarily an "absolute" meaning that war can be justified in some circumstances.

Pretty weak response.

"The point hinges on his public advocacy for which he has not demonstrated admission of sin or sought forgiveness."

I've asked for support in your statement that Kennedy actually stated that he doesn't think abortion is a sin.

And....is that any worse than other people who are not public figures who are receiving communion and have been cheating on their spouse, stealing, drunkardness, etc...and the priest just doesn't know it.


"Christians are suppose to be perfect?"


"No, but they are supposed to be honest about their sin."

Like the rest of the congregation? How do you know that they aren't repeating and defending the same sin over and over without repenting?

"God requires acknowledgment of sin and the desire for repentance before forgiveness."

Same response as above.

Can you see the problem with man made laws? Can you see why Scripture says to "examine himself" and not rely on man to do the judging?

This is between that person and God and know one knows what has been said between the two...least of all a priest who appointed himself judge and juror.

The priests responsibility is to dispense communion, not sit in judgement of what is in someone's heart.

"Remember to keep the windows open."

I always sleep with the window slightly opened! : )


:)


"I've asked for support in your statement that Kennedy actually stated that he doesn't think abortion is a sin."

You don't see a disconnect there? Even if he does believe its a sin, he's an advocate of enabling it, a sin in its own right.

"And....is that any worse than other people who are not public figures who are receiving communion and have been cheating on their spouse, stealing, drunkardness, etc...and the priest just doesn't know it."

Public advocacy undermines the Church, so yes, its worse.

""Remember to keep the windows open."

I always sleep with the window slightly opened! : )"

I was talking about when you are painting, crazy.

I don't spend time concerning myself with your sleeping habits. That's your other retort boyfriends.

:P

89


Can you show me where that "act of contrition" is in scripture??
I'm not saying it isn't there, as I know repetence leads to a better life, but do you believe an act of contrition means one will not sin anymore?


What I see in scripture from the words attributed to Jesus, is that it's ok to judge others if you have never sinned (LOL) and to be forgiven, one must forgive others.

Mat 6:14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:
Mat 6:15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

Mat 18:35 So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.

Mar 11:25 And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses.
Mar 11:26 But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.

Luk 6:37 Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:
Luk 11:4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.



And, to my question about how many times we should forgive:

Mat 18:21 Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?


Mat 18:22 Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.


Just sayin'


One of the differences between Catholicism and Protestantism is in the concept of atonement.

In Catholicism, Christ died for all your past sins, but your present and future ones are to be handled by priests through confession and penance.

Helps keep priests in bidness.

In Protestantism, all sins past, present, and future were covered by the one act.

All of each faction may not believe such, but it is at their core beliefs.

"...but do you believe an act of contrition means one will not sin anymore?"

Its not in there explicitly and no, it doesn't mean that one won't sin again, but it speaks to the point that sorrow for ones sins is requisite for forgiveness which I believe is implicit in the verses you provide.

I believe these verses approach the issue from the other side, they do not address whether the sinner deserves forgiveness or not but are about whether or not one should forgive. They are about the forgiver, not the forgiven.

"Helps keep priests in bidness."

Only a non-catholic would make that argument the thrust of his point, but it is at least arguable.

What it does, however, is suggest that Kennedy should go find another denomination that isn't as strict.

-that isn't as strict

Or that isn't bound by theology based on bad translations and good business.

I can understand how Papal Infallibility could be a problem for some.

As soon as you start thinking for yourself, the church has no use for you.

#13 | Posted by morris

True...

...in fact, they sort of remind me of Climate Change proponents.

Once again the Church displays its contempt for the laiety. If all Catholic politicians were pro-life,
most of them would cease to be politicians. The hierarchy has shown more compassion for the pederasts
among them than the pols who represent more than just their Catholic constituents.

Poor elitist Kennedy. He is used to having anyone say "NO" to him.

Correction: Poor elitist silver-spoon-in-his-mouth Kennedy. He is NOT used to having anyone say "NO" to him.

Lisa

i've backed up everything i've said

you chose to ignore it.

thats not my fault

that is yours

and no i admit when criticism is given.

example... i'm very much opposed to the blashphemy law. i'm very much opposed to the cartoon protests. i'm very much opposed to honor killing or even violence and threats related to those issues.

so please explain your position?

"Odd you know so much about a faith your people want to kill for"

i grew up in the usa around christians everyday.

i have read the old and new testaments from top to bottom.

odd that you google the koran and act like you know what it means.

i have actually read the bible so i know what it contains and what it doesn't.

don't hide behind the new testament which was censured from day 1.

"your people want to kill for"

your people????

we're all one people.

Its people who think like that.. "your people" and "my people" that keep the world divided and at war.

"your people" suffer an abundence of the deadly sin of pride.

but it speaks to the point that sorrow for ones sins is requisite for forgiveness which I believe is implicit in the verses you provide.
I believe these verses approach the issue from the other side, they do not address whether the sinner deserves forgiveness or not but are about whether or not one should forgive. They are about the forgiver, not the forgiven.

#95 | POSTED BY HAGBARD_CELINE AT 2009-11-23 10:08 AM

Pretty clear to me from reading the words attributed to Jesus....


6:14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:

Mat 6:15 But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.


I don't see anything about another "side" or who deserves forgiveness, but to each their own interpretation.


Not really, the church simply has forbidden him from receiving communion (which only deals with what happens within the confines of the church).


A. The Church needs to stop involving itself in politics or give up it's tax exempt status.


B. How many other politicians have been denied the sacrement for support of war, death penalty, etc?


#78 | Posted by 726 at 2009-11-23 08:16 AM | Reply | Flag:

Once you transform moral issues into political issues, you open the door to the church. Of course, the goal in politicizing moral issues is often to exclude religion from the public square. Doesn't work, does it?

Amusing

As a non religious person I find some of the arguments quite entertaining.

My Opinion.

The Roman Catholic Church has the right, indeed the obligation, to inform its members what is considered acceptable behavior and the consequences of violation of those prohibitions.

In this instance the church is not interfering with the rights or beliefs of non adherents.

This also blows away the concept of Christian Sharia(IN THIS INSTANCE). The Bishop is instructing a professed member of his church in the required behavior. He is not interfering in my right to do as I consider proper.

If Kennedy is opposed to the teachings of his church perhaps he should find another religion more in tune with his beliefs. I know many Christians who have done just that. They at least have the courage of their convictions.

If you are a Roman Catholic and you are offended by the actions of this Bishop I politely suggest you search for an alternative. As I understand it this Bishop is right in line with the statements of the Pope.

when the church is mandating that catholic politicians follow the church policy when creating political policy IS sharia.imposing your religious values on all Americans.

definately sharia

#108

You're in my head, Cowboy.

when the church is mandating that catholic politicians follow the church policy when creating political policy IS sharia.imposing your religious values on all Americans.
definately sharia
#109 | Posted by klifferd

"If Kennedy is opposed to the teachings of his church perhaps he should find another religion more in tune with his beliefs. I know many Christians who have done just that. They at least have the courage of their convictions."

I wouldn't criticize him for doing just that.

You people make my brain hurt!

The hypocrisy of picking and choosing some church teachings to bash politicians over the head, while ignoring others is pretty obvious.


Support of abortion choice for women=wrong

Killing/maiming/displacing hundreds of thousands of human beings already alive.....(crickets chirping)


The fact is that everyone falls a little bit short of rock and roll, including priests and cardinals, etc.....

No?

woke-waiting now for The Spanish Inquisition.....

LOL

The catholic church and its antiquated views is on the way out. Less and less people are going to church services all the time. New views on spiritualism are starting to take a stronger hold with people and eventually the church will be begging for members to fill their coffers.

Most Catholics use birth control and go against the churches teachings in many other ways, especially here in America. They need to be more realistic and start conforming to today's way of thinking. Their hard core stances do nothing more than push people away. I guess as long as they have millions of people who believe they can do no wrong they will never change their attitude.

The catholic church should keep its GOD DAM nose out of US legislation for healthcare as well as any other policy matters. Obama should contact Rome to tell the Pope that his as well as his subordinates (Bishops and Cardinals) remarks regarding US Policy are not welcome.


The catholic church should keep its GOD DAM nose out of US legislation for healthcare as well as any other policy matters. Obama should contact Rome to tell the Pope that his as well as his subordinates (Bishops and Cardinals) remarks regarding US Policy are not welcome.

#115 | Posted by JoeLabey at 2009-11-23 01:48 PM | Reply | Flag: Fucking Retard

Reinsure you have 2 dumps already. You had better watch your step.

Obama should contact Rome to tell the Pope that his as well as his subordinates (Bishops and Cardinals) remarks regarding US Policy are not welcome.

He can call Nancy Pelosi for the number. The dems already have a relationship with Rome and the Pope and consult with them before taking action.

www.democraticunderground.com

Oh Null...taking a "man's" book and using it to discredit the Bible and God's word is a hoot!-Lisa


Lisa, I hate to break it to you but much of the Bible is discredited. Words, verses, and whole chapters have been revised or omitted over the years. The Bible of today is nothing like the original Bible. Too many people got their hands on it and interpreted certain parts to fit the religious dogma of the day. The Bible has been destroyed by man and, although there is much to heed in the Bible, much of it is about as credible as a gossip column.

"Oh Null...taking a "man's" book and using it to discredit the Bible and God's word is a hoot!-Lisa"


hmm i didn't know there was a Gospel according to God.

Its a book inspired by God, but the bible is still a Man's book. Divinely inspired book by Men, maybe.

btw Lisa, the Koran is supposed to be the Gospel according to God.

If you read it outside of Google and Jihadwatch.com you would know that it is in first person from God speaking to Mohammad and to humanity.

Now if you want to get into a debate about how much of it is real..

i believe all of "god's books" are man's books.

Its all divinely inspired. And the divine was most likely in all their heads (writers of the bible, torah, koran, etc's )

Wait Kliff, are you saying we DO NOT study what Jesus said? That we only consider what God said to Mohammed???????

One never knows how to respond to arguments about how many angels fit on the head of a pin if one questions the existence of angels in the first place.

Is "The Church" entitled to excommunicate or simply not "bless" any person questioning the papal line about fetal rights? Absofreakinlutely. Is anyone choosing to remain in such a lunatic asylum out of his/her cotton-pickin' head? You, as the lady said, betcha!

This is 2009, f'chrissake. The earth stopped being flat and the sun stopped revolving around it several years ago. herm

"Wait Kliff, are you saying we DO NOT study what Jesus said? That we only consider what God said to Mohammed???????"

huh??

i'm not sure I understand what you are saying?

The catholic church should keep its GOD DAM nose out of US legislation for healthcare as well as any other policy matters. Obama should contact Rome to tell the Pope that his as well as his subordinates (Bishops and Cardinals) remarks regarding US Policy are not welcome.

#115 | POSTED BY JOELABEY AT 2009-11-23 01:48 PM | REPLY | FLAG

The catholic church can take whatever position it wants with respect to US legislation, or on any other subject it chooses. It is not constrained by our laws. The US could revoke its nonprofit status if it chooses, but that isn't going to affect - nor should it affect - the church's stance on any subject.

If people don't appreciate the remarks or policy positions, they don't have to attend or otherwise support the church. Besides, denying Kennedy communion is not a political. Not letting married persons become priests is not political.

The secular world can go on as you like, but it has no business trying to tell a church what it can and cannot teach its followers. It's called religious freedom.

Declare the catholic church a cult and shut it down.

#126 Aren't we the tolerant one? Declare war on Rome, but never Iran?

"The secular world can go on as you like, but it has no business trying to tell a church what it can and cannot teach its followers. It's called religious freedom."

Which is fine... but they can not tell politicians how to implement policy... policy is for ALL people... not just the religions...

The catholic church is against divorce... should catholic politicians start a campaign to ban divorce.

get real.

Jackass, that may be the first thing I have ever agreed with you on.

#128. I didn't realize that denying Kennedy communion is the same as starting a campaign to ban abortion.

So, saying divorce is bad and not letting someone who has been divorced get married in a Catholic mass is a political campaign? sounds to me like you're trying to dictate what the church can and cannot do based on your political agenda.

The catholic church is against divorce... should catholic politicians start a campaign to ban divorce.

Or pull a Henry VIII

"One never knows how to respond to arguments about how many angels fit on the head of a pin if one questions the existence of angels in the first place."

All of them, and none of them. Simultaneously. Welcome to Quantum Religion!

Jackass, that may be the first thing I have ever agreed with you on.

Now I'm going to give Jackass a verbal pat on the back too.

Geeze, Jackass probably won't know how to handle two compliments on DR in one day. lol

Jackass -

I was pleased to see you leave politics off of the Veteran's Day thread a couple weeks ago when I put up our "List of Drudge Retort Military Veterans."

I know you and I had a bit of a run in the previous time the List was put up (a few months back)'cause you had voiced some of your political views in connection with that List and I told you to never to do it again. This last time the List was put up (on the Veterans Day thread) you went along with my previous request and didn't bring your politics into it at all. So thank you. I mean it.

"So, saying divorce is bad and not letting someone who has been divorced get married in a Catholic mass is a political campaign? "

no thats not what i'm saying... nice try.

the church can say... mr. politician, if you want to be part of our church you can't get divorced.

the church can't say... mr. politician, you can not allow anyone else who is not catholic but is in your constituency to get divorced either.

that is basically what they are doing...

mr. kennedy, if your wife has an abortion, you can't be a member of this church... fine.

mr. kennedy, you can't not allow your constituents to get abortions even though they are not all catholics... NOT FINE.

fuckin sharia.

"mr. kennedy, you can't not allow your constituents to get abortions even though they are not all catholics... NOT FINE."

sorry let me rephrase.

mr. kennedy, you will not allow your constituents to get abortions even though they might not be part of the church.. NOT FINE!

mr. kennedy, you can't not allow your constituents to get abortions even though they are not all catholics... NOT FINE.
fuckin sharia.

Why not? The Catholic Church has no state authority. It can't say, if you allow your constituents abortions, then you die or are arrested. It doesn't have that power, so there's no separation of church/state.

Agreed that such a position should probably jeopardize a non-profit status, but under what circumstances can you tell a church what it dictates?

"Agreed that such a position should probably jeopardize a non-profit status"

under what circumstances... right there in the quote.

those circumstances.

this is straight up blackmailing a politician to either follow their mandate or lose your membership.. ie ... christian sharia.

revoke the catholic church's tax exempt status... they will reneg that decision in a second.

dude, i'm against sharia, no matter the religion.

apparently you are only opposed to muslim sharia.

Kliffy, nice try. Sharia law is in lieu of a Civil institution. This is a religious institution imposing a limit on a parisioner who knowingly and continually advocates murder. If Mister Kennedy apologizes to God for that and changes his position then he can receive communion.

If on the other hand the Catholic church took over a burg in Boston (like the Taliban takes over areas of the highlands in Afghanistan and Pakistan) booted the courts and took over, your stupid little fucking analogy may have credence. Last time I checked that has not happened.

apparently you are only opposed to muslim sharia.

#137 | POSTED BY KLIFFERD AT 2009-11-23 07:03 PM | REPLY | FLAG

Wrong. read #138, he explains it better than I could. I'm for religious freedom. If the Church of Satan told a politician "If you let your constituents praise God," then you're out of the church - who gives a shit?

If the politician tries to pass a law - and even succeeds - it'd be struck down by the courts. Or, if the politician doesn't try, then he or she is out of the Church.

No biggie. The catholic church has no police power. To the extent it tries to influence policy - it is free to do so. My limited understanding of non-profits, however, is that it jeopardizes its non-profit status to the extent it endorses political candidates or measures. that would be the circumstance under which I'd consider pulling their status.

But, I don't even think that's really happened here. Catholic church isn't in any event, change what it does based on that. I wouldn't be surprised that at some point in the next 30 years non-profit status for churches in US is pulled anyway.


I'm for ending blanket tax exclusions for churches


Damn. I agree with woke on this one.

#86 | Posted by goatman


Why?

Because the Church is pro-life ?? and they want their parishers to follow their teachings and tenets??


Kennedy has free will to do whatever he wants.

The Church has their rules. Kennedy is breaking them.

He can leave the Church.

Or attend the Church without taking communion.

Or he can have reflection and change his position on rights of the unborn versus rights of women to kill their unborn baby.

both of you are wrong... its because you don't understand how sharia exists in those tribal areas.

they are allowed to do what they want because they do exactly what the church is doing to the politicians in that area... telling their followers to not vote for this guy or telling their followers that this guy is a bad muslim because etc. The politicians end up enacting law to let their stupid morality be imposed on the citizens.


you have assumptions you get from reading your news articles

but i've been there.

its the same shit.

Who cares.
Don't need communion.
Got my Bible. That is what saves you.
Read it and see.

Using force to change a mans political views and then telling him he will go to hell unless he changes his politics proves to me it aint religion/.

JESUS never got involved in politics.

"My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world then my desciples would fight, but it isn't"

And Jesus never got involved with politics, he was into medicine.

The catholic church is against divorce... should catholic politicians start a campaign to ban divorce.

The Bishop isn't withholding communion from pols that aren't requiring "married once for life" legislation.

The Bishop isn't withholding communion from pols that aren't opposing the death penalty.

The Bishop isn't withholding communion from pols that are for the Iraq war.

The Bishop is fine with criminalizing abortion (interview with Chris Matthews) but doesn't have the balls to say the woman should be charged with murder.

As Matthews said (paraphrase) "You won't say the woman should spend even a minute of time in jail because you know everyone will think you're crazy if you cross that line."

The hypocrisy is stunning. No birth control - but communion "OK" but no abortion, and no, we don't want to give you any control over your bodies. Oh, and if that child's gay? No marriage for them, no legal relationship of two people allowed unless it's "opposite marriage."

It's like Prejean's the Pope.

Pope Prejean Palpatine

The Drudge Country Club refused to let me play golf on their course recently.

I choose not to use golf clubs. I prefer to use my aluminum baseball bats.

Throw the ball up and whack, the ball goes a heck of a lot further than when I used the Iron.

I can still come to the club house and enjoy a soda, but I can't play on the field.

Bummer.

I thought the bishop's comment was enlightening. Turns out, Kennedy was barred from communion THREE YEARS ago. This is not a recent development. Why is Kennedy raising the issue now?

looks like christian sharia has a butt load of appologists.

Why is Kennedy raising the issue now?

Because this particular Bishop has been working against health care reform unless it contains new law banning all abortion. Another example of his Excellency's hypocrisy. He'd rather let 45,000 die every year than expand the law to include this one particular church doctrine.

Abortion to the Church is the murder of an innocent. You may not agree with that view but it is a moral view not a political one. It crosses political party lines; "pro-choice" Republicans and Democrats are treated equally in this regard.

Espousing a position on a moral issue is not playing politics. If a "pro-choice" politician advocates abortion (thus in the churches eyes aiding and abetting murder) they are in mortal sin and are ineligible to receive communion by their actions.

Are churches now in this morally declining world that you liberals love ineligible to define what are the tenets of their faith?

"they are in mortal sin"

But the celebrant has no idea whether or not the politician has had a change of heart from the pew to the priest, and is not supposed to be in the position to judge. It is the parishoner who is the final human arbiter, according to the RCC's own dogma.

Danforth,

I'll play. If someone is in mortal sin, it is the RCC dogma that such a person must go to confession to absolve himself from that mortal sin before he may receive communion. And, that change of heart must be followed by sincere acts such that the mortal sin is not committed again.

Are you suggesting that Kennedy can have a change of heart every Sunday prior to receiving communion then go back to his mortal sin on Monday thru Saturday. That is not church teaching and ridiculous to suggest.

I think that the Church can safely say that Kennedy's long standing abortion advocacy means that he has not had a change of heart.

"If someone is in mortal sin, it is the RCC dogma that such a person must go to confession to absolve himself from that mortal sin before he may receive communion."

No it's not. Clearing the soul does not require confession to a priest.

"I think that the Church can safely say that Kennedy's long standing abortion advocacy means that he has not had a change of heart."

According to the church's own dogma, it's can't. It is the recipient who is supposed to search his heart and decide if he is worthy.

"Are you suggesting that Kennedy can have a change of heart every Sunday..."

No, I'm suggesting he can have a change of heart any Sunday.

"...then go back to his mortal sin on Monday thru Saturday."

No, the church's dogma is. If they wanted to set the barometer at prior approval from a priest, they should do that.

And that being said, why isn't the RCC actively discouraging people who lie, or covet things, or who miss Mass occasionally to avoid taking communion?

why isn't the RCC actively discouraging people who lie, or covet things, or who miss Mass occasionally to avoid taking communion?

they aren't? how do you know?


Just so you know, I think this whole bullshit with the Bishop is all political and not about church dogma.

Turns out, Kennedy was barred from communion THREE YEARS ago. This is not a recent development. Why is Kennedy raising the issue now?

#147 | Posted by MACV1972


Kennedy brought it up..

when the church is mandating that catholic politicians follow the church policy when creating political policy IS sharia.imposing your religious values on all Americans.

definately sharia

#108 | Posted by klifferd at 2009-11-23 12:18 PM

Except for the fact that the Catholics just kick you out of the club vs chopping your head off.

One has free will. One has no option.

See the difference?

"they aren't? how do you know?"

I've yet to see them proclaim anyone who covets the newest Lexus shouldn't receive communion. Or those who lie on their taxes. Or those who sass their parents, or miss the weekly service, or curse.

"Just so you know, I think this whole bullshit with the Bishop is all political and not about church dogma."

My point exactly.

looks like christian sharia has a butt load of appologists.

#148 | POSTED BY KLIFFERD AT 2009-11-24 12:30 PM | REPLY | FLAG

If you think the Catholic Church shouldn't be allowed to prevent someone from taking communion, then you're basically a secular-militant. There is no comparison to sharia law, because Catholic church cannot make or enforce laws. Politicians cannot pass laws that violate the constitution based on pressure brought by the catholic church. You're so sensitive to this, that you're essentially being oppressive in your views - the exact thing you are claiming to denounce.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable