Man Pays Teens to Spit in His Face | Drudge Retort

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Man Pays Teens to Spit in His Face

A 39-year-old Southern California man has been arrested for misdemeanor child annoyance after allegedly paying a teenager $31 to spit in his face. The Ventura County Sheriff's Department says Charles Hersel was arrested Wednesday in a sting operation at a mall in Thousand Oaks. He's free from jail pending a court hearing. A sheriff's statement says Westlake High School students claimed Hersel paid them to yell profanities, spit and slap him in the face. Several also claimed he offered them cash to urinate and defecate on him. A motive wasn't clear.

Posted by andyuhenet at 10:43 AM | 55 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry

Menu

Front Page
News Weblog
Comments
Flagged Comments
User Blogs
Write a Blog Entry
Create a Poll
Edit Account
Stats Page
RSS Feed
Back Page

Subscriptions

Author Info

Mark E Mark

Private E-mail
No Home Page

Joined 2008/03/04
Visited 2010/02/09

Status: user

MORE STORIES

'Human Bed Warming' Service Launched in UK (18 comments) ...

Only Failed Detonator Saved Detroit Flight (102 comments) ...

Monbiot: Blame Canada (for Global Warming) (79 comments) ...

Man Pays Teens to Spit in His Face (55 comments) ...

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Spukake!

#1 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-11-20 07:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

Maybe he was just homesick.

#2 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-11-20 07:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Hersel paid them to yell profanities, spit and slap him in the face. Several also claimed he offered them cash to urinate and defecate on him.

A motive wasn't clear."

A motive wasn't clear? Really?

Toymastery gets the FF at #1

#3 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-20 07:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

This is one of those "can't make this shit up" sort of story.

#4 | Posted by KnightHawk at 2009-11-20 07:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

I wonder what they charged him with.

#5 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-11-20 07:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm surprised there are laws against soliciting spitting.

#6 | Posted by goatman at 2009-11-20 08:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

#6

I'm suprised this man escaped from his straight jacket.

What is wrong with that guy?!

That's insane!

#7 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-20 08:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm surprised there are laws against soliciting spitting.

#6 | Posted by goatman at 2009-11-20 08:10 PM | Reply |

They released him pending court hearing.

Thats means we are talking some sort of misdemeanor, or basically nothing.

That being said, this guy might be the poster boy for such a law lol.

#8 | Posted by KnightHawk at 2009-11-20 08:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

Fuckin weirdo needs his ass beat.

#9 | Posted by wurster at 2009-11-20 10:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Fuckin weirdo needs his ass beat.

He'd probably give you $10, too.

#10 | Posted by andyuhenet at 2009-11-21 12:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

That's insane!

Not really. In my experiences in the BDSM scene, I've seen and heard a LOT stranger.

Actually, it puts me in the mind of a professional Dominatrix friend of mine who is regularly paid BIG bucks by a well known public figure to spend 2 hour sessions tying him up and repeatedly kicking him in the balls.

#11 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 01:43 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sound exactly like what your messiah is doing to the people of this country. And we have to pay him for it also.

#12 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 10:16 AM | Reply | Flag:

#11 | Posted by RevDarko

If a professional dominatrix told you about this , then she is not much of a pro.

#13 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 10:17 AM | Reply | Flag:

If a professional dominatrix told you about this , then she is not much of a pro.

She gets paid and is in high demand. That makes her a pro. The fact that she told me means that she trusts me not to reveal who it is, and I won't. You're not getting her name or her client's from me, I'm just illustrating the point that this kind of thing is not entirely unheard of.

Oh, and by the way, I don't have a bloody messiah. I'm completely a-religious. No messiah, no god, no invisible sky-friend and no hang-ups about who's worshipping correctly.

You're ALL screwing it up.

#14 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 10:45 AM | Reply | Flag:

I had forgotten that possibility Rev.

Thanks for reminding me.

You're right.

#15 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-21 10:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

Still not much of a pro.......

You must be very proud that a prostitute confides in you.

#16 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 10:50 AM | Reply | Flag:

A friend of mine is also a dom.

The things in her collection and the pictures I have seen...I should have thought that this could be why this guy did it.

But he shouldn't have been approaching children.

#17 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-21 10:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

She's not a prostitute, Chicken.

She doesn't sell her body.

#18 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-21 10:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

"to offer somebody or yourself for sexual intercourse or other sex acts in exchange for money"

yes she is

Personally, I think it should be legalized.

#19 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 10:57 AM | Reply | Flag:

Actually, it puts me in the mind of a professional Dominatrix friend of mine who is regularly paid BIG bucks by a well known public figure to spend 2 hour sessions tying him up and repeatedly kicking him in the balls.

#11 | Posted by RevDarko

REGULARLY?---he must have balls of steel----he's probably feeling guilty for supporting the "healthcare reform".

#20 | Posted by matsop at 2009-11-21 10:58 AM | Reply | Flag:

Only in California----now that they're moving out I hope they stay out of our state now that they've screwed that state up.

#21 | Posted by matsop at 2009-11-21 11:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

kinky

#22 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-11-21 11:04 AM | Reply | Flag:

Matsop,

Believe what you want, mate.

Chicken,

There's a HUGE bloody difference between a pro-Domme and a prostitute.

My friend does NOT sleep with her clients.

#23 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:06 AM | Reply | Flag:

She still rpovides a SEXUAL service to her clients.

Prostitute

#24 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:08 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sex acts with her body, Chicken.

That is not the case here.

No intercourse was involved, no oral sex was involved.

#25 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-21 11:09 AM | Reply | Flag:

No she doesn't.

#26 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-21 11:10 AM | Reply | Flag:

She still rpovides a SEXUAL service to her clients.

Prostitute

No, she beats, insults and humiliates people for money.

She's kind of like Ann Coulter.

Except, you know.

Not a man.

#27 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:11 AM | Reply | Flag:

$31 says the guy is a liberal.

#28 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-21 11:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

$.02 says Joe wishes he were that guy.

#29 | Posted by dxlingr at 2009-11-21 11:17 AM | Reply | Flag:

#27 | Posted by RevDarko

Nice try at deflection with the AC comment.

Justify it anyway you want to sparky, she is still a prostitute.

#30 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:20 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sorry, Mate.

By even the most...ahem...Liberal definition of the word, she's nowhere near a prostitute.

That's like saying a butcher is a surgeon.

After all, they both cut into bodies with sharp instruments.

#31 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Actually, it puts me in the mind of a professional Dominatrix friend of mine who is regularly paid BIG bucks by a well known public figure to spend 2 hour sessions tying him up and repeatedly kicking him in the balls."

#11 | Posted by RevDarko

I'd pay $31 to see a photo of both you and your friend. Just to see what you two characters look like.

Anybody got a pic????

#32 | Posted by BiggieDan at 2009-11-21 11:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

No pic of my friend, but if you want to see a pic of me, you can find it on the "about the hosts" section on www.freeworldradionetwork.net.

#33 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:24 AM | Reply | Flag:

"to offer somebody or yourself for sexual intercourse or OTHER SEX ACTS in exchange for money"

PROSTITUTE

#34 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Personally I do not care if someone gets off getting kicked in the balls, humiliated, etc. It is still a SEXUAL act.

Call it waht it is. Just because she is a friend of yours does not mean she is not a prostitute.

I think it should be legalized.

#35 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Rev...he doesn't get it.

#36 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-21 11:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

I have included the definition in here twice. You just cannot accept it.

#37 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:37 AM | Reply | Flag:

The acts provided are not, by any definition, sexual. The Masochistic desire (as with the Sadistic desire, or the Dominant and submissive desires), are not, by definition, sexual.

There MAY be a sexual aspect to some of them, however, they are not, in and of themselves, sexual in nature. The fact that they are often COUPLED with sexual desire and acts is due to the intimate nature of such actions and desires.

However, they are NOT sexual desire.

Therefore, the acts are NOT sexual.

NOT a prostitute.

#38 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:41 AM | Reply | Flag:

Oh, and it's because she's not a prostitute is simply that she's not a prostitute.

The friends of mine who ARE prostitutes agree with me.

And you are right about one thing: prostitution SHOULD be legalized.

#39 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:42 AM | Reply | Flag:

Oh, and it's because she's not a prostitute is simply that she's not a prostitute.

Changing thoughts mid-sentence is a bad idea, children.

#40 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:43 AM | Reply | Flag:

PROSTITUTE

#41 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:45 AM | Reply | Flag:

Maybe she should be called a therapist.

#42 | Posted by matsop at 2009-11-21 11:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

Whatever, mate. Understand this, though: pro-Dommes are LEGAL. Prostitutes, for the most part, are not.

#43 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

#40 | Posted by RevDarko

??????????????????

#44 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

#43 | Posted by RevDarko

I am sure you would know more about that than I would.

#45 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 11:50 AM | Reply | Flag:

Considering I have some prostitutes in my church, yeah, I probably would, mate.

#46 | Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

Considering I have some prostitutes in my church, yeah, I probably would, mate.

Posted by RevDarko at 2009-11-21 11:51 AM | Reply | Flag: SCARY OFFERING PLATES

#47 | Posted by The_Chapel at 2009-11-21 11:58 AM | Reply | Flag:

Actually, this sort of thing should be controlled by the state and schooling should be required--- there's got to be different methods---a side kick; drop hammer kick; one ball kick; deflection kick; etc. You could then market and advertise the benefits---of course, like medicines you would have to warn of the side affects.

#48 | Posted by matsop at 2009-11-21 11:58 AM | Reply | Flag:

#48 | Posted by matsop

FF

As much as I would like to continue this discussion, I have a 10:30 Tee.

Later

#49 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2009-11-21 12:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

He should just try junior high/high school teaching. Then, the teens would do it for free, and daily.

#50 | Posted by SamBarber at 2009-11-21 12:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

Funny how anytime perversion is the subject of a thread, all the pubbies come out in force.

#51 | Posted by RingMaster at 2009-11-21 06:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

From the article: Several also claimed he offered them cash to urinate and defecate on him. A motive wasn't clear.

Understatement of the fucking month.

#52 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2009-11-21 08:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sounds mild compared to some of the stuff that I have read in "Different Loving" Kinky.

Larry

#53 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-11-21 09:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

Maybe he is innocent. The bigger and wilder the stories, the less likely to be true. Especially once high school students start trading stories.

#54 | Posted by moder8 at 2009-11-22 01:48 AM | Reply | Flag:

#54 | Posted by moder8 at 2009-11-22 01:48 AM | Reply | Flag:Mod's alibi

#55 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-11-23 12:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable