Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

At a recent TEA Party protest in Washington DC, House Minority Leader John Boehner stood before a crowd of thousands. Encouraging him to stand against the proposed health care bill in the House (which is now endorsed by the AARP), he spoke of a great founding document, the U.S. Constitution. Holding his personal copy of the document in his hand, Boehner recited the Preamble to the crowd:

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

jackass

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Wow this goes to show the intelligence of the typical tea partier (Nanc).

I'd rather have someone in office that confuses the Declaration of Independence with the Constitution, than people who admire Mao.

Like Bush? Rove?

I would hazard a guess that a majority of the elected suits in Washington would confuse the two, but if you are going to make a point of stating it in front of the public you would at least research what the hell you were saying.

This speaks volumes for the common sense of Boner and for the defenders of such stupidity.

Good news is that I doubt that any of the tea baggers would ever notice.

TEA Party protesters today are rallying against...taxes, high spending at the federal level, Barack Obama's birth certificate, health care reform...hardly anything comparable to the grievances of the late 18th century.

In the opinion of a self proclaimed JackAss. And a stupid son of a bitch.

Comparing the grievances of conservatives today, however, to the grievances the colonies had with King George, and you're out of line.

Except for the higher taxes and tyranny(federal government expanding and having say in the schooling, healthcare, retirement, etc...) there is very little in common. Jackass is an idiot.

Mao does seem to be the current talking point for the typical mindless dittohead.

It so easy to keep up with you retards. You'll notice that you all sound the same. You all sound ignorant.

You can change that you know.

Slicksterwilly calling me a stupid SOB?? Bwahahaha that retarded moron voted for Bush 2x. Does it get any more stupid than that?? Nope it does not.

Slickster/Crusade why were you not bitching when Bush was spending too much? You kept your mouth shut because you are a partisan hack.

These are the ones saying Obama's destroying our Constitution...

THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW WHATS IN IT!


Boner is doing well to be sober enough to stand up most days.

Boner was too busy making blowups of Dachau pictures to whack off to.

Anyone else notice since Obama jokingly called Boehner a 'man of color' Boehner's cut back some on the self tanning cream?

Here is the PreAmble by the way:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.



Whereas King George took away the livelihood of the people, took away their just rights, took away their right to purue their own happiness, Barack Obama is asking the wealthy to pay a little bit more in taxes. He is asking that we not fear high spending. And he's asking that we use some of our revenue to help put in place a health care plan that will allow people to keep their insurance, or to purchase a public plan offered by the government itself.

Oops, you've screwed yourself in your liberalism!
on the very topic of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution!

While you villify Boehner for mis-construing the two documents, apparently you have knowledge of neither.

Where in either document can you find support for
"asking the wealthy to pay a little bit more in taxes". I thought the 14th A. guaranteed equal protection under the law?

"that we not fear high spending"? or "that we use some of our revenue to help put in place a health care plan"? The 10th A. reserves to the states respectively, or to the people, any powers the Constitution did not delegate to the United States, nor prohibit the states from exercising. The 9th A. declares that the listing of individual rights in the Constitution and Bill of Rights is not meant to be comprehensive; and that the other rights not specifically mentioned are retained by the people.

The health care plan -- oh yeah,I remember, it's the PreAmble "general welfare clause".

The power to induce fear, hmm.


Tyranny is when citizens are afraid of the government. Liberty is when the government is afraid of the citizens (when they don't neglect, but exercise all their God-given rights)


So to summarize, what is the difference again between what you stated about King George and what you are asking for? How does "taking from the wealthy", or "hand over the keys to health care to govt" or enslave our children/grandchildren in debt (what you call "not fear high spending"), all these things you propose not took away the livelihood of the people, took away their just rights, took away their right to purue their own happiness?

I cut and pasted an article dumbass. Those aren't my thoughts moron.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable