Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

TSA screeners at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport probably wish that the fellow they chose to grill last March about a box of cash wasn't a Ron Paul devotee who runs a committee devoted to individual rights and constitutional government. Eight months later the incident has yielded revised rules requiring TSA agents to stick to matters related to flight security rather than policing airports for other crimes. In a news release this week, Bierfeldt and the ACLU announced that the TSA had changed its rules in response to the litigation. "It's a huge victory for civil liberties that TSA agents no longer have free rein to conduct sweeping, baseless searches and detain passengers who don't pose a threat to flight safety," said Steven Bierfeldt, who was represented by the ACLU in a lawsuit.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

l_rcontrarian

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Calls to the TSA PR representative seeking further clarification as to whether the new directive applies to blind DR left partisans who seek to foolisly discredit the movement toward the proper role of government with constitutional limitations that protect them as well was returned only with a 'I suppose so'.

ACLU

Goddamn commie bastards protecting civil liberties!

How dare they!

$4,700? What's that, like 20 Euros?

" blind DR left partisans "

Don't go all "ad hominem" on me, L_R_Tardarian.

Hey prey. The ACLU called back. They said they'd support the TSA to harass dumbasses like you because apparently you're too retarded to know the Constitution. She specifically stated, hey if they love their slavery, we'll have fun with them.

Don't fly much, do you?

A Paulie and the ACLU?

That ought to drive the Repub, err, conservatives batshit for a while. Actually, more batshit. They tend to function at a fairly high level of batshitedness.


Calls to the TSA PR representative seeking further clarification as to whether the new directive applies to blind DR left partisans who seek to foolisly discredit the movement toward the proper role of government with constitutional limitations that protect them as well was returned only with a 'I suppose so'.

#1 | Posted by L_RContrarian at 2009-11-12 04:01 PM | Reply |

Why taking a shot at the DR Left for this? It wasn't the DR left that thought this shit up or supported it or enacted it.

Barnie Fife works for the TSA?

Why taking a shot at the DR Left for this? It wasn't the DR left that thought this shit up or supported it or enacted it.

#8 | Posted by KnightHawk at 2009-11-13 08:27 PM | Reply | Flag


Because the lefties here love to crack on the RP movement and when this first came up there were many calls saying that he was just asking for trouble with that much cash calling him stupid etc.

Now that he is vindicated certain folks will have to get their i told you so's in.

The ACLU can drive me crazy, but there are times when they hit a homerun. I fly every week and some of these guys who are entrusted with power look to be a few cards shy of a full deck.

'...blind DR left partisans who seek to foolisly [sic] discredit the movement toward the proper role of government...'

#1 | Posted by L_RContrarian


W H A T E V E R !

Just when you thought government officials could bend you over all day long whistling to the tune of terrorism, something comes along to brighten your day. Thanks ALCU and Bierfeldt.

I'm glad this didn't end up before the Supreme Court. Because I suspect the Court would have issued an opinion stating any search is permissible, authored by Roberts.


I'm glad this didn't end up before the Supreme Court. Because I suspect the Court would have issued an opinion stating any search is permissible, authored by Roberts.


#14 | Posted by snoofy


Sorry,you are full of shit.Scalia wouldn't go for this crap but at least 4 decided the constitution doesn't protect Americans from owning fire arms.
They went to great lengths to cherry pick historical facts to support their argument.


rwd



Ron Paul supporters and the ACLU have a lot more in common than the politics as usual crowd likes to think about.

As someone who flies alot, I learned a long time ago that TSA stands for Totally Stupid As***les

Why taking a shot at the DR Left for this? It wasn't the DR left that thought this shit up or supported it or enacted it.

Haven't seen a lot of threads lately concerning the continuation of policies enacted by the Bush Administration. Policies that were once considered unconstitutional and invasive and an encroachment upon civil liberties (by some on the left, here) are now given a pass because there's a new sheriff in town.

When it's brought up by someone who leans closer to the right than the average DR left, it's ignored or you're called paranoid or it's dismissed with "oh, so now it's a problem for you" despite taking that position when those policies were put in place by previous administrations.

Of course, I am generalizing. There are some DR left who have taken a consistent position in disagreement with those policies.

The TSA is just another federal government alphabet cop organization that has run a muck because they got so used to throwing their weight around that they trammeled all over the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. About the only terrorists they are likely to stop are the Richard Reeds of the world. Just wait until Al Qaeda sleeper cells put together a REAL terror plot. I'm glad to see the ACLU had time to help someone other than the members of NAMBLA. It's refreshing!

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable