Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Town officials in Kent, Connecticut are balking at the wording of a proposed memorial to a local victim of the 9/11 attacks. Because the victim's father insists that the memorial call the attackers as "Muslim terrorists," officials have said that it's inappropriate to single out a religion in a tax-funded project. "We're a very welcoming, caring community," said First Selectwoman Ruth Epstein. "To disparage a particular religious group would not be appropriate.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

At least one guy in the story knows what the score is.

I think there is one muslim in the town.

Beside the point really.


If he puts 'terrorists'--we'll all understand and so will future generations understand what that refers to.

To disparage a particular religious group would not be appropriate

Unless you're disparaging the religious group in who's name the attrocities were committed.

I would use "Deluded Third World Mass Murdering Arab Scum."

So let Me get this straight. You want to label all terrorists Muslim yet balk when people label all domestic terrorists as Christian is that what I am hearting?? Unbelievably sad really.

Larry

why don't we just refer to them as Towel Headed Terrorist Mother Fuckers.

Larry your such a fucking tool.

just leave religion out of it

No, Larry. We want to name the specific terrorists who committed this specific act as Muslims, which they were.

Leave their faith out of it.

Just name them and it is enough.

AHhhhhhh the LCD speaks.

no, there's no broad brush stroke in that statement at all. how about we add "box-cutter enthusiasts" to the memorial

The state of Conn should hold a state-wide election and every elgible voter in the state allowed to vote on it, perhaps that would settle the matter once for all, in fact if necessary hold a complete 50 state election, and screen each and every voter that casts a vote, for proper Citizenship, ID, Residential status, ect. and dis-allow such scum as Acorn any access or rights what-so-ever.

#5 | Posted by LarryMohr

Larry--the deceased was killed on 9/11 by---

muslim jihadists or terrorists.

It's specified--not all encompassing to include all muslims.

He should keep the muslim part off.


Although if Tiller's family wants to put Christian killer on his header--Larry might be ok with that one. ??

"Muslim Terrorists" would be redundant anyhow.

halted by the unexpected conflict arising from his father's insistence it say his son was murdered by "Muslim terrorists."

Town officials in Kent are balking, saying it would be inappropriate to single out a religious group in a project on town property and paid for with taxpayers' money.


Looks more like the easy way out for the city to use the trite religious/taxpayer funds argument.


Epstein said the town has received about 150 e-mails and numerous phone calls on the issue. She said many of them supporting Gadiel were obscene, vile and threatening, including one from a person who hoped Epstein and her family were killed by terrorists.


no word about the emails, calls against it? The arguments against it vary from the religious stereotyping to the fact that there is far from a consensus on what happened that day. (Which leads right into the next point...)


The flare-up gained traction last week when Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly talked about it on "The O'Reilly Factor." "He wants to tell the truth on his son's memorial and I'm behind him," O'Reilly said on the show. "Let's get the memorial up. We'll march into Kent, Connecticut. We'll all go up there and tell the guys to put it up." "And if we have to charter a bus and go up there, we may have to do that," he added.

[billo' accounted for 95% of those rude calls and emails]

The memorial at the site of the Murrah Building lists the names of the victims and states that they died at the hands of a psychotic white-trash Republican. That last part is a tad redundant, but, it is what it is.

THIS MEMORIAL IS DEDICATED TO THE VICTIMS OF THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING, WHO LOST THEIR LIVES TO A CATHOLIC TERRORIST.

Nope sorry do try again Murphy. I am against any and all labels of a persons religion being used to foster hate.

Larry

I am confused. I thought the terrorists were from Crawford Texas?

So let Me get this straight. You want to label all terrorists Muslim yet balk when people label all domestic terrorists as Christian is that what I am hearting?? Unbelievably sad really.

Larry

#5 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-11-07 09:31 PM

No Larry, just these Muslim terrorists. You are a tool if you can't see that.

this memorial is dedicated to the victims of OKC bombing, who lost their lives to complicity between the SPLC, unnamed officials, McVeigh and Strassmeir

THIS MEMORIAL IS DEDICATED TO THE VICTIMS OF THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING, WHO LOST THEIR LIVES TO A CATHOLIC TERRORIST.

#18 | Posted by Shmoopty at 2009-11-07 10:00 PM

That would work if it was done due to his religious beliefs but that's not why McVeigh bombed the place.

However, the 911 attack was committed due to religious beliefs.

See the difference? Can you also see how "Muslim" in the memorial applies?

Everyone know Islam is the religion of peace. The fact that every one of the 911 conspirators were waked out Islamic nut jobs should be ignored and forgotten. Just like the fort hood shooter...just because he shouted "Allah Akbar" (God is Great) does not mean he was killing for his religion. And if you say so you are a racist.

However, the 911 attack was committed due to religious beliefs.
See the difference? Can you also see how "Muslim" in the memorial applies?

#23 | POSTED BY MATO

I thought the 9/11 attacks were committed due to the U.S. government's involvement in the 1982 Lebanon War.

But then, I probably just read too much Wikipedia.

I thought the 9/11 attacks were committed due to the U.S. government's involvement in the 1982 Lebanon War.

But then, I probably just read too much Wikipedia.

#25 | Posted by Shmoopty at 2009-11-07 11:03 PM

I don't know, but nothing on Wikipedia would tell you McVeigh bombed the Murrah Building due to his Catholicism either.

So it must be something else.

I thought the 9/11 attacks were committed due to the U.S. government's involvement in the 1982 Lebanon War.

But then, I probably just read too much Wikipedia.
#25 | Posted by Shmoopty at 2009-11-07 11:03 PM

Correction, the 9/11 attacks happened because twice after the WTC bombing in 1993, the POS (piece of shit) had the actual location of Osama Bin Laden but would not authorize the attacks despite the recommendations of both his staff and the military.

PS> His wife replaced Condoleeza Rice as Secretary of State.

It's absolutely important to have the word "Muslim" in there. Otherwise...

I don't know, but nothing on Wikipedia would tell you McVeigh bombed the Murrah Building due to his Catholicism either.
So it must be something else.

#26 | POSTED BY MATO

We're on the same page then, MATO.

I have suspicions that religion can make certain individuals more than a little nutty ... but it's probably irrelevant to point out which religion was followed.
Severely schizophrenic terrorists, maybe?
Terrorists who were mercilessly beaten as children, perhaps?
Or perhaps not. It's probably best to just describe them as terrorists. It's accurate and it doesn't draw ire to other innocent people who happen to share a common trait.

This will reflect poorly on Obama because he has high praise for Islam.

This Memorial is dedicated to the brave soldiers of Fort Hood who lost their lives voluntarily serving their country . We bestow this memorial upon these brave soldiers, and their families great love, and honor acknowledging They sacraficed their lives for this country, and were stalked and murdered by a radical Extremist jidhadist in the name of his god, the god that he worshipped, and called out to as he murdered them "allah"!!!

As for the memorial... yes, do write "Muslim" on it.

So that future generations understand how you got bitch-slapped by 15-19 Arab nobodies. LOL

Arab nobodies is redundant too.

Arab nobodies is redundant too.


And yet, the nobodies prevailed. LOL

What's your angle tosser?

What's your angle tosser?


None. Just agreeing with the guy that yes, put "Muslim" in the 9-11 memorial. LOL

I thought that should make you guys happy?

#5 | Posted by LarryMohr

Larry--the deceased was killed on 9/11 by--- muslim jihadists or terrorists.
It's specified--not all encompassing to include all muslims.
He should keep the muslim part off.
Although if Tiller's family wants to put Christian killer on his header--Larry might be ok with that one. ??
#14 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-11-07 09:46 PM

No. The attacks on 9/11 are claimed to have been performed by agents of United States intelligence services who are radical Muslim. This was a facade. The actual attacking was done by internal groups organized in such a fashion as to deadlock NORAD - even Pentagon airspace was violated. The buildings collided with by remotely controlled military planes "fell" at faster than free-fall speed into their own footprint due to explosives planted weeks and days before their use. This was repeated in Oklahoma City and the earlier World Trade Center bombings where explosives planted inside of the building structures were found by authorities. In one past instance an entire wing with a kindergarten was eradicated, but surrounding columns with bombs were still intact. As for the "hijacked planes" there were no body parts, baggage or other necessities associated with anything like commercial passenger jets among other anomalies such as the low-altitude high-velocity vector of the plane which allegedly impacted the Pentagon. There is even the consideration that high-energy particle weapons were used, which might explain the category 4 hurricane just hovering offshore from the towers used to power such a feat. The questions are provocative, particularly when comparing data from the NIST official report with what actually occurred.

You can't explain college level physics to people with GEDs.

there were no body parts, baggage or other necessities associated with anything like commercial passenger

They found Atta's passport intact and without even burn marks in the debris that burned for days, and he was the pilot in the front of the jet.

www.guardian.co.uk

But we won't go there will we boys?

Ringmaster (#40)

That was a very good article. The last paragraph sums up my feelings on Iraq:

"Fourth - and most spectacular - despite having highly sophisticated satellite tracking equipment, and offering a reward of $25m for information leading directly to his apprehension or conviction, they still haven't found Bin Laden. Is this one reason why the US is talking about an attack on Iraq - a flexing of the military biceps to distract from flabby intelligence?"

last sentence...

I'm not sure the terrorists did it as much for religion as they did it because they were insane. Nothing is really done for religion anyway. It's about money or power, or any of the derrivatives of those. The truly religious are usually just canon fodder for the people in charge.

It could read:

"...was killed by some crazy guy. Think about it."

You can't explain college level physics to people with GEDs.
"there were no body parts, baggage or other necessities associated with anything like commercial passenger"
They found Atta's passport intact and without even burn marks in the debris that burned for days, and he was the pilot in the front of the jet.
www.guardian.co.uk
But we won't go there will we boys?
#40 | Posted by RingMaster at 2009-11-08 02:43 AM

Ouch. Sorry, I didn't mean to step on anyone. I agree with that what information we do have isn't easy to grasp without some authoritative data for comparison, but I don't claim to be a brainiac. I'm not even Russian!:]

Frankly I don't see what good a memorial to one local victim of the 9/11 attacks does.

Why does the right insist in wallowing in self-pity ever since 9/11? You can't drive past a flagpole these days without it being at half-mast for one reason or another.

What are you people thinking? Why are you always looking to the past and wallowing in America's worst moments? After suffering a major trauma, there comes a point where you have a choice. You can stand up and get on with your life, or let it rule you.

Where do you guys get your talking points? NotReadyToMoveOnYet.org? StillWallowing.net? LeaveMeAloneImCrying.com?

I think one of the 10 commandments would solve this issue?


Larry your such a fucking tool.


#7 | Posted by boojiboy at 2009-11-07 09:34 PM | Reply | Flag:


Hey I have an idea, everytine someone commits an atrocity we can stick their religion in the discription.

Christian terrorist Timothy McVea

Christian & serial Killer BTK killer hides among his church members

Where would the KKKkristians from the early half of last century fit in? How many did they kill in the Civil rights era???? were they terrorists?

Hitler.... where does he fit in?

How many American Indians died as a result of a direct movement to get rid of them..
Do we call this geonicide or civil war?

I have nothing for cowardly bastards that kill innocents in the name of any religion... but you better becareful about tagging a crime with a religion

This is how the memorial on the USS Arizona reads:
U.S.S. ARIZONA MEMORIAL

WAR MEMORIAL OF THE PACIFIC

PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII

"....IN HONOR AND IN COMMEMORATION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES TO THEIR COUNTRY DURING THE ATTACK ON PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII ON DECEMBER 7, 1941." PUBLIC LAW 87-201

-- CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED BY 85th CONGRESS APPROVED MARCH 15,1958 DWIGHT EISENHOWER, PRESIDENT

-- APPROPRIATION GRANTED BY 87th CONGRESS APPROVED SEPTEMBER 6, 1961, JOHN F. KENNEDY, PRESIDENT --

IN ADDITION TO $150,000 IN APPROPRIATED FUNDS. THE U.S.S. ARIZONA MEMORIAL WAS BUILT WITH PRIVATE FUNDS CONTRIBUTED BY AMERICANS FROM THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND $100,000 DONATED BY THE STATE OF HAWAII. THE PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL COMMISSION EXPRESSES GRATITUDE TO THE MANY PUBLIC OFFICILAS, VETERANS ORGANIZATIONS,OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE GROUPS AND ENTERPRISES, AND THOUSANDS OF INDIVIDUAL DONORS WHOSE SUPPORT MADE POSSIBLE THIS MEMORIAL TO THE 2,341 HONORED DEAD.

US ARMY:228 -- U.S. NAVY: 2004 -- U.S. MARINE CORPS: 109.

Unless you're disparaging the religious group in who's name the attrocities were committed.

So pardon me while I disparage Christianity for all of the atrocities committed in its name?


Unless you're disparaging the religious group in who's name the attrocities were committed.


So pardon me while I disparage Christianity for all of the atrocities committed in its name?

#49 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2009-11-08 07:53 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Funny how the views of "god" change with a persons adgenda.

I can't imagine how a hypocrite would use religion to their advantage knowing the history of Murder, Abuse and neglect on all sides.


Zombie, I guess that very well could be the problem... Maybe they just don't know history... Maybe they know and don't care as long as it's in line with what they beleive.

Funny how the views of "god" change with a persons adgenda.

All evidence points toward religions being innovations of man. That being said, I think that the overwhelming majority of religions practiced today were created with the best intentions in mind.

There just happen to be quite a few unscrupulous pieces of shit in this world who will take advantage of any ideology to gain power over others. It doesn't matter whether that ideology is religious or political. Those individuals are more of a threat to our precious "freedom" as any terrorist.


Those individuals are more of a threat to our precious "freedom" as any terrorist.

#51 | Posted by ZombieHunter


I agree, but the problem is that there is no handle for which stupid people can grab ahold. How are stupid americans going to send there sons to die, if they don't have a religious angle? So we dumb everything down for the stupid people or rather 'the lowest common denominator'.

America since 2001 = Dumbing it down so you don't have to.

Considering that 9/11 was a false flag operation, it was actually masterminded by Christian Extremists (Bush/Cheney/&Co.).

Who says we can't disparage a "religion" (cult) that...

...denigrates women...

...fosters mass homicide...

...who's members produce almost nothing of commercial value...

...forces religious doctrine as the law of the land...

...and seeks world-wide domination over other faiths?

Your just a pussy if you aren't willing to "disparage" such a cult and your future belongs on a prayer mat next to all your fellow limp-dicks.

Hahahha the hate is heavy once again.

Apparently we aren't limp dicks bender.

We reproduce more then your E.D. Ass.

Hahaha


Continue to hate sorry to disturb the hypocracy and vast generization masturbation fest.

We reproduce more then your E.D. Ass.

Then you should have plenty of fine dark women to send my way...

Continue to hate sorry to disturb the hypocracy and vast generization masturbation fest.

Yeah, man, what the fuck. It's like you walked between the camera and the money shot.

Lol zombie sorry bout that.

I gotta go shower now.

Damn haters and their range.

Hahahha the hate is heavy once again.

Apparently we aren't limp dicks bender.

We reproduce more then your E.D. Ass.

Hahaha


Continue to hate sorry to disturb the hypocracy and vast generization masturbation fest.

#54 | Posted by klifferd

You think folks like me hate you because you're Muslim?

Wrong - we hate the fact that you allow, and passively support, murderous homicidal maniacs to cause pain and torment worldwide.

You're post here is a case in point...

...you condemn me for pointing out the obvious...

...but show us your post that condemns the limp-dick who killed 13 fellow Americans.

Martyrs are you heroes, right?

I think that any memorial should indicated that the people responsible were from the cuntry of ***** ****** (redacted).

..but show us your post that condemns the limp-dick who killed 13 fellow Americans.


You only have to look up Klifferd's posts from two days ago to see how he condemned this act.

And that makes you a lying bullshitter. LOL


...who's members produce almost nothing of commercial value...


Put down that plate of Basmati rice, champ. It was made-in-Pak.


...who's members produce almost nothing of commercial value...

Translates to we can't exploit them like we want too.

With the exception of Indonesia and to a lesser extent Pakistan, Muslims have always resisted the west's hegemonic imperialism. Indonesia is an exception because they are the least conservative and the most industrious of the Muslim countries. The middle easterners who are the most radical and of the Muslim countries were historically traders. They moved the goods between the the far east and Europe. The whole purpose of the Columbus explorations was to find a route not controlled by the Middle Eastern countries. Hence the crusades started by the Catholics, which were nothing less then state sponsored genocide of the Moors. It was a bloody but unsuccessful campaign.

It wasn't until the Panama Canal that the modern day problems in the middle East began. It was not a religious problem. Muslims tolerated the religions of the countries they conquered as long as the people paid their taxes. Sound familiar? America and Europe no longer needed them as porters and merchants which was the start of forcing western values on the Muslims for the sake of industrial exploitation and the start of the present day troubles there.

In short, the Europeans hoped to do to the Moors what they did to the Native Americans of North and South America. Unfortunately, the disease that the Europeans brought with them that eventually destroyed the Mayan, Incas and American Indians didn't work on the Ottoman Empire which resulted in a standoff to this day.

Peace won't reign again in the region until both parties either destroy each other or put down their arms, and shut their foul mouths.

RINGMASTER

For some strange reason, I seem to remember reading about a massive wave of MUSLIM attacks and conquests when Europe and Islam were introduced.

In fact, it took over 300 YEARS for a counter-invasion, and that too was to an area that had been christian before being attacked.

I must be wrong, as we all know Islam is the Religion of Peace....

Maybe its due to the HUGE prices we've been paying for oil for so long.... Such evil exploitation, being expected to get paid all that money. (Perhaps the oil companies are corrupt, perhaps they are not, BUT EVEN THEY ARE, they are 10% of the "exploitation" AT MOST.)

' "We're a very welcoming, caring community," said First Selectwoman Ruth Epstein. "To disparage a particular religious group would not be appropriate.'

Where does Ruth Epstein get off calling this disparaging? Is she Muslim?

Most Muslims are indifferent to the actions of the 9/11 attackers at best. They don't feel any shame over it.

I seem to remember reading about a massive wave of MUSLIM attacks and conquests when Europe and Islam were introduced.

If you are talking about the invasion of the Moors into Spain, it was not massive and it was probably the best thing that ever happened to Spain. It brought civilization to a country that was still in the dark ages. It was more of a cultural invasion then a slaughter of infidels that became the hallmark of the crusades.

This forum is full of ruthless defenders of evil murders, that bends and warps lies to conform to their evil thoughts, in defence of their evil warped cultures of Islamic murders and deceit.

The true God commands all not to kill.
Only Satan persuades man it's OK to kill.
When one kills in the name of his god allah, he is murdering by the persuasion of Satan. Satan is his god...

Everyone knows Muslims hate Christians, and they do lie and lay plans to discredit, and destroy them anyway they can, we hear that shit every day from the Arabs in the middle East, from the Islamist Muslims in all countries, including the U.S.A, and anyone says it is not true is lying to defend their own kind. Lying Murderers that will cut their own children's throat to defend their Evil Satanic Islamic muhammad...

You can't white-wash the muslim Islamic qur'an, it is filled with evil, or else crazy nuts who follow it would not murder people.

That darn Ishmael, why can't he be more like his brother Isaac?

"The true God commands all not to kill.
Only Satan persuades man it's OK to kill.
When one kills in the name of his god allah, he is murdering by the persuasion of Satan. Satan is his god..."

That's funny shit, man. Great parody of Christians.

If you are talking about the invasion of the Moors into Spain, it was not massive and it was probably the best thing that ever happened to Spain. It brought civilization to a country that was still in the dark ages. It was more of a cultural invasion then a slaughter of infidels that became the hallmark of the crusades.

#63 | POSTED BY RINGMASTER AT 2009-11-08 06:57 PM | REPLY | FLAG:
No little pre pubescent plebe, more about how the corsairs for 250 years plied the mediterranean grabbing christians and jews and taking them as slaves to Northern Africa.

Shortly after 911, the idiot many of you sound like, ran into the 7-11 store shouting "raghead", "muslim terrorist" and shot the clerk dead. The clerk was an Indian Sikh, a peaceful man and a peaceful religion that has nothing to do with "muslim". Based on comments here, many of you would call the shooter a hero. Be Ashamed!

"Based on comments here, many of you would call the shooter a hero. Be Ashamed!"

You should be ashamed for posting such a thoughtless strawmen arguement. But I suspect you have no idea why your post qualifies as drivel.

It's too much to hope that the same people who actually watch Bill O'Reilly would have the ability to distinguish a Sikh from a Muslim from a Hindu from a Buddhist. They're just not that smart.
I'll bet they think the 9-11 hijackers came from Iraq or Iran and that GW holding hands with the Saudi ruler was A-OK.

#3 | Posted by Redman at 2009-11-07 09:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

I would use "Deluded Third World Mass Murdering Arab Scum."

Mohamed Atta was Egyptian scum. Saudi Arabia was the most represented country of origin for the 9/11 Islamic terrorists. The one thing ALL of those terrorists had in common is that they practiced Islam.

One burning question I have for potential Islamic murdering savages such as the 9/11 crew, "When you're dead, how are 70 virgins going to help you?" It would seem that not only is your religion backwards but your thinking as well. You should get your 70 virgins BEFORE you go out and commit murder/suicide! Maybe, if the murdering savages did it that way they might see the error in their ways and not commit these vile crimes...I doubt it but one can only hope...

No little pre pubescent plebe, more about how the corsairs for 250 years plied the mediterranean grabbing christians and jews and taking them as slaves to Northern Africa.

How is that any different than the slaves taken by Christians from Africa and brought to this continent?

No little pre pubescent plebe, ...

I don't debate with trash mouths or religious psychos. See a shrink Dr. Fellgood.

He was killed by SELF IDENTIFIED Muslim Terrorists, all of whom were, and are, embraced as heroes by other Muslim Terrorists.

Key Point: While Muslim terrorists might have motives also mixed with nationalism and other ism's they SELF IDENTIFY, in word and deed, as primarily motivated by Islam (misguidedly or not).

The murderer of Dr Tiller. Enough fundimentalist Christains mutter approvals while condemning the act, that a comparison can be made. That is "ONE" man.

(McVay does not count. But feel FREE to count him if you want. His primary self-identified goal was not religious, it was anti-government. If you count McVay, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of militants who are Islamic, but Primarily motivated by nationalism, get added to the Jyhadi side of the coin, for example in the former USSR and in the Phillipines....)

No matter how you cut it, if you apply a standard evenly ISLAMIC terrorism is a problem that miltants from NO OTHER religion can come even close to matching.

usaf242...Another crackpot in need of a shrink.

Two questions:
1-I wonder how many other memorials identify the attackers. It seems like it takes the focus away from what it should be on -- the victims.
2-If there are memorials anywhere to victims of the Trouble in Northern Ireland or the UK, do they identify the terrorists as Catholic or Protestant? My guess is no. Although religion does have something to do with what goes on, there are many other factors at stake. I'd argue the same thing is true here.

For what it's worth, I have no problem calling these terrorists Muslim, since that's what they were. I do feel that putting it on a memorial like this does seem to be a bad move, though, particularly if our goal is to heal ties and not deepen trenches between the US and the ME.

"We're a very welcoming, caring community," said First Selectwoman Ruth Epstein." "To disparage a particular religious group would not be appropriate."

Ohhh...that is just soooo wonderful. I'm glad there is SOMEONE who understands and appreciates that poor Hasan was just a misunderstood soul with PTSD and that the attack had nothing to do with Islam. If our press was as diligent as the UK press we'd know that.

www.telegraph.co.uk

Leave their faith out of it.

Just name them and it is enough.

#10 | Posted by boojiboy

Bullshit. Their faith had everything to do with it. It was heir faith, in the twisted way they interpret it, that told them to kill infidels who are in their land and who do not convert. Islam taught them much about hating and killing and it is what drove them to do what they did. If it were not for Islam the attacks would have never happened.

Sorry, Islam has to be mentioned. This politically correct world doesn't want it mentioned and it will be more harmful if it is not. The truth needs to be told on this about every aspect of it.

Let me ask you this. If a white supremesist (sp) killed a black guy would you want the fact that he was a skin head left out of the trial or the facts of the case?

I'll forward this comment to

firstselectman@kentct.org

and so can YOU!

Dear Selectwoman Epstein,

I read about the controversy surrounding the memorial that is to be built to Mr. Gadiel's son in remembrance for the loss of his life caused by the terror attacks on 9/11.

I have this to say about the controversy;

a muslim is an adherent to the monotheistic religion of islam. It is a FACT that the 9/11 terrorists WERE muslim and they ALL proclaimed allegiance to allah. Therefor, they would be considered MUSLIM TERRORISTS. If they were called islamic terrorists then you would be referring directly and solely to the monotheistic belief, or religion, of islam.

It's time to stop being politically correct in hopes of avoiding offending everyone. If a person sticks to telling the truth, there is no offense.

Sincerely,

AMES WOLFF


Shortly after 911, the idiot many of you sound like, ran into the 7-11 store shouting "raghead", "muslim terrorist" and shot the clerk dead. The clerk was an Indian Sikh, a peaceful man and a peaceful religion that has nothing to do with "muslim". Based on comments here, many of you would call the shooter a hero. Be Ashamed!

#68 | Posted by VMA224


Oh, please. There were a few isolated cases like that and they were performed by ignorant rednecks and not supported by anyone in America. You are greatly exaggerating.

We have given you all that you have when it comes to technology and aide. If not for us, Tosser, you probably wouldn't even be able to post on this board because you would have no access to the internet.


Sez Everwrong who confessed he works for a rich Iranian-American (muslim) family, as the domestic help. LOL


Your hatred for America comes from a place of deep seeded jealousy for our country and our way of life.


Mister.. if such things made me hate someone, I would hate Japan or China or Korea... which I do not.

No, I hate you for you lies and duplicity, to which there doesn't seem to be an end.

In fact, "hate" is the wrong word. "Disgust" is the word I would use.


You are the lowest of low forms of life on this planet


And you are a domestic servant working for an Iranian family (your own words).

You should learn to show better respect for your masters.

"Muslim terrorists," Wern't they the ones who did the deed? What is the problem? PC is out of control.

"Muslim terrorists," Wern't they the ones who did the deed?

GETTYSBURG MONUMENT

Between July 1-3, 1863, two armies - one composed of 94,000 heterosexual and homosexual soldiers fighting for the Union, the other filled with 72,000 heterosexual and homosexual traitors rebelling against the United States of America and conned by the land-owning class into doing so largely to keep 4 million African Americans enslaved - met here. The Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, and members of all relgions (and some belonging to no religion) slaughtered one another to the tune of some 47,000 dead, wounded, and missing. Here, the Lost Cause was lost.

So pardon me while I disparage Christianity for all of the atrocities committed in its name?

#49 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2009-11-08 07:53 AM

That'd just be par for the course for the old DR.

They should just leave it out.

The memorial is for remembering the victims, not for getting back at the attackers.

The true God commands all not to kill.
Only Satan persuades man it's OK to kill.

#64 | Posted by Dr_Feelgood

So if someone is slaughtering your children before your very eyes, and you have the opportunity to stop it by killing the attacker, would you then simply stand by because the commandment "Thou shall not kill" has been distorted and mistranslated?

If your country is attacked and the enemy is upon you, will you simply bow down and submit to the oppression, or will you fight, and kill if necessary, to defend you and yours, and your country?

Did God truly want His/Her children to render themselves defenseless, voluntarily submit to themselves to the abattoir, continue or not continue at the whim of Evil? I think not.

Is it not truly "Thou shall not murder"?

It is "Thou Shall not Murder"

Also, the the "Thou shall not suffer a Witch to live" is more accurately "Thou shall not suffer a POISONER" to live.

In fact, it is IMMORAL to "not" kill individuals that commit the most horrid crimes (torture murder, etc...)

They should just leave it out.

The memorial is for remembering the victims, not for getting back at the attackers.

#87 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

No.

What's the point in remembering the victims in the form of a memorial if the reason and the person(s) who caused the death are not also expressed.

One wank on the Kent city council had made mention that the guy's son had passed away. No, he was murdered.

This would be akin to stating that during WWII, millions of Jews passed away. Or the crew of the USS Arizona passed away on December 7, 1941.

Here's a memorial line then for y'a:

"2,605 people passed away on this spot on September 11, 2001, when the World Trade Center Towers collapsed."

I guess that's enough info for a memorial then?

I personally think both sides are wrong. The father shouldn't care that much about the wording on the memorial. The town shouldn't be such PC cowards.

The word "Japanese" definitely appears in Pearl Harbor memorials. When the Japanese visit Pearl Harbor (and they do, quite a bit), its not like they are surprised to find out...

In fact, it is IMMORAL to "not" kill individuals that commit the most horrid crimes (torture murder, etc...)

#89 | Posted by USAF242

I take it then that you are a death penalty advocate.

Unless you're disparaging the religious group in who's name the attrocities were committed.


Why not just call them Saudi Arabian terrorists?

is IMMORAL to "not" kill individuals that commit the most horrid crimes (torture murder, etc...)

You lining up to have our few "bad apples" in the military that tortured and killed put to death?

Why do you hate the troops?

The word "Japanese" definitely appears in Pearl Harbor memorials

I would think it would be appropriate since Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. But does it refer to Shinto Terrorists?

"The word "Japanese" definitely appears in Pearl Harbor memorials"

we went to war with Japan

are we at war with islam?

are we at war with islam?

#96 | Posted by klifferd

The $64,000 question.

When one starts digging into the reasons, the answer is probably yes.

When one looks at the early pronouncements of OBL, then yes, we are definitely at war with Islam, and will continue to be until the US leaves all Muslim Holy Lands and cities and ceases its support of Israel.

"we went to war with Japan

are we at war with islam?"

A declaration of war has nothing to do with the facts surrounding who perpetrated the attack.

Had we not gone to war with Japan, "Japanese" would still be the correct adjective used to describe our attackers.

I really don't see how denial benefits Americans or Muslims.


From Bendor..."Your faith is garbage and Mohammad was a blood-thirsty murderer."


I am not a Muslim. I am a Buddhist in faith and if you had any knowledge of history at all you would know that Muslims dislike Buddhists as much as Christians. You would also know that at one time, the Ottoman Empire was far more advanced then the Europeans in both culture and sciences. Did you ever hear of the library of Alexander? I think not.

You and your ilk sound like the barbaric hordes of old Europe.

Their faith had everything to do with it. It was heir faith, in the twisted way they interpret it, that told them to kill infidels who are in their land and who do not convert. Islam taught them much about hating and killing and it is what drove them to do what they did. If it were not for Islam the attacks would have never happened.

So you wish to follow in the beliefs you condemn about their faith?

That's a Christian for you. Just as bloodthirsty in beliefs, but in reality just a bunch of hypocrites who mock the words of Jesus, their own God.

It is "Thou Shall not Murder"

Also, the the "Thou shall not suffer a Witch to live" is more accurately "Thou shall not suffer a POISONER" to live.

In fact, it is IMMORAL to "not" kill individuals that commit the most horrid crimes (torture murder, etc...)

History rewritten by the military mind. I would laugh, but it's too sad to think someone has become so brainwashed. I got news for you flyboy, murder is killing and whether you kill you fellow man by dropping bombs under color of authority and wearing a uniform or planting bombs in the street as a terrorist in a hijab, it's still murder. You can't justify it by calling it something else.

"if you had any knowledge of history at all you would know that Muslims dislike Buddhists as much as Christians."

Technically, Muslims are supposed to get along with Christians better as they should consider them, along with Jews, "people of the book".

"You would also know that at one time, the Ottoman Empire was far more advanced then the Europeans in both culture and sciences. Did you ever hear of the library of Alexander? "

It is actually the Library at Alexandria and anyone who used to play Civilization has heard of it.

Not sure why modern societies in the region should get credit for ancient history anyway. All they have in common is geography. The merits of all people should be weighed on what they do, not what their ancetors or the previous tenants for their land did.

The library of Alexandria was in existence for over 500 years before Muhammed walked the earth.

But moslems love to take credit for it.

True Sully, my bad, you just can't trust the God damned spell checker when you type too fast.

boojiboy has a point too, but missed the big one. The middle east had a highly refined culture long before the Europeans and the fact that Muhammad wasn't born until later doesn't mean they are not the same race. My point is that the Arabs had plenty to offer Europeans and they moved into Spain gradually although forcefully, not a massive attack. The Spanish were even eager to learn what they had to offer, so much in fact that they built over 70 universities and introduced reading and writing to 99% of the population in Spain in a time when 99% of the rest of Europeans couldn't count past their fingers and toes.

Education was universal in Moorish Spain, available to the most humble, while 99% of Christian Europe was so illiterate not even the kings could read or write. In the tenth and eleventh centuries, public libraries did not exist in Christian Europe, while Moorish Spain had more than seventy, of which the one in Cordoba contained over six hundred thousand manuscripts. There were more than seventeen great universities in Moorish Spain, while Christian Europe had only two universities of any value.

Scientific progress in astronomy, chemistry, geography, mathematics, physics, and philosophy flourished in Moorish Spain. Scholars, artist and scientists formed learning societies, while scientific congresses were organized to promote research and to facilitate the spread of knowledge. A brisk intellectual life flourished in all Islamic dominated societies.

The Moors also introduced the manufacture of gunpowder into Europe, which their enemies later adopted, using this explosive to drive them back to Africa.


www.africawithin.com

We are letting political correctness keep us from saying the truth, and it is going to get more and more of us killed. This so called dr. who just killed 13 of our best and brightest at Ft. Hood was an islamic extremist jihadi terrorist bastard.

This society is going to commit internal suicide because it refuses to face the facts of the matter. The terrorist attacks committed in this country have been for the most part committed by intolerant islamic fascists who are bent on our destructin and our leaders and the left are cowards unable to see truth for fear of being called intolerant.

Pathetic cowards.

I think what is happening today is Americans and Europeans have been drilled into thinking that we could divide and conquer the rest of the world forever, but things changed after WWII. The world spit back at the British in particular (remember the fall of the British empire) and then the Russian Empire lost their way too. It's a sign of the times. The last great countries of the world to come out of the hack job created by the British and Americans in the middle east were Iran and Iraq. Those people too want us to go home.

In the end, I think we will have to leave there if we ever wish to see peace in the world. I don't think Muslims want to take America, I think it is the other way around, and you all damned well know it too.

Guys like kissntell (an oxymoron) only foster hate because they already put half the world population in a category that is beneath themselves. They don't want peace or freedom of religion or freedom of beliefs. They want to rebel against their own barbarous history of enslavement and genocide by pointing the finger at someone else.

They should just leave it out.

The memorial is for remembering the victims, not for getting back at the attackers.

#87 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

The victim, Mr. James Andrew Gadiel, did not just disappear into thin air...he, along with 2,750 other human beings, was murdered by muslim terrorists. I don't see a problem with what the man wants.

"I don't think Muslims want to take America, I think it is the other way around, and you all damned well know it too."

I think it is fairly obvious that Muslim extremists are very much into influencing the everyday lives of the rest of the world. They aren't saying that Islam will one day rule the world because they believe in live and let live. I really can't stand when people ignore what the extremists say in favor of more practicle thoughts. No matter how badly you want Islamic extremists to be rational people with whom we can negotiate reasonably, that isn't the case.

We are only concerned with their resources, although in our more pretentious moments we feign concern over their freedoms and whatnot. Really the average American has no interest in who controls those resources anyway, although many have been duped into believing otherwise. We'll pay the same amount for gas regardless of who is profiting. Actually, its more costly to try to take control of their oil than it is to just buy it from them.



I don't see a problem with what the man wants.

You need to research more into the cause and history of the 911 attacks, and a little bit of insight into controlled demolition wouldn't hurt either.

Actually, its more costly to try to take control of their oil than it is to just buy it from them.

That's true as far as the oil goes, but the 'cost" is relative. We are paying for the war with taxpayer dollars, but where is the money going? It is going into the pockets of the people who built the war machine. It is a legal way to pick the American's pockets and that is true for any other country that want's to get into the scrap. There is no better excuse to raise taxes or create massive debt (which means interest for the bankers) then to start a phony war. Don't trust my word though, just ask George and Dick.

"You smear shit on the face of God."

That's a good trick.

"we went to war with Japan, are we at war with islam?"

#98 | Posted by Sully

Does it matter? Radical islam is at war with us!!!!!

I keep forgetting, we now fight our wars with love instead of bullets. It has become a 'mother may I' type of situation ever since we got into it with N Korea right after WWII. We have to get permission if we want to shoot at the enemy unless our life is in imediate danger, and you better be able to prove it.

The cop that put the last bullets into the muslem at Ft. Hood even told the guy to put down his gun as he was shooting people before the cop shot him. MOTHER MAY I?

...islamic fascists who are bent on our destructin and our leaders...

Gee, sounds like something we did to them, only difference is we backed it up with armies. All they have is a bunch of rag tag rebels hiding in caves. Do you see any armies in America? The one incident you call terrorism in the past 8 years was a single American US Army Major gone mad. Who taught him how to kill? the Muslims? Who sold him the gun? A Muslim? Who wanted to send him to go fight his religious leaders? The Muslims?

You are a deluded toy soldier kissntell. Perhaps you need to go kill some Muslims like Dick Cheney likes to kill domesticated fowl by the truck load. Just for sport.

just leave religion out of it

#8 | POSTED BY BPH320 AT 2009-11-07 09:34 PM | REPLY | FLAG

uh, wasn't that one of the major motivations for the attack? wasn't this Jihad against the infidels? or, was it just deserts for the American pigs?

you gonna scrub the history books too?

No.

What's the point in remembering the victims in the form of a memorial if the reason and the person(s) who caused the death are not also expressed.

One wank on the Kent city council had made mention that the guy's son had passed away. No, he was murdered.

This would be akin to stating that during WWII, millions of Jews passed away. Or the crew of the USS Arizona passed away on December 7, 1941.

Here's a memorial line then for y'a:

"2,605 people passed away on this spot on September 11, 2001, when the World Trade Center Towers collapsed."

I guess that's enough info for a memorial then?

#90 | Posted by ZOT at 2009-11-09 11:40 AM

I have no problem with stating that they were killed by terrorists, but putting "Muslim" in there is just trying to make people resent "Muslims" and you know it.

Not that I care much for Muslims but I'd rather city, state, and federal government be impartial.

#117. So, Pearl Harbor Memorial. "Some planes came in and dropped some bombs and sunk some ships."

CAn't mention they were Japanese planes, might engender some ill feelings? gimme a break.

"That's true as far as the oil goes, but the 'cost" is relative. We are paying for the war with taxpayer dollars"

Yeah, I was factoring that in and that's why I was saying its more costly.

"we went to war with Japan, are we at war with islam?"

#98 | Posted by Sully

Does it matter? Radical islam is at war with us!!!!!"

I wasn't making that point, only responding to Kliff.

"Controlled Demolition"? Next you'll be talking about the temperature at which steel melts.

#112 | Posted by USAF242 at 2009-11-09 02:47 PM | Reply | Flag: Shit they still think Bush did it!!!

#117. So, Pearl Harbor Memorial. "Some planes came in and dropped some bombs and sunk some ships."

CAn't mention they were Japanese planes, might engender some ill feelings? gimme a break.

#118 | Posted by somoco at 2009-11-09 03:02 PM

The nation of Japan attacked us, so saying they were Japanese planes just spoke to that fact. "Islam" didn't attack us, a terrorist organization did. Unless you're willing to say "Christianity" murdered Dr. Tiller. Try again.

And you are a domestic servant working for an Iranian family (your own words).

You should learn to show better respect for your masters.

#83 | Posted by Tosser


First of all, I never used those words at all. And just what is it that you think is so bad about working for an Iranian family? Are you prejudiced against them as well? The words domestic servant are your words not mine. I never used used those words and thus you are lying yet again. I work and get paid and don't serve anyone. I do not and never will kiss anyone's ass that I work for and these people know it and don't expect it anyway. You sure do have a big hang up on what I do for a living.

Is it because they hail from Iran? They are all American citizens by the way. For some reason you think it bothers me when you down talk who I work for. Or rather you try to portray me as some sort of servant, which I suppose you get some sort of weird satisfaction out of. We don't have servants in America, that happens in your country where people are treated differently depending on what class they are. You, no doubt, are among the lowest of the classes. You show it with your immaturity on a daily basis. You really need to grow up, seriously. Because right now all you are is an America hating pathetic excuse for a human being.

Get one thing straight, dickwad, I don't serve anybody.

Oh, and this excuse for hating America for the lies is just more of your bullshit. Are you trying to say that your government doesn't lie or deceive? It's what all governments do. Yet you single out America? No, that tells me that's just a made up excuse to cover for the fact that you hate this country simply because of what it stands for. Just like the terrorists do. You have the same outlook and attitude of today's terrorists. You must be so proud of yourself.

Everlong: I had a girlfriend in college who was Iranian. BTW a smoking hot 10. Her family was all ex pat's who came to the US after the fall of the Shah. Some of the nicest people I ever met.

You God Damned knuckle dragging drooling moron.

Hey, I'm just trying to keep you happy flyboy. You gotta hate somebody or your conscience couldn't live with what you did in your life. It's only human nature.

BTW...How many people did you kill, or were you one of those that doesn't know and doesn't care as long it was just following orders?

The nation of Japan attacked us, so saying they were Japanese planes just spoke to that fact. "Islam" didn't attack us, a terrorist organization did. Unless you're willing to say "Christianity" murdered Dr. Tiller. Try again.
#118 | POSTED BY LIVE_OR_DIE AT 2009-11-09 03:41 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

If the history books don't say that Tiller was killed by a fundamental Christian based on fundamental Christian beliefs, I'll be shocked and disheartened.

To not include such a statement removes context and deprives history. They are saying Muslim terrorists, which implies the same kind of kookiness that you see in the Christian that killed Tiller. They want all reference to religion removed, which will, again, deprive context - and make the action more random than it really was.

You're right, Boojiboy, they are extremely nice people. Couldn't ask for better people to work for. Of course Tosser thinks they are lower life forms, but that's coming from him so we know how much that means.

I can't believe the arguments for keeping the word Muslim or Islam out of this. Do we not speak of the Christian crusades all the time? Isn't it true, that every time people want to make an argument about religious wars they will always bring up the Christian crusaders? To leave the words Islam or Muslim out of this would be a travesty to history and to the families of those who died. Not to mention the ones who did die. Who were they attacked by?

boojiboy has a point too, but missed the big one. The middle east had a highly refined culture long before the Europeans and the fact that Muhammad wasn't born until later doesn't mean they are not the same race.

True Ringmaster. Remember however that the cradle of Western civilization at the time was Constantinople which until 1200 was the center of the catholic church. It was finally overrun by the Moslem hordes over a period of 300 years.

Once they took over, the 'beacon' of western civilization was lost to the Moslems.

They assimilated well, and took advantage of Constantinople's positioning on the East West trade routes taking advantage of the Asian advances in gunpowder among others.

We also can't forget that Baghdad and the Euphrates River Valley was the cradle of civilization long before the Christians were around and they eventually settled in Turkey before the Christians. It's still the same old shell game, just different rulers.

#126 | Posted by RingMaster at 2009-11-09 06:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

MESSopotamia was the right name for it for sure.

To leave the words Islam or Muslim out of this would be a travesty to history and to the families of those who died. Not to mention the ones who did die. Who were they attacked by?

What are you hoping to memorialize? The beloved son of Kent who was killed, or the people who killed him?

Of course Tosser thinks they are lower life forms


No Everlong, I think YOU are the lower life form, since you admitted yet again... even though you tried to work around it.... the fact that you work as domestic servant for a rich Iranian-American... Muslim of course... family.

And your son is their chauffeur.

No wonder you act all hostile towards muslims... but you do that only online... when the master isn't watching. LOL

you try to portray me as some sort of servant, which I suppose you get some sort of weird satisfaction out of.


I actually think it's funny as hell.

you hate this country simply because of what it stands for.


What does it stand for?

Stealing oil?

Yep.. hate that, true.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable