The typical "left" and "right" feign apathy.

Meanwhile the "right-brainwashed" continue their drive ranting about Obama and socialism taking this country down.

The "left" kool-aid drinkers are so enamored with intra-Republican struggles, they also choose not to see the bigger picture.

Those that have awaken from the brainless left-right battles can see the corrupt full speed push on both sides to seceed from our Constitutional republic without even a fight! Global government is good! Global government is the only thing that can save our economy now! To make it even worse, it's sublimely ridiculous when both sides buy into the "the earth will be destoyed" utter nonsense.

They brilliantly pit left vs right, causing nearly everyone to become paralyzed to resist.

#9 Many
If that question is directed at me, how about the leadman himself of this story, Mr Soros and his billions of funding of their think tank blogosphere.

Many,

Perhaps instead of arguing about who supplies the kool-aid, wouldn't it be the better question to ask no matter if you're left or right leaning:

What would the voluntary handing over our national sovereignty supported by politicians of both left and right mean for America?

#14 many

On weight of the argument itself, it is pretty clear who the p*ssy is.

Let me be more specific to "the right" who is probably fuming over the claim that they subscribe to the global climate change catastrophe hoax.

Recall that GWB was represented in every climate change gathering. Your beloved Glenn Beck is happy to introduce John P Holdren as the kook who has been pushing this on the academic science community since EcoScience was published. What he conveniently leaves out is that the co-author of EcoScience, Paul (authored with wife Ann) Ehrlich was a top advisor to GWB and represented him in the climate change gatherings. Coincidence? Get real. So Glenn can ridicule Al Gore and Holdren all he wants when GWB did just as much to get us to the point we are at now. I dare you "righties" to bombard Glenn Beck on this to force him to tell you the truth!

#17 danni
If China is going to lead the new world order then I suggest we disband about 2/3 of our military, cut spending, end our overseas wars and bring our troops home from all of the various places they are stationed. Why are we paying for our military to be the policemen of the world?? Let the world take care of itself.

Danni, interesting you interject the left position here. I'm not trying to attack you, but you illustrate my point. To back up and make it into a left-right issue 1)distracts the bigger issue, 2)in the talking point, it appears you are condoning the world govt thing (as Soros advocates) in hopes that China will do things the "Left's" way.

I just watched the sham Glenn Beck just pulled over the right's eyes with Bolton/Monckton last Fri.

Anyone who has watched or listened to GB for a long time knows he has been very vocal and detailed about how global government is being pushed from every angle. He does the show where Monckton is very clear that the treaty uses term "global government" multiple times, (not just "global governance") as he tried to argue. Bolton argues 1).that this isn't the last word because he thinks the treaty won't go anywhere, 2)we wouldn't ratify it anyways 3)the consequence of what the treaty does isn't nearly as dire as the wording suggests(?). Lord Monckton common-sensically iterates, why even open ourselves to the possibility?

Finally at the very end of the show, GB does his usual stunt. Summarizes the whole topic by asking a question as if it was "just a conspiracy". With GB's record on the topic and even the weight of evidence supported even by GB during the episode, can any of the blind GB fans see through his fraud??? Bolton was a disgrace as well, basically a GWB foot-soldier!

No comment Nanc? You've been vocally pro-Beck. Did you see the episode?

Chancellor Merkel (GER) speaks before joint session of Congress:

"Icebergs are melting in the Arctic. In Africa, people become refugees because their environment has been destroyed," she said.

"We need an agreement on one objective: Global warming must not exceed 2 degrees Celsius."

"She said she hopes that agreement will be reached at a the climate conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, next month.

Merkel also touched on the global financial crisis, saying that the "near collapse of the markets has shown what happens when there is no underpinning order."

"A globalized economy needs a global order ... a global framework of rules," she said. "Without global rules and transparency and supervision, we will not gain more freedom, but rather risk the abuse of freedom and thus risk instability."

It's all happening right in front of our eyes. What are we gonna do? Bicker left-right, or join together from all political persuasions and get active and stop these tyrants now!

"Passive acceptance of the teacher's wisdom is easy to most boys and girls. It involves no effort of independent thought, and seems rational because the teacher knows more than his pupils; it is moreover the way to win the favour of the teacher unless he is a very exceptional man. Yet the habit of passive acceptance is a disastrous one in later life. It causes man to seek and to accept a leader, and to accept as a leader whoever is established in that position."

-Bertrand Russell

Speaking of the aforementioned Paul Ehrlich:

"A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions."

-Author, The Population Bomb

"Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the
equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun."

- Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

"Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level."
- UN Agenda 21

"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
- Club of Rome

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world."
- Christine Stewart (former Canadian Minister of the Environment)

"I believe it is appropriate to have an 'over-representation' of the facts
on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience."
- Al Gore,

"It doesn't matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true."
- Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace

"Unless we announce disasters no one will listen."
- Sir John Houghton,
first chairman of IPCC

Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (1872-1970) was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950 and UNESCO's (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) Kalinga prize in 1957.

The first article in this series described how scientific technique centralizes power within a society. The second part examined the stability of a scientific society and Russell's belief in the need for a world government.

From The Impact of Science on Society:
"But bad times, you may say, are exceptional, and can be dealt with by exceptional methods. This has been more or less true unless the increase in population can be enormously diminished. At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars." p. 115

"There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and third that of general misery except for a powerful minority." p. 117

"... a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government... unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars,..." p.117

"To deal with this problem [increasing population and decreasing food supplies] it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilence, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world's food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. p. 124

...Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.

#17 danni
If China is going to lead the new world order then I suggest we disband about 2/3 of our military, cut spending, end our overseas wars and bring our troops home from all of the various places they are stationed.

At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars

unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars

it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars

I was commenting on your implied approval of China heading up global governance .

These are the views of the elite. I included the other references to 'wars'. They don't think of war as you and I and don't care if you can think of a fourth way. I couldn't include everything. The whole page is dedicated to the ideology and actual draconian policies you may already heard the terminology of 'Sustainable Development' and 'Agenda 21'