Isn't encouraging people to buy houses when they couldn't afford them part of the cause of our current economic woes?
#2 | Posted by taxman at 2009-11-05 01:10 PM | Reply | Flag
You have a point, but its also more complicated than that. And to a large degree didn't involve people that couldn't afford it. That was about 10% I believe.
There were plenty of people who could afford just fine, but were kinda dumb and got setup on an ARM loan. When the rates got jacked up, they got jacked out of they're house.
There were others who again could afford just fine, but kept borrowing against the equity. Then the home value would go up and they would borrow again. Then the home value went down and they were left holding the bag.
Then there were people who liked to mix up they're bad financial strategies and misfortunes.
Theres alot going wrong here, but to pair it down to "affordability" is kind of off the mark. It was false assumptions of value, bad advise, outright greed.
Helping people get into houses is a good thing for everybody. Its the unfettered free for all that sunk the boat. And to that extent I don't know that things have changed much. Just bought a house a couple months ago, I can tell you they asked for alot more paperwork than the house I bought in 2001. But whether you can afford it or not, you'd almost be retarded to not and try to get a house this year. Hopefully america has learned its lessons about borrowing against equity and the exuberance of the market. And so far the bank hasn't sold my loan to someone else yet...
Has casino capitalism been outlawed yet?