Obama: Gitmo Won't Close by Jan. Deadline

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

President Obama directly acknowledged for the first time Wednesday that the prison facility at Guantanamo Bay will not close by the January deadline he set, but he said he hoped to still achieve that goal sometime next year. Obama refused, however, to set a new deadline.

Posted by iraqibukkake at 08:18 PM | 93 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry

Front Page
News Weblog
Comments
Flagged Comments
User Blogs
Write a Blog Entry
Create a Poll
Edit Account
Stats Page
RSS Feed
Back Page

Subscriptions

RSS Feed

Author Info

iraqibukkake

Private E-mail
No Home Page

Joined 2005/07/14
Visited 2010/02/09

Status: user

MORE STORIES

Who Was That Well-Dressed Man? (3 comments) ...

Seeking reliable workers discriminates against unreliable (3 comments) ...

December home sales down nearly 17 percent (10 comments) ...

Banks Already Finding the Holes In Obama's New Regulations (3 comments) ...

Brock Lesnar: Canadian Health Care Nearly Killed Me (11 comments) ...

Walgreen Threatens to Stop Filling Medicaid Prescriptions (7 comments) ...

Fitch Ratings: US GDP to debt ratio to reach 94% in 2011 (35 comments) ...

Saftey of Ammonia Treated Beef Questionable, USDA Clueless (18 comments) ...

Banks Make Killing on Toxic Assets (45 comments) ...

US Will Cover Unlimited Fannie/Freddie Losses (167 comments) ...

Army General in Iraq Issues Pregnancy Ban (79 comments) ...

Study: Diet Drinks May Damage Kidneys (91 comments) ...

Senate Rejects Low-Cost Drug Imports (80 comments) ...

CDC: 50 Million Americans Caught Swine Flu (52 comments) ...

Geithner Will Extend TARP to October 2010 (27 comments) ...

Special Features

Daily Nooner

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Obama refused, however, to set a new deadline.

#1 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 09:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

What's the fucking holdup Obama?? If we as a Nation want to move forwards this boulder around our bloody necks MUST be removed. It is imparative to us. Chop Chop times a wasting.

Larry

#2 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-11-18 09:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

I just hope he put the cap back on the toothpaste tube this time. Talk about failed promises!

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 10:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

"What's the fucking holdup Obama??"

Political winds have him spinning.

#4 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 10:02 AM | Reply | Flag:

There isn't maximum security prisons these guys could be put in?? There isn't that many of them.

#5 | Posted by jackass at 2009-11-18 10:06 AM | Reply | Flag:

Mention the possiblity of putting these guys in a prison in the States and the wingnuts go berserk with bumper-sticker wisdom.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-11-18 10:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

I am sure the terrorists will love winters in IL.

#7 | Posted by KBM at 2009-11-18 10:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

Are we really surprised?

#8 | Posted by nanc at 2009-11-18 10:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Are we really surprised?
#8 | Posted by nanc

So you don't like that Obama won't get the Gitmo slammer closed by the January deadline, believe the prisoners should be transferred to cells in the US, and criticize him for not meeting the deadline? Or do you disagree with him and want the prison to remain open, in which case not meeting the deadline is a good thing?

#9 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-11-18 10:29 AM | Reply | Flag:

Most of the terrorists wouldn't fare so well if they hit gen pop in Attica or Sing Sing.

#10 | Posted by jackass at 2009-11-18 10:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

Talk about failed promises

That's all we ever seeem to talk about with Obama.

#11 | Posted by cookfish at 2009-11-18 10:38 AM | Reply | Flag:

#9 - I'd be happy if he'd just set realistic deadlines and quit trying to sell himself. Slavery WAS abolished in the 1860's and as far as I know prostitution is still illegal in 56 of the 57 states.

#12 | Posted by nanc at 2009-11-18 10:40 AM | Reply | Flag:

*8]

#13 | Posted by nanc at 2009-11-18 10:41 AM | Reply | Flag:

The right wing has been fighting tooth and nail to try to convince us that these guys are sooooo scary that we have to abandon centuries of Constitutional law.

This is just another brick in the wall of Republican obstructionism. Every Obama proposal is evil in the eyes of the GOP.

If we abandon the centuries of court precedent in our country to a kangaroo court system the terrorists win.

If the right wing can convince America that these guys are beyond our ability to convict and imprison in our own country, the terrorists win.

The GOP is doing everything they can to convince the world that the American legal system is so toothless that it cant be trusted to administer Justice, if the world sees and accepts this, the terrorists win.

The GOP is doing everything they can to convince Americans that the terrorists have won.

#14 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2009-11-18 10:47 AM | Reply | Flag:

That's all we ever seeem to talk about with Obama.
#11 | Posted by cookfish | Flag: Even This Loser Senses One-Trick-Pony's Past Its Prime

#15 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-11-18 11:03 AM | Reply | Flag:

Hilarious. The half black Jesus can't fulfill his promise, and some how that's the fault of the party with no majority in either house and bumper stickers.

You limpwrists are fucking hilarious.
(Don't cry Starvis. Joe isn't here to hurt you)

#16 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-11-18 11:06 AM | Reply | Flag:

This is just another brick in the wall of Republican obstructionism.

Why don't you admit for once that since you have majorities everywhere, the Democratic party quite simply is a bunch of pussies?

#17 | Posted by IraqiBukkake at 2009-11-18 11:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

This is just another brick in the wall of Republican obstructionism. Every Obama proposal is evil in the eyes of the GOP.

Wow. Everyone should read this and immediately realize the partisan blinders on this guy. Corky and Larry looked at this with a very open mind and scolded their guy, but this guy blames Republicans.

The Senate, which has 60 people in the Dem Caucus, and 258 house Dems (an 81 rep lead!) and you are still going to blame Republicans? They are slightly more influential than the WHIGS at this point!

Is your argument that the Republicans made enough noise to cause President Obama to re-think his decision? If so, then would you at least criticize him for being weak in the wake of incorrect (in your view) arguments against the closure?

And isn't this an executive order, making the hundreds of Republicans in Congress (that are a minority in every definition of the word) a moot point anyway?

I would be very interested to see your response, OWS.

(Great drink by the way.)

#18 | Posted by andyuhenet at 2009-11-18 11:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

3 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 10:00 AM | Reply | Flag: So much for being facetious around this crowd

#19 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 11:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

3 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 10:00 AM | Reply | Flag: So much for being facetious around this crowd
#19 | Posted by Corky

I took you as serious too, but wasn't going to make an issue of it.

#20 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 11:59 AM | Reply | Flag:

you could also ask him what the hold up is on the fort hood investigations since he doesnt want congress to go forward and in fact even asked one committe who was supposed to meet on monday to not and of course they agreed??

the answer??

easy...

he is waiting on provisions of the patriot act to end which are set to end shortly.
one in particular is the 'lone wolf' section.

#21 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-11-18 12:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

Considering the state of the economy, jobs, health care, and wars..... just the usual post-Bush clean-up efforts, I put this debate about closing Gitmo by some arbitrary deadline in about the same order of importance as whether he puts the cap back on the toothpaste tube or not.

It might be irritating, especially to some, and it might even be important, but comparatively speaking? Not so much.

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 12:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

Unlike Corky I was being serious. I know what it's like being locked up for an extended period of time(More than a few hours or days) and it galleds My balls that these detainees have never had charges brought on them within at least 15 day period but at greatest a 72 hour period of time. I am also galleded by the fact that these detainees have not had their days in a fair court of law. I am also appalled that we have many detainees innocent of everything. Here in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA It's totally fucked up. Either Bring them to the mainland and charge them all try them all and either get a conviction or an aquittal on them. OR Release the whole bunch. We can not condone the continuation of the GITMO Prison system. It must be shut down post haste. IT'S BULLSHIT.

Larry

#23 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-11-18 12:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

It might be irritating, especially to some, and it might even be important, but comparatively speaking? Not so much.

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 12:03 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

YES IT IS VERY IMPORTANT Corky!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's a Huge fucking boulder around Your neck as well as mine. It should have been one of His TOP Priorities. A Man held without charges without trial is abhorant to Me aqnd My psyche Corky. It's not how we are supposed to do things. This shit needs rectified post haste quick.

Larry

#24 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-11-18 12:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I put this debate about closing Gitmo by some arbitrary deadline in about the same order of importance as whether he puts the cap back on the toothpaste tube or not."

If it was entirely arbitrary, why did he even bother to state a deadline? Was it because there was some political benefit in doing so?

#25 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 12:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm sure Gitmo will eventually close. The question is, what will that mean? Bagram is still going to be open, is it not?

Shutting down a facility doesn't mean squat unless we make real policy changes to go along with it.

#26 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-11-18 12:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Shutting down a facility doesn't mean squat unless we make real policy changes to go along with it."

100% agree.

#27 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-11-18 12:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Shutting down a facility doesn't mean squat unless we make real policy changes to go along with it."

Our most significant policy change is that we are no longer releasing photos of the "hazing" that went on there. Having done that, and counting on the poor memory of Americans, there really is no reason to shut down Gitmo at all.

#28 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 12:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

-Was it because there was some political benefit in doing so?

He is a politician ya know. I tried to point that out in the primary, but was disbelieved.

Of course he needed to be left of Hil on every little thing, which I thought laughable at the time, but others here seem to think that he only ever spoke out of truth, justice, and the American Way, not occasionally out of political expediency.

That said, he was as good a choice as Hil, but should not be made a philosopher king in a time of political hard choices.

If closing Gitmo was easy, it would already have been done.

I think it was a brave step to bring some of these top 911 criminals to justice in an American courtroom in NY.

All this holier than thou bullshit from the Right about coddling terrorists and "states of war" seem kind of empty when there is no other sovereign government to be at war with, just a group of terrorists who have been elevated to nationhood by Righties so they could have a "war" with somebody... anybody.

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 12:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

Suddenly, this doesn't seem so appalling...

#30 | Posted by nanc at 2009-11-18 12:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Of course he needed to be left of Hil on every little thing, which I thought laughable at the time, but others here seem to think that he only ever spoke out of truth, justice, and the American Way, not occasionally out of political expediency."

Really? Oh yeah, I think I remember now. Who was that poster who was always defending you on that point anyway? I forget. He seemed really reasonable.

#31 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 12:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

"others here" was not to you HC, as I knew you would understand what I mean.

How's your little girl, btw?

Is that you I see wrapped around her little finger? If not, soon! Mine is 26 now and applying to PhD programs in ecology.

You have a lot to look forward to, and she has a great Dad. Ever see the TV show Castle? It has a favorite actor of mine in the lead, and his Daddy/Teen Daughter relationship is well played on the show.

#32 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 12:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

"How's your little girl, btw?"

Stop trying to soften me up. She's great. Daycare teachers and director trying to blow smoke... telling me how smart she is, how advanced in her development. I try to ignore it.

#33 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 12:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

"He is a politician ya know. I tried to point that out in the primary, but was disbelieved."

Yeah, but that's just because you're a neo-con. Or was last year, or something. lol

#34 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-18 12:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

- telling me how smart she is, how advanced in her development.

Your wife must be very proud, lol.

-Or was last year

God knows what I'll be if I don't tow the line on all these things that are more important than jobs or health care.

#35 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

Has anyone stated this is more important than jobs or health care?

And what was that about walking and chewing gum at the same time?

#36 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-11-18 01:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sorry, LoD. We were talking between us progressives about a fractious Dem primary debate here on this Yellow Dog site last year.

Implied and understood was the fact that some Libs now whine about how some of their top priorities may be overlooked in the short term as the last GOP Pres' mess is cleaned up, yet again.

But if we ever need a Libertarian/Republican view, we'll know who to ask.

#37 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

Implied and understood was the fact that some Libs now whine about how some of their top priorities may be overlooked in the short term as the last GOP Pres' mess is cleaned up, yet again.

#37 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:11 PM

Those libs are now whining?

LOL, way to throw them under the bus.

#38 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-11-18 01:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

You really are slow on the uptake, Sally.

I, and others, have been saying the same things since Obama was chided by the far Left for not having accomplished his full agenda in 6 mos.

But that's just a family feud. There is no comparison to all of our disgust with the outright fabrications and twisted spin of "getting" the Pres by any means necessary on your side of Kanrei's fence.

(THAT ought to get him back here posting soon!)

#39 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

(THAT ought to get him back here posting soon!)
#39 | Posted by Corky

"Good Kanrei's make good neighbors."

-Robert Frost

#40 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 01:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

#41 really laughed out loud!

#41 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

#42

*bows

#42 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-11-18 01:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

There is no comparison to all of our disgust with the outright fabrications and twisted spin of "getting" the Pres by any means necessary on your side of Kanrei's fence.

#39 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:21 PM

What is being fabricated or twisted about Obama's handling of Gitmo? Is there something wrong in stating that unless the policy of indefinite detention is changed overall, closing Gitmo is meaningless?

#43 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-11-18 01:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

You say the same thing about Obama regardless of the topic. That is, when you can remove your mouth from his genital area.

#40 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-18 01:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

You, on the other hand, are full of worthwhile points.

Posted by JOE at 2009-11-18 12:51 PM | Reply

#44 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-18 01:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

I see I must have pushed Lil' Joe's button on another thread. "Swhat happens when they have no retort, they just try to bushwhack ya on a different thread.

But really, Joe, don't you have another degree to FAIL to get somewhere?

Perhaps your time would be best spend in some professor's pants instead of on the blog?

#45 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

#45 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-18 01:32 PM | Reply | Flag: Still has no worthwhile points

#46 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-18 01:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

#44 My post was not Gitmo specific, so that makes a poor deflection on your part.

Perhaps you have missed all the, "Obama's Waterloo", cries of "Socialism", Birthers, and official GNOP policy of opposing the Pres no matter the subject.... unless it's more war.

#47 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

#44 My post was not Gitmo specific, so that makes a poor deflection on your part.

Perhaps you have missed all the, "Obama's Waterloo", cries of "Socialism", Birthers, and official GNOP policy of opposing the Pres no matter the subject.... unless it's more war.

#48 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:36 PM

Deflection? On a thread about the same topic I was supposedly deflecting to? lol!Damn, you're touchy.

BTW, I completely agree with your assessment of the GOP's tactics of opposing everything Obama does, right wing hate, and unfair criticisms. Your strawman notwithstanding.

#48 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-11-18 01:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Deflection? On a thread about the same topic I was supposedly deflecting to?"

Perhaps you haven't noticed, but any post directed toward Dorky is either "deflection," "stalking," etc.

#49 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-18 01:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I must have pushed Lil' Joe's button on another thread"

LOL. The thread you disappeared from yesterday? Yeah, that really riled me up.

#50 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-18 01:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

The thread you disappeared from yesterday? ...

#51 | Posted by JOE

Not everyone is unemployed, Joe.

#51 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-18 01:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

Perhaps you haven't noticed, but any post directed toward Dorky is either "deflection," "stalking," etc.

#50 | Posted by JOE

Yes, so unlike the highly intellectual thesis of, "That is, when you can remove your mouth from his genital area."

Pot/kettle.

But I don't blame Joe. No, I blame the mother who didn't wash out his mouth with soap as a child. But then they didn't have much soap in the trailer park to begin with.

#52 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 01:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

No "mom's basement" remark? Come on Dorky, you're almost there.

#53 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-18 01:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

I don't want to break your trademark on those lines, Joe.

But don't you think you sound just a bit like a pre-teen girl whining about someone else's posts after your own assholishness?

#54 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 02:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

We once again see that for the Obama-mammas like Corky, it's only the words that matter, not the deeds.
We've seen that since the day Obama was sworn in and immediately tried to lower expectations that he himself had set.

#55 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-11-18 02:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

-Obama-mammas like Corky

Bushy Butts must be forgiven, though, for their support of the Worst Pres Ever.

It's not been a year yet, and already we have averted the worst scenarios of Bush's recession, and come closer to universal health care than ever before.

I'm sure he'll get around to letting you out of the gay military closet so you can post your wares on Jeff Gannon's site soon enough. Do try to be patient.

#56 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 02:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

"your trademark"
Translation: I know you are but what am i?

"Bushy Butts must be forgiven, though"
Translation: They did it, so I can do it too.

How old are you? Four?

#57 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-18 02:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

He never cared about Gitmo to begin with. He said what he had to say to get the libbies to play along during the primary, then settled in on his own agenda: doing what's best for Obama.

#58 | Posted by rightisright at 2009-11-18 04:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

Mention the possiblity of putting these guys in a prison in the States and the wingnuts go berserk with bumper-sticker wisdom.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-11-18 10:12 AM

How about we store them in your Mom's basement?
They can have your room.

#59 | Posted by Washboard at 2009-11-18 07:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

How about we store them in your Mom's basement?
They can have your room.

-Washboard

There it is!

Corky, has there been anything that President Obama's administration could have done better? Surely in 10 months there has to be something you don't agree with 100%.

#60 | Posted by andyuhenet at 2009-11-18 08:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's not been a year yet, and already we have averted the worst scenarios of Bush's recession, and come closer to universal health care than ever before.

I'm sure he'll get around to letting you out of the gay military closet so you can post your wares on Jeff Gannon's site soon enough. Do try to be patient.

#56 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 02:18 PM

How many doctors are being added to the care force under "universal health care" ?

#61 | Posted by Washboard at 2009-11-18 08:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

If no one had insurance we'd be able to buy health care for what it's truly worth. But then, lots and lots of people would have to find jobs that truly serve/benefit people.

#62 | Posted by Washboard at 2009-11-18 08:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

That was his first order after being sworn in. I guess it is no surprise

#63 | Posted by bph320 at 2009-11-18 09:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

At least Bush was forthright about Gitmo. Like it or not.

The rhetoric is different, but Obama's policy seems to be the same as Bush's. If this is true, he is not honest and has been lying. Even liberals will have to admit that. And Bush would have never put them through the civilian court.

#64 | Posted by wurster at 2009-11-18 09:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yet another ObamaFail!

#65 | Posted by KBM at 2009-11-18 09:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

Wurst: That's a good point. President Bush's stance was basically "Gitmo is gonna house suspected terrorists, fuck it". If he said he was planning on closing Gitmo he would've meant it, too.

#66 | Posted by andyuhenet at 2009-11-18 09:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

Talk about failed promises

That's all we ever seeem to talk about with Obama.

#11 | Posted by cookfish

From the right, anyways. Except when they complain when he fulfills a promise. Then it's a socialist/nazi/communist takeover.

The righties have been sucking and blowing on Gitmo since January. Same with afghanistan. Not so much on Iraq, where they seem to have accepted Bush's timeline for letting the terrorists win. It's simply amazing how fast the central front on the global war on terror became unimportant once they didn't have to support Bush's failed policies.

#67 | Posted by northguy3 at 2009-11-18 09:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

Is "main street" better off now than a year ago? No, not with 10.2% unemployment and rising...

Has "Wall Street paid"? No, not when the consolidated banks are better off now than they were before he took office and handed "bail out" money and zero precent interest to the big banks from the fed...

Is Guantanamo closed? No...

Does anyone see a trend here?

Are you liberal voters ready to take responsibility for the lies you believed and who you voted for? Are you going to change you minds, or do you insist on keeping you heads shoved all the way up you asses?

#68 | Posted by The_Janitor at 2009-11-18 10:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

Well NANC why don't you go snuggle up with one of these mother fuckers in their cell with them..?

#69 | Posted by The_Janitor at 2009-11-18 10:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

He is turning in George W Bush before our eyes. What's next? Golfing while the country goes down the shitter? What's that? Oh.... nevermind.

#70 | Posted by PublicTrough at 2009-11-18 10:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

Many of the American people are naive and consistently scammed---why do you think it was so easy for Bernie Madoff-- Obama was the ultimate marketting scam and those easily manipulated bought into it-- this is just the beginning of the disappointment of the cult of personality. Jim Jones was excellent at it but I don't think Obama's lemmings will be as extreme in their ultimate actions.

#71 | Posted by matsop at 2009-11-18 10:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yeah Nanc, go snuggle with the terrorists. After all, we all know how much you love muslims. You're a muslim snuggler.

#72 | Posted by wurster at 2009-11-18 10:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

If we abandon the centuries of court precedent in our country to a kangaroo court system the terrorists win.

#14 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2009-11-18 10:47 AM | Reply | Flag:

Centuries of precedent show that these prisoners are best tried by a military tribunal -- not a civil court.

Why are you hell-bent to abandon precedent?

#73 | Posted by vernon at 2009-11-18 11:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

It won't be closed by January 2011 either.

The KSM Circus in NYC is ensure that...

#74 | Posted by BENDOR at 2009-11-19 08:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

#9 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis
either way, I would like him to complete one task that he said he would by the time he said he would do it. If I had his record with my boss, I would have been fired a long time ago. Excuses are like assholes, everybody has one, and they all stink. Step up and be a leader!

#75 | Posted by freechoice at 2009-11-19 09:26 AM | Reply | Flag:

The Obameter

www.politifact.com

#76 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-19 09:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Doc,

I know your question wasn't directed at me, but I'll answer anyway.

I don't give a rip that he isn't meeting his deadline. On an issue such as this, the deadline is trivial.

What I am bothered by is his actual decision. Closing the facility is stupid. What's worse is that it's only a symbolic gesture. What makes Gitmo so 'controversial' is that it's detainees are being held indefinitely without counsel and due process. Moving the detainees to the states doesn't do anything to address the 'controversy' it just changes the geography. So, we are going to piss untold millions of dollars away on a symbolic gesture that doesn't, in reality, change anything.

It's stupid.

#77 | Posted by JeffJ at 2009-11-19 09:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

Most of the terrorists wouldn't fare so well if they hit gen pop in Attica or Sing Sing.

or maybe while locked up they could recruit some of are home grown muslim's into the wonderful ways of jihad.

#78 | Posted by semtex111 at 2009-11-19 09:52 AM | Reply | Flag:

The reason he is not able to meet the deadlines he post are either because they are (crack) pipe dreams and the subject matter is far to complex for a child like him to understand and therefore set he sets unrealistic goals. Or that he understands the complexity of it and just lies through his teeth to placate is sheeple. Either way it's the same the left accused Bush of doing and now they have one of their own they can be so proud of. Unless your Corky then you use a deflection or trivialize the matter.

#79 | Posted by WI_Hunter at 2009-11-19 11:35 AM | Reply | Flag:

-Unless your Corky then you use a deflection or trivialize the matter.

People who see a tabulation and explanation of promises kept and promises delayed as "deflection".... prolly have little idea of what they post.

#80 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-19 11:41 AM | Reply | Flag:

what he says and what he does are two different things.

#81 | Posted by bph320 at 2009-11-19 12:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

Gee, how did I know Obama would do this?

Because he's a centrist that made promises to the left, and not the far far lefty that all the rightwingnuts think he is.

PS- You're a jerk, Obama.

#82 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-11-19 12:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

Moving the detainees to the states doesn't do anything to address the 'controversy' it just changes the geography. So, we are going to piss untold millions of dollars away on a symbolic gesture that doesn't, in reality, change anything.

It's stupid.

#77 | Posted by JeffJ at 2009-11-19 09:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

Except that Khalid is actually getting a trial now. Step in the right direction. IF none of the rest get a trial, then you're right...but how likely is that, jeff?

Harder to keep these men from due process when they're not "out of sight out of mind" in Cuba.

#83 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-11-19 12:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

Here's the problem... it's much easier to criticize the policies of the guy calling the shots when you're in the cheap seats. It's tougher to make all the right calls when you're the one in the hot seat. On the whole, the guy is doing a decent job. It's only when you compare him to the Fantasyland ideal that he presented when he was a candidate that he comes up short.

The bottom line is that anyone who thought he wouldn't backtrack on some promises was kidding themselves.

#84 | Posted by TylerDurden at 2009-11-19 12:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's only when you compare him to the Fantasyland ideal that he presented when he was a candidate that he comes up short.

No shit. See, we call that LYING in the real world.

When W said he was against nation building during his campaign? Lying.

Putting out a fantasyland ideal you know probably isn't going to happen, is very much deserving of derision.

#85 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-11-19 12:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

Here's the problem... it's much easier to criticize the policies of the guy calling the shots when you're in the cheap seats. It's tougher to make all the right calls when you're the one in the hot seat. On the whole, the guy is doing a decent job. It's only when you compare him to the Fantasyland ideal that he presented when he was a candidate that he comes up short.

The bottom line is that anyone who thought he wouldn't backtrack on some promises was kidding themselves.

#84 | Posted by TylerDurden at 2009-11-19 12:42 PM

I agree with everything you're saying (even the decent job part), but indefinite detention is something he needs to keep his promise on. It's a slippery slope from there.

#86 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-11-19 12:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

Corky on this one you didnt deflect you trivilized it, claiming it didnt make much difference to you. The point I made is you are a sheep and dont even realize how stupid you are and how you will carry water for him regardless.

Carry on with your next post. Will it be a deflection or trivilization post? We all want to know

#87 | Posted by WI_Hunter at 2009-11-19 12:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

YES IT IS VERY IMPORTANT Corky!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Larry

#24 | POSTED BY LARRYMOHR AT 2009-11-18 12:08 PM | REPLY | FLAG

Can't you see that I've put it in ALL CAPS with a bunch of exclamation points?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?

#88 | Posted by somoco at 2009-11-19 08:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

The bottom line is that anyone who thought he wouldn't backtrack on some promises was kidding themselves.

#84 | Posted by TylerDurden

Oh, I get it, we vote for the biggest con (ala Bernie Madoff) or the biggest liar.

#89 | Posted by matsop at 2009-11-19 09:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

Good!

#90 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-11-19 11:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's VERY VERY VERY VERY Bad Murphy. That boulder is getting mighty heavy now. We can't hold onto it forever. We need to make a clean break of everything Dubya did wrong which is too numerous to list here. GITMO Must close like Day before Yesterday quick. I am sorry that You just do not understand this. Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Larry

#91 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-11-19 11:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

Hey Larry you didn't get the memo from Corky? It's all good man. The President doesn't really need to keep promises especially when the economy is a much greater concern than indefinite detention.

To overcome extremism, we must also be vigilant in upholding the values our troops defend because there is no force in the world more powerful than the example of America. That is why I have ordered the closing of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, and will seek swift and certain justice for captured terrorists because living our values doesn't make us weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger

President Barack Obama, Address to Joint Session of Congress, Feb. 24, 2009.

Why doesn't our president want us to be safer and stronger?

#92 | Posted by andyuhenet at 2009-11-20 12:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

Bushy Butts must be forgiven, though, for their support of the Worst Pres Ever.

It's not been a year yet, and already we have averted the worst scenarios of Bush's recession, and come closer to universal health care than ever before.

I'm sure he'll get around to letting you out of the gay military closet so you can post your wares on Jeff Gannon's site soon enough. Do try to be patient.

#56 | Posted by Corky

I have news for you. Bush was elected twice. That means that a whole lot of middle of the road folks voted for him. There just aren't that many right wing people in this country. Not enough to ensure two victories. In other words, you are insulting a whole lot more people than just hard core Bush people.

#93 | Posted by everlong at 2009-11-20 02:48 PM | Reply | Flag: