Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

www.youtube.com">www.youtube.com" type="application/x-shockwave- flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344">

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

l_rcontrarian

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Ooooooooo someone graduated top of JeffnDenmarks class on Fear Propaganda and scare tactics. How much was the course material?? Was it cheap??

Larry

Act Threatens PA with Forced Vaccinations

hey larry, why don't you get your partisan kool-aid drinking a** out of your brain and review the heaps of evidence.

Nice not working link, Jeffi-Head.

which one tark

here's a video that also discusses the same intl swine flu conference PDF, (in case you're lazy, lol):

YouTube

My God you're an idiot.

Unbelievably gullible.

#7 jpw
well, well, and the neighborhood pharma-shill isn't at all biased?

Did you even bother reviewing it?

The two who witnessed the training first hand made it all up (included ex-highway patrol).

What about the govt-released conference PDF?

Hardly.


Great analysis, as usual.

"Have you been made aware of the massive roadblock plans to stop all travelers for a vaccine bracelet (stainless steel band with a micro-chip on board) that will force you to take the shot?"

You are truly fucking insane if you believe this shit.

My God you're an idiot.
Unbelievably gullible.
#7 | Posted by jpw at 2009-11-07 01:12 AM

Of all of our educated people you need to show more patience and encourage debate. Some people profess blindness to many horrific things, but I would rather consider all probabilities.

So, read the following excerpt and tell me what is wrong with it:

.. The resulting vaccination map would allow swift intervention in neighborhoods left vulnerable to the fast-moving respiratory illness.

The trial starts this afternoon, when several hundred people are expected to queue up for immunizations at the headquarters of the Boston Public Health Commission. Each of them will get a bracelet printed with a unique identifier code. Information about the vaccine's recipients, and the shot, will be entered into handheld devices similar to those used by delivery truck drivers.

Infectious disease specialists in Boston and elsewhere predicted that the registry approach could prove even more useful if something more sinister strikes: a bioterrorism attack or the long-feared arrival of a global flu epidemic. In such crises, the registry could be used to track who received a special vaccine or antidote to a deadly germ.

"Anything you can do to better pinpoint who's vaccinated and who's not, that's absolutely vital," said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy at the University of Minnesota. "I wish more cities were doing this kind of thing."

Boston is believed to be the first city to embrace this particular approach to tracking vaccinations against the seasonal flu, estimated to kill 36,000 people each year in the United States, principally the elderly.

But when Boston bought the monitoring system from a Milwaukee company in 2006, emergency authorities had a far different use in mind: tracking people injured in big fires, plane crashes, or other disasters.

"When there's a large catastrophic event, people end up in a variety of healthcare facilities," said Dr. Anita Barry, Boston's director of communicable disease control. "Of course, their family members and loved ones are trying to find out where they are and how they're doing."

To see how well the system would work, emergency crews tested it at the Boston Marathon and the Fourth of July extravaganza on the Esplanade. The trial proved successful.

"If we can make it work in the Boston Marathon medical tent, then you have to think about making it so that it can work in other environments as well - whether it's a community clinic or a doctor's office or a flu shot clinic," said Rich Serino, chief of Boston Emergency Medical Services. Thus, the idea to use the registry as a flu vaccine tracker was born. ..

CDC - Seasonal Influenza (Flu) - Q & A: Seasonal Influenza

The best way to prevent seasonal flu is by getting a seasonal flu vaccination each year. In the United States, on average 5% to 20% of the population gets the flu; more than 200,000 people are hospitalized from seasonal flu-related complications, and; about 36,000 people die from seasonal flu-related causes. Some people, such as older people, young children, pregnant women, and people with certain health conditions, are at high risk for serious flu complications.

Questions and Answers Regarding Estimating Deaths from Seasonal Influenza in the United States

.. How did CDC estimate that an average of 36,000 people die in the U.S. each year from seasonal flu?
This statistic came from a 2003 JAMA study by CDC scientists [10]. The study used statistical modeling to estimate that during 9 influenza seasons from 1990-91 through 1998-99, an annual average of 36,000 flu-related deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate was listed as a respiratory or circulatory disease. A 2009 study that appeared in the journal Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses made a similar estimate for the 10 influenza seasons from 1993 to 2003 [9].

What are seasonal flu-related deaths?
Seasonal flu-related deaths are deaths that occur in people for whom seasonal influenza infection was likely a contributor to the cause of death, but not necessarily the primary cause of death.

Does CDC know the exact number of people who die from seasonal flu each year?
CDC does not know exactly how many people die from seasonal flu each year. ..

jpw - please find the CDC data showing how many people die from pneumonia each year in the United States. I'm guessing the number is around 34,000?

#10 redlight
So, read the following excerpt and tell me what is wrong with it

Let's be clear. Are you challenging the pharma pushers to justify the draconian readiness planning echoed by multiple inside sources and confirmed by the international swine flu conference that all have no correlation to each other based on a few excerpts you cut out of it?


I want to be sure I'm understanding your position first.

"#10 redlight
So, read the following excerpt and tell me what is wrong with it"

Let's be clear. Are you challenging the pharma pushers to justify the draconian readiness planning echoed by multiple inside sources and confirmed by the international swine flu conference that all have no correlation to each other based on a few excerpts you cut out of it?
I want to be sure I'm understanding your position first.
#13 | Posted by L_RContrarian at 2009-11-07 04:03 PM

How does the CDC come to the conclusion that 36,000 United States citizens die every year from influenza? They word it slightly differently - "seasonal flu-related causes", which means that influenza may or may not be part of the equation. Divided into the correct categories - 2,000 die from influenza, 34,000 from pneumonia.

So, if the data is skewed, the vaccines questionable, the threat misdiagnosed, then the real purpose for the tracking is most certainly a classified national security secret.

Of all of our educated people you need to show more patience and encourage debate.

I'm full of patience and love debate when a sane individual is pushing it. However, there are certain individuals on this blog who's favorite past time is skewing or misrepresenting stories in order for them to push the red panic button.

Those individuals have no interest in debate, so I don't indulge them.

As per your other posts, redlight, I don't know why they'd want to track someone who's received a vaccine. So they are testing methods to track people who receive vaccines, it's still a large jump to assume this means they'll start forcefully vaccinating those not in the system at random road checkpoints manned by soldiers and police.

They word it slightly differently - "seasonal flu-related causes", which means that influenza may or may not be part of the equation.

They word it that way because it's not cut and dried. Influenza infections can increase susceptibility to all sorts of things that may kill you, hence the designation as "influenza-related" causes.

It's just like HIV. HIV itself doesn't actually kill you, it's the assortment of opportunistic infections that you get BECAUSE you have HIV that kills you. It's a grey area that can be caused by a complex series of events.

As is usual for conspiracy theorists, Contrarian takes something that has a kernel of truth and is based on actual facts, but spins it into this twisted web of government deceit and lies without any real evidence to suggest it's true. In this case he posts an article that claims two inside sources. I question two anonymous "insiders" who are basing their credibility in the matter on their word alone. Sorry, but that's not going to cut it with me.

it's still a large jump to assume this means they'll start forcefully vaccinating those not in the system

kernel of truth and is based on actual facts, but spins it into this twisted web of government deceit and lies without any real evidence

Clearly Mr Jpw didn't actually review the material. First of all, it should be obvious to any reader that any whistleblower risking their lives doesn't have the liberty to meet the jpw-standard of proof. And no "assumption" was made. One of the sources even was completely non-anonymous, but jpw didn't care. Beyond the fact that the jurisdictions of these two are completely different (KS, CA) while the training was the same, the international swine flu conference PDF places the mass vaccination plan in black and white. Of course, Mr jpw had no interest in that fact because it doesn't suit his purpose.

Mr JPW also foolishly employs the same tactic as his minions, denying as conspiracy theory what is documented mainstream reporting. No comment on The Boston Globe's creating a "vaccination map" charting which people have taken the vaccine and which have not, or creating a citywide registry of everyone who has had a flu vaccination. Perhaps it's too much of a leap to conspiracy to ask why would anyone go to all that trouble building the technology without intending to use it in enforcement?

"Police, Military Train To Intern Flu Vaccine Refusniks"

Rehearsal for the eventual RFID "vaccination"?

LOL.

"Anything you can do to better pinpoint who's vaccinated and who's not, that's absolutely vital," said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy at the University of Minnesota. "I wish more cities were doing this kind of thing."

This guy is what you get when you train someone to know a lot about one thing in particular, and nothing about one or all others. In this case, Osterholm's blind spot is the constitution, since he's arguing that any measure that can be taken in the name of public health, should be taken, without even a passing mention that he appreciates the legal issues that are involved with measures such as that which is proposed here.

"They word it slightly differently - "seasonal flu-related causes", which means that influenza may or may not be part of the equation."

They word it that way because it's not cut and dried. Influenza infections can increase susceptibility to all sorts of things that may kill you, hence the designation as "influenza-related" causes.
It's just like HIV. HIV itself doesn't actually kill you, it's the assortment of opportunistic infections that you get BECAUSE you have HIV that kills you. It's a grey area that can be caused by a complex series of events.
As is usual for conspiracy theorists, Contrarian takes something that has a kernel of truth and is based on actual facts, but spins it into this twisted web of government deceit and lies without any real evidence to suggest it's true. In this case he posts an article that claims two inside sources. I question two anonymous "insiders" who are basing their credibility in the matter on their word alone. Sorry, but that's not going to cut it with me.
#15 | Posted by jpw at 2009-11-07 07:08 PM

Either they are infected with influenza or they are not. That seems cut and dry to me. Why the highly improbable death toll attributed to influenza? Misdiagnosis or purposeful 18x skewing? I'd assume that medical practitioners would also be able to determine the strain, but again, if they misdiagnose the initial symptoms, the virus and the prognosis..

So, if the 2000 actual influenza deaths is off by a factor of 18 they still find meaning in the tracking of those inoculated - just not the factual relationship between the infected, the inoculated and those who die. Suspicious rationale to spend billions yearly on vaccines which we they don't prepare enough of anyhow. If we made our own local immunizations we'd cover the less mutated strains earlier, but what the hell do I know. China makes these vaccines cheaper and "better" according to WHO and CDC acquisitions.

In my experience conspiracy theories usually have some basis in reality, from the Warren Commission to Israeli bioweapons to UFO sightings. The WHO, AMA and the CDC are no exceptions, and in fact would need to be much more insidious at hiding their malfeasance.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable